discussed.The paper concludes with a discussion of plans to continue the process of refining the modules,adapting their inclusion more seamlessly into the Statics curriculum, and investigatingassessment tools that could be used to evaluate the visualization or critical thinking skills thatmight result from including Graphical Statics.ApplicationsThere are three concepts, the understanding of, on which student success in Statics seem to rest.The first is that vectors are defined by two things, magnitude and direction. As a result, they canbe described with respect to any coordinate system without changing their meaning; specificcoordinates might change but magnitude and direction remain the same. Putting in an arbitrarycoordinate system, and moving
majors,but also including students in computer science or applied math programs. The engineeringprograms at Wentworth Institute of Technology strongly focus on project-based learning.Devices and prototyping are therefore an integral part of many of the courses for which physicsis a prerequisite. Hence, it is essential that students leave with a working knowledge of basiccircuit concepts as well as an appreciation for the complexity that can arise in circuit analysis.Given this population, the main learning outcomes of the new game-based exercise were forstudents to: 1. Demonstrate the ability to add resistors in series. 2. Demonstrate an ability to add resistors in parallel. 3. Decompose a complex circuit into its basic elements. 4
reasonsbeyond follow up on the survey Figure 4. Analyzed responses to Question 3 regarding the relativequestions. In general, inquiries that importance of various specializationsfollowed up to the survey questionsprovided a means to elicit more detailedinput on the subject of the HEVE curriculum. Although the interviews were too unstructured tolend themselves to qualitative coding and analysis, they provided a window into the moredetailed concerns and need of the industry. As an example, one of the questions that we soughtanswers to was the role of fuel cell systems in the future of hybrid electric vehicles and HEVEeducation. The results of the surveys (see
: Page 26.1583.6International Business EnvironmentThe current learning outcome for the course is somewhat “Think Local, Act Local”. Studentsidentify an engineering problem in the community or in industry and then develop a product orservice to fit local customers, regulations, and market requirements. One of the anticipatedlearning outcomes of the proposed curriculum modification was to broaden the course objectiveto “Think Global, Act Global”. Students are expected to learn about global business dynamics,economic integration, supply demand, manufacturing, supply chain, logistics, etc. whichenhance students understanding about multinational businesses and global engineeringproblems, and needs for solutions.Cross Cultural Elements of Engineering
higher education as a means to provide moreengaging, quality-driven experiences for learners. It aims to optimally integrate face-to-face oralcommunications with online learning, which often contains a written component [1,2,3]. Withblended learning, aspects of face-to-face classroom learning are replaced or augmented byappropriate online or technology-based experiences, such as simulations, labs, tutorials, andassessments [1].An NSF grant allowed us to experiment with alternative teaching modes in a numerical methodscourse, and we began a formal comparison of blended vs. flipped instruction in 2014. This isone of the first studies we are aware of (after a search of the literature) that compares blendedversus flipped instruction in a STEM course
, citing thecriticisms of employers of engineering graduates who lacked communication skills, businessacumen, and “an understanding of men.” [sic]1Sir Eric Ashy writes in 1959 that he sees a higher purpose to a humanistic education, not just intaking specific courses, but in making sense of the technology the engineer employs in itswholeness, what he calls the essence of “technological humanism.”2Samuel Florman in 1968 provides five reasons for studying the liberal arts in the introductorychapter “The Civilized Engineer” of his book Engineering and the Liberal Arts. Three of thereasons are for the personal benefit for the engineer, including an appreciation of beauty,enhancing the imagination, and the development of leadership characteristics. Two
increase thestatus or decrease the grading load of the instructors, and it perpetuated a reductionist conceptionof technical communication that persists outside of the field to this day. Perhaps the moststriking feature of the situation was described by Kynell: “A great irony in the evolution oftechnical communication in an engineering curriculum was the virtual second class statusimposed on the discipline by [emphasis added] those who taught it” (p. 93). They accepted aposition that they typically agreed was below both the teaching of literature and the teaching ofengineering—and they got out of it as soon as possible, or perhaps just got used to it. Onceoutsourcing was established as a dominant model, it has been very difficult to dislodge, both
friends with boys better.Alice may have had an easier time integrating into the team because her gender expressioncontained elements that are more typically male. Alice's athleticism, especially her choice ofphysically demanding sports like field hockey, may have made her more acceptable in CTA’smale dominated team culture. We know that her physical appearance at her first CTA meeting(disheveled from sports practice) had initially impressed the team. Alice is also openly anddirectly competitive: I like to compete in all areas. One thing I have noticed, I used to think I had to be number one. I had to be the best at everything. I was valedictorian, I was super competitive with this one guy in school, we fought it out to the
in engineering curriculum: Students conceptions and performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1): 138–162, 2012.[18] J. Hiebert and P. Lefevre. Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics, pages 1–27, 1986.[19] J. R. Star. Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 36: 404–411, 2005.[20] L. Filipsson, M. Cronhjort, and M. Weurlander. Can peer instruction in calculus improve students’ learning? Proceedings of the 9th international CDIO conference, 2013.[21] K. Chappell and K. Killpatrick. Effects of concept-based instruction on students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge
experiences into the curriculum. Leadership strategies that may feel uncomfortable to undergraduate students will become increasingly relevant as they gain experience with organizational contexts outside of the university classroom, but it can be overwhelming for them to wait until they leave university to learn these skills. Two historically popular strategies for integrating workplace learning into engineering education are semester long co-op terms and 16-month internships. If these two options are not feasible in a particular institutional Page 26.1519.12 context, it is possible to infuse meaningful experiential
vettors.Future Peer Review Using Internet TechnologyInternet curricula offerings, through MOOCs or other means, rely upon the accreditation andvetting by the university that offers the online course in order to establish the validity of theoffered curriculum. Articulation, the process whereby credit is given for completing a MOOCcourse is undergoing discussion and definition.Regarding publications, Akerman further states, “For the certification role, the current system of peer review has enduring value, ensuring that an article passes certain standards of scientific quality and integrity. It requires considerable knowledge and expertise, as well as a wide base of contacts within academia to be able to select appropriate reviewers. But
students are always challenged to apply their engineering knowledge and research skillsgained from an engineering curriculum toward design and implementation of challenging seniordesign projects. Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) is an apparatus that is used to studymaterials behavior under high speed deformation, where strain rate is very high. Hopkinson barsare usually custom made based on the needs of customers, who are mostly researchers inuniversities or research labs. In this work, in a form of a senior design project, the authorsprovided learning opportunities for engineering students to design a data acquisition system for asmall size split Hopkinson pressure bar previously designed by former students. The objectivesof this project are
course as illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 2- MATLAB Marina WebpageAs part of this model, students were also instructed to post their questions online in a discussiongroup with the purpose of initiating 2-way communication hub for students and faculty toexchange ideas and ask and answer questions in an informal setting. Participation in this activitywas required and students were assigned participation grades based on each their activity. Theseonline discussions were necessary to help the faculty prepare a 15-minute lecture review which isan integral part of this hybrid model. The lecture review was incorporated to provide interactivediscussion between students and faculty inside the classroom. After the lecture
diverse students at UCSD by serving on the faculty advisory board for the IDEA Student Center. Her research is focused on engagement strategies for large classrooms and the development of K-16 curriculum in earthquake engineering. Page 26.1595.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Tracking Student Engagement with a Touchscreen App for Spatial Visualization Training and Freehand SketchingAbstractThe Spatial Visualization Trainer (SVT) App was developed for an iPad to enable students tofreehand sketch isometrics and orthographic projections. The App consists of
Paper ID #14145Bringing technology to the First Year Design Experience through the use ofElectronic Design NotebooksDr. Tracy Jane Puccinelli, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison In 2011, I joined the Biomedical Engineering (BME) Department as a Lecturer and Outreach Coordinator. As part of the BME design faculty, I work on curriculum development, as well as innovative approaches for teaching design. I coordinate BME outreach, advising BME seniors as they develop interactive hands- on activities for K-12 students that teach biomedical engineering concepts. Additionally, in 2012, I began teaching an
2015 ASEE Northeast Section Conference Educating the Engineering Educator Moses Tefe1 and Tara Kulkarni2 1 Assistant Professor, Norwich University, Northfield VT/ 2Assistant Professor, Norwich University, Northfield VTAbstractEngineering education research largely focuses on student learning to meet industry demands,with little attention paid to faculty. An assumption is that professors get their “ training” atgraduate school. This may be true of content areas, but most graduate education occurs in largeresearch focused universities. With limited and variable training across institutions, theconsensus is that many graduates are
arereflected and support for successful transfer, and application is provided. Learning contractsinclude learning goals and change purposes of course participants.Some transferable elements for adaptability of our concept to other existing programs orschools are a clear task-oriented description for the change agents’ profile in the profession-specific area, an integration of this position into departmental structures and professionalnetworks with other change agents, a permanent support and assessment of the change agentsby tailor-made and general didactic continuing education, the development and evaluation ofteaching projects in the change agents’ and the departments’ professional teaching field. Thismodel curriculum for change agents can provide
started, I have reworked some of my teaching activities in this and otherclasses. Further, our department is holding one of our CPREE meeting/workshops specifically onissues related to group work in our engineering and pre-engineering classrooms. In our first plenarymeeting, we spent time talking about what our image of successful students is: what changes we wishto affect in them over the term. All of these were set off by the process of reflecting on reflecting. I do think this is actually connected to a fundamental issue in education - that the curriculum wegenerate for students is informed by an image of what sort of people we want to produce at the end ofthe educational or training process and that for instructors to take the time to
jobopportunities and fairs. Presently, there exist a number of weakly connected 3+2 programs,transfer programs, 2 year Engineering Technology programs, and non-accredited programs.A baseline 2 year freshman and sophomore curriculum program is proposed based on casestudies, on research, and on alumni questionnaires. After a decade of SCU Engineering Physicsteaching experience it was also found effective by faculty to give closure to the 2 year programcurriculum with a sophomore-type “Cornerstone” class called “Principles of Engineering”. Thisintegrative class is essential for 2 year students to be effective in the workforce as an EngineeringTechnologist job applicant, as a competitive summer intern applicant, and in deciding on aspecific Engineering major
curriculum. All Bridge students enroll inSCLC. The SCLCs are one-credit courses, and the students meet twice a week for two hourswith an instructor dedicated specifically for the course. The students enrolled in SCLCs areprovided with additional instruction and time for problem-solving. This instruction requiresstudents to interact in heterogeneous groups of 3-4 to master the course material usingcooperative learning strategy23, 24, and grades are based on mandatory attendance andparticipation in the cooperative learning process. It further strengthens the learning communitybuilt in the Summer Bridge Scholars Program.NETWORKING The networking strategies include: academic assessment and monitoring program; monthlysocials; MentorNet; community
educating student to generate creative concepts; 2. train instructors on how to teach Design Heuristics within existing engineering classes; 3. assess learning outcomes from Design Heuristics pedagogy from diverse instructors, courses and universities; 4. incorporate the lessons learned to develop an effective, easy-to-adopt pedagogy for educating students about how to generate creative ideas.Key research questions include: How do instructors’ emphases on concept generation change asa result of introduction to Design Heuristics at a workshop? How do instructors integrate DesignHeuristics in their courses? What similarities and differences exist in Design Heuristicspedagogy across course level and type? How do students
Page 26.1498.8curriculum, review the readings, structure the exercises and craft the work, provide feedback,leading and coaching, and include the students in the entire developmental process. Storytelling Based Learning is intended to assist both the students taking a course and theinstructors teaching and creating the curriculum. Specifically, it guides and assists participantsbecause it fills the gap between disciplinary engineering learning, which is a cognitive processand embedded in logics of natural sciences. Storytelling is a socio-cognitive process. Yet it ismore so an experiential learning process where the hands-on or theoretical engineering learningis replaced by hands-on socio-cognitive experiential process of Tell/Make
Construction Management Curriculum,” International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 10:111-125, 2014.LT Colleen SymanskyLT Colleen Symansky is a member of the rotating military faculty at the United States Coast GuardAcademy. She is with a Civil Engineering degree from the USCGA in 2005 and she earned herMBA and MS Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois in 2012. LT Symansky is aregistered Professional Engineer in the State of Connecticut and a practicing Project ManagementProfessional.Hudson JacksonDr. Hudson Jackson is an associate professor at the United States Coast Guard Academy. He holdsa PhD in Geotechnical Engineering from Rutgers University. He is a licensed Professional Engineerwith over 25 years of experience
statistically overwhelming and this partnershiphas provided a collaborative opportunity to identify and remove academic, administrative, andtransfer barriers in-situ. As the engineering academy model is being created and refined throughthe research literature, the three main goals of the academies remain: 1) increase theparticipation and graduation of underrepresented groups interested in pursuing an engineeringdegree, 2) provide an immediate impact on the STEM workforce by minimizing the time tograduation through curriculum alignment between the two- and four- year institution, and 3)increase the number of awarded Associate degrees.The authors plan to expand the engineering academy model across Texas, while continuing tocontribute to the literature on
attributes such as structure, moisture content, and electrical charge. Thosecan be dealt with at a later time when the students are better able to cope with abstractions. Aspiral curriculum describes an approach to the design of the curriculum that is built on thisidea. Thus, in this example the students meet the concept on several occasions during theschooling and on each occasion more material is added to the understanding of the concept.Graduate student teachers including scientists and engineers find it difficult to defineattributes and values but the evidence is that when they are forced to think about thedominant features of a concept they find it to be an aid in the planning and implementation ofa lesson. It is also evident that part of the
growing demand in this field4. While industrycertification programs are available5, they tend to emphasize memorization and repetition over adeeper cognitive framework or understanding. It can be quite challenging to prepare students forIT careers in this rapidly evolving field, or to integrate these offerings into a more traditionalundergraduate engineering curriculum. More hands-on experience is desirable, since studentsmust be prepared to deal with not only existing security threats but also new and increasinglycomplex exploits which emerge more frequently each year. However, students require a secure,isolated environment in which to practice their security skills without risking damage to thecampus data centers or servers on the Internet
period. As the field of electronics technology entered themicroelectronics era, courses about integrated circuits, microprocessors, and digital logic wereadded to the biomedical curriculum to keep up with the rapidly changing technology. As wastypical of that stage in the evolution of electronics, the curriculum was extremely “parts centric”since biomedical (and electronics) technicians were expected to repair electronics based medicalequipment by troubleshooting faults/problems to the part/device level. This popular program ransuccessfully for approximately three decades during which time most of the medical facilities inwestern Massachusetts and regions in surrounding states (i.e. middle to north-central Connecticutand southern Vermont
initial study suggests that VOLTA can be used as aneffective learning tool in circuits laboratories.I. IntroductionLaboratories in which engineering concepts were reinforced by hands-on experience have alwaysbeen an integral part of engineering education. Traditional on-site experiment-based laboratorieshave many limitations including space, equipment, scheduling conflicts and limited contacthours. Therefore, numerous alternative approaches have been explored such as virtuallaboratories1, table-based laboratories2, and remote laboratories3.In a traditional “closed laboratory” environment, students perform the assignments following a“cook-book” lab manual and submit a written report drafted after the laboratory has beencompleted. It is argued that
course concluded with a problem-basedproject, wherein student groups were required to select and address a problem of their choosingwith the development of an analog circuit.Student progress was evaluated and grades were administered based on homework assignments,three examinations, laboratory reports, and final project deliverables. Weekly homeworkassignments were comprised of two different question sets. The first set focused on the basicunderstanding and application of concepts covered in class while the second set posed morechallenging concept integration questions. Often, the second question set was framed aroundconsumer and industrial applications in an attempt to engage students with the relevance of thematerial. Similarly, the
including I.C. design, MEMS and semiconductor technology and its application in sensor development, finite element and analytical modeling of semiconductor devices and sensors, and electronic instrumenta- tion and measurement. He can be reached at guvench@usm.maine.edu.Mr. Mao Ye, University of Southern Maine Mao Ye is an electrical engineering student at the University of Southern Maine, and an equipment engi- neering intern at Texas Instrument, South Portland, Maine. He also worked at Iberdrola Energy Project as a project assessment engineering intern. Prior to attending the University of Southern Maine, he served in the United States Marine Corps as communications chief. His area of interests are microelectronics