students, would have negative repercussions for the individual’sperformance as well as the duration in which the students will be able to whether thatenvironment. This theory will help us to examine the level of compatibility as described byBlack graduate students and the academic environments they are successfully navigating. As the goal is to explore how institutions might better create spaces where Black studentsfeel their values and beliefs are espoused, person environment fit theory is used here tounderscore the need to utilize real experiences of those who have previously navigated thesehostile spaces to inform how these spaces can be climate controlled moving forward. In extantliterature, there has been documentation of coping
that any analysis that does nottake intersectionality into account does not adequately address the manner in which Blackwomen are subordinated16. Being sure to look at the Black woman as she is, both a woman and ablack person, is both powerful and insightful. The studies in this literature review use anintersectionality lens by looking specifically at African American women.For the African American woman faculty member oppressions take the form of invisibility,isolation, and other barriers that stand in the way of career advancement as faculty. Malcom,Hall, & Brown discovered in their analysis almost forty years ago that, “[t]he more an individualresembles the ‘typical scientist’ the lower are the costs. Each deviation from the norm raises
research on Si and GaAs electronic devices and semiconductor lasers at the research laboratories of GEC and ITT and published numerous articles in this field. He was a professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Dominion University. He has advised 14 PhD and 16 MS students. He received numerous awards: Doctoral Mentor Award 2010; Excellence in Teaching Award 2009; Most Inspiring Faculty Award 2008; Excellence in Research Award 2004; and Certificate of Recognition for Research - NASA, 1994. He is a Senior Member of the IEEE and a Member of the Electrochemical Society.Dr. Demetris Geddis, Hampton University Demetris L. Geddis is an associate professor and Chair of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Hamp
their potential engineering pathways [n=5]. Examples include “broader impact” efforts with research faculty, a calculus- ready program for high school students, neurodiversity, artificial intelligence in K- 12 teaching, and agriculture/STEM summer programs for girls.2. Projects that impact undergraduate students (scholarships, Summer Bridge programs, transfer bridge programs, wrap-around supports, persistence to graduation) [n=10]3. Projects that impact graduate students (scholarships, path to doctorate) [n=1]The second cohort (2023) was introduced to the Academy during Summer 2023through 6 half-days of similar presentations, breakouts & discussion. They werecharged with developing an Action Plan first, and then ultimately a
your undergraduate career that influenced you to pursue an advanced degree?All interviews were recorded and transcribed. Each participant was given a pseudonym (whichare also used in the findings section).Data AnalysisFor this study, an interpretive phenomenological (IPA) approach was used as this is a qualitativeinquiry to discover the lived experiences of several individuals (i.e., Black Males) experiencing aphenomenon (e.g., graduate students in engineering, Black males with advanced degrees) [20],[21]. This method is iterative and ongoing. Two members of the research team independentlyreviewed transcripts. Portions of transcript text that gave insights into experiences of participantswere identified as examples of coding. After reviewing 5
students during theirinterpretation and practice. Since the purpose of this study is to explore and gain an in-depthdescription to understand as much as possible about how faculty teaching technical contentinclude social impacts and social justice perspectives into their courses a well-bounded andcollective case study approach was chosen [42].Study Design and MethodologyRQ: How do engineering faculty incorporate social impacts into their technical courses?Setting and recruitmentMany faculty members teach engineering science courses each with their own uniqueperspectives and curricula. It was essential for this project that faculty were selected who had afoundational understanding of sociotechnical integration as outlined in this paper. It was
(2017) in whichthey stated that failure experiences are important to realize as such failures can result in unproductive anddisrupt youths’ engagement in positive youth development frameworks during summer camps.However, the main outcome of summer camp is sought to be an increased interest in the camp subject.Students’ attitudes towards a major or field are factors which maintain the potential to influence students’willingness to pursue that major in college. Several potential motivators, including interest, relevance, funand enjoyment, and hands-on learning can interact and may explain why a person pursues a particularaction. Drey (2016) explored students’ affect towards mathematics and science and their perceptions ofhands-on activities
future graduates of the program they may hire. However, this form of recognitionminimizes other activities that serve specific functions for the department. Activities such asteaching, service, or community engagement are given markedly less space in the magazine,though other documents outline faculty and student engagement with K-12 schools, participationin engineering-based extracurricular activities, and mentoring. Notably, engagement with K-12schools is noted as an important way to spark interest in students who will eventually apply forcollege and may consider applying for this specific program (Electrical and ComputerEngineering Department External Review, pp. 53-54).Engineering Identity Not Merged with Personal Identities The
the forefront and expect facultyto be positive role models. When they experience a cultural climate that deviates from thisexpectation, it can lead to negative social/emotional experiences which may lead some toquestion their decision to pursue engineering as a career path. The students leading the workshowed a deep commitment to sharing the student voice however, they also experienced anemotional impact due to the uncertain and challenging nature of the work. Overall, they reportedthis as a rewarding yet challenging experience through which they learned about thecomplexities involved in navigating change and advocating for an inclusive culture. Thedepartment benefited from hearing the student perspective as has inspired them to develop
research and teaching within university settings. However, the workforce needs of aglobalized economy and students empowered by their agency to venture outside the traditionalacademic sphere into industry, entrepreneurship, consulting, and pre-college leadership, forexample, have led to the emergence of varied and non-traditional career paths. These pathschallenge the conventional norms and expectations of what it means to be an engineeringeducator.Despite the gradual recognition and tokenized celebration of these diverse career paths, asignificant gap exists in understanding the experiences of those pursuing them. The narratives ofPh.D. graduates in Engineering Education who choose non-academic careers are oftenovershadowed by the predominant
programs will be covered.IntroductionMost degree programs that teach building engineering have design opportunities are often less thanideally constructed to reflect practical careers due to relatively few faculty members being trained, or theyhave no similar industry experience necessary to guide students [1]. Consequently in these settings, only asurface level understanding of their value is realized [2]. Many engineering students do not know how toapproach large complex systems due to their exposure to idealistic examples [3]. Additionally, they notcapable of providing critical multi-disciplinary integration of their designs due to the isolated nature oftopics in the classroom [4] [5]. Capstone courses provide a comprehensive evaluation of
. [1 credit hour, elective] E145: Academic and Professional Preparation for Engineers II: Engineering as a field of study and profession. Career and professional development, goal setting, decision making and effective communication strategies. [1 credit hour, elective] E201: Engineering Transfer to Success: This 8-week course will provide an overview of the NC State University policies and procedures, organizations, and resources available for enhancing the academic success of new transfer students in the College of Engineering. Lectures and discussion from departmental representatives will focus on requirements and availability for financial aid, cooperative education, career services, and campus student organizations
students would beblock scheduled typically by an administrative assistant based on test scores and placement tests,and then the faculty advisor would meet with the student once a semester for the rest of thestudent’s academic career to advisee the student on the next semesters courses. This is a fairlystandard model that is used at many different institutions and is one that allows for one on onepersonal interactions with the student and minimizes the workload on the faculty advisor.However, in order to address the issues of mechanical engineering student retention, recruitment,and the initial math placement of these students the new active and structured advising modelwas created as seen in Fig. 1. The structured advising model integrates
example) that might deriveexplanations for the findings. Bottomley concluded: “Because aspects of personality traits that make up the GRIT scale can, in fact, be taught, first year courses or programs to enhance student retention might be able to make important and impactful changes. Secondly, if GRIT is sufficiently predictive, as some earlier results suggest, some aspects of GRIT might be used to impact admissions or placement decisions, allowing students who are not able to show their capabilities on standardized metrics to have an additional input to the admission decision process.”By contrast, Williamson, Pannizo, Perriakos and
skills that are needed to make lasting connections after graduating college.The program cultivates a sense of belonging to international members who may not have theirfamilies close to home for support. The program has been deemed highly beneficial forinternational students due to the fact that it enhances the network for individuals to discover newemployment opportunities. After graduation, program graduates can potentially benefit fromthese relationships by obtaining a highly desired employment position or by receiving anoutstanding recommendation from various industry CEO’s who have a first-hand demonstrationof the student’s real-world experience and professional demeanor.Introduction Middle Tennessee State University’s Human Exploration
climate was a large factor in women’sdecision to either leave or never enter the profession after graduating from college. Previousresearch indicates that women that persist in engineering have developed a strong sense ofengineering identity and have developed skills to navigate the workplace environment. AtVillanova University, the number of women graduating with a Bachelor of Science in CivilEngineering has been 33% over the past three years and the percentage of women faculty isnearly 50%, which are both above the national average. This paper explores whether the womengraduates of this department persist in the profession at higher percentages than what has beenfound nationally and if their persistence in the profession is comparable to the
less than 10% of them declare engineering as a major [29]. Wehave begun a line of inquiry into the ways in which students who have already matriculated intoengineering construct smartness [11, 22, 30, 31]. We have also explored the beliefs thatuniversity faculty hold about the nature of intelligence [32]. However, it is with this contributionthat we look at the construction of smartness by high school science and engineering students.Other influential work on the construction of smartness in K-12 education, such as work by Hatt[3] draws on empirical evidence from much younger students (e.g., kindergarten). By studyingthe beliefs of high school students directly, we begin to build an understanding that can lead todisrupting such beliefs that
American students to work with her as a Navajo principal investigator on the project and building an interdisciplinary, collaborative team of scientists with expertise in analytical chemistry, geoscience, cancer biology, and social sciences are also important to her research. She is a member of the Navajo Nation (born to the N´aneesht’ e´ zhi clan) and is involved in outreach activities for Native American students in undergraduate and graduate research. She is the principal investigator of the Partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention and the director of the Bridges to Baccalaureate program. She was named the 2018 recipient of the American Chemical Society Award for Encouraging Disadvantaged Students into
College cum laudeSamantha Swanson 2014-2015 Anticipated 2018 Augsburg College, Minnesota State University MankatoCaroline Wochnick 2014-2015 Anticipated 2017 Augsburg CollegeAmanda Kapetanakis 2016-present Anticipated 2017 Augsburg CollegeKelsey Irvin’s Evaluation of her Personal NarrativeWhat led me to STEM as an undergraduate student “Even before I first arrived at my undergraduate university, I knew that I wanted to pursue studies and a career in STEM
process andthoughts of two researcher's conversation of key incidents related to positionality over time; (3)barriers and supports to exploring positionality; and (4) how this exploration influences theirrespective research. The personal exploration presented here is intended to serve as a startingpoint to ongoing reflexive work for each graduate researcher as a means of continuousdevelopment in their research practice.Background: The Self and SystemEach individual possesses intentions and perspectives that are unique to their personal paradigmor worldview. This basic set of beliefs guide ontological, epistemological, and methodologicalchoices and action [2]. These paradigms that an individual possesses can be a complex makeupof life experiences
thesuccess of each respective student “type” that will prove useful to faculty, staff, and practitionerswho work with Black male students in STEM.IntroductionThe nation strives to maintain a competitive edge internationally by contributing significant andinnovative advances in science/engineering. However, our postsecondary institutions are notproducing the number of graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and math(STEM) fields, necessary to keep pace with demand. To curb projected shortages, it isimperative that the country invests in developing and educating a talented pool of qualifiedSTEM graduates. It must do so with an increasingly racially/ethnically diverse society andcollege-aged population. Despite the high demand and
, and the pronouns correspond to the gender identified by the participant in thequalification survey.The analysis team included faculty members and graduate students in engineering and scienceeducation, as well as a multi-disciplinary team of undergraduate students divided into six-personsub-teams exploring themes related to academic influences, social influences, and familialinfluences. The focus of this paper is on data analyzed by the familial influences sub-team.Each transcript was unitized prior to distribution to the undergraduate analysis team, so that teammembers would be coding the same meaningful units of text [26]. Individual team members readthe interview transcripts and created open codes related to themes they found. The analysis
is also studying entry and persistence in engineering of first generation, women, and under-represented ethnic minorities.Dr. Kyle D. Squires, Arizona State UniversityDr. James Collofello, Arizona State University Associate Dean of Academic and Student Affairs Professor of Computer Science and Engineering School of Computing Informatics and Decision Systems Engineering Ira A. Fulton Schools of EngineeringMs. Robin R. Hammond, Arizona State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Engineers from Day One: A Pilot Collective Impact Alliance Effort to Foster Engineering IdentityIntroductionThis Work in Progress paper reports on an effort that
Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15701Dr. Leidy Klotz, Clemson University Leidy Klotz is an engineering faculty member at Clemson University, where he developed and teaches courses like the one described in this paper. He does research on decision making and education for sustainability.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Clemson University Dr. Landis joined Clemson in June 2015 as the Thomas F. Hash ’69 Endowed Chair in Sustainable Development. Previously she was an Associate Professor at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the
in sharing their logical thought processes as well as beingquestioned about them.Intentional community building in PREP begins on Day 1 of the intensive when students,TAs and faculty are randomly paired, interview each other and then introduce their partnerto the group. The same short bios are later posted to a members-only website that supportsthe cohort, next to a photo of that person. During the first week other ice-breaker andteam-building activities continue to be implemented so that students bond and feelknown. Having this sense of ease among the group is important, as the academic tasks theyare given can be daunting. Students are divided into four different small groups over thetwo weeks so that they have worked closely with nearly
biology classrooms. Throughout her scientific career, Gloriana has been an advocate for underrepresented and underprivileged populations, and is an active member of SACNAS.Dr. Carol B. Muller, Stanford University Carol B. Muller is the Executive Director of WISE Ventures, an internal initiative at Stanford, designed to communicate, build networks, and help seed new and needed ventures across the Stanford campus to c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Paper ID #23735advance gender equity in science and engineering. She also directs Stanford’s Faculty Women’s Forum.A longtime university
Starling, anengineering educator and curriculum development specialist with over ten years of K-12classroom experience, directed and organized the camp activities and lead the team ofprofessionals. The science teacher provided additional instructional support during theimplementation of the camp. The TVIs and O&M supported the students in daily living andtransitional skills. Additionally, one undergraduate education student and one graduate studentstudying biology provided insight on current strategies helpful to navigating college. Thesynergistic efforts of each team member contributed to being able to meet the needs of thestudents and provide them with an outstanding opportunity to explore engineering practices.Student application and
skills that are transferable in their decisions to enter into graduate studies or the professional worldDr. Luis Rodolfo Garcia Carrillo, New Mexico State University Luis Rodolfo GARCIA CARRILLO received the PhD. degree in Control Systems from the University of Technology of Compi`egne, France. He was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Center of Control, Dynamical systems and Computation at UC Santa Barbara, USA. He currently holds an Assistant Professor position with the Klipsch School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at New Mexico State University, USA. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Latinx Engineering Students Surviving the Odds to Accomplish
gradually increases thelevel of vulnerability required so as to ease students from a context where personal affectiveexperience is uncommon. Begin with low-risk Open Sentences that allow for various levels ofcomfort. To take a real-world example from a sustainable design class exploring the design ofenvironments, beginning with an Open Sentence such as, “A place that I loved as a child…” issafer than “When I look at the world today, what I find most heartbreaking is…” Along similarnotes, beginning a feedback session with an Open Sentence that prompts positive feedback isoften easier for students, and cultivates greater openness to then progress to sharing criticalfeedback, such as, “When I reflect upon my experience working on this team, I wish…”In
longer meets the 0.05 threshold.Further comparison of the small Engineering cohort and the BCOM cohort shows significantswings in the small Engineering cohort's improvement on Questions 9 and 11-13. This furtherconfirms both the effectiveness of training smaller cohorts and the effect of the communicationstraining on engineering students.ImplicationsSimilar to the smaller engineering cohort, the 105-member BCOM cohort consisted of smaller(35-person) classes. The business students’ prior experience working with more than two teammembers on open-ended projects appeared to help the BCOM cohort in this study navigate someof the areas explored by the Briggs [10] team health check: Team Leadership, Processes,Understanding Differences, and