Paper ID #38922Impact of Inclusion of Makerspace and Project Types on Student Comfortwith Additive Manufacturing and Three-Dimensional Modeling in First-YearEngineering ProgramDr. Andrew Charles Bartolini, University of Notre Dame Assistant Teaching Professor, University of Notre Dame Coordinator, First-Year Engineering Program, University of Notre DameSimran Moolchandaney, University of Notre Dame Simran Moolchandaney is a class of 2023 undergraduate student at the University of Notre Dame major- ing in Computer Science and minoring in Bioengineering. Outside the classroom, Simran is an NCAA Division 1 Fencer, and an active
scholarship program. The project builds on prior research suggesting thataffective factors including sense of belonging, identity, and self-efficacy play important yet notfully understood roles in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students’academic persistence and successful progression toward careers, and that these factors can proveparticularly influential for individuals from groups that have been historically marginalized inSTEM [1]-[6]. Prior studies conducted as part of this research project have demonstrated impactsof Scholars’ math-related experiences on their developing identities [7] and found that structuresassociated with the scholarship program helped support Scholars’ developing sense of belongingdespite the shift
the underrepresentation ofwomen and historically marginalized communities [1]. The need for skilled workers in STEMcontinues to grow, yet women make up only 1/3rd of the STEM workforce [1]. This issue is evenmore pronounced when considering the field of engineering where women hold only 16% thejobs. Furthermore, students in high-poverty populations score significantly worse onmathematics and science assessments in 4th and 8th grade, and classroom teachers with lessexperience in STEM are more prevalent at schools with high-minority or high-povertypopulations [1]. The pandemic exacerbated disparities, with isolation and limited opportunitiesfor formal and informal educational engagement. K-12 education in mathematics and science arethe
Mindsets Over the Course of a Semester: A Longitudinal Study AbstractStudents, like all people, have elements of both growth and fixed mindsets. We studied shifts inboth types of student mindsets over three one-semester courses. We found no significant changein students’ growth mindset at the beginning of the semester compared to the end of the semester.However, students’ fixed mindsets showed a statistically significant increase of 0.37-points fromthe beginning of the semester to the end of the semester, with an effect size of 0.43. Two multilevelmodels were used to understand why students’ fixed mindsets may have increased 1) personalsources¾mastery goal, performance
instructors as to how theyshould guide a team that is struggling with interpersonal conflict and/or difficulty in completingproject work cooperatively.BackgroundIt is widely agreed that the ability to function productively on a team is an important engineeringskill [1]. This ability is also a common learning outcome in project-based introductoryengineering courses [2]. Quite often, student teams are not self-selected, in order to simulatesimilar situations in the engineering workplace, and to prompt students to develop additionalflexibility and objectivity toward fellow team members’ diverse educational, cultural, andbehavioral orientations. Since these courses and teams often last for only one semester, theamount of time to develop this ability is
approach,survey data was collected to assess students' sense of belonging as engineering students. Thevalidated survey consists of 33 items distributed in four constructs: 1) Sense of belonging-general, 2) sense of belonging-interactions, 3) Self-efficacy and 4) Perceived institutionalsupport. From this, we identify and discuss the student's sense of belonging and how itinteracts with self-efficacy and perceived institutional support. This research allows us to haveevidence that supports the visibility and creation of initiatives on the services offered tostudents, which impact their sense of belonging.Keywords: sense of belonging; self-efficacy; gender studies; women in engineeringI. Introduction and theoretical frameworkThe sense of belonging is
highschool internships that engage students in authentic STEM environments [2], [3]. High schoolinternships are especially impactful for underrepresented minority (URM) female students inSTEM [1]. Prior research has shown that these internship opportunities can increase students’sense of self-efficacy in STEM fields, give students insight into career paths they might nototherwise be exposed to, and increase students’ interest in and pursuit of STEM-related majorsand careers.The home environment can also provide opportunity for students to increase and strengthenSTEM identity and the consideration of STEM careers. A model for STEM identity has beendeveloped as a framework building on disciplinary studies and includes the interplay of threeelements
inform how educators can use making to design learning environments thatsupport engineering students’ (re)negotiation with their disciplinary relationships.IntroductionDespite the need for diversity in all forms (e.g. racial, gender, socioeconomic status, etc.) inengineering [1], marginalizing narratives still exist that affect individuals’ participation inengineering. These narratives include: engineering is masculine and competitive [2], andengineering values technical competency much more than creativity and social interactions [1],[3], [4]. These narratives can lead to students feeling little sense of belonging, and their identitiesnot being validated in engineering [5] [6]. Studies show that students shifting narratives abouttheir
research at the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023A Comparative Analysis of Support Perceptions between Transfer and First- Time-in-College Students in Engineering, Science, and Mathematics ProgramsIntroductionAn important mechanism for retaining engineering students is offering support programs at thecollege level, which includes, for example, formal structures such as living-learning communitiesas well as both formal or informal opportunities for mentoring by faculty and peers. However,traditional student retention theories concentrate primarily on the institutional level [1]–[5]. TheSTEM
contexts. Third, we compare the methods and tools used to assess teamworkin engineering in the two cultures. Finally, we briefly discuss the implications of such acomparative literature review for constructing a more comprehensive, culturally responsiveapproach to defining, developing, and assessing teamwork.1. IntroductionThere has been increasing pressure on higher education institutions to be accountable forprofessional outcomes since approximately the mid-1980s [1]. Especially since the 1990s and theintensification of globalization, higher engineering education in the United States hasexperienced numerous calls for increased accountability due to public concerns about the qualityof engineering and engineers [2]. The ABET (incorporated as the
of the core curricula classrooms. He has now been at Georgia Tech’s CEISMC for the pasJulia VarnedoeDr. Marc Weissburg ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Biologically Inspired Design For High School Engineering Students (Work in Progress)IntroductionBiologically inspired design (BID) has gained attention in undergraduate and graduateengineering programs throughout the United States, and more higher education institutions arebeginning to implement it into their engineering curriculum [1], [2], [5], [6]. However, little hasbeen done to introduce BID concepts more formally into the K-12 education high schoolcurriculum. BID, also known as biomimicry
objective and politically neutraldiscipline, scholars have recently called for reforms to engineering education that challengetechnical/social dualism by integrating the “social realm” into dominant ways of thinking,knowing, and in doing engineering [1-2]. By social realm, we mean to evoke the waysengineering shapes, and is shaped by, social, cultural, political, and ethical systems, that informwho gets to participate in engineering, how and why engineering problems are perceived andundertaken, the results of engineering work, and who benefits from the outcomes of engineeringwork [1,3]. As scholars become increasingly aware of the role engineering plays in socialsystems, there have been increasing calls for engineering education to center the
, mass transfers, thermodynamics, reaction kinetics, separation, and process control[2]. Even though the hands-on learning in a laboratory is an integral part of the undergraduateexperience for the chemical engineering students, the COVID-19 pandemic forced universitiesand laboratories to close, leaving educators and students searching for ways to stay productive.Feisel and Rosa [1] outlined thirteen typical learning objectives for engineering laboratorycourses. In a recent survey article, the AIChE Education Division Survey Committee reportedthe universal key educational outcomes for a laboratory course which includes Design ofExperiment, Analysis and Interpret the Data, Effective Teamwork, Creativity, andCommunication [2]. Although experience
existing research in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fieldsdemonstrates two trends: 1) the demand for STEM jobs has outpaced the current supply ofSTEM workers in the United States; and 2) the demand for STEM jobs has outpaced the futuresupply of STEM workers, i.e. current degree-seeking college students [6], [7], [8], [9]. The lackof representation of Black students in undergraduate engineering programs is particularlypronounced. Black Americans make up approximately 13% of the population but less than 5% ofengineering graduates year-over-year [10]. In recent years, engineering education literatureacknowledges the fact that Black students and other minoritized groups have been systemicallyexcluded from engineering over time
, the School of Engineering (SoE) began to receive feedback frommultiple stakeholders – including prospective students, parents, enrolled students, nationalagencies, and employers – during open house events and other gatherings, all of whom voicedthe need for a curriculum that would fit a broader range of interests and would respond to newand complex challenges in society. Related trends are captured in recent reporting by theNational Academy of Sciences [1], including the shift in national and global economic direction,changes in consumer habits, concerns about sustainability, accelerated product life cycles, andnew trends in nationwide industrial developments. Additionally, engineering students areexpected to possess a wider range of skills
in Figure 1 or an antiquated milk line that was no longer working as shownin Figure 2. Conclusion While ambitious, there are many challenges to providing this collaborative learningexperiences for students in the US and Botswana. First, investigators must determine theappropriateness of educational technology used in support of co-curricular learningexperiences. While research suggests that use of AR technology within a problem-basedlearning activity can provide students with a learning environment that is authentic andimmersive (El-adaway, Pierrakos, Truax, 2014; Finelli et al., 2012; Garzón, 2021; Suskie, 2015),questions remain around access, compatibility and licensing of both the AR
. BackgroundRound Robin Design The format of student feedback and evaluation data collected from team collaborations inengineering education settings usually coincides with a round-robin format, where each studentwithin a particular team provides feedback to every other team member, as illustrated in Figure1. In this example, there are four students, students 1, 2, 3, and 4. Each student provides feedbackto others, as the arrows show. Specifically, student 1 gives feedback to students 2, 3, and 4;meanwhile, student 2 provides feedback to students 1, 3, and 4; the same goes for students 3 and4.Figure 1An Example Illustrating Round-Robin Design with Four Participants The use of round-robin data in engineering education applications is often
Diversity Recognition Program to Promote Changed Practices at PostSecondary Institutions Amy Slayton1 , Kayla Maxey2 , Monica M. McGill3 , and Jordan Williamson4 1 Drexel University 2 Purdue University 3,4 CSEdResearch.org 1 slatonae@drexel.edu, 2 carte231@purdue.edu, 3 monica@csedresearch.org, 4 jordan@csedresearch.org
adoption, it is crucial to receivefeedback from teachers who have already tried NE in their classrooms. The aims of this researchwere to 1) identify and evaluate the barriers to NE implementation and 2) uncover if anyrelationship exists between the backgrounds of the research participants and the barriers that theyexperience.Students are capable of developing engineering thinking and problem-solving skills at an earlyage [1]. Engineering education brings a real world perspective to kids in classrooms. It providesthem an outlet to explore their ideas through hands-on activities. Especially in the twenty-firstcentury, when our everyday lives revolve so much around engineering and technology, it iscrucial to foster engineering and technology literacy
equivalence, instruction and assessment.Table 1: Literature dealing with WIL models and assessmentResearch MethodBased on our literature review, we identified two possible instances, where WIL is aimed atrelevance and career growth namely, Exeter and BITS Pilani. Out of these two, we selected 3A descriptive study of an innovative and sustainable model of work integrated learningfor industry professionals – An Indian casethe latter considering the access to the data. Post 199210 no structured study has beenpublished on this institute model hence we undertook to study the developments during thepast two decades.We adopted
, respectively, and an MBA from Cornell University. He also held international Postdoctoral Fellowships at Cambridge University and Technische Universit¨at Wien. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Innovation Through Making Course:Creating a Distinctive Prototyping Experience as part of a New Entrepreneurial PathwayIntroduction:Engineering education is at a crossroads, with a need to produce graduates who can meet thedemands of a rapidly changing and complex global environment. Technology is advancing sorapidly that an estimated 85% of jobs in 2030 have not been invented yet [1]. The pace of changewill be so rapid that people will learn “in-the-moment” using new
).In the past, the ENE program educated, trained, and prepared students for the traditionalenvironmental engineering fields, such as water supply and wastewater treatment, air qualitymanagement, and solid waste management, via coursework in these topics. Its graduates go tograduate schools for civil and environmental engineering majors or are hired by the public orprivate sectors with a focus on infrastructure.Transportation studies in HBCUsIt was found from the web search that among the 101 HBCUs, at least ten institutions offertransportation-related degree programs (Table 1). While some programs are at the undergraduatelevel, some institutions provide degrees at the doctoral level.Table 1: HBCUs that offer transportation-related degree
, the challenge of creating effective assessments and evaluations.Additionally, there are concerns about the potential for microcredentials to create "badges" thatare not truly indicative of mastery or competence. Many researchers have already emphasized theimportance of technology in education and provided a theoretical foundation for the role oftechnology in the design of microcredentials in computer science. For example, Lamb and Beck[1](2017) highlighted the benefits and challenges of microcredentials and provided a foundationfor considering best practices in the design of microcredentials, especially for computer science.McGivney-Burelle et al. [2] provide a comprehensive review of the literature on microcredentialsin higher education. The
engineering is an interdisciplinary major that offers lectures, team projects, andlaboratory tasks. One of the milestone courses, Biothermodynamics, which encompassesformulas, equations, and physical applications of biology systems, is traditionally taughtpassively through lecturing and note-taking. In the past two decades, active learning methodshave been studied and promoted vastly in engineering education, including adding group workand peer interaction into the teaching and learning of such courses to increase studentengagement [1-4]. This work-in-progress study further explores the ability to create a“neighborhood” in a sophomore-level Biothermodynamics classroom. The present study aims todesign a new learning environment that maximizes students
versions ofdifferent hands-on experiments. In these virtual experiments, students can reproduce all thehands-on practices virtually and learn concepts, procedures, and attitudes towardexperimentation. The authors will discuss the theoretical foundations of the framework andpresent examples of virtual labs already developed for mechanical, electrical, civil, andchemical engineering education. In addition, the authors will discuss the main concerns anddifficulties in creating a virtual labs web platform used by more than 1,000,000 students.1. IntroductionThe use of virtual labs in education has its roots in the early days of computer-basedsimulation and modeling [1], [2]. In the 1990s, early virtual labs were used primarily asteaching tools to
portionsof their academic experience under both systems. Using the architectural engineering (ARCE)program as an example, this paper addresses all of these and suggests some helpful hints fornavigating the process.IntroductionMost colleges and universities are on the semester calendar system. Since 1987, 132 collegeshave converted from quarters to semesters, leaving only around 5 percent of the Nation’scolleges on a quarter system [1]. The California State University (CSU) system, the largestuniversity system in the nation, consists of 23 universities. In 2012, six CSU campuses startedtheir conversion to the semester system. Currently, 22 of the 23 CSU campuses are on thesemester system. In October 2021, the CSU Chancellor mandated that California
design team was tasked with creating a simplified process totransform post-consumer High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) into a casted functional product.Post-consumer plastic poses a significant threat to the environment due to the long time it takesfor it to decompose [1], and that 36 million tons of plastic waste is generated in the United Stateseach year [2]. As HDPE plastics can be recycled at least ten times without significantdegradation of its mechanical properties [3], they are an ideal target for recycling programs toreduce landfill waste and maximize the useful life of these plastics. Challenges in recyclingpost-consumer plastics center around the purity of the plastic product, as different types ofplastics are often mixed in
inIndiana grew back to pre-pandemic figures with a need for 526,000 workers in 2021, comparedwith 539,000 in 2019, resulting in the country's highest concentration of manufacturing jobs [1].The problem further intensifies because although the manufacturing workforce growth results innew jobs and higher wages, manufacturers face challenges in recruiting well-qualified workers[2].While reskilling and upskilling efforts will be needed for the current workforce, particularly inthe plant floor, new jobs and occupations will emerge. These new jobs will require professionalsand future managerial employees to have strong data science skills in order to effectively designand oversee future AI-enabled manufacturing systems. However, a critical gap exists
groupcontexts. Our results also indicate that despite the additional barriers that BLI studentsexperience, they continue to espouse the meritocratic belief that anyone, regardless of identity,has an equal opportunity to become an engineer. The implications of this belief for BLI studentsuccess are discussed in the paper.Introduction Black, Latino/a/x, and Indigenous (BLI) students currently represent less than 17% ofbachelor’s degrees in engineering [1], despite decades of effort aimed at addressing theirunderrepresentation. BLI students are uniquely affected by overt whiteness in engineeringculture, especially at Predominately White Institutions (PWI), which can make classrooms feelunwelcoming and exacerbate experiences of systemic racism
conversion andalteration, as well as production of prefabricated ship and barge sections and other specializedservices. The industry also includes manufacturing and other facilities outside of the shipyard,which provide parts or services for shipbuilding activities within a shipyard. This segment of theUS economy contributes 42 billion dollars to the annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) [1].Currently, there are 154 private shipyards in the United States spread across 29 states and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition, there are more than 300 shipyards engaged in ship repairs orcapable of building ships but not actively engaged in shipbuilding [2]. Public shipyards includePortsmouth, NH, Norfolk, VA, Pearl Harbor, HI and Pudge Sound, WA. Further, the