June 24, 2017
June 24, 2017
June 28, 2017
Educational Research and Methods
Work in Progress - seeking feedback from the community
A signature pedagogy is a specific pedagogical technique that may be unique to a discipline (Gurung, Chick and Haynie, 2009) and that organizes the fundamental ways in which future practitioners are educated for their new professions (Shulman, 2005a). Since disciplines vary in their ways of knowing, thinking and doing (Habits of Mind) and educational practices also vary in their way of teaching and learning. According to Shulman (2005a), signature pedagogies have three dimensions - surface, deep and explicit.
While there is extensive research in the field of engineering education, as evidenced by the number of journals and conferences, a concise definition of the signature pedagogy of engineering has not been articulated.
Specifically, this paper aims to define the signature pedagogy of engineering though an analysis of topics found in handbooks on engineering education, topics presented in engineering education journals and in conference proceedings. Shulman (2005b) notes that it is expected for signature pedagogies to change over time, and thus the literature analysis will be limited to the past five years of publication.
This study uses a grounded theory approach and a method of coding educational practices from the literature to develop the distinction of what is considered a 'signature pedagogy' for engineering.
Gurung et al. (2009) pose the interesting question of whether learning in a discipline actually reflects the ways of thinking and doing of disciplinary experts. The results of this study will inform a larger study which looks at disconnects between the way we teach engineering (signature pedagogy) and how engineers actually function in the discipline (Engineering Habits of Mind or EHoM, Lucas and Hanson, 2014).
Gurung, R. A. R., Chick, N. L., & Haynie, A. (2009). Exploring signature pedagogies: approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (1st ed.). Sterling, VA: Stylus Pub. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?vid=isbn9781579223076
Shulman, L. S. (2005a). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20027998 Lucas, B., Hanson, J., & Claxton, G. (2014). Thinking like an engineer Implications for the education system. Retrieved from http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/thinking-like-an-engineer-implications-summary
Shulman, L. (2005b). The Signature Pedagogies of the Professions of Law , Medicine , Engineering , and the Clergy: Potential Lessons for the Education of Teachers. Lecture, Irvine California.
Tingerthal, J. (2017, June), Work in Progress: Signature Pedagogies in Engineering - Surface Structure Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--29178
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015