positedearlier in this paper, i.e., that there is too much variability in the methodologies and metrics ofcurrent ranking systems.Another nagging question, beyond that of the focus of the unit of comparison, remains however.This question asks: For what purpose is the comparison being made? The literature reviewyielded a whole range of purposes including: • Comparison of institutions • Evaluation of institutions/colleges/programs • Assessing progress towards strategic plan goals • Accreditation • Performance assessment, e.g., for promotion and tenure decision, of faculty • Guiding individual decision makingThe complexity of the problem of assessment and comparison is depicted by the illustrationdepicted in Figure 1. It shows that the
with their product idea.Each proposal includes a patent search, a description of the invention and development plan, anda budget. The director of the RUVF works with students to refine each proposal before and aftersubmission. Funding up to $2500 per team is awarded each semester. Teams can win severalawards to support their ideas through multiple semesters.IV. Mapping Entrepreneurship onto the Engineering Clinic SequenceThe Venture Capital Program described in section III has existed for over 10 years but relativelyfew students have taken advantage of it. In the past two years, the Sophomore EngineeringClinic instructors have implemented new assignments intended to promote entrepreneurship.With these new assignments, it is possible
organizations, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1) pp. 76-87.27. Perttula, M., & Sipila, P. (2007). The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(1), 93-102.28. Pugh, S. (1990), Total Design, Addison-Wesley, New York.29. Purcell, A. T., Williams, P., & Gero, J. S. (1993). Fixation effects: Do they exist in design problem solving. Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design, 20, 333-345.30. Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies, 17, 363-383.31. Saaty, T. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, NewYork.32. Saunders, M., Seepersad, C.C., & Hölttä-Otto, K. (2009). The characteristics of innovative
technologies, along withincreased awareness of the environmental impact of petroleum energy use, have resulted in newopportunities for vehicle electrification. The EcoEagles HyREV system features a high degree ofvehicle electrification including; an all-electric driving range of 32 km, all electric accessories,plug-in charging and electric all-wheel-drive and the integration of three electric motors witheach over 55kW of peak power.The competition and EcoEagles vehicle performance specifications, based on their CAD andPSAT analyses, can be seen below in Table 1. Table 1: Vehicle Technical SpecificationsDevelopment of the HyREV SystemsThe EcoEagles team has adhered to a simplified version of GM’s Global Development plan
order to meet thisobjective the COE is focusing on improving retention rates at the freshman and sophomore levelsbecause the attrition rate is highest during the first two years. The COE is implementing aholistic program to address common reasons for students leaving the engineering program,including lack of academic preparation; financial difficulties; difficulty in adjusting to collegelife; lack of a community atmosphere; and disappointment at not being able to experienceengineering principles during the first two years. Following an initial planning period, the COElaunched seven major initiatives in 2007 to achieve project goals. These initiatives include (1) anEngineering Residential College that forms the foundation of a new living
. the material.5. Synthesis The ability to put parts together to form a new whole. This adapt; combine; may involve the production of a unique communication, a compile; compose; plan of operations (research proposal), or a set of abstract create; design; develop; relations (scheme for classifying information). Learning devise; generate; outcomes in this area stress creative behaviors, with major integrate; modify; plan; emphasis on the formulation of new patterns or structure. revise; structure.6. Evaluation The ability to judge the value of material for a given purpose, appraise
versus experimental groups, all work terms.It is interesting to note that the responses to Question 3 showed an increased percentage ofrespondents reporting a positive response when comparing experimental to control groups. All(100%) respondents from the experimental group noted an increase in their understanding ofworkplace culture while participating in the revised program.Question 4To what extent did participation in the co-op program affect your employment opportunities by: a) Enabling you to identify, assess and develop workplace skills and personal competencies b) Teaching you how to write an effective resume and cover letter c) Teaching you how to interview effectively d) Assisting in the process of career planning e
AC 2010-1622: THE EFFECT OF PANOPTO ON ACADEMIC PERFORMANCEAND SATISFACTION OF TRADITIONAL-DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTSChung-Suk Cho, University of North Carolina, Charlotte DR. CHUNG-SUK CHO is an Assistant Professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Department of Engineering Technology. His teaching and research focus on project scope definition, pre-project planning, sustainable construction, project administration, construction safety, construction simulation, and project management. He has prior teaching experience at North Carolina A&T State University in construction management and working experience with Fluor Corporation as a project manager.Stephen Kuyath, University of
student learning by providing formativefeedback to students6.Diefes-Dux, et al.4 present a concrete example of how educational design research, a models-and-modeling perspective from mathematics education, and multi-tiered teaching experimentshave been used in the design of valid and reliable evaluation tools for scoring team responses toMEAs. Their work demonstrates how the design of a package of evaluation tools (includingrubrics, task-specific supports, and scorer training) based on the aforementioned educationalresearch methods supports (1) sustained fidelity to engineering expert-identified characteristicsof high performance across iterations of change to improve reliability, and (2) theimplementation of planned iterations of the evaluation
, author added] by reaching out to middle school, high school, and community college students through the RET program. They have all the bases covered without going too far. If you try to do too much in a limited amount of time, it can dilute the overall objective. The research does satisfy the vision because the RETs are doing lesson plans and the high school students are visiting next week. The students will see the research being done in bio-engineering. Undergraduates get to see the focus for research available in the Ph.D. program here. The research experiences do advance the proximal and distal outcomes because the program has been a catalyst for undergraduate students to become more enthusiastic about research
the problem. The instructor acts as afacilitator as students independently seek out the information and resources needed to fill in their Page 15.985.3knowledge gaps. Once the self-directed learning phase is complete, the group reconvenes tobrainstorm possible solutions and then devise a test plan to validate their solution. If the solutiondoes not adequately address the problem, the cycle is repeated. Student groups then present theirfinal solution for peer review and comment and reflect on their learning experience. Problem Analysis
practical ingenuity (skill in the ability and self-confidence planning, combining and to adapt to rapid or major adapting) change a profound understanding of function on multidisciplinary the importance of teamwork teams flexibility & agility flexibility an ability to think both critically and creatively, creativity independently and cooperatively understand the impact of leadership
industry professionals to activelyparticipate as content providers. Finally, influences to adopt social media technologiesfurther drove development of more features that promote collaborative relationshipsbetween students, teachers, and industry. Examples of how social media concepts plan tobe used used in the careerME.org website called my.careerme, are also explored.1. Introduction – How to Address a NeedWhen the project conceptualization process started in early summer 2008 for the Societyof Manufacturing Engineers (SME) – Education Foundation1, the idea was to create aweb portal to show high school and college students, primarily between grades 11-14,that there are and will continue to be lucrative, high paying jobs in manufacturing;despite
unsolicitedcomments from students after class such as “thank you for doing this [assistive] project.” Figure 2: Automated Pill Dispenser Prototype, Accommodating Multiple Disabilities (Functional prototype and photo by “Team #18”: B. Ludwig, N. Bryant, and C. Schults)3.2 Course Background: 3rd Year Design Methods rdThe 3 year Design Methods course strengthens and extends the foundational conceptsintroduced in 1st year Cornerstones Design for all engineering and engineering technologymajors, excluding materials joining and civil engineering (60-90 students per year.) Studentsexplore a variety of engineering design methods through a semester-long reverse-engineering re-design team project. Example topics include: planning the
policiessituated within colleges (P&T). By conducting in-depth interviews with STEM faculty membersand exploring organizational texts such as the PL and P&T document guidelines, or college anduniversity level strategic plans and policies for stopping the tenure clock or granting courserelief, we will demonstrate the usefulness of the IE method in engineering education research.This methodology has theoretical and policy implications that address the phenomenon ofwomen’s underrepresentation among engineering faculty.We begin this paper with a discussion of the sociological theory investigating the construct of an“ideal worker” in the context of academia. We then describe some of the theory behind theinstitutional ethnography research method, and
performance.This paper concludes with recommendations for fostering engagement in undergraduate coursesand plans for future work. Our results linking course performance with completion of extra creditassignments will spur further study of how to best encourage learning in heat transfer courses.Course BackgroundThe introductory heat transfer course held in Fall 2009 had three required components: an in-class component, an at-home component, and a laboratory component. In addition, there wereoptional components that students could choose to pursue including attending the teachingassistant-led sessions or completing extra credit assignments. There were 61 students enrolled inthe course, and 60 students agreed to participate in this engagement study.There
assistance of an outside expert in assessment. • Revisit the scope of the exercise. Should it include both operating point and series/parallel configurations, or should it be limited to determining the operating point? • Make improvements to the in lab apparatus to make it easier to operate and gather data. The less the students have to think about operating the equipment the more thought they can put into the concepts.In addition to the exercise specific steps listed above there are plans for a significant upgrade tothe entire suite of exercises. Future work planned for the overall project includes: 1) Researching the feasibility of moving the exercises online making them much more accessible to others
. Focus groups are used as one of the assessment methods. The assessment result is used to further improve the laboratory course. Economy: As much as possible, space, money and student time should be economized. A multidisciplinary facility, shared between ECE and ME classes would allow efficient use of space and equipment, better use of available funds, and elimination of overlap among individual departmental labs. Focusing experiments on control technologies, embedded systems, and industrial drives rather than a plurality of devices would result in economies of space, money and student time.To achieve these goals we have carefully planned the new control laboratory. As part of thisprocess
. Participants learned how to be receptive to adviceand opinions from viewers, which they in turn incorporated into new iterations of their design.This created an online collaborative environment to complement the on-site activities of theyoung participants.Studio STEM used the design studio as a pedagogic model for introducing STEM throughenergy conservation as a focus area. Predicated on a common construct in architectural fields, the“studio” as physical and virtual space allowed students the opportunity to share design plans as“pin-up sessions” or “gallery walks.” Students focused on, explained, and justified their designsin design critiques (or “crits”), incorporated the input from their peers, and refined their designideas. 22,23 Likewise, our
of defects. These operations do not add value tothe final product, and many of them can be mitigated by re-organization of the production area,which in this case refers to the laboratory.Cellular Layout. The laboratory for the course is set up as cellular manufacturing layout. Eachstep in the laboratory protocol (including measurements and analysis) is arranged sequentiallyaccording to process flow, with stations in close proximity. The students make “spaghetti” orwork-flow diagrams (using the floor plan of the lab) as part of their lab reports.Kanban. The kanban system is used to manage the flow of material or product through thefactory. Kanban is one of the main components of the visual workplace.Workplace Organization (“The 5-S’s”). The
of power and energy consumption by DC loads4.3 Assessment of LearningA plan has to be created to develop the assessment tools required to collect informationthat allows generating conclusions about student understanding of the targeted concepts.Next is the assessment plan for this example challenge: Page 15.396.9 Formative Assessment: it consists of practice activities, which should not count in a significant way as grades; however, it needs to provide feedback to the students and the professor in order to address any learning problems or difficulties. à Pre-test. à Classroom activities: ″ Study working principle and
pieces are shekels). This is becauseusury, which is the practice of charging excessive interest, was forbidden in the JewishLaw. We know that “excessive interest” was defined as “the hundredth” (one percent?), because it was specifically condemned by the prophet Nehemiah (Nehe.5:10,11),in the Old Testament.4. Engineering ThinkingComputation and scientific thinking may come easily for some students, but manyfreshman-engineering students don’t automatically think like engineers. It takes a fewcourses to undo some habits learned earlier, so that one can help students considerrealistic requirements and constraints, estimate answers rather than blindly acceptingcalculator answers, and plan out a project instead of jumping too quickly to a
students for this problem as18.4 points. Next, we calculated the instructor average rating score as follows: (18.4/20)*5=4.6,which is listed below O6 on the third row in Table 3. As we mentioned before, grading thestudent’s projects yielded the instructor average rating score for outcome 8 (O8). The instructoraverage rating scores for assessing the rest of course learning outcomes are included in Table 3.The average rating scores from both the student survey and the instructor assessment can serveas a reference for the faculty to improve the course. For example, any course learning outcomeachieving an average rating score below 3.5 will raise a concern and require an action plan to fixthe issue
preferences for visual, active, orhands-on learning. Use of toys and demonstrations, when well-planned, practiced, andintroduced in support of class content, can liven up the classroom, engage and challengestudents, and help them visualize concepts that may otherwise be outside the realm of theirexperience.The literature on use of toys in education is indeed rich. Articles can be found in publicationssuch as American Journal of Physics, The Physics Teacher, the European journal PhysicsEducation, Prism and the Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education. Severalsuppliers including PASCO and Educational Innovations, Inc. have developed their businessesaround supplying the types of toys used in support of science and engineering education
in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals (EF), they may teach a section of a first-year engineering course. The practice of the Engineering Fundamentals department is to pair agraduate student with a faculty mentor to assist them with things such as lesson planning, studentethics, and grading policies. Recently, this program has been evaluated in order to betterunderstand the impact and future directions of EF graduate student mentoring. Additionally, theapproach of the EF mentoring program has been compared to its contemporaries at otheruniversities.Some universities have graduate courses specifically aimed at teaching techniques in highereducation for STEM fields. The University of Washington has developed a 2 credit graduatelevel
College of Humanities and College of Engineering. The program was developed in 2003 through a grant from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, with the goal of integrating communication (speaking and writing), teamwork, and ethics into the curriculum of every department in the College of Engineering. Dr. Kedrowicz has been the director of the program since its inception and has developed a situated, incremental curriculum plan in all seven departments in the college. Her responsibilities include faculty development (she has facilitated numerous college-wide workshops), TA training (approximately 15 graduate students from the Humanities work with CLEAR to develop the communication
engineering license, even if one plans to be a facultymember, can be an important credential. Therefore, at some point, in order to gain the workexperience necessary to sit for the second part of the professional engineering licensure exam,engineers interested in this credential need to spend a period of time outside academia.LiteratureThe literature is replete with anecdotal and more carefully gathered qualitative evidence of thesex gap in completion of graduate studies. In many cases, these accounts are often “buried”within larger treatises on leaving science7 or are included in extended legal briefs9. Institutionsthat train large numbers of graduate students like the University of California at Berkeley, forexample, have implemented policies that
professional preparation programs have content that can help students become aware of, and examine, their own mental models, beliefs and values, metaphysical assumptions, and future plans and aspirations. But this content will not generate that awareness and enable that examination unless it is accompanied by appropriate pedagogical strategies. Most important, both the curricula and teaching practices need to be accompanied by teachers who are themselves authentic, who are open and candid, [and] who share their own searching, their own concerns, and their own struggles, past and present.”11However, not much is offered in terms of how an engineering curriculum might bespecifically upgraded in this regard
, and discussing general topics on pedagogy particularto elementary school teaching. The Fellows worked out a schedule with the teacher. The Fellowsbegan their visits to classroom, identified the science needs with the teacher and begancontributing to the enrichment of the lessons and discussing the science behind the lessons. TheFellows were introduced to the children as Scientist, Researcher, or an Engineer. Thus, a strongfoundation was laid for a long-lasting partnership between the school and the university.Ongoing ActivitiesOne of the key activities of the Fellows is the enrichment of existing curriculum and leading thediscussion of the science behind the experiments. The Fellow and the teacher plan the activities aweek ahead so that there
withlongitudinal data of 22,000 students that S-L had significant positive effects on 11 outcomemeasures that included: academic performance (GPA, writing skills, critical thinking skills),values (commitment to activism and to promoting racial understanding), self-efficacy, leadership(leadership activities, self-rated leadership ability, interpersonal skills), choice of a servicecareer, and plans to participate in service after college.Eyler and Giles (1999) found S-L to impact positively: personal development, interpersonaldevelopment, and community-to-college connections. Students reported working harder, beingmore curious, connecting learning to personal experience, and demonstrated deeperunderstanding of subject matter. They found that S-L is more