Asee peer logo
Displaying results 781 - 810 of 1042 in total
Conference Session
Ethical Reasoning and Responsibility
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Debra S. Fuentes, Brigham Young University; Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University; Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Randall Davies, Brigham Young Unversity
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Ethics
Conference Session
Proven Strategies in Classroom Engagement Part II: Activities for Creative Pedagogy
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Susan Michelle Reynolds P.E., Colorado School of Mines; Raul N. Tackie, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
are of greatimportance, while others may only need to be briefly mentioned in the lecture. To reflect thisrelative importance in the skeleton notes the instructor should rank each topic in the list; in effectcreating a hierarchy of importance. The next step is to reorder the list of topics as they wouldappear chronologically in a lecture; the topics should build on one-another in a logical fashion tocreate a progression of thought that serves to inform the student and demonstrate how theconcepts relate to one another. This reordering can take many forms, and should be written in away that encourages the instructor to think about how the topics are related. Some instructorsmay find that a bulleted list serves this purpose best, while others
Conference Session
Effective Use of Technology in Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nina Magpili, Engineering Management & Systems Engineering (EMSE), Old Dominion University; Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University; Preetham Sathish Ullal, Old Dominion University
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
learners surpasses unsupported instruction with regards to the effective transfer ofknowledge.6 Collaborative work largely reflects the actual environment in engineering-intensiveorganizations that use interdisciplinary teams to solve engineering problems. By carefullyconstructing guidance to support the team in the form of tools and guided activities, we canfacilitate and evaluate interactions and then further determine design improvements to ensurethat effective collaboration takes place. The structure and goals of the collaboration tool andinstructional scaffolds aligns with evidence-based research and the foundational knowledge ofteam processes and team effectiveness.14-16 The collaboration tool was built using Google Appsthat are freely
Conference Session
Works in Progress: Classroom Practice
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ada Hurst, University of Waterloo; Oscar G. Nespoli, University of Waterloo
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
order to optimize the classification effort while attempting toinform us of feedback activity nature and level. For example, we recognize the importance ofneed analysis and the emphasis that experts place on this stage verses novices, and so theimportant coding classifications of problem identification, representation and communication areprominent in our model. Additionally, the verification classification is available at each stage, asthis reflects best design practice. Figure 1. A generalized engineering design process model with coding classifications Initiating Planning
Conference Session
Graduate Programs, Development, and Research Fellowships
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Monica Farmer Cox, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
engineering can have on human lives, as is the focus ofmany recruitment campaigns and messages within undergraduate engineering programs as partof diversity campaigns. Indeed, the fact that the National Science Foundation requires thegraduate students to meet the same Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts criteria required bygrant awardees signifies commitment to requiring engineers, future academicians, andresearchers to carefully consider the merits and impacts of their work. This is potentially avaluable form of reflective practice (essential for developing expertise)35, and contributes to thedefinition of the essence of engineering and what it means to be an engineer, although facultydefinitions of engineering largely still differ from the
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohamed Yousef Ismail, Texas A&M University - Qatar; Hamid R. Parsaei, Texas A&M University - Qatar; Bing Guo, Texas A&M University - Qatar; Konstantinos E. Kakosimos, Texas A&M University - Qatar; Raelene Dufresne, Texas A&M University - Qatar; Nasser Alaeddine, Carnegie Mellon University - Qatar
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
offers a venue for increasing awareness,demonstrating relevance, building confidence, and proving satisfaction for faculty audiences.Furthermore, the influence of peers can play an important role in promoting change in theattitudes of faculty audiences 19, 20, 21, 22. The competition acting as a medium for triggering acontagion effect, or social spillover effect, can lead faculty audiences to imitate the adoptionbehaviors of their peer group of participants.Finalist ProjectsResults from the 2013 competition have demonstrated the potential of the approach in promotinginnovation in engineering education 18. In 2014, there was a variety of projects reflecting thevision of contributing faculty members in relation to advancing education through
Conference Session
Student Preparation for, and Outcomes from, Community Engagement Efforts
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dan Budny P.E., University of Pittsburgh; Sina Arjmand, University of Pittsburgh; David V.P. Sanchez, University of Pittsburgh
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
needs. Firstly,the benefit is for the community that is served by students, and secondly, students areencouraged to connect and reflect how their education connects to their professional career.Through this experience students feel better about their actions and understand the need andtherefore the impact engineers have on a community. This encourages them to learn more abouttheir chosen profession, and feel more confident about their achievements.Also, students have a chance to practice and apply what they learn in class in a real project wherethey are exposed to the results of their design. The positive side of the service learning is in theend, the students are giving back to the communities and society the knowledge they gained inthe
Conference Session
Design Throughout the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
James M. Widmann, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Peter Schuster, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
1 2 Full Professor 11Other quantitative and qualitative data was gathered for this study through a post-class survey. Thesurvey was designed to capture student’s attitudes concerning the use of Active Learning in theMC/MSD class and also to assess the overall student experience. To answer the final question,Instructor B was asked to reflect on his experience of using Active Learning and his plans forfuture implementation.Typical ClassFor the MC/MSD class described here, the student receives four credit units. They meet in 50-minute lecture sections on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday; and a three-hour laboratory sectionon either Tuesday or Thursday of each week. The students in the laboratory sections are
Conference Session
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Outreach in K12 through College Engineering Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eric Iversen, Start Engineering
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
participate in anoutreach survey than those not. We could well have a disproportionate data set. But outreach certainly“feels” like a nearly pervasive activity among universities, and this magnitude of extrapolation is likelyto be generally valid.Three programs reported about 65,000 of the 147,000-plus student total, each with about 20,000participants. The median figure for student programs was 200. The spiky-ness of participation numberspoints up something fundamental about the nature of the field. Outreach is a highly varied undertaking.Different schools have different goals, capabilities, and opportunities. Programs come in all shapes andalso all sizes.The community member total does reflect one unusually large program total that might bear
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christina S. Morton, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan; Julie Libarkin, Michigan State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
students’ entrepreneurial intentions and entrepreneurial self-efficacy, it is not surprising that the Theory of Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive Theoryare commonly used. Although all of the papers in this review placed an emphasis on gender within theirstudies, there appeared to be little consensus regarding which theoretical frameworks to use thatpertain to gender. Three of the 24 papers (12.5%) used Eagly’s Social Role Theory33, whichdescribes how beliefs concerning the different sexes are reflective of the sexual division of laborand gender hierarchy within society. Other theories pertaining to gender that were used to framestudies included Gender Schema Theory34, Liberal Feminism Theory35, Gender Role Theory36,and Sex Role
Conference Session
Research on Design Learning
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cassandra Telenko, Georgia Institute of Technology; Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology; Christopher Saldana, Georgia Institute of Technology; Todd Sulchek, Georgia Institute of Technology; Shannon K. Yee, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Thomas Kurfess, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
activitiesmust be structured to meet the appropriate knowledge levels and learning goals. Students mustbe clearly informed in their role as researchers or contributors to research. As part of this role,they should be given some level of autonomy, such as the ability to tweak the experiment orgiven access to equipment or tools for their creative projects. Despite the level of autonomy thatstudents thrive on, it is important that faculty realize students may be slow to question ahypothesis when engaging in experiments. They thus require mentoring and reflection withregards to research methods. Faculty must also invest in these activities by purchasing orproviding access to equipment, or consulting with students regularly. Additionally, many ofthese
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Improving Female Faculty Experiences in STEM
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel Yonemura, University of Washington ; Denise Wilson, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
is that the individual feels isolated and is able to identify potential sources of those feelings.• Mysterious Pathways: covers feelings of being stalled, stuck, or unable to move forward in a career. Originally classified as a result of not knowing the pathways to promotion or advancement, this category was expanded slightly to also reflect those career pathways that are stagnant or stalled for both men and women.• Diving Catch: refers to a tendency of some workplaces to put those who are risk averse at a disadvantage. In a diving catch work environment, the individual who feels less comfortable with risk feels more at a disadvantage with regard to advancement or performance because he or she is penalized by not
Conference Session
Diversity in Community Engagement Implementation II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer L Sullivan, Rice University; David Daniels, DREAM - Achievement Through Mentorship; Imani O. Butler, Rice University; Brent C Houchens, Rice University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
Understanding functions rank asthe strongest influencers on Head Mentors’ motivation for volunteering. The differencesbetween Values and the Understanding are statistically significant compared to each other, andare also statistically different when either function is compared to all of the others. Asinfluencers these are followed by Enhancement, Social, Career, and Protective, although theonly statistically significant difference among these four functions is between Enhancement andProtective. It is important to emphasize that the ANOVA results reflect trends in the relative impact ofthe functions on the average respondent: specifically, that the Values score for the averageDREAM Head Mentor was greater than their scores in the other functions
Conference Session
Communication as Performance
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Pulford, Center for Engineering Learning and Teaching (CELT); Cibele V. Falkenberg, Auburn University
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society
important part ofengineering research and practice.Finding ways to normalize mistakes and failures, and make them safe to perform in public,enables a number of learning enhancements. Foremost, it allows us a much less complicatedmeans of understanding what our students are learning and what they find challenging. Butperhaps more importantly, when mistakes seem safe, it enables students to practice seeingmistakes and feedback as helpful and nonthreatening. A learner’s constructive attitude towardmistakes is a major component of current pedagogical concerns such as growth mindset,mastery-based learning motivation, reflection and resiliency 16–19. Improvisatory educationmethods provide us with a very promising strategy toward scaffolding a value for
Conference Session
Developing Infrastructure Professionals
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Douglas Schmucker P.E., University of Utah; Joshua Lenart, University of Utah; Steven J. Burian P.E., University of Utah; Amir Mohaghegh Motlagh, University of Utah
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
rather than a high performance by the students. Instead, the criteria for performanceat the Analysis level might more accurately be defined as demonstrating an understanding of thecompeting measures of success for the various project criteria and how to obtain, process, andanalyze the appropriate data associated with success in each category. If so, the performance ofthe students would occur, at best, around the Application level. It is more likely that other levelswould then be re-scaled to reflect average performance occurring around a mean of 2.5 (betweenComprehension and Application). Note the large coefficient of variation of 0.4. Such a largevalue suggests significant scatter about the mean. (Given the changing perspective of the
Conference Session
But I'm a Loner! Expanding capability and creativity by examining effective alliances
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Waddah Akili, Iowa State University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
goals and student learning, often referredto as educative assessment (8, 27) .This would include decisions on how to provideinformation on students’ strengths and their mastery of course material, as well asguidance on how to proceed with learning activities to insure compliance withdefined goals and how to improve students’ performance and their grasp of newmaterial. Students will eventually need reliable feedback on their performance thatallows them to move forward as learners and deepens their understanding of thesubject matter. This feedback could come from the instructor, their classmates, theirown self-reflection, or a combination of the three. (27, 28)Another important factor in the optimization process is to integrate the
Conference Session
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Fundemental and Evaluation: Embedded Programs in Engineering Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California, San Diego; Heidi A. Tremayne, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute; Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University; James Mallard, UC San Diego
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
3-5-ETS1-1 Define a simple design problem reflecting a need or a want that includes specified criteria for success and constraints on materials, time or cost. 3-5-ETS1-2 Generate and compare multiple possible solutions to a problem based on how well each is likely to meet the criteria and constraints of the problem. 3-5-ETS1-3 Plan and carry out fair tests in which the variables are controlled and failureAdditional description and resources related to this K’Nex™ structure design activity can befound in the educational resources in NEESacademy on the NEES website[12], PacificEarthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) website[9] and in a paper[7].During the
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Darren C. Olson, Central Washington University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
used the results from their analysis ofincidental interactions, along with reflections on product interactions with the environment andthe user, to identify risks and seek means by which those risks could be countered via robustdesign enhancements. Students were taught about failure mode effects analysis (FMEA), a toolthat is well suited for the activity at hand, and a template was available for their use. However, itwas necessary to limit the project scope so that work could be accomplished within the timeavailable and so that unreasonable expectations would not be placed upon students. Therefore,FMEA was not a required project activity. At a minimum, students were required to identifyissues that they believed might present unacceptable risks
Conference Session
CEED Paper Session 2: Leveraging Internships and Experiential Learning in Higher Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Derrick Langley, Air Force Institute of Technology; Diana Lynn Cahill, SOCHE; Mary Yvonne Lanzerotti, Air Force Institute of Technology; Richard Martin, The Air Force Institute of Technology; Maggie Varga, Southwestern Ohio Council for Higher Education; Sean Joseph Creighton, SOCHE; Jeremy Paul Stringer, Air Force Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Cooperative & Experiential Education
rigorous accordingto Ohland and McNeil (2015) and Guest (2012).In this partnership, SOCHE collects free-form student responses obtained in in-depth studentpre-surveys and in-depth student post-surveys in 2012 (48 students, 18 responses to post-survey), 2013 (43 students, 8 responses to post-survey), 2014 (49 students, 33 responses topost-survey), and 2015 (34 students; 17 responses to post-survey). AFIT collects free-formThe views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position ofthe United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. This document has been approvedfor public release; distribution unlimited
Conference Session
Best of DEED
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Timothy W. Simpson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Emily A. Waterman, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
Conference Session
Diversity in Community Engagement Implementation II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ziyu Long, Colorado State University; Sean Eddington, Purdue University; Jessica Pauly; Linda Hughes-Kirchubel, Purdue University; Klod Kokini, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Patrice Marie Buzzanell, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
, year-longprocess of learning, reflection, and support by colleagues. Another important difference is that faculty learning community emphasized onrelationship development and community building among faculty. As noted by prior research onsocialization, successful relationships cultivated through organizational connections furtherembed and empower individuals to participate, identify, and engage more deeply with theirorganization (Kramer & Miller, 2014, see also Illiesa, Dimotakisc & Spitzmullera, 2013). FLCsdesigned specifically for new faculty, as in the case of this study, provide coaching andleadership opportunities for individuals who are already experiencing organizational change andtransition. It is therefore conceivable
Conference Session
Make It!
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nathan Tyler Thomas, Western Carolina University; Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University; Hugh Jack, Western Carolina University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
unit the ability to move in a differential manner 1 . Figure 1: Kilobot AgentsThe assembly jig is a 3D printed component that assist in the Kilobot construction, making themounting of the legs and motors quick and consistent. Figure 2: Kilobot JigThe arena can consist of any smooth reflective surface but, as recommended, a dry erase surfaceshould be used. The overhead infrared programmer/controller (OHC) is a circular printed circuitboard (PCB) about 3” in diameter with a USB connection on the top center and infrared LEDsmounted on the bottom perimeter of the PCB. The OHC is designed to program or controlmultiple Kilobots at one time
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Retaining and Developing Women Faculty
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Theresa M. Vitolo, Gannon University; Karinna M Vernaza, Gannon University; Lori D. Lindley, Gannon University; Elisa M. Konieczko, Gannon University; Weslene Tallmadge, Gannon University
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity, Engineering Deans Council
Tagged Divisions
Engineering and Public Policy, Women in Engineering
members.Upon review several modifications to the website were communicated to the HR specialist, whoalso acted as liaison between any and all constituents. A major modification reflected howmedium-to-large institutions receive and process applications. Through various communicationand performance difficulties on the part of the webmaster required that, the HR specialistworked closely with the webmaster over the next18 months in order for a majority of therequested changes to be implemented. Unfortunately, these changes were not completed tospecification or functioning.To address these technical limitations and frustrations, a local technology group was hired toexamine and to correct the architecture and functioning of the website. After six months
Conference Session
Instructional and Learning Assessment in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico; Jamie R Gomez, University of New Mexico; Victor Law, Program of Organization, Information, and Learning Sciences at University of New Mexico; Sophia Bowers, University of New Mexico
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
. Thelab members all have experience conducting qualitative analysis. Members reviewed 25 samplesof student work on the DST, placing sticky notes on the tests where they noted a particular codeor saw something of interest. These initial ideas were turned into a coding scheme and applied tothe dataset, omitting codes that were not relevant to the research focus (e.g., design aesthetics) orthat were found to be redundant. This coding scheme was refined further at another research labmeeting; per recommendations for qualitative researchers, disagreements in coding werediscussed.66 The chemical engineers involved in the project reviewed the scheme and confirmedthat it was ecologically valid,67 meaning it authentically reflected their understanding of
Conference Session
Teaching Methods in Mechancial Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca L Norris, University of Oklahoma; Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma; M. Cengiz Altan, University of Oklahoma; J. D. Baldwin, University of Oklahoma; Wilson E Merchán-Merchán, University of Oklahoma
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
innovative and productive workforce [1]. Recognizing thisneed, significant attention and resources have been allocated in the recent past towardsincreasing female and underrepresented minority student enrollment in STEM fields, includingengineering. These efforts have resulted in a more diverse undergraduate population in USinstitutions, but overall graduation rates still do not reflect a fully diverse student body. Forinstance, women and underrepresented minorities earned only around 19% and 13% of the 2012 1bachelor degrees in engineering, a small increase from previous years [2]. Additionally, thisincrease in diversity is not uniform across disciplines; traditional engineering disciplines havemuch
Conference Session
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Use of Technology and Tools for K-12 Engineering Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Henry M. Clever, New York University; Allison Graham Brown, New York University ; Vikram Kapila, New York University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
by incorporating real work: real-worldrelevant assignments, ill-defined problems, sustained investigation, collaboration, and reflection.The AR Drone lab targeted all of these real work elements with its inherent real-worldimportance in technology, ill-defined experimental process, sustained investigation of errorsources, and continuous collaboration and reflection between teams. Simultaneously, it promotedthe three categories within quantitative research through this real work scenario: actualexperimental design and setup, theoretical calculations of ground speed from distance and time,and descriptive analysis of a real-world scenario.Within the “real work” learning process, it is essential to account for how the Net Generationlearns.21 The
Conference Session
Computer Modeling/CAD in Mechanical Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aneet Dharmavaram Narendranath, Michigan Technological University; Prathamesh Prashant Deshpande, Michigan Technological University; Madhu Kolati, Michigan Technological University; Datta Sandesh Manjunath, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
not of the essence for the focus of this work. A detailedmethodology for similar situations of circular plates is described in literature 14,15,16,17 . It isinteresting to note that analytical accounts and approximate solutions show preponderance overexperimental data. This was realized independently by the students too and reflects in their choiceof mode of validation. Students overwhelmingly used published analytical equations to validatetheir own analytical/Mathematica work and results obtained from the Hyperworks Suite.Analytical equationsFor loaded circular plates with a central hole, for a variety of boundary conditions, analyticalequations for the maximum deflection, ymax , of the plate are described by equation 11. These arecommonly
Conference Session
Using Laboratories for Instruction in Mechanical Engineering
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Vidya K Nandikolla, California State University, Northridge; Vibhav Durgesh, California State University, Northridge
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
mechatronic system with microcontroller integrationConclusion and future planInspite of the changes made to both the curriculums, we still feel there is room to incorporatemore changes. Using rubrics for the project assessment helps the students and the instructor tofollow the same expectations for both laboratory portions of the courses. Implementing the samerubrics in two semesters gives students training in problem solving while working in teamenvironment. Goal of creating a common set of rubrics not only helps with outcome assessmentbut also encourages reflection in the curriculum to make positive enhancements. Inclusion ofethics discussion is important as students manipulate data and understanding the representation iscritical. As we continue
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Yi Pan, Georgia State University; Michael Weeks, Georgia State University; Yanqing Zhang, Georgia State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
that we can measure the learningexperiences and outcomes in these 4 courses. Below are the evaluation results.Pre-EvaluationAll the participants are students from the computer science department at Georgia State University. Theassessment is divided into three parts:  Work experience with computer and programming language used (written response)  Knowledge of operating system (choice question)  Study experience of PC and different ways to learn (choice question)The diversity in the nature of question reflects both the understanding of students about the operating system andthe best way for the students to learn it effectively.Written response – Operating System:Work Experience YES (%) NO (%)Have
Conference Session
Student Preparation for, and Outcomes from, Community Engagement Efforts
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kurt Paterson P.E., James Madison University; Christopher Swan, Tufts University; David W. Watkins, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
seemsbright; yet the rapid emergence of these offerings (and the position of many outside the requiredcurriculum) has outpaced our ability to assess potential learning outcomes for participatingstudents. This paper aims to contribute evidence regarding the engagement and cultural agility ofengineering students, providing data-driven insight and reflection in the process.Our research effort focuses on two specific working hypotheses: H1: Service-oriented international experiences attract engineering students with an intercultural mindset H2: Participation in service-oriented experiences will lead to elevated intercultural proficiency for engineering studentsThese research hypotheses will be tested in the following ways