Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver; Jong-Hoon Kim, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

] university. University of This section (conclusion/summary) is a summary of In an online lab Minnesota the results and discussion from the report. It is still report writing Department of discussion, where you insert your opinion of the resource of a R1 Mechanical results. Report the key findings of the report here. It is university’s Engineering much like the results and discussion sections of the mechanical Student Writing abstract. Directly answer the report question here. Do engineering Guide [14] not be vague. program. Ringleb, S. I., Conclusions are logically tied to inquiry findings and In an engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert C. Martin, Texas A&M University; Cynthia Lang, Texas A&M University; Sin-Ning Cindy Liu, Texas A&M University; Carolyn L Sandoval, University of California, San Diego; Mindy Bergman, Texas A&M University; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Ohio State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

, “Development of a Classification System for Engineering Student Characteristics Affecting College Enrollment and Retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361–376, October 2009.[7] M. Meyer, and S. Marx, “Engineering dropouts: A qualitative examination of why undergraduates leave engineering,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 525-548, October 2014.[8] S. Haag, N. Hubele, A. Garcia and K. McBeath, “Engineering undergraduate attrition and contributing factors,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 929-940, October 2007.[9] K. L. Sutton, and C. Sankar, C, “Student satisfaction with information provided by academic advisors,” Journal of STEM Education

Conference Session

FOCUS ON EXHIBITS: Welcome Reception & NEW THIS YEAR! 2018 Best Division Paper Nominee Poster Session Sponsored by Engineering Unleashed

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert B Austin P.E., Bowling Green State University

Tagged Topics

ASEE Headquarters

development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.3. Austin, R. B. (2017) Reengineering BGSU’s Construction Management Capstone, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Columbus, OH4. Berg, D., Manib, H.S., Marinakis, Y., Tierneyc, R. and Walsh, S. (2015) An introduction to Management of Technology pedagogy (andragogy). Technological Forecasting & Social Change 100 1–45. Berg, T., Erichsen, M. and Hokstad, L.F. (2016) Stuck at the Threshold, Which strategies do students choose when facing liminality with certain disciples at a business school?6. Chan, S. (2010) Applications of Andragogy in Multi-Disciplined Teaching and Learning, Journal of Adult Education Volume 39, Number 2

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Judith Shaul Norback, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

differences in the trends emerging from the twogroups. Our analysis thus far suggests that trends tend to be common to both groups.Specifically, most of the trends emerging from Table 2 are replicated in Table 3 and vice versa.Table 2. Papers Presented in Divisions Other Than LEES Table&2.&PAPERS&PRESENTED&IN&DIVISIONS&OUTSIDE(OF(LEES& Division Number and Title of Session No. & Paper Title(s) & ID Numbers Non-LEES Sessions Position of Papers 1. Chemical Engineering W105 Communication in the 4 (entire • “Improving Student Technical

Conference Session

Capstone Design in ECE

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Scott McGuirk Ph.D., United States Air Force Academy; John G. Ciezki, United States Air Force Academy

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

Paper ID #14624An Electromagnetic Railgun Design and Realization for an Electrical Engi-neering Capstone ProjectLt. Col. Jeffrey Scott McGuirk Ph.D., United States Air Force Academy Jeffrey S. McGuirk received his BSEE degree in 1995 from the United States Air Force Academy (US- AFA) in Colorado Springs, CO, and an MSEE degree from Iowa State University in 1996. From 1997- 2000, he was with the Air Force Research Laboratory at Eglin Air Force Base where he designed fuzes for weapons. From 2000-2003, he was with the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center where he directed tests on satellite communication systems

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 9: Evaluating and Measuring Recruiting and Major Selection Strategies

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jaqi C. McNeil, University of Louisville; Angela Thompson P.E., University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

interested in. This was done over two class periods. Almost all the ofcomments about time were negative, ranging from the presentations being too short (, or therewasn’t enough time to answer questions or students felt rushed. One student seemed to enjoy thepresentations but thought they should be longer, “It would have been helpful if the presentationswere a little longer because some of the speakers had a lot of great info in their presentations butcouldn't get through all of it because of the time constraints” (DP196). Some students wantedone-on-one time with the department presenters, “I have considered switching majors but theydon't give you enough time to talk one on one to the presenters about what it mean(s) to switchor compare the 2 fields

Conference Session

Student and Other Views on Engineering Leadership

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara Jansen Perry, Baylor University; Emily M Hunter, Baylor University; Ed Frauenheim, Great Place to Work Institute; Steven C. Currall, Southern Methodist University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.2. Washington Post (2014, January 28). Full transcript: Obama’s 2014 State of the Union address, accessed January 31, 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/full-text-of-obamas-2014-state-of-the-union- address/2014/01/28/e0c93358-887f-11e3-a5bd-844629433ba3_story.html3. Engineering Research Centers. “Summary of ERC Study Findings 2001-2008,” accessed April 24, 2013. http://www.erc-assoc.org/studies_and_reports.4. Roessner, D., Manrique, L., & Park, J. (2010). The economic impact of Engineering Research Centers: Preliminary results of a pilot study. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 475-493.5. Currall, S. C., Hammer, T. H., Baggett, L. S., & Doniger, G. M. (1999). Combining qualitative and

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Michelle Kay Bothwell, Oregon State University; Susan Bobbitt Nolen, University of Washington; Devlin Montfort, Oregon State University; James D. Sweeney, Oregon State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

developments. In Design research on learning and thinking in educational settings: Enhancing intellectual growth and functioning. London: Taylor & Francis, 2012.8. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.9. Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based learning curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springler-Verlag.10. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87-101.11. Woods, D. R. 1994. Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. Waterdown, Ontario: Donald R. Woods.12. Woods

Conference Session

Solid and Structural Mechanics in Aerospace Engineering

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David C. Fleming, Florida Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

machine. The testing machine is pre-programmed to execute constant amplitude loadingunder load control conditions. Figure 3: Installation of fatigue test specimen in servohydraulic testing machineResults for fatigue life in general strongly depend on the load levels experienced. Given the timelimitations, a single load range is used for all test samples. (In a materials rather than astructures lab, variations in fatigue life due to different stress amplitudes can be explored in thecontext of a rotating beam test to generate a S-N curve.) The peak amplitude of stress was set toprovide an estimated run time of about 30 minutes for the specimens with a circular hole. Thisresulted in a maximum load of 1788 lb (7.95 kN), corresponding to a

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh; Cheryl Matherly; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Lisa Benson, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Education, 8(1).9. Machotka, M. and S. Spodek (2002). “Study Abroad: Preparing Engineering Students for Success in the Global Economy,” (CD) Proceedings, 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.10. Besterfield-Sacre, M., Matherly, C., G. Ragusa, L. Howard, and L.J. Shuman. “Assessing the Spectrum of International Undergraduate Engineering Education Experiences,” 2013 ASEE International Forum, Atlanta, GA, June 22, 2013.11. S. Huang, S. Levonisova, Streiner, S., S. Cunningham, G. Ragusa, M. Besterfield-Sacre, L. Shuman, C. Matherly, and D. Kotys-Schwartz, “Exploring Engineering Education in Broader Context: A Framework of Engineering Global Preparedness,” 2014 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Seda McKIlligan, Iowa State University; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Colleen M. Seifert, University of Michigan; Richard Gonzalez, University of Michigan; Colin M. Gray, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

. International Studies of Management and Organization, 1976. 6: p. 45-63.12. Perkins, D., Creativity’s camel: The role of analogy in invention, in Creative Thought, T. Ward, S. Smith, and J. Vaid, Editors. 1997, American Psychological Association: Washington, DC. p. 523-528.13. Zwicky, F., Discovery, invention, reserach through the morphological approach. 1969, New York, NY: Macmillan.14. Gordon, W.J.J., Synectics. 1961, New York: Harper & Row.15. de Bono, E., Six thinking hats. 1999: Back Bay Books.16. Finke, R.A., T.B. Ward, and S.M. Smith, Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. 1992, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.17. Eberle, B., Scamper. 1995, Waco, Texas: Prufrock.18. Altshuller, G

Conference Session

Discussions on Research Methodology: ERM Roundtable

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brent K Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sang Eun Woo, Purdue University; Qin Zhu, Purdue University; Kavitha D Ramane, Purdue University ; Neha Choudhary, Purdue University Programs

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

questions.While we are just launching our validation effort, it is worth commenting on some criticalmethodological issues related to the two main approaches we are now pursuing. The firstapproach is among the most widely used for scoring SJT items. It involves utilizing a smallgroup of SMEs (i.e., job incumbents with extensive global experience) who identify best andworst options, or rate each response option on a continuum using a Likert-type scale (e.g., from1=least desirable behavior/action to 5=most desirable behavior/action). A test-taker’s answerswill then be compared to the SME ratings; the more similarities between SME ratings and thetest-taker’s answers, the higher scores s/he would receive. This presumes that responses collectedfrom SMEs

Conference Session

Reimagining Engineering Information Literacy: Novel Perspectives on Integration, Assessment, Competencies & Information Use

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Laura Robinson Hanlan, Worcester Polytechnic Institute; Evelyn M Riley, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

(s) of studyand completed in the final year of the undergraduate degree. The three projects may becompleted off-campus at global projects centers, which accounts for WPI being recognized in theU.S.A. for sending more engineering undergraduates abroad than any other school. Moststudents who choose to go away do so for the IQP project, and complete projects sponsoredmainly by governmental and non-governmental organizations, and advised by WPI faculty on-site at the project centers.WPI has a population of 4100 undergraduates, 32% of whom are female. Students come from 47states and 71 countries. Seventy-one percent of students major in a choice of more than tenengineering majors, including the U.S.A.’s first undergraduate major in robotics

Conference Session

Engineering Economics Teaching Tools

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ted Eschenbach P.E., University of Alaska Anchorage; Neal A Lewis, University of Bridgeport

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

beyond thesimple price indices. Note that both price and total return versions of the Dow Jones and the S&P500 indices are available. Only total return versions should be used. We note that the S&P 500and the Russell 1000 are generally regarded as better measures than the Dow Jones, as theyinclude more firms and they weight them by their capitalization or float, rather than simplyaveraging the stock market prices of 30 firms as does the Dow Jones with a divisor calculated tomaintain historical continuity.A Realistic and Valuable Bond and Stock PortfolioWe want to build a portfolio that is a combination of assets in order to manage the risk and returnof the entire portfolio. In general, we want to maximize the return while minimizing the

Conference Session

Assessment of Engineering Leadership Skills

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Doug Reeve P.Eng., University of Toronto; Cindy Rottmann, University of Toronto, ILead; Robin Sacks, University of Toronto

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Leadership Development Division

strongleaders and strong engineers.T ABLE  1 :  S AMPLE  S URVEY  Q UESTIONS  Survey Sample Question Focus CodesectionPart 1: Age: 20-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-59; 60+ Self Demographics (AgeDemographics Category)Part 2: As a student, when dreaming about my future, I Self Time (student)Student imagined doing technically complex work. Situationexperiences (1 never, 2 rarely, 3 occasionally, 4 frequently, 5 (aspiration/satisfaction

Conference Session

Teaching and Learning Strategies I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alison B. Hoxie, University of Minnesota Duluth; Thomas Shepard, University of St. Thomas; Robert Feyen, University of Minnesota Duluth

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

  0.86   0.00   0.80   0.71   0.00   helping me to understand the material.   3. The course format/delivery -1.13   0.73   0.00   -0.57   1.01   0.01   method encouraged cheating.   4. I enjoyed the course. 0.37   0.89     0.03   0.50   0.78   0.00   5. I was interested in the material 0.80   0.81   0.00   1.07   0.78   0.00   presented.   6. It would bother me if other 0.57   1.04   0.01   0.63   1.13   0.01   student(s) cheated during this course

Conference Session

Survey and Assessment Development

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Menold Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

methods include the use of content experts, reviews of existinginstruments, and lists of behaviors and descriptors commonly associated with the construct(s) wewish to assess. Unfortunately, however, item creation sometimes becomes overly dependentupon a researcher’s personal attitudes about the construct(s) being tested, or on “borrowing”items from other instruments that may or may not be sound measures of the construct(s) ofinterest. These risks are particularly likely for new researchers in engineering education, whomay have little experience with best practices in social science research.One way to support best practices in the development of new surveys and assessments is to usean instrument blueprint to guide the creation of items, as well

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ralph Ocon, Purdue University, Calumet

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

humor by an instructor is 1.60 1.58 1.68 typically a waste of classroom time. 5. I feel more comfortable asking an 3.83 4.25 4.43 instructor a question if s/he uses humor in the classroom. 6. An instructor’s job is to teach, not 2.83 2.33 2.75 entertain. 7. I would rather have an instructor try to be 4.14 4.17 4.00 humorous and fail rather than not try to be humorous at all. 8. I am sometimes offended by the uses of 1.43 1.79 1.72 humor by an instructor. 9. I am likely to go to class where the 4.13 4.30 4.50 instructor uses some humor. 10. An instructor doesn’t have to use humor 3.96 3.42 3.50 to be an

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: It's All About Teams and Teamwork

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nick Tatar, Olin College of Engineering; Kevin A. Nguyen, Texas Tech University; Chris Gewirtz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

.”Perspective Respect does not just “When you talk they will listen. They respect your happen ideas, so be willing to admit your flaws because other[s] might not.”ConclusionEngineering Student Reflection Based on our findings we believe engineering students learn a great deal aboutthemselves and their teams when they have time to reflect on those experiences. A larger samplesize may be required to satisfactorily tell whether or not there actually is a difference betweenprompts that are used to promote learning and the possible differences in gender ratings suggeststhe need for further research and confirmation in that area. Though the assignment

Conference Session

Two-year College Division: Authors Address Transfer Matters-Part I

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State University; Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

Paper ID #12213BRCC to LSU Engineering Pathway to SuccessMrs. Sarah Cooley Jones, Louisiana State UniversityDr. Warren N. Waggenspack Jr., Louisiana State University Page 26.288.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 BRCC to LSU Engineering Pathways to SuccessABSTRACTThe National Science Foundation (NSF) S-STEM funded scholarship program, EngineeringPathway to Success, is a joint effort of the College of Engineering at Louisiana State University(LSU) and Baton Rouge Community College (BRCC), and it

Conference Session

Shaping the Future: Structured Mentoring for Today's Diverse Engineering Student Populations

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Alyce Wilson, University of South Florida; Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida; Deonte Cooper, Bulls-Eye

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

. New York: Teacher College, Columbia University. 9. Cashman, S. B. & Seifer, S. D. (2008). Service-learning: An integral part of undergraduate public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(3), 273-278. 10. Chang, J. C. (2002). Women and Minorities in the Science, Mathematics and Engineering Pipeline. ERIC Digest. 11. Chen, G., Gully, S. M. & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 62-83. 12. Cora-Bramble, D. (2006). Minority faculty recruitment, retention and advancement: applications of a resilience-based theoretical framework. Journal of Health Care for the poor and underserved, 17(2), 251-255. 13. Downes, E. A

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 1: Using Technology and/or Technology Tools to Enhance Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Matthew Long, Deakin University; Sivachandran Chandrasekaran P.E., Deakin University; Simon William Cavenett

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

community of inquiry amongst students,the students need to experience a diversity of interactions across both, and possibly within eachof the, online and on-campus modes of student presence involved in blended learning.Weighing up the advantages and disadvantages of residential schools, we conclude that theyare a very important component in an online undergraduate engineering program. As far asonline education in engineering is concerned, a balance needs to be found between ensuringproper training and assessment of trainee engineers and the very worthwhile goal of providingengineering education “anywhere, anytime”.42AcknowledgementsThe authors express their sincere thanks to K.L. Chenery, W.B. Stannard, S. Palmer, andM. Khalife who gave invaluable

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session II

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut; Mark Tehranipoor, University of Florida; Caitlin Nichole O'Brien, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

McIntyre and Caitlin O’Brian is appreciated.References1 Fugate, C. M., Zentall, S. S. & Gentry, M. Creativity and Working Memory in Gifted Students With and Without Characteristics of Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder: Lifting the Mask. Gifted Child Quarterly 57, 234-246 (2013).2 White, H. A. & Shah, P. Uninhibited imaginations: Creativity in adults with Attention- Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Personality and Individual Differences 40, 1121-1131, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.007 (2006).3 White, H. A. & Shah, P. Creative style and achievement in adults with attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Personality and Individual Differences 50, 673-677, doi:http://dx.doi.org

Conference Session

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Engineering Alignment with Core Curriculum (Physics)

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamalee A. Brady, California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo; Jennifer H. Rushing, Central Coast New Tech High

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics, Pre-College Engineering Education Division

 that when the marble is first struck by the pinball  start off at zero and once  mechanism it reaches a maximum velocity of 1.46 m/s. The  put in motion down the  acceleration of the ball is very fast peaking at 8.36 m/s  track; gravity does the rest,  before making contact with the track and slowing to about  until it reaches the bottom  5.7 m/s.  and stops.     C. Describe 2 types of forces exhibited by machine components  Emerging (​ Low​ )  Proficient (​ High​ )  We have gravitational forces, with  The domino at the end of the

Conference Session

Perspectives on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Beyond the Undergraduate Years

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Francesca Dupuy, University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida; Paul G. Richardson, Independent Consultant/Engineer

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

enoughto ensure proper use of it. However, there were participants who were content with theircompanies because of a perception of objectivity in the workplace.This study allowed the researchers to view the many issues surrounding lack of diversity in thetechnology industry, which lays a foundation for future studies on how diversity can beimproved in the technology industry.ReferencesAnzaldúa, G. E. (1990). Making face, making soul/hacienda caras: Creative and critical perspectives by feminists of color. San Francisco: Aunt Lute books.Bell, E. L. (1990). The bicultural life experience of career-oriented black women. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(6), 459-477.Camacho, M. M., & Lord, S. M. (2011). “Microaggressions" in

Conference Session

Cognitive Engagement

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Benjamin David Lutz, Oregon State University; Allyson Jo Barlow, Oregon State University; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia; Cassandra J. Groen, Virginia Tech; Shane A. Brown P.E., Oregon State University; Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

project of survey development is entering its second year, and the section concerningstudents’ in-class, cognitive engagement is in its final stages. In Fall 2017, the survey wasdistributed to 618 students across courses of varying size, undergraduate academic level, andcontent focus in engineering. Another round of factor analyses will be conducted with our newround of survey data, and items will be revised, reworded, and removed as necessary. ReferencesAppleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445.Chi, M. T., &

Conference Session

Military and Veterans Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian J. Novoselich, U.S. Military Academy; Jakob C. Bruhl, U.S. Military Academy; Matthew Scheidt, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Christina Nicole Willis, University of Utah; Michael Scott Sheppard Jr., Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Military and Veterans

education.References[1] National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics, “Education program beneficiaries,” 2014.[2] ABET, “Accreditation policy and procedure manual (APPM), 2016 – 2017,” 2016.[3] J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, and S. M. Lord, “Using focus groups to understand military veteran students’ pathways in engineering education,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2016, pp. 1–9.[4] US Department of Veterans Affairs, “Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs,” 2018.[5] K. McBain, L.; Kim, Y.; Cook, B.; Snead, “From Soldier to Student II: Assessing Campus Programs for Veterans and Service Members.,” Washington D.C., American Council on Education, 2012.[6] R. Ackerman, R., Diramio, D

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Methodology

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shraddha Sangelkar, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Benjamin Emery Mertz, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Ashley Bernal, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Patrick Cunningham, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Academies Press Washington, DC, 2004.[3] J. Trevelyan, "Technical coordination in engineering practice," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 191-204, 2007.[4] S. Summers, R. Bercich, P. Cornwell, and J. Mayhew, "Technical Communications across the ME Curriculum at Rose-Hulman," 2018.[5] J. Chen, F. Damanpour, and R. R. Reilly, "Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: A meta-analysis," Journal of Operations Management, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17-33, 2010.[6] R. G. Cooper and E. Kleinschmidt, "New product performance: keys to success, profitability & cycle time reduction," Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 315-337, 1995.[7] R. A. Guzzo and G. P

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rohini N. Abhyankar, Arizona State University; Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology; Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

to probe participants’ thoughts andperspectives as they related to each of the proposed FIC elements. The original Business ModelCanvas elements, proposed FIC elements, and corresponding interview questions are shown inTables 2 and 3.Table 2: Mapping of Business Model Canvas and proposed Faculty Innovation Canvas elements BMC: A tool for a company or Proposed FIC: A tool for an individual or entrepreneur with a vision/mission for a group of faculty member(s) with a new venture vision/mission for a change / innovation. Value propositions: What the company brings Motivation: What attracted the faculty to the to its customers in the form of a product / affinity group service

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malle R Schilling, University of Dayton; Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

The STEM Gender Gap: An Evaluation of the Efficacy of Women in Engineering Camps Author Name(s) Malle Schilling and Dr. Margaret Pinnell School of Engineering University of Dayton Dayton, Ohio 45469 Email: schillingm3@udayton.eduAbstractIn the present day, it is not uncommon for there to be a class full of engineering students withvery few women in the room. To combat this lack of gender diversity, colleges and universitieshave employed outreach programs and developed summer engagement opportunities that allowwomen to explore engineering before they graduate high school. As