seniordesign experience including the courses, projects and student teams. The School is expandingthe research options available to students by committing university funding to perform internalprojects and securing external funding. A prior NSF – ILI program (NSF-DUE-9751372) thatdeveloped a $130,000 multi-purpose Integrated Systems Engineering Laboratory7,8 was largelyimplemented by Senior Project teams over two years. The students, under the direction of thegrant’s principle investigator, were involved in the lab layout, selection of equipment, andassisting in preliminary curriculum development.Students have been extensively involved in the development of the new energy conversionlaboratory. Two student design teams and an undergraduate research
management of stack frames. An online labmanual has been developed for this course that is freely available for extension or use by otherinstitutions.Our previous papers reported on pedagogical techniques for facilitating student understanding ofthe relationships between high-level language constructs, such as algebraic expression syntax,block-structured control-flow structures, and composite data types, along with theirimplementations in machine code. While this integrated approach to introducing control-flowstructures has been successful, many students have been confused by the large number ofdifferent addressing modes. The present paper describes further extensions of this integrated C-and-assembly language pedagogical approach in which
Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”desire to share their interest with non-engineering peers and parents, and find that unlike othermore abstract classes it is straightforward to communicate what they are learning in a robotics-centric curriculum. We frequently have students request to show their visiting parents therobotics lab; I have never had a similar request to open the controls lab! Instructors like usingrobots in introductory courses because with one device they can discuss many major electricalengineering subdisciplines (analog, digital, controls, programming, computer architecture),provide an introduction to the most important test instruments (DMM
problem is encountered, divergent thinking serves best. Iterationbetween these two is recognized as an integral part of the design process,9 and a designer mustreadily switch between wearing the hats of convergent and divergent thinking.Connections Between Engineering Design and CreativityDesign is an increasingly more important part of the engineering curriculum. Senior capstoneprojects have been a part of that experience for decades, but recently cornerstone and Project-Based Learning (PBL) has become more ubiquitous. There are some distinct elements that arepresent in most project-based design courses that can be linked (either rightly or wrongly) toencouraging creativity. Those elements are teaming, brainstorming, open-ended projects
system.This could be a huge opportunity if colleges adjust their curriculums to address the latesttechnology demands. One stated example was “What software programs do they use for theclass in mechatronics - a combination of mechanics, information technology and electronics?” 1.This is an area industry needs from the Indian higher educational system.Quality Engineering Education is a Worldwide ConcernRepresentatives from 31 organizations representing 10 countries and ASEE met in Rio deJaneiro, Brazil in October 2006 to launch the International Federation of Engineering EducationSocieties (IFEES). A November 2006 article titled “Engineering Educators Go Global to ShareSolutions & Resources: New Alliance to Shape International Engineering Education
type [8] have created thepremises for an enhanced academic process capable to directly connect theory and practice,causes and effects, engineering design parameters and their impact on system performance.In this paper, the main elements of designing the AoE in UAS are presented. The role and placeof the AoE within the AEBS curriculum are explained in Section 2. The main educationalobjectives and motivation are outlined in Section 3. The targeted learning outcomes are listed inSection 4. Section 5 includes a brief discussion of the adopted strategy and the main educationaltools used for the design and implementation of the AoE. The general curricular structure andacademic requirements are described in Section 6. Finally, some conclusions and a
can be completedin one year. Typically, these degree programs emphasize coursework, and advanced trainingin an area of technical specialty. Typical graduate engineering curriculum consists of a set ofcore courses which address critical competencies needed to enhance technical skills, followedby course technical electives in a concentration area. However, most of the programs aredeveloped without any direct involvement or collaboration of an external industry. As a result,the specialized programs are not effective.Curricula structured around traditional disciplines can be easily developed without anyindustry involvement. However, trans-disciplinary programs in specialized fields can beenhanced by harnessing industry collaboration. By bringing
Paper ID #39608Do Short-Term Diversity Trainings Have Lasting Effects?Dr. Laura J. Bottomley, North Carolina State University, Raleigh Laura Bottomley is the Director of Engineering Education for the College of Engineering at NC State University. She has worked in engineering education from preK-20 for more than 30 years, starting the Engineering Place for K-12 Outreach at NC State in 1999 and the Women in Engineering Program in 1998. She has been recognized with the PAESMEM award, once as an individual and once as a part of a program award, but her students would say that her Superbowl commercial was the greater recognition
contributions to the new canon. We have held two such events. Some of the new courses discussed below are a direct result of these events. 2. Social Justice and Humanitarian Engineering Workshops: Juan Lucena and Jessica Smith of Colorado School of Mines presented the first workshop that focused on incorporating humanitarian perspectives in classroom activities. A second workshop delivered by Caroline Ballie emphasized the nexus between engineering and social justice. The objectives of the workshops were to develop an understanding of the barriers, mindsets, and ideologies that get in the way of integrating humanitarian engineering and social justice in the engineering curriculum and strategies for how to overcome
4 4Once again, the Spring 2008 Chemical Plant Design class out-performed the Spring 2007 PlantDesign class in all respects. This was true despite the fact that the class of 2007 earned slightlybetter grades in the curriculum as a whole. While the Chemical Plant Design results wereobtained from small sample sizes of 4 teams per cohort, and therefore not statistically significant,they provide an additional indication of a lasting impact from the Fall 2005 improvements toSophomore Clinic I. Anecdotally, the Spring 2008 class projects was observed to show moreevidence of divergent thinking than the Spring 2007 class. For example: ≠ The 2007 Plant Design project was on production of Methyl Methacrylate and the 2008
. Page 14.531.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Encouraging Conceptual Change in Science through the Use of Engineering Design in Middle SchoolAbstractThe United States is suffering from a national crisis in science and math education. At the middleand high school level, US students perform poorly on standardized tests in comparison to otherdeveloped countries. Middle school may be the key to capturing students’ interest in math andscience; this is the time when many children decide they are not interested in science, or notgood at math. Additionally, most never get the chance to learn about engineering.In this study, eighth grade students participated in an engineering design-based curriculum
develop industry-readiness in our students and support theirlearning of professional skills. The course is not designed to teach additional technical content,but rather to give students opportunities to integrate the content learned across other courses intoa single project. Because of this, students are required to have two engineering scienceprerequisite courses completed before taking the course, an introductory controls systems courseand a microcontrollers course. In our curriculum, SEED Lab replaced another requiredmultidisciplinary discrete experiments-based laboratory course which had less intensivetechnical learning objectives and lacked an explicit emphasis on intradisciplinary systemsintegration. SEED Lab is a prerequisite course for EE
innovations, the College of Engineering was an earlyand enthusiastic adopter of the program, serving as both a source of expertise (e.g. fabrication,coding) and as the largest pool of participants. Through involvement and sponsorship of theuniversity-wide Cal Poly Center for Innovation & Entrepreneurship, the program is broadeningand maturing. Engineering students are seeing significant benefits from working with diversemajors on designs that sometimes involve technology in only a minor supporting role. This typeof problem solving develops abstract, innovative “soft” skills that complement the technicaldepth they develop in their traditional curriculum. These skills are critical to producingengineers that can thrive in a global environment. At
pedagogy, fairness in AI, disinformation, social justice addressing theinequities of society, and ethics/professionalism topics. In most of these topics, equity incomputing is still forming and not widely seen as an integral part of the discipline.N. Washington [31] discusses the glaring omission of non-technical issues from the CScurriculum that would allow CS students, and future professionals, to understand, analyze, andoffer solutions about the inequity and lack of representation that exists in computing. Dr.Washington argues that there is a need for all CS students to have a level of cultural competenceso that students can begin to understand, critically analyze and look for solutions that willimprove equity in our field. Another CS Educator
value.Meanwhile, the increasing need of specialized and unique products requires engineers toinnovate in relation to cross-disciplinary fields. Traditional engineering education is losingsome of its relevance in relation to these new requirements of the engineering knowledgeand profession [1]. In many universities, the traditional engineering curricula areincreasingly replaced by learner-centered and group-organized approaches, such asproblem based learning (PBL). Facing employer demands for innovative engineers,engineering education has tried to connect engineering scientific knowledge withprofessional practice. New educational models, like problem based learning (PBL)curriculum, are intended to integrate subject knowledge into projects, empower
Opportunities in STEM (TAPDINTO-STEM); Co-PI of NSF EEC ”RFE Design and Development: Framing Engineering as Community Activism for Values-Driven Engineering”; Co-PI of NSF CISE ”EAGER: An Accessible Coding Curriculum for ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #41881Engaging Underserved Students with Special Needs in Afterschool Programs”; co-PI of NSF INCLUDES:South East Alliance for Persons with Disabilities in STEM, Co-PI of NSF CE 21 Collaborative Research:Planning Grant: Computer Science for All (CS4ALL)).Dr. Marghitu was also PI of grants from Center for Woman in Information Technology, Daniel F
AC 2007-2460: EXPERIENCES AND TEACHING TOOLS IN ALTERNATIVEENERGY EDUCATIONSlobodan Petrovic, Arizona State University Dr. Slobodan Petrovic is an associate professor at the Arizona State University, with teaching and research interests in the areas of alternative energy (fuel cells, hydrogen production and storage, CO2 reduction), MEMS and sensors. Prior to joining ASU Dr. Petrovic held appointments at Clear Edge Power (formerly Quantum Leap Technology) as a Vice President of Engineering; at Neah Power Systems as Director of Systems Integration; and Motorola, Inc. as a Fuel Cell Group Manager and Reliability Manager. Dr. Petrovic has over 20 years of experience in energy systems
Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology Abstract Sum-of-Products (SOP) expressions are two-level representations of Boolean functions consisting of an OR sum of AND terms. There exist many methods of SOP synthesis, but the Karnaugh map method is the most frequently taught in undergraduate curriculum. Unfortunately, most traditional approaches to teaching Karnaugh map-based SOP minimization are not very engaging for the learner. To increase student engagement, game-based approaches to teach- ing are increasingly being used to supplement traditional teaching methods. There has been limited research into extending such game-based teaching ap- proaches towards SOP minimization with Karnaugh maps. This paper pro
followed learning outcomes, and integrated learningwith team teaching of modules. Their response was to revamp the curriculum to be highlyintegrated and focused on problem-based learning to develop transferable and conceptual skills(Gomes, et al., 2006). Another study at the University of Barcelona looked at adapting theirchemical engineering curriculum to be more student-oriented and structured around theundergraduate and master’s degrees. They changed their curriculum gradually to have moreemphasis on ethics, feedback, and collaborative learning. Their findings were that although moretime consuming, both students and teachers responded positively (Iborra, et al., 2014). A similarstudy was completed at Newcastle University, and resulted in using
-specific. Gathering this information from people executing orsupervising the engineering tasks enables the development of instruction with “high functionalcontext.” 4 Using this process, the context of the workplace is integrated into the engineeringcommunication course. As a result, students are much more capable of applying the workplacecommunication skills, learned in the classroom, to their job. 4Although across-the-curriculum applications have met with much success, it is widely noted that“what constitutes an effective communication differs from discipline to discipline and fromprofession to profession.”17 Discipline-relevant content is believed to motivate learners andprovide the contextual use of discipline-specific vocabulary.18 This
included multiple constraints. The IE program utilized industrysponsored open-ended design projects or case studies from professional organizations in severalcourses in the curriculum to provide hand-on practical design experience to graduates. Thesenior-level capstone design course provided integrative experience in an industry sponsoredproject that allowed students to apply what they had learned in the lower level courses. 4 From 1970s through the 1990s the industrial design project sponsor reimbursed students’travel expenses. PACCE now provides support for such service learning projects in IEcurriculum. This has allowed for more nonprofit organizations to become project sponsors. Infall
robot useful,while the AR robot scored highly in the interest portion of the MUSIC model.This study highlights the potential of AR and VR technology to motivate students in the field of robotics. Theimplementation studied was an effective proof of concept, and future iterations will include a fully immersiveprogramming interface within a virtual environment to allow collaboration over shared tasks and resources, evenwhen geographically separated. Future iterations will also incorporate accessibility and inclusivity to a greater degreeby leveraging Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles to integrate the tool effectively into the curriculum of anundergraduate engineering course.Keywords: Virtual Reality, robotics, Engineering Education
, CAD, DFM, CAM and CNC machining. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com CAD Instruction in the Time of COVIDIntroductionCourses in an engineering curriculum with a high computer-based laboratory content wouldappear to be well suited to weather the transition to online instruction necessitated by theCOVID-19 pandemic. Such classes already have an established hardware and softwareinfrastructure upon which to build. This together with the shift to cloud-based computing wherecomputational and data storage capabilities are increasingly distributed, the accessibility problemfor students should at first glance be easy to
review of the ME engineeringprogram strategic plan. The intent is to provide a benchmark that can assist us to determinewhere we are with respect to our design requirements and goals for the ME101 course. Theauthors expect that as the engineering program with its processes evolves and it is iterated,its built-in feedback mechanisms will eventually show where improvements may be moreadvantageous.The ME curricula at AAMU has been designed with vertical and horizontal integration andit is discussed in a separate paper. It should suffice to mention that as a result of theresearch and planning it became clear that an introductory course in mechanical engineeringwas strongly recommended in order to reach the program’s proposed outcomes.IV. Course
Session 2202 Problem-Based Learning in Aerospace Engineering Education Doris R. Brodeur, Peter W. Young, Kim B. Blair Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstractProblem-based learning is now a widespread teaching method in disciplines where studentsmust learn to apply knowledge, not just acquire it. In the undergraduate curriculum inAeronautics and Astronautics at MIT, problem-based learning and design-buildexperiences are integrated throughout the program. In an early freshman-year experience,Introduction to Aerospace and Design, students design, build, and fly radio-controlledlighter-than-air (LTA
(focused on research),secondary (focused on teaching and/or service), and intersectional (aligned with identities ofscholars’ choosing). This integrated model engages scholars, mentors, and members of theadministrative team in authentic dialogue to promote a culture that differs from traditionalmodels of postdoctoral mentorship and development. Initial findings show that to maximize the progression of postdoctoral scholars, it isimportant to understand and address their self-identified issues surrounding mentorship andprofessional barriers that impede their success. The target audiences of this work are institutionalprograms, individuals who work with postdoctoral scholars, and those with an interest indiversifying and retaining future URM STEM
) curriculum (Museum of Science, Boston). The focusof the professional development (led by the researchers) was to orient teachers to engineeringand technology, uncover misconceptions, and provide an overview of the EiE curriculum alongwith an in-depth examination of one EiE unit they would implement in the Fall 2013. All fourteachers are employed in schools with large percentages of non-White students and studentsreceiving free or reduced lunch. We deliberately chose to work with schools with diverse studentpopulations with the goal of providing an opportunity to enact innovative, engineering-basedcurricula in hopes of challenging the status quo in a non-dominant demographic elementaryschool population.Each teacher implemented one EiE unit during
mindset in curriculum formany years. Recent efforts in mechanical engineering programs have focused on modulesembedded in engineering classrooms that support mindset development in students [3]–[5].Many prior authors have published in the field of concept mapping in engineering. One of themost relevant studies by Martine et al. [6] and Ferguson et al. [7] discuss methodology forscoring concept maps that is relevant for our work. Cornwell provides an overview of the wayconcept mapping may support the mechanical engineering curriculum broadly [8]. A summaryof prior work is shown in Table 1.Table 1. Summary of concept mapping methods from the literature. Author Year Student Course Methods
of continuous curriculum improvement. Rim has a PhD in Instructional Systems/Educational Technology from the Florida State University (FSU). Rim also holds a M.Sc degree in Instructional Systems and a Certificate in Human Performance Technol- ogy from FSU, and a B.Sc in Information Technology from Notre Dame University. Rim’s major project and research interests include technology integration in education; assessment and evaluation; learner- centered methods and strategies; and any other methods that assist in enhancing human performance and learning improvement. Rim has authored and co-authored several published articles in peer-reviewed journals, and conferences proceedings. Anshuman Razdan is Professor in
). Essentiallyservingness is a metric of the efforts to support student inclusion and thriving, a metric in whichthe role and work of Latine and Hispanic TFF are integral. We derive this question and ourprojects broader motivation from Garcia (2019, p. 4) who argues that, “Moving from servignessas a theory to an actual practice requires learning with and from HSIs that are currently 10implementing these practices.”. We see this work as looking to those who are contributing mostto servingness within the classroom to explore how and how much they contribute to highereducation institutions' servigness, as well as to how these institutions can best support them