for Mathematics Identity,” Child Dev., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1048–1062, Jul. 2015.[17] C. A. P. Cass, Z. Hazari, J. Cribbs, P. M. Sadler, and G. Sonnert, “Examining the impact of mathematics identity on the choice of engineering careers for male and female students,” in 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011, p. F2H–1–F2H–5.[18] J. E. Stets and P. J. Burke, “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory,” Soc. Psychol. Q., vol. 63, no. 3, p. 224, Sep. 2000.[19] J. E. Stets and R. T. Serpe, “Identity Theory,” Springer, Dordrecht, 2013, pp. 31–60.[20] R. Jenkins, Social identity. Routledge, 2014.[21] E. H. Erikson, “Autobiographic notes on the identity crisis,” Daedalus, 1970.[22] J. P. Gee, “Chapter 3 : Identity
3 3 M. Navigation skills 3 3 N. Hands-on skills 3 2 O. Working under pressure 3 2 P. Living independently 3 2 Q. Problem-solving skills 3 2 R. Organization skills 3 2 Attitudes A. Hard-working 11 5 B. Perception of Chinese people-friendly 8 5 C. Empathy 8 1 D. Perception of Chinese
://48ba3m4eh2bf2sksp43rq8kk-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/2018/12/UDHR70_AI.pdf [Accessed Jan. 30, 2019][50] H. Sloan, Human Rights and IoT: The Right to Fair and Decent Work. Dec. 13, 2018. Available at: https://medium.com/iotforall/human-rights-and-iot-the-right-to-fair-and-decent-work-23a97bab25d4 [Accessed Jan. 20, 2019][51] R. Rincon, “What’s the gender pay gap in engineering?” All Together - SWE Blog. April 20 2018. https://alltogether.swe.org/2018/04/pay-gap-in-engineering/ [Accessed October 20, 2018].[52] E.A. Cech, “Ideological wage inequalities?: the technical/social dualism and the gender wage gap in engineering,” Social Forces, vol. 91 (4), pp. 1147-1182, June 2013.[53] J.R. Mihelcic, C.C. Naughton, M.E. Verbyla, Q
, vol. 9, C. Harteis, A. Rausch, and J. Seifried, Eds. Springer Science, 2014, pp. 189–210.[22] W. C. Newstetter, E. Behravesh, N. J. Nersessian, and B. B. Fasse, “Design Principles for Problem-Driven Learning Laboratories in Biomedical Engineering Education,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 3257– 3267, 2010.[23] R. Razzouk and V. Shute, “What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 330–348, Aug. 2012.[24] D. D. Pratt, J. B. Collins, and S. J. Selinger, “Development and Use of The Teaching Perspectives Inventory ( TPI ),” pp. 1–9, 2001.[25] D. D. Pratt, “Conceptions of Teaching,” Adult Educ. Q., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 203–220, 1992.[26] G. Hall, S. Loucks, W
] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation and research methods. (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 2002.[39] D. R. Thomas, A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, vol. 27, pp. 237-246, 2006.[40] J. C. Richard and S. Y. Yoon, “Impact of undergraduate research experiences on diverse national and international undergraduate researchers”. Proceedings of the 125th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2018.
high attrition rates among science, mathematics & engineering undergraduate majors: final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on an ethnographic inquiry at seven institutions. Ethnography and Assessment Research, Bureau of Sociological Research, University of Colorado, 1994.[4] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Leaving engineering: A multi‐year single institution study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 6-27, January 2012.[5] J. Gill, M. Ayre and J. Mills, “Revisioning the Engineering Profession: How to Make It Happen!,” In Gender and Diversity: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, Vol. 1, IGI Global. 2019, pp. 427-442.[6] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan and J. Tang
] H. M. Matusovich, R.A Streveler, and R. L. Miller, “Why Do Students Choose Engineering? A Qualitative, Longitudinal Investigation of Student’s Motivational Values,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 289- 303, October 2010. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01064.x. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[7] Q. Li, D. B. McCoach, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of an Instrument to Measure Perspectives on Engineering Education Among College Students,” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 47-56, January 2008. [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00953.x. [Accessed January 13, 2019].[8] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein
environment,” Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 2000, 30-43.2. Bishop, J. L., M.A. Verleger, “The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of Research,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Atlanta, GA (2013).3. Foertsch, J., G. Moses, J. Strikwerda, M. Litzkow, “Reversing the Lecture/Homework Paradigm Using eTEACH Web-based Streaming video Software,” Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 2002, 267-274.4. Talbert, R. “Learning MATLAB in the Inverted Classroom,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, San Antonio, TX (2012).5. Kecskemety, K. M., B. Morin, “Student Perceptions of Inverted Classroom Benefits in a First-Year Engineering Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2014).6. Stickel, M., S. Hari, Q
provides insight to the up and coming technology. Ms. Monereau, presently is an active member of the Associated General Contractors (AGC), American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), and the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Through her tenure within these organizations she has served on the Board of Directors for NSBE, and multiple leadership roles throughout her undergraduate career with AGC and ASME. For more insight into her research, review her paper: Reality in the Nuclear Industry: Augmented, Mixed, and Virtual (https://peer.asee.org/?q=monereau).Dr. Makita R. PhillipsMs. Arielle M. Benjamin
. Some seminars are delivered by individuals, and some are delivered by aportion, or all, of the project team. Some seminars are 30 minutes long, and some are 3 hours induration. Some constitute a series over multiple days. Significant time for discussion and Q&A isprovided at the end of each seminar. A survey instrument is used to assess the impact of theseminar. Overall, the seminars have been very well received, as evinced by survey data presentedin a later section of this paper. The following section provides examples of the kind of materialthat is presented in these seminars.Ingenuity in NatureAccording to Mechanical Engineering Professor Robert L. Norton, a machine is defined as “asystem of elements arranged to transmit motion [and
, Chubin DE. A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. J Eng Educ. 2003;92(1):27 – 39.15. Haden C. Evaluating support for underrepresented students in engineering degree programs. In: Proceedings of 114th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.; 2007.16. Roberts S, Bray K, Shishodia V, et al. Evaluation of retention and other benefits of a fifteen-year residential bridge program for underrepresented engineering students. In: Proceedings of 116th ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition. Austin, TX; 2009.17. Ackermann SP. The benefits of summer bridge programs for underrepresented and low income transfer students. Community Jr Coll Res Q Res Pract. 1991;15(2):211–224
classroom as wellas instructing students to watch online video modules ahead of face-to-face session. Interactiveproblem solving and Q & A still comprised a good part of the classroom activities.The following sections describe the new curriculum developed to support the power industry(Section 2), teaching the Power Electronics course for the first and second year (Section 3),course assessment, results and findings (Section 4), and Conclusions (Section 5).II. New Curriculum Supporting Power IndustryAt (…) University, the engineering and engineering technology curricula have been currentlydeveloping to support the power industry in the region. Specifically, the electrical engineeringcurriculum was selected to comprise two common fundamental
. (2014). Women of Color engineering faculty : An examination of the experiences and the numbers An Examination of the Numbers : African American Female Faculty in. In 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.11. Yoder, B. (2011). Engineering by the numbers, 11–47.12. Blake, S. (1999). Mentoring dilemmas: Developmental relationships within multicultural organizations (p. 288). Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press.13. Malcom, S. M., Hall, P. Q., & Brown, J. W. (1976). The double bind : The price of being a minority woman in science (pp. 1–79).14. Adams, M., Anne Bell, L., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching for diversity and social justice (Second.). New York: Routledge.15. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought
to teach new classes. They tend to vote with their feet, attending events as long as theyfind them valuable. On average, 60% of the junior STEM faculty attended each cohort event.Women STEM faculty represented 55% of the attendees. Meeting scheduling tools such asdoodle.com have helped us identify meeting times that suit the largest number of faculty.Table 2 – Responses of new STEM faculty involved in mentoring cohort program to survey questions New STEM Faculty Cohort Events (Luncheon Program) Rating* Introduction of new STEM faculty to recent cohorts & STEM guide distribution 4.9 Informal Q&A session with critical university grants administrator 4.1 Faculty
these service courses and need to be reminded of their importance to the major. Theexample given in the paper involves liberal arts students required to take a technical course inaeronautics. The reflective essay was proposed as an excellent way to have the students find theintersection of their major with the service course. Page 26.598.11Bibliography1. ABET Criterion 3 a-k, http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3143 accessed on February 1, 2015.2. Nankervis, K., “Service Teaching: Student experiences, issues and future directions at RMIT,” http://emedia.rmit.edu.au/edjournal/?q=node/326, accessed on January
research (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.[28] Greene, J.C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.[29] Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.[30] Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 69-91.[31] Abes, E. S., Jones, S. R., & McEwen, M. K. (2007). Reconceptualizing the model of multiple dimensions of identity: The role of meaning-making capacity in the construction of multiple identities. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 1-22.[32] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985
engineersresponded with the following. “By my observation, the biggest benefit of the capstone class is that it forces the students to draw upon the body of knowledge that they have developed to-date and to apply that knowledge in a fashion that is not already pre-defined for them.”Practicing engineers also provided feedback and suggestions for how the course could beimproved to better prepare students for their careers. “In lieu of having a few folks serve as general advisors to the class, I would suggest soliciting the help from additional practicing engineers. You could then have each of those individuals assigned to a specific team. They could arrange for a weekly Q&A session. I anticipate that each group
), 1993, pp. n1.2. W. C. Lee, Providing Co-Curricular Support: A Multi-Case Study of Engineering Student Support Centers, 2015: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.3. V. Tinto, Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nd, Series University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1994.4. R. K. Yin, Case study research: Design and methods, 4, Series Sage, 2009.5. R. E. Stake, Multiple case study analysis, Series The Guilford Press New York, 2006.6. Carnegie Foundation. The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. 2015 January 24]; Available from: http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/.7. M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, Series
strongleaders and strong engineers.T ABLE 1 : S AMPLE S URVEY Q UESTIONS Survey Sample Question Focus CodesectionPart 1: Age: 20-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-59; 60+ Self Demographics (AgeDemographics Category)Part 2: As a student, when dreaming about my future, I Self Time (student)Student imagined doing technically complex work. Situationexperiences (1 never, 2 rarely, 3 occasionally, 4 frequently, 5 (aspiration/satisfaction
. Educational Theory 45 (2): 1-22.26. Giffney, N. (2009). Introduction: The “q” Word. In N. Giffney, ed., The Ashgate Research Companion to Queer Theory (pp. 1-13). Farnham, Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing27. Adams, R.S., et al. (2011). Multiple Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers. Journal of Engineering Education 100 (1): 48-88.28. Davis, L. J. (2014). Disabilities Studies Reader, 4th Edition. New York: Taylor & Francis.29. Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.30. Slaton, A.E. (2010). Race, Rigor and Selectivity in US Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color-Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.31. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political
1 u 2 u v2 dq 2 2 1 p 2 dp (21) Page 26.1273.8 1 o2 owhere o tan o is the projection slope. For the initial conditions stated in Eqs. (16) and (17),observe that v 1 when u o , and also recognize that p and q are merely dummy variablesof integration. After the indicated operations are performed, Eq. (21) yields
/508.pdf 4. National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004. 5. Qazi, S., Khalid. A., and Malik, Q., Incorporating New Trends and Teaching Methodologies: Improving State of Engineering Education in Pakistan. Proceeding of ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013. 6. http://www.pec.org.pk/ 7. Skinner, E. A., and Belmont, M. J., Motivation in the class room: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student behavior across the school year. Journal of Education Psychology, 85(4), 1993 8. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., and Gonyea, R. M., Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on
challenging team scenario of engineering students attempting to worktogether. During this activity, the actors and actresses manifest common difficulties onengineering teams, including gender dynamics, miscommunications, misunderstandings, andother frustrations that emerge from teamwork. Afterwards, the facilitator leads a discussion withthe students, including a Q&A session between students and the actors and actresses in character.The interactive theater sketch ends with an invitation for the audience to brainstorm strategies toimprove interactions within teams. The actors/actresses then re-enact their scenario, butincorporate the suggested strategies to improve their synergy. Findings suggest that theinteractive theater sketch can help
interestof this manuscript is the fact that this elementary education program is 100%engineering driven.BackgroundThere are many approaches to introducing engineering into the elementary schoolenvironment. Many of these pathways have been presented at the American Associationfor Engineering Education annual conference. The Society conducts workshops on thistopic and has also published papers on various approaches. Readers are encouraged toexplore the ASEE website, https://www.asee.org/search?q=elementary+education , formore details. The DLJ program was developed in partnership with the University ofSouth Florida College of Engineering; a National Science Foundation designatedRegional Center for Advanced Technological Education in
, A. V. (2012). A realistic look at STEM and the role of community colleges. Community College Review, 40, 2.12. Harland, D. J. (2011). STEM Student Research Handbook. National Science Teachers Association.13. Heinze, N., & Hu, Q. (2009). Why college undergraduates choose IT: A multi-theoretical perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 18 (5), 462-475.14. Houston, R. & Heflin, M. (2015) Go flight! the unsung heroes of mission control, 1965-1992. Library of congress catalog.15. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational psychology review, 16(3), 235-266.16. Jones, J. (2010). Closing the Gender Gap, Civil Engineering, 80, 7, 60-63.17. Lent, R
, 2010.[8] B. A. Smikle Jr., “Solving Minority Underrepresentation In STEM Careers,” TheHill, 06-Mar-2015. .[9] R. Boege, “North Carolina’s 2015 STEM Report Card,” The Alliance for Science & Technology Research in America, Washington DC, 2015.[10] J. U. Ogbu and H. D. Simons, “Voluntary and Involuntary Minorities: A Cultural-Ecological Theory of School Performance with Some Implications for Education,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 155–188, 1998.[11] A. L. Harris, “I (don’t) hate school: revisiting oppositional culture theory of blacks’ resistance to schooling,” Soc. Forces, vol. 85, no. 2, p. 797+, Dec. 2006.[12] I. A. Toldson and D. Owens, “Editor’s Comment: ‘Acting Black’: What Black Kids
design for innovative concept generation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(5).24. Fila, N. D., Hess, J. L., Dringenberg, E., & Purzer, Ş. (in press). Exploring the role of empathy in a decontextualized engineering design task. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2).25. Postma, C. E., Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E., Daemen, E., & Du, J. (2012). Challenges of doing empathic design: Experiences from industry. International Journal of Design, 6(1), 59-70.26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283.27. Young, R. A., & Collin, A. (2004). Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism
. Capobianco BM, French BF, Diefes-Du HA. Engineering Identity Development Among Pre-Adolescent Learners. J Eng Educ. 2012;101(4):698-716. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01125.x.20. Markus H, Nurius P. Possible selves. Am Psychol. 1986;41(9):954-969.21. Shavelson RJ, Marsh RW. On the structure of self-concept. In: Schwarzer R, ed. Self-Related Cognitions in Anxiety and Motivation. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1986:305-330.22. Brown Q, Burge JD. MOTIVATE: Bringing out the fun with 3d printing and e-textiles for middle- And high-school girls. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. ; 2014:24.915.1- 24.915.12.23. Lyon GH, Jafri J, St. Louis K. Beyond the Pipeline: STEM Pathways for
: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. (2006).5. STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. (The National Academies Press, 2014).6. Mau, W. Factors that influence persistence in science and engineering career aspirations. Career Dev. Q. 51, 234–243 (2003).7. Nicholls, G. M., Wolfe, H., Besterfield-Sacre, M. & Shuman, L. J. Predicting STEM degree outcomes based on eighth grade data and standard test scores. J. Eng. Educ. 209–224 (2010).8. Schunn, C. D. How kids learn engineering: The cognitive science perspective. Bridg. 32–37 (2009).9. Wang, X. Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of