innovation.Participation in REU programs has shown positive impacts on both undergraduate students andfaculty mentors [1]. For undergraduate students themselves, most of the positive effects are in theareas of analytic and critical thinking, academic achievement and retention, and graduate schoolapplications [2-3]. However, how to effectively engage the undergraduate students during andafter REU program in order to maximize the positive impacts is always a challenge for most REUsites [4-6].2. Project Design and ImplementationThis REU site is designed to develop and implement a model environment for multidisciplinarycollaborative efforts where research and education are tightly integrated around the differentfacets of energy research.In the first year (Summer 2015
nationally that the United States is in urgent and critical need for the powerand energy engineering workforce [1]–[3]. The severity and urgency of the problem has alreadybeen recognized in the 2007 Long-Term Reliability Assessment [1] by North American ElectricReliability Corporation (NERC); it was recognized that “the loss of industry workers and theiryears of accumulated experience due to retirement is a serious threat to the bulk power systemreliability, exacerbated by the lack of new recruits entering the field.”The goal of this program is to significantly increase enrollment in electric energy-related STEMmajors at Washington State University (WSU) and prepare them for the workforce. Tosuccessfully achieve this goal, four components are needed
positionthemselves, grow through their education, and navigate the cultures of engineering theyexperience in college. Our goal is to investigate ways to engage students with non-normativeidentities to become more active and life-long participants in engineering disciplines. Our workis proceeding in three phases: 1) Identify, through a quantitative instrument, the normative andnon-normative attitudinal profiles of students in engineering; 2) Characterize students’normative and non-normative identities through in-depth interviews and analysis of differencesbetween students with normative and non-normative identities in engineering; and 3) Drawingfrom our findings, develop a workshop and set of courses to incorporate diversity topics intoengineering programs
within and beyond the engineering education community on how tocharacterize the impact of research [1]. Over the last decade, researchers in other fields havebegun to take a scholarly approach to distill what impact looks like for them [e.g., 2-5]. Thisstudy serves as a comparable exercise for the field of engineering education while adding anemphasis on how research does and should impact practice in our context. Using a convergent parallel mixed methods research design [6], the two-fold aim of thisstudy is to develop a valid framework that characterizes the impact of engineering educationresearch, and describe engineering education researchers’ and practitioners’ perspectives on howresearch does and should influence practice in our
alongside their human counterpartstowards the completion of a common task 1.In the context of engineering education, co-robots have the potential to aid studentsduring tasks that may require real-timeobservation and feedback 2. Figure 1presents a scenario that involves a student(left) and a co-robot (right) working togetherin an engineering design workshop. Here,the task to be completed is the design of anengineering concept/idea/prototype, created Figure 1: Student-Co-robot Collaboration towards the Successful Completion of an Engineering Prototypeusing tools such as a hammer, wood, andother engineering laboratory equipment and materials. The primary objective of the student is tocomplete
narratives. This study has potential for broad systemic impact bydiversifying pathways to and through engineering programs.During Year 1 (2014-2015) of the grant, we interviewed 23 key informants at our institutions.Key informants include professionals supporting veterans in student veteran success centers,financial aid, advising offices, and other student support services. We identified themes thatshape student veteran experiences on these campuses: the presence/absence of key studentpolicies and services; and gaps in the provision of such services. At each institution, there hasbeen a heightened emphasis on improving services for veterans.In Year 2 (2015-2016), we conducted five focus groups with a total of 21 student veteransengineering students
entry in a public college andtheir exit from the college system up to 6 years after their entry. We supplement this dataset withadditional administrative data from Missouri High School system, as well as with informationfrom the Census Bureau and the National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) Common Core.Therefore, the resulting data set provides a comprehensive look at the experiences of students inMissouri from high school through postsecondary education. The resulting dataset includesapproximately 156,000 individual students. We present summary statistics in Table 1.Approximately 55% of the sample is female, 9% black, 2% Hispanic, and 2% Asian.Table 1: Sample Summary Statistics
American. The students represented a number ofengineering disciplines, such as Mechanical, Civil, Electrical, Chemical, Industrial, Biomedical,Environmental. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis of 39 with a focus on themajor selection process.ResultsResearch findings indicate that women are more likely than men to choose Chemicalengineering, whereas Hispanic/Latino students are more likely to choose Electrical or Industrialengineering versus other majors, all else equal. African American students are more likely to choose Chemical or Electrical engineering compared to other majors. Table 1 summarizes the logit regression results. Table 1. Likelihood of Entering Civil, Chemical, Electrical, Industrial, or Mechanical Engineering
team of hearing and DHH members includesinstructors in statistics/math, game design instructors with a specialization in educational games,tutors, students, visual learning specialists and American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters.Core objectives include 1) develop a pilot collection of SOLTs and 2) test the efficacy of thesevideos. Along the way, a third objective has emerged: Embed the SOLTs into an interactiveweb-based experience in which students can obtain, describe, and make inferences from sampleswithin a relevant and appropriate context.In the first year of this exploratory project, statistical concepts were selected using multiple datasources and encompass concepts that are built upon throughout the introductory statistics course.The
pleasedto note that many lively conversations occurred in planned breaks and social events we hadincluded on the program, with shifting perspectives and new collaborations emerging for manyof the participants along the way. In this paper, we report only on the formally structured aspectsof the event. We developed five threads (themes); all components of the conference schedule(including pre-conference communication and during-conference activities) were aligned withthese threads. The five threads were informed by the theory-methods-research questions triangle(figure 1) along with Booth, Colomb, and Williams’s (2008) innovation cycle of educationalresearch and practice (figure 2).Conference threads: 1. What theories inform your work? 2. What
of careers graduates pursue.We begin with the goal of effectively employing the Threshold Concepts Framework to identifytransformative targets for curricular revisions. Our first step in approaching the RED grant fromthe perspective of curriculum develop includes a literature review that both systematicallycanvases existing resources and summarizes and synthesizes themes that enable us to answer thefollowing questions: 1. What research findings have been reported about threshold concepts across disciplines, in the field of engineering, and in electrical engineering, computer engineering, and computer science? 2. What are the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the threshold concepts framework, both in theory and
, 2.5 times greater than the proportion in 2012.Persistence of underrepresented minorities has increased from 29% for those entering in 2011 to50% for those entering in 2013 or after. Unfortunately, total enrollment of underrepresentedminorities has not grown. The recruitment of underrepresented students has proven morechallenging than their retention. Future work will focus on recruitment, including outreach to localhigh schools and the development of bridge and/or transfer programs.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation (NSF) Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, andMathematics (S-STEM) program funds scholarships and support systems for undergraduate STEMstudents demonstrating academic talent and financial need.1 In 2012
electronics is an enabling technology for the smart power system, the smart grid [1]. Powerelectronics studies efficient conversion of electric power from one form to another (e.g., DC toAC). It has applications in a wide-range of areas, from the tiny battery charger in a cell phone tothe small inverter in a solar renewable system [2] to the enormous converters in an HVDCconverter station. Therefore, it is imperative for students who seek employment in the powerindustry to understand the underlying concepts of power electronics. However, students oftenstruggle in understanding power electronics concepts. Increasing this understanding is what thiswork addresses.Power electronics is typically taught as a senior-level course (EE 486 at WSU). It is
teacher programs [1].Additionally AILDI was cited in a study by the U.S. Department of Education as one of the tenoutstanding programs for minority teacher preparation in the nation [2]. Pre-college teachers andcommunity college faculty from Native American-serving institutions are recruited to experienceoptical engineering research and learn about techniques to transmit their research knowledge totheir students using innovative methods. Participants take part in AILDI classes tied to scienceeducation, basic optics lessons in the Optics Research Workshop (ORW), a tribal scienceeducation workshop led by Professor Gregory Cajete [3], and a research project facilitated byesteemed UA research faculty. They are given the opportunity to develop their
available to the localcommunity for 3D printing and scanning services. Youth who work in the print shop have theopportunity to 1) develop and maintain technical skills; 2) hone “design thinking” skills throughreal-world problem solving; and 3) develop important soft skills (including working with aclient, creating and sticking to a project timeline, and professionalism).Our research is investigating many areas of maker and design thinking, the impact of maker jobs,and how to establish and maintain a community 3D print shop. This print shop has been designedto be a living laboratory to evaluate commercial and research software for 3D modeling,scanning, and fabrication software with youth performing real-world tasks.Related Work3D Printing and
biweeklyworkshops followed by a semester of six biweekly mentor-supported, disciplinary community-of-practice (CoP) classroom implementation biweekly discussions.In the earlier JTF collaborative project seven materials science faculty participated in theprogramoverafour-yearperiod.Theguidingprinciplesoftheprojectwerebasedontheresearch findings described in the book, How People Learn (HPL).4 The book describedhow cognitive processes act to achieve learning through conceptual change. For moreeffective learning, instructors need to: 1) elicit students' prior knowledge to informinstruction;2)engagestudentstopromoteconceptualchangesotheycanconstructdeepknowledgeorganizedinaconceptualframework;and3
USF, chemical and civil/environmental engineers at ASU, andelectrical/computer engineers at AAMU. Our research questions were: 1) Are there differences in achievement level for various demographic groups when using blended versus flipped instruction for numerical methods coursework at various undergraduate institutions? 2) Do students’ perceptions of the learning environment differ with blended versus flipped instruction in numerical methods coursework at various undergraduate institutions? 3) What do students perceive as the benefits and drawbacks of flipped instruction with numerical methods coursework?By addressing these questions, our goal is to develop recommended practices for teachingnumerical methods and
), with theknowledge and skills to equip their students to become part of a technologically adept workforceas well as informed designers and users of sustainable products. The objectives are: 1) To enhance teacher quality and proficiency in teaching highschool science, 2) To increase the number and diversity of students who study STEM (science,technology, engineering and math) in high school and college and choose STEM-related careersand 3) To equip participating teachers to share their knowledge and innovative, science-basedcurricula within their districts and with a broader, national community of high school STEMteachers. Our rationale for proposing this project is that there is high demand for a scientificallyliterate workforce
, engage key course/subject concepts andmaterials through an interactive and adaptive manner in the classroom. Research demonstratesthat active learning pedagogical practices are more effective for promoting student learning andachievement. After conducting a thorough review of the literature, Prince concluded thatengineering faculty should consider incorporating new instructional practices and techniques,especially active learning principles, into their classroom, based on compelling evidence in theliterature base which suggests that student-centered teaching promotes greater student learning[1]. In a separate review of the literature, Freeman et al., conducted a meta-analysis of 225studies that examined instructional practices in undergraduate
could engage in engineering after school to complement thescience and engineering learning during the normal school day [1]. Our initial goal was tointroduce a variety of engineering topics/platforms that related to the atmosphere and associatedsciences including wind power, solar energy, aircraft design, atmospheric sensors, and testingphysical models of dropsondes using a wind tunnel.The project team collaborated with an after-school program near Boulder, Colorado, whosemission was to serve students from low-income families by offering multi-year programming tostudents and support for families. This group was initially interested in Engineering Experiencesin order to provide STEM opportunities to their students.In order to get to know the
theclassroom. The expectation is that students who experience classrooms led by ISE-2 faculty willhave higher engagement, success, and retention than students in non-ISE-2 classes. Additionally,although students from all backgrounds are expected to benefit from experiencing ISE-2classrooms, underrepresented minority (URM) students in Engineering programs (i.e., women,ethnic minorities, first generation) are expected to have an even greater positive outcome thantheir non-minority peers, because the content of the development program directly addressessome of the causes of experiences that lead URM students to report feeling less welcomed in thefield of Engineering [1], [2]. The project period is March 1, 2017 to February 29, 2020 [3].As part of the
facultydevelopment program aimed at increasing active learning, improving classroom climates, anddecreasing implicit bias and deficit thinking among faculty. The program consisted of threeworkshops, a series of informal coffee hour conversations, and two deliverables from theparticipants. Workshop 1 consisted of an overview of the ISE-2 program and an introduction tosocial cognitive biases. Workshop 2 focused on how students learn, provided evidence for theeffectiveness of active learning strategies, and exposed participants to these strategies. Workshop3 prepared participants to apply the material to their own teaching. Coffee hour conversationswere conducted on a near-weekly basis between the second and third workshops. Facultyparticipants created a
Engineering Education, 2019 Critical Thinking Skills in First Year Non-Calculus Ready StudentsIntroductionCritical thinking is defined as self-reflective thinking[1]. Critical thinking requires the use ofcertain skills and disposition to evaluate thoughts and ideas with the purpose of refining them [2,3]. Critical thinking involves an in depth evaluation of events, problems, ideas, and artifactsbefore accepting or framing a conclusion or opinion [4]. Engineers are trained to becomeproblem solvers and critical thinking is essential for problem solving. Many educators believethat critical thinking skills are important and should be promoted in schools and universities, butthey feel unequipped to teach those skills[5, 6].The purpose of this
factors.IntroductionMakerspaces are becoming increasingly prevalent on college campuses due to their perceivedpedagogical benefits for students. On many college campuses, makerspaces have become a hub ofcreativity and innovation. Those working in these spaces may gain skills crucial for developingengineers.Creative design, prototyping, building, and communicating ideas are important skills to fosterwithin students in engineering. Makerspaces are an ideal place for students to develop theaforementioned skills and more. Universities usually have machine shops for making parts forprojects and prototypes, but the shops are run by professionals, and extensive training is requiredfor students to use equipment themselves [1]. Makerspaces, on the other hand, utilize a variety
educators, employers, and communities to foster STEM literacy [1].Despite the focus on collaboration in this strategy, nowhere in the report is there any mention ofmanagement or leadership. In contrast to the absence of engineering leadership in this report,engineering leaders will be key to creating a successful STEM ecosystem due to their uniqueability to coordinate interdisciplinary efforts to solve complex challenges associated with anincreasingly interconnected world. Thus, it is key that engineering undergraduate studentsreceive management or leadership training and build identities that align with leadership. Thispaper provides an overview of the qualitative phase of a larger project to understand thedevelopment of engineering leadership
factors:1. The attitudes and beliefs of faculty and staff toward underrepresented students and howthese attitudes influence their classroom and advising interactions and expectations, and theimpact this has on the students’ sense of belonging and academic success;2. The existing institutional support mechanisms at both institutions and students’ perceptionsof their efficacy and the role they perceive these mechanisms play in their academic success;and3. The influence of student organizations- specifically underrepresented minority engineeringaffinity groups and the embedded networks therein on the social and academic integration ofAfrican American students at the two types of institutions.IntroductionThis paper provides a preliminary examination
for success in further study or theworkforce. Active and collaborative instruction coupled with various means to encourage studentengagement invariably lead to better student learning outcomes irrespective of academic discipline [1, 2].Despite decades of research and calls for change and effort, traditional teaching is still the normin higher education STEM teaching. The purpose of this project is to translate the results fromthe significant body of research on teaching and learning into effective, evidence-based teachingpractices in all core mathematics, science, and engineering-science courses taken by students intheir first two years, with approximately 600 students entering engineering each year. Theproject provides support to enable the
disciplines through to graduation hasbecome a pivotal strategy in national initiatives to increase the overall number of engineeringgraduates [1]. Prior research indicates that most undergraduate students who enter into anengineering major in the United States will not ultimately obtain a degree in engineering [2]. Ithas been suggested that many do not persist in engineering through to graduation due to a lack ofability, motivation, or interest, but there is evidence to suggest that other factors offer superiorexplanations for why individuals leave engineering [3]. Engineering identity, the degree to whichengineering is central to a student’s self-concept, has been found to explain retention-relatedoutcomes better than a lack of interest or ability
over time. As will be explained in more detailbelow, specific ERP components can be identified that index a particular cognitive processassociated with the processing of this external event. We collected ERP responses to literal,nonsense, and novel metaphorical sentences that were either referring to engineering knowledgeor general knowledge, testing engineering and non-engineering students. Following Rutter et al.[1], sentences differed in verb only and had been classified in prior sentence norming studies ashighly unusual and highly appropriate (novel metaphors), low unusual and highly appropriate(literal sentences), and highly unusual and low appropriate (nonsense sentences). Participantsread sentences while their EEG was recorded, and
Paper ID #25426EAGER: Broadening Participation of First-Generation College Students inEngineering – Backgrounds, Experiences and Strategies for SuccessDr. Jessica Mary Smith, Colorado School of Mines Jessica M. Smith is Associate Professor in the Engineering, Design & Society Division at the Colorado School of Mines and Co-Director of Humanitarian Engineering. She is an anthropologist with two major research areas: 1) the sociocultural dynamics of extractive and energy industries, with a focus on cor- porate social responsibility, social justice, labor, and gender and 2) engineering education, with a focus on