-known Stages of TeamDevelopment [1]. Based on these findings, the we propose a high-level conceptual framework ofgroup development specific to the development of collaborative communities aimed to supportresearch goals within engineering education. To confirm preliminary results, we are solicitingfeedback on the proposed conceptual framework.The field of Engineering Education is a relatively new discipline that has been growing innumber of researchers and students in recent years [2, 3]. Despite the recent development ofdepartments and degree-programs, many engineering education researchers lack supportstructures to contribute to their success and are often seen as lone wolves in their departments.Moreover, a number of issues including a
the UnitedStates that focus on promoting the development of youths' engineering identity and interest inSTEM-related career paths. In this paper, we present work in progress, focusing our discussion onrising 7th and 8th grade youth drawings and accompanying explanations of “an engineer in action,”as part of a summertime STEM summer outreach program for underrepresented minority middleschool youth. Our work is an adaptation of Draw an Engineer Test (DAET) [1] which focuses on thestereotypical understandings and (mis)conceptions adolescents have of scientists and engineers intraditional PK- 12 classroom settings. The context of this study, however, is an informal STEMlearning environment, entitled Bulls-Engineering Youth Experience for
[1]. The practice of connecting projects across years,classes, and student cohorts, and further linking these projects to research interests of the faculty,is a model of education that could benefit members of a university system at all levels [2-3].Programs such as the KEEN network [4] have provided both the resources necessary to rethinktraditional curricula in engineering. Likewise, pedagogical training has reduced the activationenergy required to engage in active learning strategies, specifically open-ended, project basedlearning [5]. This educational model has been cited as one method to increase student motivation,curiosity, and ultimately understanding of how engineering truly fits into the world [6-7]. As theinterrelatedness of
have contributed to their leadership learning. We began by exploring thenature of the adversities faced in engineering leadership. Using situated learning theory as ourprimary analytical lens, two main themes on leadership learning emerged through our dataanalysis: (1) Contextual awareness in managing and navigating constraints, with subthemessuch as “think in terms of systems,”1 recognize when to walk away, and foster a culture thatpromotes organizational success; and (2) Leveraging personal resources and experiences inleadership, with subthemes such as learn from (painful) experience, and rely on personalstrengths such as integrity and tenacity for guidance in leadership. The study also draws fromtheories of emotional intelligence, the
, digital image processing and analysis, and numerical approximation of partial differential equations on fixed and evolving domains. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Women enrolled in engineering programs: Their interests and goals Although women earn about half of science and engineering bachelor’s degrees, and 44%of master’s degrees, women are underrepresented in certain areas of science and engineering [1].According to the National Science Foundation, women received the highest amount of sciencedegrees in psychology and biosciences, and the lowest in computer sciences and engineering [1].Why are women entering the fields of psychology and biology
undergraduates do not rate themselves asbeing as creative as a “typical engineer”, and there is a strong association between self-ratings ofcreativity and professional identity. Engineering identity is discussed in the context ofparticipants’ reported goals for the conference and its benefits. Suggestions for promotingengineering identity are described.Introduction and BackgroundAs universities aim to address the gender gap problem of their engineering and computer sciencestudent population [1], recruiting and retaining women has become ever more critical. To thisend, a one-day annual Women in Engineering conference [2] was organized and hosted by alarge public university in the west. One overarching goal of the conference is to foster thedevelopment of
[1]. Between 2010 and 2017, almost half ofU.S. baccalaureate degree earners had done some coursework at a community college, and almost20% had earned an associate’s degree [3].The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) has highlighted the importance of communitycolleges in broadening participation in engineering because of the diversity they represent [4], [5].In fall 2017, approximately 43% of Hispanic undergraduates, 42% of American Indian/AlaskanNative undergraduates, and 35% of Black undergraduates were enrolled in two-year institutionsacross the United States [1]. Among women, 31% of undergraduate students were enrolled in two-year colleges in fall 2017 [1]. More attention to supporting students on the transfer pathway intoengineering
hasidentified student groups in engineering who are likely to struggle more or be disadvantagedcompared to majority White male students.Gender: Women make up 58.2% [1] of the population in the United States yet earn only 19.8%of all bachelor’s degrees in engineering and 24.2% of masters degrees [2] [3]. In the workforce,they represent only 14.5% of engineers [4]. Despite extensive efforts to reach gender parity inengineering [5], engineering remains stubbornly resistant to providing a compelling andwelcoming environment for women while other fields like biology and math have advanced tomuch greater gender balance at 60% and 42% of bachelor’s degrees granted to womenrespectively [6]. Women bring diversity of thought to engineering and their
that includedtransgender, gender-nonconforming, and an option to skip the question. The data set includedinterviews with the participants conducted at three, six, and twelve months of work. Interviewswere analyzed with multiple rounds of coding to determine which challenges articulated byparticipants were unique to women.Results indicate that women face many of the same challenges as men. Women also face a set ofunique challenges, which were sometimes overtly rooted in sexism.IntroductionSignificant research in the past few decades has documented the experiences and challenges thatwomen in engineering face, not only in a professional setting but also as engineering students[1], [2], [3]. However, few of these studies have reported on the
engineering and introduces some tools used for the design and implementation of devices and systems.Nicole Bosca American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work-in-Progress – Integration of Voice Technology into First-Year Engineering CurriculumIntroductionThis is a work-in-progress paper. Voice technology is a growing field and is becoming moreprominent in our day-to-day lives. National Public Research, in a study conducted in early 2020,found that an estimated 60 million people (24% of total U.S. adult population) own a voice-enabled smart speaker [1]. The number of smart speakers in the U.S. household has grown by anastounding 135% in last
during the course toconstruct and program a tensile tester. This tensile tester is then used to conduct tests to determinemechanics propertiesCourses Utilizing Tensile-Tester Project The tensile tester project has been implemented into two different courses. The first course isStatics and Mechanics of Materials. This is a sophomore-level course required for students in allengineering disciplines. The second course is Applied Engineering Mechanics, a sophomore-levelcourse part of the controls and systems engineering technology program. Table 1 outlines thetopics covered in each class. Table 1. Course Topics in Approximate Order Introduced Statics and Mechanics Applied Mechanics of
by reflecting on doing and thence how we mightimprove the delivery of the course.In this paper, we briefly introduce the framework of a computer program used to process a largenumber of learning statements by way of providing context. We focus on comparing what studentslearned with what instructors expected the students to learn thus providing evidence-basedguidance to instructors on how to improve the delivery of AME4163 thus providing an initialanswer to the question posed above.1. Frame of ReferenceIndustry is facing an ever-changing environment. Many companies want their engineer employeesto have the ability to adapt to the changing environment [1]. From the education perspective,universities or colleges are also providing programs and
technique called “Moats and Bridges” frompublished research in the computer architecture security community [1].FPGA logic blocks are capable of attacking co-resident logic blocks via side-channel attacks toreveal the inner-workings of the victim logic, as demonstrated in existing research in thecommunity. The “Moats and Bridges” technique changes the synthesis process and providesisolation to logic modules. The synthesis process could otherwise lead to placement of logicblocks that breeds vulnerabilities and back channels. The work-in-progress discussed here willprimarily focus on understanding and implementing the Moats and Bridges techniques andtechnology. Through the research, the activities provided insight towards the more
mid-twentieth century mainly based on an abundantsupply of fossil resources for chemical production and energy, so process design concepts focusedprimarily on large tonnage-scale manufacturing facilities [1]. However, the economic use ofrenewable energy resources such as solar and wind is rising rapidly [2]. Transitioning to thesesources of energy is an important endeavor; however, the technology to do so and the costs of thistransition indicate that it will happen slowly. The unprecedented revolution in domestic suppliesof new light hydrocarbon resources from shale provides a compelling opportunity for the U.S. tobecome a global leader in fuels and chemicals production. Although this has potential to lower thenation’s energy costs, and
purpose of this work-in-progress paper is to present our methodology forfeedback from the community, our preliminary results from the initial Fall 2019 data, and to start a larger conversationabout the importance of studying conceptual understanding from a longitudinal perspective.1 IntroductionThis work-in-progress paper outlines our planned study of students’ conceptual understanding of signals and systems.Signals and systems (SS) is the focus of an electrical engineering (EE) science course at most universities, and topicsin SS, such as filtering and Fourier transforms, are fundamental to control theory, signal processing, and machinelearning. Despite the importance educators place on SS concepts, previous studies have shown that students
[1].Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) and the Entrepreneurial MindsetDedication to preparing future leaders and innovators in engineering who have an EM wassubstantiated through Lawrence Tech’s partnership with the Kern Family Foundation. The KernFamily Foundation was founded with the belief that, to meet the needs of an ever-changingglobal marketplace, engineering education must evolve to develop entrepreneurial-mindedengineers that possess the requisite technical skills but also leverage those skills to bothrecognize and fulfill unmet customer needs. In 2004, LTU became a KEEN partner with otheruniversities having the shared mission of transforming undergraduate engineering education.Through granting financial support
function. For example, the edX course on electrical circuits listsas learning objectives: designing and analyzing circuits; lumped circuit models and abstraction;construction of simple digital gates; and measurement of circuit variables [1]. This paper is abouta course designed to enable the novice learner to begin using foundational understanding todesign simple instrumentation circuits that can sense and measure physical phenomena that areconcrete to the novice learner, such as angle, weight, temperature, relative humidity, distance,and one’s own heartbeat, pulse, and blood pressure. After completing the modules, students aregiven an opportunity to design a final project involving sensing, measurement, andinstrumentation. As a first-semester
assess the risks associated with anyproject they are working on to concentrate upon the risks involved in completing the project —the loss of someone with the special skills needed for an aspect of the project, a loss of funding, afailure of everyone to do the work assigned to them, a technical failure, and so on [1-4].However, most professional codes of ethics require engineers to “hold paramount the safety,health and welfare of the public”, which means considering risks beyond the immediate boundsof the project, and considering the ethical implications of their work. Engineers must broaden thearea of concern to include the introduction of their design solution into the world [5], whichmeans considering many widely varying aspects of their
Engineering from RPI, and a Ph.D. in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering from Princeton. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress – A Problem-Based Curriculum in Support of Structured Learning Experiences to Prepare Ph.D. Candidates for Independent ResearchStephanie Cutler1, Yu Xia1, Cliff Lissenden2, Francesco Costanzo2, Thomas Litzinger1, & Bruce Gluckman2 1 Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education, Penn State 2 Engineering Science & Mechanics, Penn StateIntroduction In
American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: A Qualitative Exploration of Female Undergraduate Decisions to Specialize within Engineering DisciplinesIntroductionWhile engineering has long been recognized as one of the most highly and persistently sexsegregated occupations in the US, researchers have also begun to recognize patterns of intra-occupational sex segregation within engineering, such that gendered roles and career paths existin the engineering profession [1-3]. Men are more frequently in the most technical roles (i.e.,those that rely almost exclusively on technical rather than professional skills). These roles areoften perceived as the highest status and most
can increase the likelihood of success with sustained engagement in EER. Suchopportunities are critical to the discipline of EER moving forward, expanding to include thosefrom diverse professional backgrounds and experiences. Divergent experiences bring criticalnew perspectives to address the ongoing goal of positively impacting the overall engineeringeducation experience of students.IntroductionMany skills needed to be an effective engineering faculty member are not explicitly taught [1].For example, few engineering faculty experience basic training on teaching or mentoring.However, engineers possess the technical and design skills to innovate, recognize deficiencies,and strive for process optimization. These habits are relevant both in
presents an initial survey of undergraduate engineeringstudents and engineering course instructors on the use of websites and apps like Chegg, CourseHero, and Slader (collectively “unsanctioned online resources,” or UORs) in engineering courses.The survey sought to determine 1) the degree to which engineering students are using UORs toviolate academic integrity, 2) how well instructors’ beliefs about students’ use of these resourcesalign with students’ actual behaviors, and 3) potential strategies for decreasing the use of UORs inviolating academic integrity. The students reported similar frequencies in using UORs comparedto traditional resources for most of the queried behaviors. Instructors estimated a much higherfrequency of students’ violation
transferringregulation of behavior from outside to inside the individual is called internalization; hence whenindividuals are self-determined, the reasons to engage in this behavior are fully internalized [1].So, it is not just about the individual on his or her own, but how the individual interacts with thesocial context. In the absence of adequate support, intrinsic motivation is undermined thusdiminishes sense of self [2]. In this case, we are interested in investigating team dynamics in theclassroom as the social context.At this time, this study consists of a pilot project conducted in a semester-long first yearengineering design course. The authors evaluated motivation in teams, for which “Psych Safe”modules were used in the classroom to support team
Outreach Impact 1 Work In Progress (WIP): A Systematic Review Describing Impacts on Engineering Undergraduates Who Participate in OutreachOverview To teach STEM content to K-12 students, and recruit talented and diverse K-12 studentsinto STEM, many outreach programs at universities in the United States rely on the collectiveefforts of undergraduate students. Outreach design and research have typically focused on theK-12 students and their teachers, leaving the effect of the outreach on the STEM undergraduatesthemselves to be an important but overlooked consideration that has received less attention in theengineering education literature. This WIP paper describes the preliminary findings of
activities.A Brief Overview of Engineering Electromagnetics Education ResearchSeveral authors have reported the difficulty students face when studying electromagneticsincluding the abstraction of concepts and the trouble with vector calculus [1]-[3]. A surveyconducted in 2005 of electromagnetics curricula around the world directly identified thatstudents feel that electromagnetics is very challenging and demanding [4]. Due to the difficulty,student motivation is low which does not encourage passion for the course topic [5].The literature shows that students need help in visualizing the abstract concepts embedded inelectromagnetics and have suggested transformations involving computer software packages andnumerical simulation [2],[3],[5]. Some authors
distinct but complementary functions: (a) a contentrepository, (b) an audience response system to deliver content, and (c) learning analytics thatprovide data to instructors and researchers. It houses over 3,000 ConcepTests, which are shortquestions that can rapidly be deployed to engage students in concept-oriented thinking and/or toassess students’ conceptual knowledge, along with more extensive concept-based active learningtools and concept inventories. Screenshots of students’ views of a ConcepTest and aninstructional tool developed during this project are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. TheConcept Warehouse has grown rapidly over the last five years with over 1,200 faculty accountsand 28,000 student users (Friedrichsen, Smith, and
(WIP) assessing how engineers view aspects of the workplaceculture affecting the extent to which they can authentically be themselves. Our conceptualframework includes Faulkner’s [1] concept of in/authenticity and Kendi’s [2] history of racistideas in the U.S. In this paper we present experiences of three engineers working at the samecompany, which were collected as pilot data for an NSF-funded study. We found that the twoWhite engineers saw no distinction between their personal and work identities. They saw thecompany’s values aligning with their personal values, and the workplace as being open andcomfortable. In contrast, the Black engineer described taking on different identities in businesssettings and one-on-one interactions. Several
. They achieve this in ways that make effective use of naturalresources, enhance the environment, promote social cohesion and inclusion and strengtheneconomic prosperity” [1]. Further, this framework describes 7 main components of sustainablecommunities as: 1) governance, 2) social & cultural, 3) housing & the built environment, 4)economy, 5) environmental, 6) services, and 7) transport & connectivity. In sum, the EganReview is a visionary statement which brings together the time frames of sustainability byapplying two types of vision: 1) the ability to see things clearly in the present and 2) the ability toenvision a better future [2]. This future-oriented vision serves as the foundation of our research.Engineers are one of the core
engineering has come to align with the specific three elements proposed by theLearning Assistant Alliance (Cao et al., 2018; Gallegos al., 2018; Tanu et al. 2017; Wendell atal., 2019).LA Pedagogy SeminarAn outline of the weekly content of the LA Pedagogy Seminar is shown in Table 1. To preparefor class, the LAs are assigned reading and must respond to a specific prompt that connects to theweekly reading and asks them to reflect on their learning and practice in writing. This process isintended to help them connect the three program elements and build a broader understanding oftheir own learning and pedagogical practice. It also provides the instructor of the pedagogyseminar specific ideas and real experiences to draw upon for class discussion
presented.Assessments and student outcome tracking for the course will be discussed. Experiences,outcomes, feedback, and lessons learned from the initial offering of this course will be presented.Introduction Recently, the Honor’s program in our college has been revised to focus on undergraduateresearch. Undergraduate research experiences are considered High Impact Practices (HIP)[1] andare broadly used to improve recruiting and retention. As a result, all students will be required totake 3 credits of undergraduate research, complete a senior thesis, and deliver a researchpresentation.[2] The goal of this change is to increase the number of students conductingundergraduate research and to also increase the number of students applying for graduate school