improve three-dimensional visualization skills” [1]. The professor’sinnovative instruction included creative ways of learning which targeted students’ spatialreasoning skills. Through the semester, students practiced freehand sketching, learned ComputerAided Design (CAD), designed for additive manufacture, and created 3D printed tangibleobjects. The instructor consistently encouraged the students to freehand sketch objects, as a wayto enhance their ability to see the physical environment and improve their spatial visualizationskills. The instructor employed various exercises throughout the semester to challenge thestudents to think creatively to let their artistic talent shine as well as aiming to instill confidencein their freehand sketching
communication at Pennsylvania State University. He is the author of The Craft of Scientific Presentations (Springer-Verlag, 2013) and founder of the web- site Assertion-Evidence Approach, which receives more than 200,000 page downloads each year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 The Assertion-Evidence Approach to Technical Presentations: Overcoming Resistance in Professional SettingsSummary The assertion-evidence (AE) approach to presentations is a non-traditional way [1-4] forengineers and scientists to share their work with their audiences. In short, the approach calls onpresenters to build each talk on messages (not topic phrases), to support those messages with
appointment of five lead engineers to serve as project mentors for theprogram. These project mentors selected ten community college students from a shortlist of 20candidates provided by two members of the RU team (lead principal investigator and graduatestudent researcher) who conducted 34 interviews from an original pool of 58 applicants. Originalapplicants represented a range of individual differences: 26% female, 55% underrepresentedethnic minorities; 57% first generation; 27% veterans; 62% low-income; 5% students with1This research was supported by, or in part by, the U. S. Office of Naval Research under awardnumber N00014-15-1-2438.disabilities2. The final selection of ten from this diverse pool echoed such diversity: two females,five minorities
environment across theprogram.Future plans for BEPI include adding more options to the weekends for students who havealready selected a focus area. We are also currently developing advanced residency courses,which offer students the opportunity to learn the state-of-the art in a specific field taught byleading scientists and working biomedical engineers.BackgroundThe Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that biomedical engineering is expected to be one of thefastest growing occupations from 2014-2024[1]. With a 2015 median pay of almost $90,000 peryear and an expected job growth rate of 23% over the next decade, biomedical engineeringcareers will enjoy a growth rate well above the expected level of 7% for all occupations [2]. Thedata are summarized in
provide“careful, thorough advising and regular supportive mentoring”1 in areas ranging from thespecifics of their dissertation research to broader questions of personal and professional success.2This interactive panel discussion will introduce future and new engineering educators—especially those with young or forming research groups—to some best practices in setting thetone for a productive research group and navigating difficult situations related to graduatestudents. The panel discussion is led by Dr. Katy Luchini Colbry (Michigan State University)and Dr. Catherine Berdanier (Pennsylvania State University). The session will offer theory-basedbest practices for research group leadership and management in light of graduate education
. This goal is achieved throughengaging engineering students in design exercises and experiences throughout their academicundergraduate careers. The CASCADE project provides student support in an innovativeconfiguration of cascaded peer-mentoring. This program exposes freshman students to theengineering design process with vertically aligned design experiences through the sophomore andjunior years. Cascading vertically, undergraduate seniors mentor juniors, juniors mentorsophomores, and sophomores mentor freshmen. The objectives of the CASCADE project are to:1) infuse concepts of the design process across all four levels of the engineering undergraduatecurriculum (i.e., freshman through senior), 2) increase first-year, second-year, and third
the search for new ways to collectmore behavioral, fine-grained, real-time data across more diverse populations [3,16], and CBLEssuch as MOOCs and blended classrooms match those requirements.1 Kitchener [23], among others, has called for the field to adopt the distinction that “epistemological” refers to atheory of knowledge and “epistemic” refers to merely a claim regarding knowledge. The field has not settled on aspecific nomenclature between “epistemological” and “epistemic.” [16] Therefore, some researchers use“epistemological” and “epistemic” interchangeably, while others might have named a construct as “epistemological”earlier in their work when “epistemic” might have become a more accurate descriptor later in their work. Because
and intensity.2-4 A college course was created in2009 to examine how engineering design and technology developments have manifested inheavy metal’s evolution. While a complete description of the genre is excessive for this follow-up paper, a synopsis of the original paper’s1 examination of how the course accomplishes itsgoals is necessary to provide the framework for the new developments in the course.Goals and structure of the courseThe course outcomes, detailed in the original paper, are: 1. Students will describe the history of, culture of, and influences to heavy metal music. 2. Students will describe the engineering and technological developments that have enabled heavy metal music’s unique sound. 3. Students will explain how
. Although traditionalenergy sources (such as fossil fuels) still meet most of our energy demands, the benefits ofrenewable energy have no match of being environmentally friendly while they are virtuallyinexhaustible. Sustainable development includes solving the sustainable energy resourcesproblem[1, 2]. “A sustainable energy system may be regarded as a cost-efficient, reliable, andenvironmentally friendly energy system that effectively utilizes local resources andnetworks.”[3]. The development of renewable and sustainable energy sources will lead to anincrease in energy independence which, in turn, will lead to advancement in local and regionalsustainable manufacturing industries and to promotion of regional development of the workforcespecialized
lower the window panes. The force required to adjust the windowsis often much too large for the nursing home tenants, making it very difficult for them to regulatetheir room temperature.Your team has been tasked with designing a device that will assist the elderly tenants withraising and lowering the building’s windows. You will produce a complete engineering designsolution for the client. Someone should be able to build the device from your solution withoutany questions. Since each window is not guaranteed to be located near an electrical socket, thisdevice should not rely on electric power.The building’s windows are double-hung, Figure 1. The double-hung window consists of anupper and lower sash that slide vertically in separate grooves in
question was followed by an open-ended response opportunity. As the purpose was to identify how the program could be improved,responses to the first questions that were either “no” or “somewhat” were particularly noted. Asample of the responses are provided in Table 1.To further examine the fidelity of the simulation in providing a more generalizable ethicaldilemma and not just a legal focused simulation, students were also asked to rate the degree towhich they felt the role play was representative of a real ethical dilemma by responding on a 4-point agreement scale to the question: “The interview allowed me to experience an ethicaldilemma as it might actually occur.” Agreement showed a mean rating of 3.57 (SD = .61)indicating that students at
primary focuses of the RET supplemental researchwere: 1) To study the viability of the sand casting process in the 21st century; 2) To test theefficiency and effectiveness of rapid prototyping, combining the modern technologies of 3DPrinting with the sand casting process; and 3) To assist a Tennessee Tech engineering student,who has already started a personal casting and smithing business, with his entrepreneurialendeavors.3. Process OverviewIn this project, prototypes of various designs were printed with 3D printers and then cast in threemetals. Before the prototype tool or object could be printed, it had to be designed. Theprototypes were designed with a variety of programs. Dassault Systèm’s SolidWorks andAutodesk’s AutoCAD, both of which are
results and describe opportunities forfuture work, encouraging continued involvement in research. Many FIRE students continue toparticipate in research after the program concludes and note that the program influenced theirdecision to attend UT Austin and confirmed their interest in the field of mechanical engineering.The general structure of the FIRE program is documented in this paper, along with investigationsof its impact on participants’ GPA, retention within the major, rate of participation in undergraduateresearch, and intention to pursue higher education. Student perceptions of the program andopportunities for improving it are also discussed. 1. Introduction Participation in undergraduate research provides students with
engineering consultants HatchMott MacDonald.1 “When you can look at a truck, which weighs about 60,000 kg fully loaded,then those numbers start to make more sense to you. That’s the kind of practical thing you don’tlearn in a book,” he says.Traditionally, strength of materials labs typically include tensile testing of metal samples. This isnormally achieved through the use of an automated tensile testing machine with data acquisitionsystem (hardware and software). Examples would include Tinus Olson2 and Instron3 tensiletesting systems. Even though students may be allowed to load the part into the fixture manually,however, during the pulling process, students are mostly standing there watching. This is simplybecause it is impossible for humans to pull
economic developmentinitiatives provided fiber optic internet to local schools, an engagement agreement was drafted inwhich an ETSU graduate student team was contracted to develop an improved deliverymethodology. This article presents a longitudinal case study and underscores the implicationsfor engineering management education.Background/IntroductionReference is made to a 2016 ASEE Conference publication: Strategic Alliances May BecomeKey Success Factors for Enhanced Experiential Learning: A Conceptual Framework forImplementation. 1 Building upon the successful strategic alliance formed in 2014 with themayors of Sullivan and Washington counties in East Tennessee, a common Workforce Readinesschallenge to economic development was addressed. Both
their learning had a better understanding of learning and were more successful[1, 9, 17]. Specifically, students’ self-awareness of their learning processes facilitated learningand performance [2]. In addition, students’ application of metacognitive skills in practicesupported students’ learning within different contexts and improved their adaptive capabilitieswithin those contexts [23]. Because adaptive capabilities are critical within the engineeringworkplace, it is important that engineering students learn metacognitive skills necessary todevelop adaptive capabilities. The purpose for this work is to examine students’ statements abouttheir experiences within engineering competitions and a service-based learning projectidentifying their
especially engineering despite benefits of diversity 1-3. Barriersthat prevent more diverse students participating and persisting in STEM include lack of interestand campus climate 4.Campus climate and issues around race, class, and gender are critical components that shape thelearning environment in higher education. Issues around race, class, and gender often make thelearning environment hostile and unwelcoming, particularly in science, technology andmathematics or STEM fields. Aspects of the hostility include racial microaggressions which aresubtle messages that are insulting or demeaning to people of color 5-7. Research suggests hostilecampus climates are associated with students of color leaving STEM fields before graduating.For instance
below.1. Signal processing-MATLAB & SIMULINK12. Signal transmission-Microwave Office23. Data communication- Riverbed Modeler3 (formerly OPNET modeler)MATLAB is a high level programming language for technical computation. The softwareincludes computation, viewing, and programming in a user-friendly environment. AlthoughMATLAB has a user-friendly graphical user interface (GUI) interface, its functions are primarilyexecuted through commands. Therefore, the user must know these commands and the syntax ofthe programming language. Common uses of MATLAB include: a) plotting of complexmathematical equations, b) mathematical computations, c) algorithm development, and d)modeling and simulation.SIMULINK has an interactive environment that facilitates
focuses on evaluating methods of effective practice of an engineering design summerprogram for middle school students. The paper reflects on findings and observations regardinggender groupings in STEM, and how they affect student learning and confidence. In 2009,President Obama's Administration implemented the "Educate to Innovate" program to emphasizeSTEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) education. Women and men hold nearlyequal professional positions in the biological sciences, and close to that in math, yet womencomprise less than 30% of the science and engineering workforce as a whole.1 Students as youngas kindergarten express the belief that fields of study such as science and math are “boysubjects.”2 The societal norm that males
warming.Causes of Global Warming Climate change is the direct result of human progression. Population increase has led tothe need for more materials, mass production, and more food in order to sustain the growingnumber of people present. To fully understand what is happening to Earth, it is necessary to lookback at the source of the problem. Since the start of the 20th century, human population has skyrocketed. The worldpopulation growth rate for around 800 years prior to this time was rather stagnant, averagingonly about 0.1% growth a year.18 In the 20th century alone, the human population roughlyquadrupled.3 At the start of the 19th century, human population exceeded 1 billion for the firsttime in history.3 It took only 120 years after
factoranalyses (CFA) will be conducted. The purpose of conducting several CFAs is to determinewhether any level of the theories used to develop the scale are supported: an 11-factor model(figure 1.1), a unidimensional model (figure 1.2), or an 11-factor with 1 higher order factormodel (figure 1.3). These models also reflect how the E-SIS has to this point been scored, as asingle identify factor and 11 subscales, each matching to one of the measurement approachesdescribed above. Three models are examined in this paper (see Figures 1.1 through 1.3 for a visual of thesetheoretically based models). Model 1 (Figure 1.1) represents a combination of the 11 separatetheoretical approaches and supports the scoring of 11 subscales. Model 2 (Figure 1.2
basiccomputation to be independent from the underlying hardware that performs it, be it electronicor biological. If we can identify skills and processes that are common to both electronic andbiological computing (see Fig. 1), then through such a common skillset we might be able tolink some of the above electronic CT practices to our typical cognitive (i.e., biological CT)skills. By promoting common core CT practices in K-12, we might not only improvefundamental cognitive skills of students but also prepare them for and motivate them towardslearning additional electronic CT skills, including programming.Common core CT processes: Seventy years ago, Alan Turing,24 widely recognized as thefounder of computer science, suggested that if thoughts (i.e
participation by STEM students has increased over the last decade, during the2009/10 academic year, only 3.9% of study abroad came from engineering majors [1]. This isattributed to the heavy course loads required in engineering programs and the highly-structured,sequential curriculum that makes missing a semester problematic, in addition to difficulties infinding equivalent technical courses which can be transferred back to American institutions.When I started teaching at UAB, study abroad options for engineering students were few and farbetween. Because of the transformative role that studying abroad played in my ownundergraduate experience, I wanted to create similar opportunities for my students. Drawing oncontacts made during two years living in
theFBDs of two- or three-dimensional particles, single rigid bodies and structures to be correctlydiagrammed and analyzed from a mechanics perspective. The steps are outlined below and willbe applied to three example static cases.Step 1: External forces/moments Define a coordinate system and draw every external force and moment, including the weight (if applicable), that is acting on the entire mechanical system. Also, find the equivalent concentrated load for any external distributed forces present in the system.Step 2: Separate everything! Separate the particles and bodies present in the system from one another and the ground or any other support and draw all of the forces and moments acting on each of the individual
continuesunabated due to years of massive growth in undergraduate CS enrollment, the ability to servestudents is constrained by the limited group of faculty who are qualified and committed toeducation; hiring of these faculty is failing. Demand is so great that Stanford has introduced anew MS in Computer Science Education (which requires a prior PhD in a non-computingdiscipline), and this program began a year earlier than anticipated [1].The field needs to understand those responsible for lighting the fires. This research characterizesrecent hiring of instructional faculty at all levels of higher education through two studies: ananalysis of twenty years of job advertisement messages on a listserv for the CS educationcommunity, and a survey of department or
capstone design projectsVarious stages are ascribed to the engineering design process, but they typically include (1)problem identification, (2) research and conceptualization, (3) prototyping, (4) testing, andfinally (5) iteration of some or all of steps 1-4. Design courses are often tasked with teaching allof these in the span of a single semester. The coverage is often biased; problem identification,research, and brainstorming are easily taught in a traditional classroom. Fabrication, testing, anditeration, in contrast, are often emphasized less. This is presumably due to the facilities, time, andmaterial costs needed to execute these steps.We posit that immersive design-build-iterate experiences are a vital part of early-yearundergraduate
ofannoyance (or empathy) with David’s statement, which resembles a mild diatribe that one mightexpect to overhear among an arbitrary group of science or engineering students.As defined by Graesser and colleagues, frustration is “a feeling of making vain or ineffectual allefforts however vigorous; a deep chronic sense or state of insecurity and dissatisfaction arisingfrom unresolved problems or unfulfilled needs” (pp. 304-305)1. In the above quote, Davidhighlights these elements of frustration. He indicates his unfulfilled needs (“I guess some of thestuff was ambiguous to me”). He represents a perceived dissatisfaction by simultaneouslyassigning responsibility for his situation on the instructor (“. . . it was hard to find that guy’snumber”), on
andestablished as a national committee in 1942, ELD achieved divisional status within ASEE in1967. This year, 2017, marks the 50th anniversary of ELD’s division status and the 75thanniversary of the first Engineering School Libraries Committee. This paper explores the historyof ELD from 1960 to the present. The author’s preceding paper, published in 2016, covered thehistory of librarians in ASEE from 1893 through the 1950s.[1]The history of ELD over the past fifty years has been marked by three major themes or trends.The first trend is rapid and continuous technological change, beginning in the late 1950s, that hastransformed how scientific and technical information is created, disseminated, stored, andretrieved. The 1970s and 1980s was a time of rapid
of a uni-versity wide educational quality enhancement programme in 2008. The Domain of Scienceand Technology responded to the challenge presented by this programme by establishing aCouncil for Educational Development in Science and Technology with a task to promotea community of scholarly practice. The revision and continuation of the programme wasapproved by the office of the Vice Chancellor in 2016.An inventory of existing practices and attitudes to education among academic staff wasinitiated in 2009 to explore possible effects of the enhancement programme. A review of workon benchmarking academic’s approaches to their teaching practice identified the Approachesto Teaching Inventory(ATI)1 as one of the most relevant staff attitude