, and validation lifecycle.III. program launchThe Capstone Experience was originally designed as a 5 credit-hour, one-quarter-long projectcourse. Projects were solicited from internal faculty and from local industry, tapping into thecontacts of members of the EE Advisory Board. A faculty member (the author) was the facultyadvisor and, in lieu of charging companies to participate in the Capstone program as someschools do, each company was asked only to provide material support, such as the cost offabricating a printed circuit board, and provide an engineering mentor for the team. The mentor2 The author is quite knowledgeable about the technology lifecycle, having come late to teaching after spending themajority of his professional career as an
the construction, start-up, and op- eration of a $50M optical fiber factory in Suzhou, China where he was the sole in-country representative of his US-based company. Following China, Peter joined the RVCC Science and Engineering Department in Fall 2014 where he instructs Physics and Engineering courses and also remains the Chief Technology Officer of the China company. He holds a BS in Chemistry and MS and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Laser Music – Authentic Engineering Product Development for a Real Customer T. Rokosky, J. Rodriguez, K
universities and amajor professional society. Libraries are transdisciplinary spaces that promote interaction andcollaboration. We are exploring ways to tap into this interest – including a follow on panel composedentirely of student and recent graduate entrepreneurs alongside speakers from corporations, andcompetitions that exercise entrepreneurial thinking.PITCH CompetitionDuring a one month period in the academic quarter following the panel discussion, Drexel UniversityLibraries and the College of Engineering jointly-hosted a blended online competition for students to craftideas for new technology-driven startups. The goal was to engage students across disciplines in thesimulated entrepreneurial experience of pitching an idea in a mock “Series A
and The Built Environment Engineering at Arizona State University. She holds a B.S. and a B.A.Econ degree from Beijing University, and received her M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil and Coastal Engineering from the University of Florida. Before ASU, she worked at the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Lou is very passionate about teaching and education research. In her teaching, she always emphasizes not just the ”how” but also the ”why” by providing background information on broader issues of the discipline and insights into theories and procedures. Dr. Lou has introduced active learning technologies (such as Clickers) to engage students more effectively
Proceedings of 2017 St. Lawrence section of the American Society for Engineering Education & the New York Cyber Security & Engineering Technology Association COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACROSS DISCIPLINES: ENGINEERING WITHIN THE SERVICE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Edward T. Davis, M.S., R.A.: Queensborough Community College, CUNY Tony Monahan, PhD: Queensborough Community College, CUNYAbstract Working within an interdisciplinary service learning environment fosters informationsharing; donning those “many hats” by incorporating contributions of all participatingdisciplines. The “Tiger Trails” project was designed to facilitate collaboration between facultyand students in different departments
/showAward?AWD_ID=1449489Cech, E. (2014). Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(1), 42-72.Cech, E. A. (2010). Trained to Disengage? A Longitudinal Study of Social Consciousness and Public Engagement Among Engineering Students. American Society for Engineering Education.Cruz, J., & Frey, W. (2003). An Effective Strategy for Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum in Engineering: An ABET 2000 Challenge. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9, 543-568.Deneulin, S. (2014). Wellbeing, Justice and Development Ethics. New York and London: Taylor and Francis.Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Changes in students' use of lifelong learning skills during a problem
School of Engineering and Associate Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at Morgan State University in Baltimore, MD. She earned her bachelor and master of civil engineering degrees from the University of Delaware in 2000 and 2002, respectively, and her doctorate in structural engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in May 2007. Her research and teaching interests include experimental testing, detailed analytical modeling using state-of-the-art software to study the responses of bridges, structural dynam- ics, bridge engineering, performance-based bridge design using AFRP composite materials, reinforced concrete design, seismic retrofitting of bridges, and engineering education. Dr. Head is a
. A new program, in its second year,leverages over forty years of manufacturing and industrial technology programs with therequirements and demands of an engineering program and an increasingly sophisticatedmanufacturing environment. The four pillars [1] of manufacturing knowledge: materials andmanufacturing processes; product tooling and assembly engineering; manufacturing systems andoperations; and manufacturing competitiveness provides a framework of educating the nextgeneration manufacturing engineers. Much thoughtful design and consideration has taken placefor manufacturing engineering education to adequately recruit and train the manufacturingengineering workforce [2-9]. Because there are in existence accredited manufacturingengineering
Society, the Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology, California Institute of Technology, the College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics at California State University Fullerton, the Office of the Vice Provost for Graduate Education at Stanford University, the School of Medicine at Stanford University, and the School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.Dr. Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #19515Sheri D. Sheppard, Ph.D., P.E., is professor of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Besidesteaching
SecPro app as an educational tool for teaching engineering mechanics Nicolas Ali Libre Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering Department Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla, MO, USA libren@mst.edu Abstract—Incorporation of educational apps into classroom curriculum includinggamification, collaboration, self-learning and assessment apps is a major trend in engineeringeducation. Educational applications either in desktop or mobile devices enable students to learnin a modern context when
significant way, namely that it is designed toprepare students for their upcoming courses more so than directly for their intended careers. Theemphasis in the readings is on both the relevance of EE as it pertains to technology that studentscan relate to, e.g., MP3 players, and to global problems, e.g., energy efficiency, as well as whatwill be taught in various courses that they will see in their next two or three semesters, and lesson “what an electrical engineer does in her/his career.”The course goals are listed and discussed below:1. Expose students to a wide range of EE-related topics. The choice of topics is necessarily limited by the constraints of a single semester, so it is not possible to discuss many of the areas of electrical
ABET-accredited program. The subset of the undergraduatepopulation that transfers into an engineering program" has become significant as the UnitedStates looks to ameliorate the erosion of its preeminence in science and technology in the world"[2]. According to the Committee of Science, Engineering, and Public Policy and the NationalScience Board as reported by Ashby, "the decline of U.S. born baccalaureate and graduatedegreed engineers and scientists and increasing global competition for engineers and scientists,there are those that argue that the very security and future economic prosperity of the country isthreatened if the U.S. does not reverse these trends" [2].The role played by two-year programs is an "integral part in engineering
of undergraduate electro- magnetics texts and has won several awards related to teaching. He is the department’s undergraduate Program Director and Chair of its Curriculum and Assessment Committee.Prof. Mark Lee Adams, Auburn University Dr. Adams earned his Bachelor of Electrical Engineering degree from Auburn in 1997. Dr. Adams com- pleted his M.S. (2000) and Ph.D. (2004) in electrical engineering with an emphasis on biophysics and nanofabrication at the California Institute of Technology. He joined Auburn University as an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering in 2014. His interests include smart materials, organic electronics, biologically inspired structures, electromagnetics, photonics
Paper ID #19671Examining student attitudes to improve an undergraduate online engineeringcourseMr. Devayan Debashis Bir, Iowa State UniversityDr. Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017Examining student attitudes to improve an undergraduate online engineering courseAbstractDue to the advent of technology and the world wide web, online engineering courses have gainedprominence and have become a popular way to learn new content. Universities around thecountry, in addition to traditional face-to-face courses, are taking advantage of technology andthe web to
technologies have evolved into dynamic, complex systemsthat profoundly change the world we live in. Designing these systems requires not only technicalknowledge and skills but also new ways of thinking and the development of social, professionaland ethical responsibility. The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) atIowa State University was awarded a National Science Foundation (NSF) grant in 2016 aimed attransforming curricula and practices to better respond to student, industry and society needs. Thisis being done through new structures for faculty collaboration and facilitated throughdepartmental change processes. Ironically, an impetus behind this effort was a failed attempt atdepartment-wide curricular reform. This failure led
(technological, knowledge and skills societal, financial,projects in consecutive courses during the freshman year. The 12. Willingness to environmental, etc.)project connects more than 375 engineering students with work with o. Understands how elements ofeach other as well as approximately 35 high school students individuals with an ecosystem are connectedas customers to instill Curiosity, Connections and Creating different skill sets, p. Identifies and works with expertise
the active, problem-based and experiential learningapproaches previously identified. Engineering educators are using cutting-edge technologies likevirtual reality and 3D printing in the classroom.Engineering educators Enhance and Supplement their courses. Enhancement includes practicesthat draw on the research on teaching and learning14 to help students learn better. Supplements inthe form of text books have long been a staple of the traditional course, however, engineeringeducators are also using supplemental instruction (via teaching assistants) and web resources.This is most evident in the flipped, blended and online formats.About two percent of the codes mapped to the Assessment practice theme. Many of these areconsistent with Angleo and
Suzhou, China where he was the sole in-country representative of his US-based company. Following China, Peter joined the RVCC Science and Engineering Department in Fall 2014 where he instructs Physics and Engineering courses and also remains the Chief Technology Officer of the China company. He holds a BS in Chemistry and MS and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 IllumiNUT Shake-Light Manufacturing: An Engineering/Business Interdisciplinary Supply Chain Project P.R. Stupak, T. Rimple, A. Shapiro, N.V. LaRosa, and S.R. Fegely Department of Science and
were removed as they had notcompleted both questions, leaving 13 male and 12 female respondents. For each of these 13skills the male and female responses were separated into perceptions of the Engineer’s Skill Setand Own Skill Set. Details of five of these skills are found below in Figures 4 through 8. Theremaining data will be included in a future publication. Figure 4: Perception of engineering and self-proficiency with technology by genderEngineering Skill Comparison: Both male and female students perceive engineers to haveExceptional proficiency with technology.Own Skill Comparison: There is an indication that female students perceive their technicalproficiency to be Average, significantly lower than their expectations of the
engineering. While the Internet-of-Things has applications in manydiverse areas and involves several engineering disciplines, Electrical and Computer engineeringtechnologies and methods are its core (i.e. networking, embedded computing, sensing and dataanalysis, Figure 1). Furthermore, IoT is something that everyone is currently seeing proliferatebefore their very own eyes, IoT technologies are tangible and their impact is highly visible. As aresult, students are excited to learn more about IoT and eventually pursue employment in IoT-related fields.Along with the excitement brought about by IoT comes a significant educational challenge,particularly if using IoT as a form of outreach. Even within the domain of Electrical andComputer Engineering, the
empathy in engineering students. Their college of engineering at the University ofGeorgia was established in 2012 with the goal to educate a contemporary engineer who hasexcellent technology skills and is innovative, but is also well-grounded with humanistic values.There is much we can learn from their innovative effort. Their effort is expected to lead tofundamental insights.Our approach here is more pragmatic and is ‘applied’, given our university’s status as an olderinstitution, with well-established scopes and responsibilities for each college. Our engineeringstudents take social studies and humanities courses offered by other colleges as service courses.Our faculty would not be considered qualified to teach those courses. A more
roboticdesign projects. While in the second semester, entrepreneurial mindset materials wasincorporated in a smart design project emphasizing seeking opportunities using brainstorming,accessing market interest, accessing technical feasibility, designing for manufacturability, andproviding a cost analysis of an eventual finalized product.A semester-long freshman engineering design course [8] was developed from scratch to coverthe entrepreneurial topics including opportunity recognition and value proposition, understandingintellectual property, ideation and concept generation, customer discovery, pro-forma financials;manufacturing considerations in product design, technology roadmapping, understanding returnon investment and venture creation within and
Engineering’s Engineering Education Research Center at the University of Pittsburgh. Prior to joining the University of Pittsburgh, he was a science educator at Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). Dr. Spiegel also served as Director of Research & Development for a multimedia development company and as founding Director of the Center for Integrating Research & Learning (CIRL) at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University. Under Dr. Spiegel’s leadership, the CIRL matured into a thriving Center recognized as one of the leading National Science Foundation Laboratories for activities to pro- mote science, mathematics, and technology (STEM) education. While at Florida State University
Paper ID #18730First Impressions: Evaluating Student Performance in Demonstrating Engi-neering LeadershipDr. Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Handley is currently the Associate Director of Engineering Leadership Outreach in the School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs at Penn State University. Meg received her PhD from Penn State University in Workforce Education where she studied interpersonal behaviors associated with engineering leadership. At Penn State, Meg teaches in the undergraduate Engineering Leadership Development Minor and the Engineering Leadership
been an Electrical Engineering Professor. Dr. Mendoza is interested in Socioeconomi- cally Disadvantaged Engineering Students, Latino Studies in Engineering, Computer Aided/Instructional Technology in Engineering, and Entrepreneurship/Service Learning.Dr. Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University Dr. Richard got his Ph. D. at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1989 & a B. S. at Boston University, 1984. He was at NASA Glenn, 1989-1995, taught at Northwestern for Fall 1995, worked at Argonne National Lab, 1996-1997, Chicago State, 1997-2002. Dr. Richard is a Sr. Lecturer & Research Associate in Aerospace Engineering @ Texas A&M since 1/03. His research is focused on computational plasma modeling using
comprised of 77 students with mostly non-STEM majors; a core-chemicalengineering program course with 35 sophomore/junior-level engineering students; and, a 20student, senior-level engineering technical elective course.The intervention included baseline assessment of students’ understanding of and opinions onfracking, presentation of two video tutorials on fracking (one from an industry group, one from anon-profit science-literacy organization), and subsequent student group research (online andduring class) within five separate focus groups: science/technology; environment; social/health;policies/politics; and, economics. Following the group research, consensus statements from eachgroup were openly discussed and summarized, and students
Paper ID #17715WIP: Introducing Active Learning in a Software Engineering CourseDr. Bruce R Maxim, University of Michigan, Dearborn Bruce R. Maxim has worked as a software engineer, project manager, professor, author, and consultant for more than thirty years. His research interests include software engineering, human computer interaction, game design, social media, artificial intelligence, and computer science education. Dr. Maxim is associate professor of computer and information science at the University of Michigan—Dearborn. He established the GAME Lab in the College of Engineering and Computer Science. He has
study in the future.Electrical Engineering Program and Admission CriteriaThe EE program at UW Bothell offers students BS (since 2010) and MS (since 2015) degrees.The educational experience of the EE program is based on strong student-faculty relationships,small classes and hands-on learning. The BSEE program, accredited by ABET, is designed tomeet the needs of technology-oriented employers in the Puget Sound region. The programculminates in a capstone design course whereby student teams implement a design with a facultyadvisor and a corporate sponsor.Students are required to complete a specific set of prerequisite courses before admission to theEE program at UW Bothell. These prerequisite courses are Calculus I, Calculus II, Calculus III
.2014.991099Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Brophy, S. (2011). Engineering in young children’s exploratory play with tangible materials. Children, Youth and Environments, 21(2).Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Dobbs-Oates, J. (2012). The role of classroom artifacts in developmental engineering. Presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio. TX.Bers, M. U., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics in early childhood education. Information Technology in Childhood Education, 1, 123–145.Bers, M. U., & Portsmore, M. (2005). Teaching partnerships: Early childhood and
College Engineering (WECE) study. Cathy received her S.B. in cognitive science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and her Ph.D. in educational psychology from Stanford University.Dr. Christine M. Cunningham, Museum of Science Dr. Christine Cunningham is an educational researcher who works to make engineering and science more relevant, accessible, and understandable, especially for underserved and underrepresented populations. A vice president at the Museum of Science, Boston since 2003, she founded and directs Engineering is ElementaryTM , a groundbreaking project that integrates engineering concepts into elementary curriculum and teacher professional development. As of September 2016, EiE has served 12.6