dimensions.MethodologyThe study employed a mixed-methods approach to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of ahands-on physical model lab for teaching reinforced concrete concepts in a structures forconstruction course. The research focused on junior-year undergraduate students majoring in aconstruction management program at a public university in Florida, representing a critical pointin their academic progression when they begin engaging with advanced structural concepts. Asshown in Figure 1, the research methodology unfolded across three distinct phases: (1) needsassessment, (2) lab development and implementation, and (3) effectiveness evaluation.The initial needs assessment phase, conducted in Spring 2023, began with an end-of-semestersurvey integrated into
Georgia Racheida S. Lewis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at the University of Georgia in the Engineering Education Transformations Institute (EETI) and the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Lewis believes in creating a diverse engineering field and strives to do so through connecting with teaching and mentoring future engineers. She has devoted her life to this mission through her leadership and lifetime membership in NSBE, SWE, & SHPE. Ultimately, Dr. Lewis aspires to bridge together research and pedagogy within the academy to improve engineering education within the field and across disciplines.Nyna Jaye DeWitt, University of Georgia Nyna, born and raised in Durham, North Carolina, obtained
gas or liquid.” [4] Mechanics isdefined as “the study of forces and motions.” [5] Common disciplines that include fluidmechanics are mechanical engineering, chemical engineering and civil engineering. While theprinciples are the same, key applications often differ. Engineering educators have sharedinnovations in fluid mechanics instruction. Examples are provided below and presented basedon whether the course is discipline-specific or a shared course.Discipline-Specific CoursesFaculty at University of Wisconsin Madison [6] describe an innovation in a civil engineeringfluid mechanics course created because hydraulics was needed in the curriculum and wasn’ttaught in solid mechanics. The paper acknowledges that fluid mechanics is taught in
are currently underway to involve students from our otherengineering programs (e.g., biomedical, building). Since communication must flow both ways,the information gathered from the surveys will help us identify areas for improvement in theactivities, enhancing coordination and aligning resources across departments and faculty. Thispaper will be included in the M-MCDP documentation provided to students and instructors, andis an integral part of our continuous improvement process. We will continue our effort toimprove uniformity, coordination, and calibration between instructors and staff. Instructors havebeen administered to the graduating students will also be Additionally, we are continuouslyadjusting the SharePoint tools used to facilitate
formal onboarding practices were only laboratory 34% 22% safety training. It appears that most student process preparation must take place on an individual basis, No formal 60% 72% which means that the faculty mentor must be process responsible for it. Don't know 5% 5%Based on the responses to questions on research credit in the curriculum, most programs haveformal offerings that can count toward a chemical engineering degree, most commonly fulfillingrequirements either for chemical engineering electives or technical electives (Table 4). For mostof those, the
Paper ID #46108Investigating Preliminary Examination Practices in U.S. Mechanical EngineeringDoctoral ProgramsDr. Grace Burleson, University of Colorado Boulder Grace Burleson is an Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering at CU Boulder where her research focuses on advancing engineering design theory and methodology. She earned her PhD in Design Science at the University of Michigan as well as a dual MS in Mechanical Engineering and Applied Anthropology and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Oregon State University in 2018 and 2016, respectively. She was an ASME Engineering for Change Fellow from 2017-2021.Dr. Janet Y
overcome, they require careful planning and a significant investment of time whencreating the course or when adapting the course for specifications grading.Specifications grading can be tailored to support the learning outcomes of an individual courseand the course’s role in the curriculum. For example, Tsoi [14] describes the development ofthree specifications grading variants for undergraduate science and mathematics courses. Incourses with “core” learning objectives foundational to subsequent courses, students wererequired to master all core objectives to pass the course. Students could earn a higher grade bycompleting additional (non-core) learning objectives. In other courses, all learning objectiveswere deemed equally important. Students
learning experiences via her own research and in her professional role supporting interdisciplinary research teams. She uses social network analysis and qualitative methods to understand relationships between team members and plans to develop interventions to build closeness and belonging in teams.Dr. Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, Universidad del Norte Ruben D. Lopez-Parra is an Assistant Professor in the Instituto de Estudios en Educaci´on (Institute for Educational Studies) at the Universidad del Norte in Colombia. His Ph.D. is in Engineering Education from Purdue University, and he has worked as a K-16 STEM instructor and curriculum designer using various evidence-based learning strategies. In 2015, Ruben earned an M.S. in
settings.Jack Boomer Perry, University of Michigan .Dr. Aaron W. Johnson, University of Michigan Aaron W. Johnson is an Assistant Professor in the Aerospace Engineering Department and a Core Faculty member of the Engineering Education Research Program at the University of Michigan. His design-based research focuses on how to re-contextualize engineering science engineering courses to better reflect and prepare students for the reality of ill-defined, sociotechnical engineering practice. Current projects include studying and designing classroom interventions around macroethical issues in aerospace engineering and the productive beginnings of engineering judgment as students create and use mathematical models. Aaron holds
. The frequency ofconcerns cited by students having used and not used Gen. AI is presented in Table 2. Note thatnot all concern prompts were provided to both groups and in the case of a group not receiving aprompt an “N/A” is shown. Both groups most frequently had concerns around low qualityresponses and academic integrity issues. An AI policy was circulated stating students were freeto use any tools they wished but that students were responsible for the accuracy of the work theysubmitted, and this policy was mirrored in the communications course. In general based on theresponses students seemed to have a healthy amount of skepticism in terms of Gen. AI usage.One noted difference between groups, is that none of those using AI reported an issue
pre-service teachers requires time and coordination. Additionally, a modest budget of approximately$150 per team is necessary to cover project materials, transportation costs, and hourly wages forpre-service teachers.To build confidence in their teaching and ensure everything works as designed, each team shouldrehearse their lesson with the assigned pre-service teacher. Based on written reflections, studentswho delivered lessons in a local school engaged more deeply with the experience compared tothose who participated in an on-campus outreach event.ConclusionThis paper presents a semester-long leadership development course for first-year engineeringstudents. A community-engaged team project is integrated into the curriculum, allowing
program’s primary objectives includedelivering a comprehensive high school engineering curriculum, providing professionaldevelopment for teachers, and conducting research to advance engineering education, promotingequitable learning environments for students from diverse backgrounds [6].The project’s prior research has examined students’ interest and intentions to pursue engineering.This work-in-progress expands previous findings through an analysis of survey data gatheredbefore and after course participation from high school students enrolled in a high schoolengineering curriculum during the 2022-2023 academic year to examine whether previousfindings persist. The focus of the investigation is on the experiences of TGNC students withinthe course
Practice: Tips for how to do it Right,” in Robotics: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, IGI Global, 2014, pp. 193–223. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4607-0.ch011.[12] A. S. Gomoll, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, E. Tolar, S. Šabanovic, and M. Francisco, “Moving Apart and Coming Together: Discourse, Engagement, and Deep Learning,” Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 219–232, Jan. 2017.[13] D. Bernstein, G. Puttick, K. Wendell, F. Shaw, E. Danahy, and M. Cassidy, “Designing biomimetic robots: iterative development of an integrated technology design curriculum,” Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 119–147, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11423-021- 10061-0.[14] S
integrating project-based learning in the ECE curriculum. Through an isolated and emotional experience, this studywas able to document the effect of project-based learning (PBL) on conceptual connections andearly professional development.IntroductionProject-based learning (PBL) has long been recognized as an integral tool in engineeringeducation, enabling students to bridge theoretical knowledge with practical applications throughhands-on experiences [1-2]. Research demonstrates that, compared to traditional curricula,students in PBL-focused programs exhibit significantly increased levels of self-efficacy, intrinsicvalue, cognitive strategy use, and self-regulation [1]. Furthermore, PBL fosters a greaterabundance of self-regulated learners and
which prompted an evaluation – and ultimatelya redesign – of its undergraduate curriculum. At the same time, the engineering school wasreevaluating its approach to undergraduate education in response to a university-driven effortleading to an increased emphasis on design, including plans for a new school-wide design center.Thus, in keeping with the mission of the University and to fulfill a multitude of our ownobjectives – e.g. attracting and retaining students by making them feel part of a community,integrating an authentic design experience early in the curriculum to build students’ designthinking skills, and engaging students with the community in their adopted city – the programadded a one-credit cornerstone design course to its new first
become an essential toolfor academic and professional growth. Over the past couple of years, the use of GenerativeArtificial Intelligence (GAI) in academia has been the subject of several debates, with discussionsfocusing on its ethical implications and how to use it to aid teaching and learning effectively. AsGAI technologies become increasingly prevalent, raising awareness about their potential uses andestablishing clear guidelines and best practices for their integration into academic settings isessential. Without proper understanding and frameworks in place, the misuse or over-reliance onthese tools could undermine the educational goals they aim to support. Workshops and seminarsplay a critical role in addressing these concerns by not only
., Kaczynski, Developing culturally competent teachers: AnD., & Leonard, S. N. (2015) international student teaching field experienceQuiñonez, T. L., & Olivas, A. P. Validation theory and culturally relevant curriculum in the(2020) information literacy classroomKettle, M. (2017) International student engagement in higher education: Transforming practices, pedagogies and participationWang, R., & BrckaLorenz, A. (2018) International student engagement: An exploration of student and faculty perceptionsOlayemi, M. (2023) Understanding Culturally Relevant Engineering Education
Paper ID #45420Assessing Systems Thinking Skills in Engineering Education: AddressingImplementation Challenges and Unintended Consequences in Ill-structuredProblemsDr. John Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida John Mendoza Garcia is an Instructional Associate Professor at the Department of Engineering Education in the Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering at the University of Florida. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University, and he has a Master’s and a Bachelor’s in Systems and Computing Engineering from Universidad de Los Andes, in Colombia, and Universidad Nacional de Colombia respectively
). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148[9]. Kumar, A., Tejaswini, P., Nayak, O., Kujur, A. D., Gupta, R., Rajanand, A., & Sahu, M. (2022). A Survey on IBM Watson and Its Services. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2273(1), 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2273/1/012022[10]. Fernández, A. A., López-Torres, M., Fernández, J. J., & Vázquez-García, D. (2024). ChatGPT as an Instructor’s Assistant for Generating and Scoring Exams. Journal of Chemical Education, 101(9), 3780–3788. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00231[11]. Imran, M
broadening student participation in STEM through robotics education. His research focuses on enhancing STEM participation through robotics education, employing learning technologies and storytelling to craft inclusive educational experiences that foster student belonging.Dr. Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Morgan Hynes is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and Director of the FACE Lab research group at Purdue. In his research, Hynes explores the use of engineering to integrate academic subjects in K-12 cla ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025ASEE 2025 Conference PaperTitle: Impact of a stipend on high school
cognition incontext more naturally, facilitating deeper learning.Integrating informal methods with formal procedures can significantly enhance mathematicalunderstanding. This approach allows learners to connect intuitive problem-solving strategieswith structured mathematical concepts, fostering a deeper comprehension of the subjectmatter. In the study by Hattikudur et al. [25], participants were introduced to two distinctmethods for solving systems of equations: an informal “trading” procedure and a formal“matrix” procedure. They examined how comparing informal and formal procedures affectslearning in solving systems of equations. Similarly, Civil [5] provides valuable insights intohow integrating everyday mathematics with formal mathematical
Paper ID #46247BOARD # 199: Comparing Computational Thinking Learning and Engagementin First-Grade Boys and Girls: A Study of Algorithm Design and Debugging(Work-In-Progress)Ms. B´arbara Fagundes, Purdue University I hold a Ph.D. in Engineering Education and an M.S. in Computer Science, focusing on integrating computational thinking into pre-college education. My experience includes developing and implementing engineering and computer science curricula and actively participating in professional development for teachers to establish inclusive and innovative learning environments. At Purdue University’s Center for
Paper ID #48606Countering Systemic Racism in Infrastructure Education: A Group ConceptMapping Study on Priorities for Educating Future EngineersDr. Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez, Colorado State University Dr. Rodolfo Valdes-Vasquez is an Associate Professor in the Department of Construction Management at Colorado State University. His research, teaching, and engagement align with sustainable design and construction topics. He has received grant funding from federal and state agencies and private organizations. Rodolfo has taught multiple courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels, and he is well-versed in the
Engineering Tools of Scientific Discovery in Popular Culture, Part I in a Series of Thematic Courses Introducing Non-Majors to Space Exploration Concepts and TopicsThe University of Denver (DU) has a Common Curriculum which provides students with a well-rounded education by creating a context for major or minor courses of study and introducesstudents to new areas of interest. One of the main elements of the common curriculum is a seriesof elective courses which cover “Scientific Inquiry: The Natural and Physical World” (SI-NPW).If a student is not an engineering or science major, they must choose one of these series whileattending DU. Most of these electives are given by the School of Natural Science andMathematics (NSM
racial or ethnic experiences thatindividuals who are not white experience. We use the term “faculty of Color'' to highlight the range of identitiesreported by those in our sample. These identities include Black, Latiné, Indigenous, Asian and Multiracial BLI. Weutilize this phrase to underscore the instances of marginalization that participants of Color reported regularlyenduring in engineering contexts [1]. We intentionally capitalize the word Color as an act of resistance against theculture of white hegemony often experienced within higher education.must contend with the “hidden curriculum” of faculty life and tenure achievement. Faculty ofColor often face higher expectations for their performance than those expected of their whitecolleagues
Paper ID #46521Which undergraduate student activities develop specific career and leadershipskills for Black vs non-Black engineering graduatesD’Andre Jermaine Wilson-Ihejirika, University of Toronto D’Andre Wilson-Ihejirika is currently a PhD candidate at the University of Toronto within the Institute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education & Practice (ISTEP). Prior to that she worked for many years as an engineer and project manager in the Oil & Gas industry. She is originally from Nassau, Bahamas, and completed her B.Eng in Chemical Engineering at McGill University and her MASc. from the Centre
moresalient within the context of civil engineering, a trade-heavy industry awash with physical andsocial demands associated with the design and construction of the built environment. However,civil engineering graduates may pursue a variety of positions, including those that are moreoffice-based (e.g., structural designer) and those that require significant time outdoors (e.g., fieldinspector, construction manager, etc.). For this reason, the civil engineering discipline offers aunique opportunity to integrate disabled perspectives into the profession, diversify theengineering workforce, and ultimately, promote the overall accessibility of the spaces in whichsociety functions.In this paper, we provide an overview of the work conducted in the first
design" OR curriculum*Stage three is characterized by a selection process. Studies are selected from inclusion andexclusion as described in Table 2. Studies fitting all the descriptions listed in the inclusion criteriaare moved to the next level of the review, while studies including a minimum of one of theexclusion criteria are removed from the review. Each study went through two phases of review.The first review phase accessed titles. If the title included any variation of the search terms in theappropriate context, it moved on to the abstract review phase. In reviewing the abstracts, if theabstract discussed the integration of JEDI principles within an engineering course, program, oroverall curriculum, without any of the exclusion criteria
discipline. Integration ofexternal disciplines is typically limited to short-term curriculum design and reform,offering only temporary training in interdisciplinary knowledge, skills, and literacy.These limitations significantly hinder the effectiveness of learning outcomes.Therefore, exploring methods to transcend disciplinary constraints and fosterlong-term, diverse interdisciplinary engineering education remains a pressingchallenge.To address this issue, this study examines the “Advanced Engineering EducationProgram”, an interdisciplinary engineering minor offered by Zhejiang University inChina. The program is characterized by four key features: a personalized curriculumsystem, projects targeting national-level engineering challenges, an
Paper ID #49792GIFTS: Time Management as a Tool in a Stress Toolkit for First-Year EngineeringStudentsDr. Laura Ann Gelles, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Laura Gelles is a teaching assistant professor in the Engineering Fundamentals program at the University of Tennessee Knoxville (UTK). Her previous work has focused on persistence and retention of engineering students, integrating social and environmental context into technical engineering curriculum, and mentoring and career resources for engineering graduate students.Prof. Laura Knight, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Laura Knight is a Lecturer in the