other in countless ways” (p. 68)34. Race and gender, as well as other sociallyconstructed concepts that contribute to one’s identity, must be understood intersectionally. Intersectionality is defined as how socially-constructed social categories such as race andgender intersect and influence experiences 50,51. Instead of examining race, gender, sexualorientation, and other markers of difference as singular identities, Riley & Pawley (2011) useintersectionality to look at individuals’ experiences through their narratives which reflected theirintersecting identities 51. In looking at the intersectionality of race and gender and its effect onmentoring, intersectionality can provide insight into how race and gender influence
supervisors presented the task. In addition, they received detailedinformation on the scope of the project, the timetable and deadlines and the evaluationcriteria.During the semester the students went through the following stages1: 1. Researching the topics 2. Finding the technical and mathematical solutions 3. Acquiring the relevant background knowledge and skills 4. Designing and programming the software 5. Documenting the process from research to development and finally to output 6. Reflecting on project management, team work and the performance of individual team members in the form of a brief written appraisal 7. Handing in software and documentation on a pre-defined dateThe role of the project advisors, as subject experts
controlled.” 9 After discussing several casestudies, students were then invited to identify opportunities within the mobile app arena: whatneeds do they think that they, their peers, or their families have, that could be addressed withapps; how could existing apps be improved to better meet consumers’ needs? In the first twocourse offerings, students discussed their ideas and formed their own teams within the groupmembership policy presented earlier in this section. In the third and fourth course offerings, weformalized the team creation process by encouraging students to post their reflections on an“Idea Bounce” blog; the students then “pitched” their app ideas in class, and listed their threebest ideas in order of preference. The instructors then
experience), watching (reflective observation), thinking/modeling (abstractconceptualization), and applying/doing (active experimentation). Kolb’s learning cycle has beenused in various engineering education programs such as civil2-4, mechanical4, chemical2, 3, 5,industrial6, aeronautical4, and manufacturing2, 3, 7 engineering. Thus, active experimentation likebuilding mechanical objects as visualization aids, building mechanical parts as a newmanufacturing process, and building prototypes as steps in the design process or research, is anessential part of the learning process.The success of rapid prototyping projects in engineering education, albeit using expensive 3D
the Learning Sciences,Vol.9, No.3, pp.313-314.26. Oakes, W. C., Jamieson, L. H., and Coyle, E. j.,(2001), “EPICS: Meeting EC 2000 Through Service Learning,” Proc., ASEE Conference and Exhibition, Session 3461.27. Bright, A., and Dym, C. L., (2004), “General Engineering at Harvey Mudd: 1957-2003,” Proc., ASEE Conf. and Exhibition, Session 1471.28. Adams, R. S., Turns, J., and Atman, C. J., (2003), “Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice,” Design Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp.275—294.29. Mills, J. E., and Treagust, D. F., (2004), “Engineering Education- Is Problem – Based or Project - Based Learning the Answer?” Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, www.aaee.com. Au/journal
, Harman reported the existence of 368 higher education institutions providingfor over 1.5 million students and in 2013, Nguyen et al .report 419 institutions enrolling 2.2million students, reflecting the large growth in higher education occurring in Vietnam.11The country is undergoing a social and economic planned transformation, and like China, isforging its own path in the development and application of a “socialist-oriented marketmechanism.” The higher education system is under a major structural and policy reform, moving Page 24.972.12Vietnam from a Soviet model of higher education towards a western-styled system. The reformis being planned in the
methods approaches.26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32ResultsThe significant findings from our research efforts, so far, fall into six primary categories, relatedto the six categories discussed above in the brief literature review. Our findings are summarizedbelow along with further explanation. Page 24.977.6 1. A student’s sense of belonging in classes and major is strongly associated with academic engagement and other positive outcomes.26 Belonging reflects the experiences of a student in the STEM environment and has implications for what they do in class (effort and participation) and how they feel about their
worksupported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program underGrant No. DGE-1333468. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation. Page 24.991.11References1. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington DC: National Academies Press.2. National Academy of Engineering. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prosects. Washington, DC: National Academies
rather significant typographical error that any competent copy editor shouldhave corrected. Figure 3. Poor website advertisement for a publisher-based conference18Grammatical errors may also be found in the titles of certain journals, such as 66 of the 72journals published by Advance [sic] Research Publications that all begin with the phrase“Journal of Advance Research in. . . .”19 In addition, predatory journal sites tend to be “poorlymaintained,” with dead links, and may include purloined images reproduced without permission.9Explanatory sections on journal websites may exhibit language that reflects poorly on editorialstandards. International Journal of Latest Research in Engineering and Computing, forexample, identifies itself
concepts to transportation. 3) Next, students engage in hands-on activities, utilizing and applying the main concepts of the day’s lesson. 4) Typically, transportation professionals are invited to club sessions, where they provide a multimedia presentation pertaining to their respective field, a project going on in the community and/or a specific sector of the workforce (e.g., salary information and educational requirements). This presentation tends to take place toward the end of the club period. 5) The program day ends with a “wrap-up” activity to summarize main themes or ideas and record reflections on the day’s
students to share their experiences. Other optionsmight include presenting a poster or giving a talk at a campus or regional symposium, or evengiving a formal presentation to the research group or department. Distilling their experiencesinto a poster or oral presentation gives students valuable experience in communicating technicalcontent, and encourages students to reflect on the their contributions to the larger researchproject.Example ProjectsThis three-step method for mentoring undergraduate researchers is easy for faculty to implementand scaffolds students’ introduction to the research domain. Highly motivated students have theopportunity to gain skills and responsibility as they move through the three stages of thismentoring plan. For
another to Reduction in degree of freedomfreedom perform the task by breaking down (Wood, Bruner, & Ross, 1976) the problem.Marking critical A peer asks questions in order to Marking critical features (Woodfeatures understand why and how the other et al., 1976) came to a certain conclusion. This helps students to identify and reflect on discrepancies in the design.Fading support A peer initially helps another but Ongoing diagnosis gradually modifies his/her role so (Wood et al., 1976
this labor supply gap can use information aboutthe varying STEM career interests of different types of students, such as students fromhistorically underrepresented groups, to most effectively achieve their goals.AcknowledgementsPortions of this material are based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. (DUE-1038154) – any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Portions of the work were also supported by The Golden LEAF Foundation. Page 24.1114.13References1. National
described. Many of the testing tools only consistently provide statement andbranch coverage.26 From the results shown in Table 2, second to last row, labeled Average, thevalue in the branch coverage column was consistently lower than the values for statement cover-age. The results of the study support the claim that branch coverage subsumes statement coverage.In future studies we plan to investigate other subsumes relations, e.g., multiple condition coverage(MCC) subsumes branch coverage. One limitation of extending the study is that most freely avail-able tools only provide statement and branch coverage, which is two of the less efficient white-boxtesting techniques as reflected in the subsume hierarchy
in this figure. The “Other” 90% 15.5% 16.5%reasons included sleeping in, subway delays and 100% 7.7% 13.8%commuting, and having a test on that day. Themajor difference in the “Too much work” Figure 3. Primary Reason for Missing Lecturesresponses could be due to the fact that one ofthe other courses in this term modestly reducedtheir design project requirements from 2012 to2013. However, this is likely only part of thereason given that the change was not as drasticas the data reflects. The fact that 16% of theinverted cohort chose “Too early” is likely dueto the fact that of the three lecture sections, onesection did have a 9 AM class, while for thetraditional
reflected in a brief questionnaire atthe end of the semester, as shown in Table 1. Of the 20 students, 19 preferred using spreadsheetsto conventional methods (one preferred using traditional engineering factors). Voluntarycomments were strongly supportive of the spreadsheet approach. Based on these results, theSpring 2014 course is being held in a computer lab. Table 1. Student Responses to the Computer Lab Question 1a and 1b What is the value What is your (N=20) of using Excel in recommendation class? regarding having
engineering courses. And I saw civil and I saw that there was a lot of equivalencies so that I could just keep going with the course and not really pay attention to co-reqs. Because I’ve already taken the co-reqs and pre-reqs. I: So you went to civil because many of the courses that you had taken would apply in civil? M: Yes. Yes.When reflecting on the transfer experience, Mike noted that he had been admitted to D-State as afreshman and chose to go to Southeast D-State instead. I: So what do you think would’ve been different if you had decided to come here as a freshman? M: I probably wouldn’t even gone through engineering. I probably would’ve stayed
significant differences between the groups’ ratingsof their advisors’ effectiveness. However, there were several interesting trends in students’ open-ended responses. A disproportionate number of direct-pathway students mentioned anappreciation for their advisors’ assistance networking and for those that serve as a professionalmentor, which could possibly reflect returners’ higher likelihood of having past experiencewithin the field and existing professional connections. There were also interesting trends in someof the negative characteristics identified by students. Returners were much more likely tospecifically critique their advisors’ management style, whereas direct-pathway students morefrequently asserted that their advisors were difficult to
. Equity & Excellence in Education, 35(2), 131-143.[9] Jackson, J. F. L., & Moore, J. L. (2006). African American males in education: Endangered or ignored?Teachers College Record, 108(2), 201-205. Page 24.1266.12[10] Jett, C. C. (2009). African American Men and College Mathematics: Gaining Access and Attaining Success.Middle-Secondary Education and Instructional Technology Dissertations. Paper 44.[11] Noguera, P. A. (2008). The trouble with black boys: And other reflections on race, equity, and the futureof public education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.[12] Maton, K. I., Hrabowski, F. A., & Schmitt, C. L. (2000). African
National Science Foundation (NSF)under awards 722221 and 0939065. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] Bernold, L. E., Spurlin, J. E., & Anson, C. M. (2007). Understanding our students: A longitudinal study ofsuccess and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 263-274.[2] Denning, P. J. (1992). Educating a new engineer. Communications of the ACM, 35 (12), 82-97.[3] Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2005). Integrated engineering curricula. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147-164.[4] National Research Council (Ed.). (2002
a Team-effectiveness Inventory18. This inventorypresents 27 competencies that comprise three aspects of individual team-member effectiveness:organizational aspects (project management), relational aspects (interpersonal relations), andcommunication aspects (information presentation and discussion) as shown in Table 1. Thesecompetencies are developed in students through the use of an online Team-effectivenessLearning System that allows students to complete and reflect upon self- and peer-assessments oftheir actions along these competencies. The inventory is comprised of a 7-point behaviourallyanchored rating scale for each competency which describes what each of the competenciesshould look like in a team working at the ‘performing’ stage of
videos from a previous offeringof the course. These videos are linked from the Moodle Courses homepage. A short reflection onthe video is due at noon the following Monday.Required MaterialsThe required BME 201 Course Handbook will be sold by the UW Chapter of the BiomedicalEngineering Society (BMES) during the first lecture for $20.00. There are no other requiredtextbooks. Videos, slides, and written materials will be provided on Moodle Courses. Printing access (such as through your CAE account) will also be needed for somesupplemental materials to your handbook such as Lab 2 and notes about the design project.Course HandbookThe BME 201 Course Handbook contains notes about design project topics, the lab materials,and starting space for your
showcases will be used to promote bothtechnological literacy and the “TECH393: Technology in World Civilization” course. It is likelythat this effort will steer additional students into the course as well.Conclusions, Reflections, and the FutureThe study of past technologies utilizing recreated artifacts, collected objects, graphic images,pictures, videos, and display cases has enhanced the student's knowledge of technologicalliteracy. The relationship between people and technology is now better understood in terms of itssocial, cultural, political, and economic aspects. The problem solving ability of previousgenerations of humans along with their desire to invent and develop new tools, techniques, andprocesses are also more appreciated. The
, there are“marked differences in the responses of boys and girls” in topic interest. For example, “girls’priorities lie with topics related to the self and, more particularly, to health, mind and well-being.The responses of the boys reflect strong interests in destructive technologies and events.”14 Theseand similar findings, as well as research in the history, philosophy, and sociology of science,have suggested the existence of “epistemic differences between men and women from theirstandpoint in life” and that these differences provide “differential interaction with the nature ofscience, and hence their participation in the field.”15In response, some researchers and educators in this area call for re-evaluation of the “values andstandards of
grad-ing scheme is used in which students must demonstrate mastery of specific concepts to pass theclass. Mastery of additional outcomes beyond these specific concepts leads to a higher grade.This paper focusses on the outcomes-based grading used in the course and the students reactionsto the grading scheme.Results of preliminary assessment indicate that outcomes-based grading may create greater un-certainty in students regarding their final grades and can lead to the perception that final gradesdo not reflect their true knowledge of the material. Outcomes-based assessment can help stu-dents to better anticipate what they will be tested on, but a well-organized traditional “points-based” grading scheme can accomplish this just as
researchers have argued that this model does not provide a complete picture ofengagement. They pointed out that it does not consider the commitment of psychological energyor the relationship between the quality of student effort and student learning.30 Other theorieswere developed to explain the impact of engagement on student development. For example,experiential learning theory took a dynamic view of learning entirely separate from the IEOmodel. Instead, it was based on a learning cycle which in turn was driven by the resolution ofdual dialectics which it defined to be action/reflection and experience/abstraction.24 Regardless of the model, it has been well established that engagement has a positiveeffect on student outcomes and development
found thatpersistence rates and levels of engagement varied significantly from institution to institution.They also reported that engineering students have the same level of engagement as students inother majors and, despite heavier course loads, reported levels of satisfaction with the collegeexperience and involvement with campus organizations and volunteer work at levels similar tostudents in other majors. One notable difference reported by engineering students in that study;however, was that those students rated themselves lowest in terms of personal and socialdevelopment, as well as in regard to reflective and integrative learning, when compared to theirpeers in other majors. The authors of that study speculated that this perceived lower
Council did initiate two actionsintended to address ASCE’s concerns: • The Council recommended changing the “Find Accredited Programs” database on the ABET website to reflect which Program Criteria, if any, were used as the basis for each program’s accreditation.21 Programs accredited only under the General Criteria were annotated as such. • The Council recommended a change to Section II.G.5.a(2) of the APPM, specifying that “For a program in a curricular area where no Lead Society has been designated, the program evaluator will be selected from a member society that the commission leadership, in consultation with the program and representatives of any potentially interested member society(ies