Asee peer logo
Displaying results 781 - 810 of 1425 in total
Conference Session
Computers in Education Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James Riddell, Baker College, Flint; Anca L. Sala, Baker College; Tom Spendlove, Baker College, Flint
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
. Thurston, S. Hundley, “Enhancing Student Classroom Engagement through SocialNetworking Technology”, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.3. L. Frehill, A. Lain, C. Didion, “Destination Unknown: Gender Differences in Attrition from Graduate Study inEngineering”, 2010 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.4. J.K. Estell, “Connecting with Alumni: An Experiment In Social Networking Using Facebook Groups”, 2009ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.5. ABET, “2010-2011 Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs.” http://www.abet.org/Linked%20Documents-UPDATE/Criteria%20and%20PP/E001%2010-11%20EAC%20Criteria%201-27-10.pdf Page 22.1707.6
Conference Session
Design Communications & Cognition I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tiffany Tseng, Stanford University; Maria Yang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Daniel Frey for consenting to use his course as acontext for this study and also thank the students for their participation. The work described inthis paper was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Award 0830134. Theopinions, findings, conclusions and recommendations expressed are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors. Page 22.1501.15References1. Hsi, S., Linn, M., and Bell, J. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158.2. Sorby, S. (2009). Educational
Conference Session
Sustainability and Humanitarian Engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Khanjan Mehta, Penn State University; Duarte B. Morais, North Carolina State University; Yu Zhao, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
experience with the team project. If you speak about thecontents of the focus group outside the group it is expected that you will not tell others whatindividual participants said. Please let us know what you think. 1. To start off this conversation, I’d like to know more about you: a. Please state your name, major(s), and minor(s) b. Please take a minute to explain the MTR project in your own words. c. List three things you learned (specifically) while working on this project. 2. In what way has participation in the MTR project shaped your global awareness and understanding (of other people and cultures). Please give an example. 3. You may consider yourself a
Conference Session
ELD Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James A. Van Fleet, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Libraries
, evidence and narrative. Cheshire, Conn.: Graphics Press.3. Foenix-Riou, B. (2006). When search engines play at maps: Visualization technologies. Online, 30(2), 29-32.4. Marcinko, R., & Arnold, S. (2009). Grokker mystery : Beyond search. Retrieved 2/18/2011, 2011, from http://arnoldit.com/wordpress/2009/08/22/grokker-mystery/5. IBM Research, & IBM Cognos Software Group. (2010). Many eyes. Retrieved 2/22/2011, 2011, from http://www-958.ibm.com/software/data/cognos/manyeyes/6. Simboli, B. D. (2008). Web of science's "citation mapping" tool. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, (54), 5-5. http://www.istl.org/08-summer/electronic-1.html7. Luther, J., Kelly, M., & Beagle, D. (2005). Visualize this. Library Journal
Conference Session
Issues Affecting Engineering Program Development
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Brian L. Houston, University of Pittsburgh, Johnstown
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
educational system. Why cannot a system develop wherefaculty with research aspirations are balanced by those who have passion for teaching, withouttrying to get “a little bit of everything” from each person? In this way both sets of individualshave the ability to expand there potential to greater heights within their own area of passion.In fact the power structure of most of academia is held by those who have doctorates, and believethat this is the single criteria for exclusion. This is in part due to the diversity of criteria acrossthe various technical and non-technical fields. It also has roots in the executive directives of the1960’s to develop a research powerhouse within the United States to compete with cold war
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship Courses and Outcomes II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica R. McCormick, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Beverly Radloff, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Nancy Lamm, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Terri L. Talbert-Hatch, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
they are not in a traditional engineering program nor in the EDDP.Appendix A contains a comprehensive listing of the month and year each survey participantgraduated and Appendix B shows the distribution of responses by engineering discipline.Research QuestionsResearch questions were developed to gather a large amount of data that can be evaluated toanswer the research problems. The questions were compiled using an if/then system in thesurvey tool. The employment questions (3-10) were given based upon the previous question’sresponse. Each participant was asked questions 10-14. The questions are: 1. Month and year of graduation 2. Major(s) 3. When did you receive your first job offer (related to your major)? Month and year 4. Did
Conference Session
Innovations in Computing Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aidsa I. Santiago-Román, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Nayda G. Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez; Cesar A Aceros; Brandeis H Marshall, Purdue University; Eric T. Matson, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Computing & Information Technology
problemsolving task, we explored how technology and engineering students approach solvingcomputational problems. This study is guided under the premise that people’s ways ofexperiencing phenomena result from the unique interaction of their understanding of thephenomena and the situation in which they must apply that understanding 6 . Our ultimate goal isthat by identifying, comparing, and contrasting students’ understandings and strategies toapproach problems, more effective instructional approaches will be identified.Theoretical FrameworksProblem-based learning and Computational thinking theoretical frameworks are merged in thedesign and analysis of this study. Problem-Based learning is a student-centered instructionalstrategy to guide the learner(s
Conference Session
ABET Accreditation, Assessment, and Program Improvement in ECE
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John K. Estell, Ohio Northern University; Stephen M. Williams, Milwaukee School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
(s) made to your program. 6. Has further assessment been made to measure the effectiveness of the change(s) made?The primary modes of assessment asked about were surveys, focus groups, and advisory boards,along with an “other” category to allow for the accounting of other assessment modes. Of the113 responses to this question, 99.1% of the programs reported using one or more surveyinstruments, with 55.8% using paper surveys, 42.5% using e-mail surveys, 60.2% using web-based surveys, and 4.4% using telephone surveys. The next highest used mode was the industrialadvisory board, with 87.6% of the programs indicating their use. Finally, only 43.4% of theprograms reported using focus groups, with 37.2% using alumni focus groups and 33.6
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Jackson, VCU Haptics Lab; Dianne T.V. Pawluk, Virginia Commonwealth University; Curtis R. Taylor, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees
v – cursor velocity (P1 - P0) / t P1 – cursor’s position, found by the equation (P0 + v*t) A, B, C, D – the four corner points of a brick’s rectangular side n – the surface normal to the plane of the brick’s side s – the distance between the cursor’s previous position and intersection point when moved along the direction of vIf t = 1, Page 22.495.10 Figure 6: Diagram of collision detection algorithm.The collision detection algorithm has to locate the plane intersection point where thebrick’s surface exists and to determine if the intersection point is within the four cornersof the brick’s side. The
Conference Session
Innovative Methods to Teach Engineering to URMs
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jean Kampe, Michigan Technological University; Douglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
Alternative high school weatherization of homes, and environmental and economic analysis of project(s). Mohawk, MI 49950 Grades: 10-128 Melvindale High School Randy Thomas: Number of Students: 37 Cyber Cards: Design and build a hybrid or Michigan Tech large urban city Physics, Chemistry Minority: 13 fuel cell vehicle & Public high school (Gr.9-12) Women: 10 NSF - ITEST
Conference Session
Innovations in Power Engineering Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Seyed Mousavinezhad, Idaho State University, (first, corresponding author)
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
AC 2011-554: ELECTRIC ENERGY AND POWER EDUCATIONAL PRO-GRAMS DEVELOPMENT SYMPOSIUMS. Hossein Mousavinezhad, T. E. Schlesinger, Michael R. Lightner, Mark J. Smith, Langis Roy, Barry J. Sulli-van, S. S. (Mani) Venkata, and Anthony Kuh, Idaho State University (first, corresponding author) BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION S. Hossein Mousavinezhad, Ph.D. Professor and Chair, Department of Electrical Engineering and Com- puter Science, Idaho State University Dr. Mousavinezhad is an active member of IEEE and ASEE having chaired sessions in national and regional conferences. He is an ABET Program Evaluator (PEV) for Elec- trical Engineering and Computer Engineering. He was General Chair of the IEEE 2009 International Elec- tro
Conference Session
Students' Abilities and Attitudes
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John R. Reisel, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee; Leah Rineck; Marissa Jablonski, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Ethan V Munson, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; Hossein Hosseini, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Tagged Divisions
Mathematics
Policy (COSEPUP), 2007.3. Bochis, C., Hsia, S., Johnson, P., Boykin, K., Wood, S., Bowen, L, and Whitaker, K. “Integrated EngineeringMath-Based Summer Bridge Program for Student Retention”, Proceedings of the 2007 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.4. Fletcher, S. L., Newell, D.C., Newton, L.D., and Anderson-Rowland, M. “The WISE Summer Bridge Program:Assessing Student Attrition, Retention, and Program Effectiveness”, Proceedings of the American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2001.5. Varde, K. S. “Effects of Pre-Freshman Program for Minority Students in Engineering”, Proceedings of the 2004American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Conference Session
Persistence and Retention II: Curricular Issues
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
potential for widespreadapplication.Bibliography[1] MIDFIELD, "Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development", 2011.[2] Ohland, M., M. Camacho, R. Layton, R. Long, S. Lord, and M. Wasburn, "How we measure success makes a difference: Eight-semester persistence and graduation rates for female and male engineering students", 2009 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14, 2009 - June 17, 2009, Austin, TX, United states: American Society for Engineering Education, 2009, pp. BOEING.[3] Ohland, M.W., S.D. Sheppard, G. Lichtenstein, O. Eris, D. Chachra, and R.A. Layton," Persistence, engagement, and migration in engineering programs", Journal of Engineering
Conference Session
Two Year-to-Four Year Transfer Topics Part II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kevin Lemoine, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board; James K. Nelson, University of Texas, Tyler; Lynn L. Peterson, University of Texas, Arlington; James Sells, San Jacinto College, Central Campus; Mary Eileen Smith, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board
Tagged Divisions
Two Year College Division
, University of Texas, Arlington Dr. Peterson is Sr. Associate Dean of Engineering for Academic Affairs at U. Texas Arlington College of Engineering, and is Professor of Computer Science and Engineering. Her Ph.D. is in medical computer science from U. Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Research interests are in artificial intelligence, engineering education and medical computer science. She is a member of the UT Arlington Academy of Distinguished Teachers.James Sells, San Jacinto College Central Campus Professor James Sells teaches mathematics at San Jacinto College (SJC) in Pasadena, Texas (a suburb or Houston). He has a B. S. degree in Mathematics, an M. S. in Mathematics, and an M. S. in Petroleum Engineering, all
Conference Session
Emerging Areas: Biotechnology, Microtechnology, and Energy
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Claire Komives, San Jose State University; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University; Theresa A. Good, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Laurent Simon, New Jersey Institute of Technology; John P. O'Connell, University of Virginia; Jeffrey John Chalmers, Ohio State University, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering; Erik Fernandez, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
Genencor, a Danisco Division, where she developed a metabolic flux model for an enzyme production process. Additionally, after her postdoctoral research at the ETH-Zurich, she obtained a Science and Diplomacy Fellowship from the American As- sociation for the Advancement of Science to spend a year working in the U. S. Agency for International Development providing technical expertise to the Child Health Research Project which promoted research targeting the reduction of child mortality in third world countries. She has 19 publications and 2 patents, has received over $1MM in grants since joining SJSU. She currently serves on the Executive Committee of the ACS Biochemical Technology Division and on the advisory board of
Conference Session
International Experience, Effective Instruction, and Student Exchange Programs
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Waddah Akili, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
International
instructor, would be gearedtowards relevant technical and nontechnical issues that had a bearing on the case. In this secondsession, all seven groups that made up the class contributed to the discussion. In the thirdsession, an invited speaker, a practitioner, would address the class, focusing on real issues andconcerns that only practitioners could address. During the final fifteen minutes of the thirdsession, the instructor would summarize the case pointing in the direction of: lesson(s) learned,discrepancies, if any, and how the presented case would relate to and/ or supplement theknowledge students have been exposed to in previous courses.Getting off to a good start is vital, so the first class session was an ideal opportunity to be clearabout
Conference Session
Focus on Capstone Experiences in the Chemical Engineering Curriculum
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Philip H. Harding, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
operations lab experiments and provides instruction for the virtualbioreactor. Dr. David Hackleman developed CBEE 416 and served as the Linus PaulingEngineer for 5 years. The authors are indebted to numerous practicing engineers for sharingtheir time and experiences with students. Finally, several faculty members sponsor seniorprojects, committing resources and knowledge.References1. Feisel, L. D. and A. J. Rosa. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. J. Eng. Educ., 94, 121–130.2. Wankat, P.C. and F.S. Oreovicz. (1993). Teaching engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.3. ABET Website, http://www.abet.org/, retrieved Jan. 2011.4. Dutson, A., R. Todd, S. Magleby, and C. Sorensen. 1997. A Review of Literature
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship Courses and Outcomes II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anthony Marchese, Colorado State University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
, environmental and health problems in the developing worldthrough the formation of innovative business structures that disseminate these products on thewidest appropriate scale. The GIC has played a central role in facilitating the spinoff of a varietyof CSU-related business ventures such as Envirofit [9] and Solix Biofuels [10]. Figure 1 showsan example of the GIC approach wherein research on clean cookstoves at the EECL (Fig. 1a)was transformed into a viable product (Fig. 1b) by the non-profit corporation Envirofit, whichrecently partnered with the Shell Foundation to produce and sell 10 million clean-burning stovesover the next 5 years. Figure 1 (a) Cookstove research at CSU and (b) the Envirofit S-2100 cookstove in use in India.Putting it All
Conference Session
Laboratories and Projects in BME
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical
Agrawal R. Programming games to learn algorithms. Proceedings of theASEE Conference 2007.3. Bowen J. Motivating civil engineering students to learn computer programming with astructural design project. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference 2004.4. Bundy D. Four steps to teaching C programming. Proceedings of the Frontiers in EducationConference 2002.5. Clough D. Teaching introductory computing to ChE students - A modern computing coursewith emphasis on problem solving and programming. Proceedings of the ASEE Conference2002.6. Clough D, Chapra S and Huvard G. A change in approach to engineering computing forfreshmen - Similar directions at three dissimilar institutions. Proceedings of the ASEEConference 2001
Conference Session
Design Tools & Methodology I
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pedro Renato Acosta, University of Texas, El Paso; Rafael Gonzalez, University of Texas, El Paso; Noe Vargas Hernandez, University of Texas, El Paso
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
for options. For example, adesign engineer may use brainstorming for all occasions; there can be various reasons for this, Page 22.174.4some of them understandable. First, learning a new method may require some time, further,identifying which method is more appropriate to learn for the particular design problem can bedifficult. The knowledge or expertise to identify which method(s) are most appropriate for eachdesign problem, takes time to develop, and when considering multiple areas or disciplines in thedesign process, one can imagine the difficulty of becoming expert in more than one area (e.g.design quality, design creativity, sustainable
Conference Session
Teams and Teamwork in Design
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rob O. Hovsapian, Florida State Univeristy ; Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State University; Bruce A. Harvey, Florida A&M University/Florida State University, College of Engineering; Okenwa I. Okoli, Florida A&M University/Florida State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
capstone senior design course objectives and outcomes are met, the senior designteams and each student is evaluated by course instructor, faculty advisor(s), two or more in thecase of the multidisciplinary teams, peer evaluation, external sponsors, Mechanical EngineeringAdvisory Council (MEAC) and by senior exit interviews. These evaluations are conductedthrough presentations, reports, staff meeting and Peer self evaluations. Grading rubrics weredeveloped for assessment during the course. It was established to assess the students on the courseobjectives and student outcomes as set forth in the course syllabus. During the two semesters the teams present their project a total seven times. During the 1stsemester the team has three presentations
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Division Poster Session
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adeel Khalid, Southern Polytechnic State University; Chyna Kristin Vaughn
Tagged Divisions
Systems Engineering
Transportation Policy: Funding Metro Atlanta’s Transportation Needs, Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, 2010. 2. Goodwill, J. & Hendricks, S. Building Transit Oriented Development in Established Communities. Center for Urban Transportation Research (CUTR). Tampa, FL. November 2002. Helling, Amy. The Effect of Residential Accessibility to Employment on Men’s and Women’s Travel. George State University. Women’s Travel Issues; Proceedings from the Second National Conference. 3. 2007 Atlanta Regional Commuter Survey, 20-County Nonattainment Area, Survey Key Findings. Georgia Department of Transportation 4. Wolf, J. ,Guensler, R. ,Washington, S. & Lawrence, F. Use of Electronic Travel Diaries and Vehicle
Conference Session
Research on Engineering Design Education
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Gül E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University; Hyun Kyoung Ro, Penn State University; Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
design and problem solving throughout theirundergraduate curricula. Findings are drawn from the Prototyping the Engineer of 2020: A 360-degree Study of Effective Education (P360) and Prototype to Production: Processes and Conditionsfor Preparing the Engineer of 2020 (P2P) projects. P360’s qualitative data from six case studiesexamines concrete examples of effective design curricula and co-curricular activities. P2P, whichcollected quantitative data from 31 four-year engineering schools to provide information on thestructure of the design curriculum in nearly 120 engineering programs, augments the qualitativedata from P360. Both projects collected data from multiple sources: faculty, program chairs,administrators, and undergraduate engineering
Collection
2011 ASEE Midwest Section Conference
Authors
Michael Reynolds; Nick Huisman
Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education,” EducauseQuarterly, Nov. 4, 2006, pp. 22-30. Proceedings of the 2011 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 6[3] Hiltz, S., and Turoff, Murray, “Education Goes Digital: The Evolution of Online Learning and the Revolution inHigher Education,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 48, Issue 10, Oct. 2005, pp. 59-64.[4] Bourne, J, Harris, D., and Mayadas, F., “Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime,” Journalof Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, Jan. 1995, pp. 131-146.[5] ASEE Prism, March 2009, pp. 22-23.[6] College Board, Trends in
Collection
2011 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Edward M. Land; Michael Marcus; Aaron Abugaber; Rohit Dayal; Noah Greenbaum; Sally Hong; Jon Hunt; Joseph Saltzman
- releases; review same with instructor.Internship(s): Prospective BME, ME, EE & 1st and 2nd yr Medical Student Research Assistants.Work assignments- Your team will develop a strategy, adopt a design, compare and contrastworkable ideas through synergistic team collaborations working with 2-3 RAs (max). Yourgroup shall include observations and findings, through the elimination of less robust designs infavor of simpler, more aggressive, and better suited ones. Selected students/RAs will be assignedto continuously review the on-going progress of competitive device designs and report theirweekly progress/status to other classmates. 441Graduate students or special students such as those receiving grants
Collection
2011 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
Warren Rosen
graphicalnetwork traffic simulator used for packet-level performance analysis of metrics such as throughputand delay. To use it components such as routers, hosts, servers, etc. are dragged from variousmenus and then connect them up in the desired topology. Figure 3 shows a typical screenshot of anetwork defined in this way. It shows three hosts connected through a local 100 Mb/s Ethernetswitch to a cable that provides an Internet connection through a WAN to three remote servers.OPNET provides accurate models of real commercial devices—note in the figure that the model fora real, commercially available Linksys cable modem is being used. They also have models for all 577popular protocols and you can
Collection
2011 Pacific Southwest Section Meeting
Authors
Rafael D. Alvarez; Raga M. Bakhiet; Theresa M. Garcia; Angeline V. Yang
growth inSan Diego.Advances in Science and Engineering (S&E) are ever more critical for the U.S. to maintain itsposition of leadership in STEM and keep its competitive edge in the global marketplace5,15, yetthe “new” American dilemma is ever more urgent in the 21st century, given that minorities remainseriously underrepresented in science and engineering, while they are also the most rapidly growingsegment of the population4. As reported in a 2010 report, Expanding Underrepresented MinorityParticipation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads5: Underrepresented minority groups comprised 28.5 percent of our national population in 2006, yet just 9.1 percent of college-educated Americans in science and engineering
Collection
2011 Northeast Section Meeting
Authors
Ying Yu
the potential to fullyengage every student. Whether a student is engaged in “instructing” or “beinginstructed”, s/he will be involved in one-to-one interaction, thus will give and be givenfull attention. While students who are less informed on a certain topic catching upthrough the instruction of peer students, the students who are fast-learners will be able tofurther clarify and better their own understanding of the topic by debating and explicitlyarticulating their thinking. “Clickers1” is also known as “audience voting system” or “instant pollingsystem”. Three basic elements make up a typical audience response system: pollingsoftware (similar to Powerpoint, but also let you collect data and organize them),response keypads (similar
Collection
2011 Northeast Section Meeting
Authors
Louis Manzione; Akram Abu-aisheh
with extensive customer interface.References[1] J. Goentzel, L. Manzione, R. Piberink, J. Pruett, and B. Thiessen. “ StrategicDevelopment of Specialized Testing and Remanufacturing in a Global High Tech SupplyChain.” International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 11(1)P28, 2007.[2] Arntzen, B., Brown, G., Harrison, T., and Trafton, L. (1995), “Global supply chainmanagement at Digital Equipment Corporation,” Interfaces, Vol.25, No.1, pp. 69-93.[3] Beamon, B. and Fernandes, C. (2004), “Supply-chain network configuration forproduct recovery,” Production Planning and Control, Vol.15, No.3, pp. 270-281.[4] Cohen, M. and Huchzermeier, A. (1998), “Global Supply Chain Management: ASurvey of Research and Applications,” in Tayur, S
Collection
2011 Northeast Section Meeting
Authors
Jeremy Li
Structures, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2003, p. 57-61.[2]. Pijush. K. Kundu and Ira. M. Cohen, “Fluid Mechanics”, 4th edition, Academic Press, 2008, ISBN 978-0-123-73735-9.[3] J. Chakraborty, N. Verma and R.P. Chhabra, “Wall effects in the flow past a circular Cylinder in a lane channel: a numerical study”, Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol. 43, 2004, p. 1520 - 1537.[4] S. A. Isaev, P.A. Baranov, N. A. Kudryavtsev, D. A. Lysenkoand, and A. E. Usachov, “Comparative analysis of the calculation data on an unsteady flow around a circular cylinder obtained using the VP2/3 and Fluent packages and the Spalart-Allmaras and Menter turbulence models”, Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, Vol. 78, No.6, 2005, p. 1199