that the skills in both fields overlap. A good artist and a goodengineer need to have confidence in their abilities in creative problem solving. Structuring thecamp with a theme of art allows students more opportunities to feel like they belong in the field. The sculpture area at WSU provided hands-on practices in three-dimensional art includingsculpture and jewelry/small metals as part of our contribution to the camp. Most often theworkshops applied the welding skills students learned from the engineering lessons to createexperimental sculptural forms in metal with an emphasis on being playful, creative and havingfun. However, the most notable project with the strongest impact and depth in learningprofessional art and design issues was
, more recently, filled via “Course Management Learning System”. The universityadministration uses such evaluations to solve agency problems related to the selection and motivation ofteachers, in a context in which neither the types of teachers, nor their effort, can be observed precisely(Becker & Watts, 1999).Truly speaking, students’ evaluations are useful during the hiring process of professors. Particularly ithelps to ascertain the situation whether to promote a professor or not. Some of the educational institutionswhere more research is emphasized on professors, the administration relies fully on students’ evaluationof teaching (Becker & Watts, 1999).Administrators from educational institutions have struggled for a long time with
(provided by NSF and an industry partner) to produce graduates with intrapreneurshipcompetencies. A total of 68 scholars in four cohorts were admitted to TIP. Scholars, hiringmanagers, and mentors were surveyed on topics to reveal the efficacy of the program. Bothqualitative and quantitative data were collected. This paper presents data on the growth inintrapreneurship competencies for each of the cohorts of students, data on mentoring practicesthat were integral to the TIP experience, as well as student and mentor perception data on thebenefits of the program.introductionThis paper examines the outcomes of a National Science Foundation sponsored Scholarships inSTEM (S-STEM) program. This S-STEM program (TIP) was designed to produceintrapreneurial
Paper ID #42184Lessons Learned: Summer Book Club to Promote Reflection among EngineeringFaculty on Mental Health of StudentsLuis Delgado Jr., Penn State University Luis R. Delgado Jr. is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Pennsylvania State University. He has a bachelor of science in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at El Paso and earned a master of science degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Public Policy from Penn State. Along with his role as a Ph.D., he is also a graduate research assistant at the Leonhard Center for Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn
Comfort with Ambiguity aimed to build community and a sense ofpsychological safety in the course through mindfulness and was conducted by our teachingassistant based on her own work [31].The Impact Gap Canvas Workshop [19] guides students through a structured exercise that helpsstudents to gather knowledge on the current understanding of the problem, solutions that havebeen tried, and to work through the current gaps.The Workshop on Interview Skills introduced best practice for conducting expert interviews aswell as ethical considerations.The 5Rs Workshop helps students to elucidate the Roles, Relationships, Rules, Resources andResults of their system and to create a summative map [19]. This map is used in a Peer Feedbacksession.The Team Check-in
Paper ID #41867Building Collapse: Tackling the Construction Quality Gap in NigeriaMr. Muritala Hassan Ayinla Mr., University of Central Missouri Muritala Ayinla is a second-year graduate student at the University of Central Missouri. He is pursuing a master’s degree in technology management. He is a seasoned storyteller, researcher, communication scholar, writer, content creator, and award-winning journalist. While practicing journalism, Muritala has embarked on an array of investigative reporting and human interest stories, especially the recurrent incidences of building collapses in Nigeria. He won the Nigerian
betweenengineering education researchers and machine learning researchers, we can work together at theintersection of machine learning and discipline-based education research. During the qualitativecoding process, we shared multiple perspectives on how students could discuss differentconcepts so that we could work towards making a more diverse codebook. When evaluating thecodes generated by machine learning analysis alongside the results from manual coding, wediscussed how to best work towards a better coding process to help train algorithms.LimitationsThis study did not factor in the differences between instructors and their context or instructionalmoves. For example, some instructors may emphasize the importance of written responsesdifferently, impacting
participant’s design outcomes [10][11]. Further still, many papersaddress different ideation methods and their efficacy [12] [13]. However, all previouslyreferenced papers follow participants who all have similar engineering and problem-solvingexperience. This paper not only addresses the different ideation methods but also compares theoutcomes between student and practicing engineers. By understanding the importance of learningdifferent ideation methods and detailing how to use them effectively, this paper describes how tooptimize problem-solving to best demonstrate the competencies that employers are seeking. This paper and associated research is for a Senior Honors Project within the engineeringdiscipline. The inspiration behind this project
students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a 2016 National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical
in addition to the financial assistance totruly support students during their transitions. The high-impact practices designed forEMPOWER to influence each of Schlossberg’s transition factors include: ● A month-long summer preparatory program to prepare students in both technical and professional skills for internship applications. EMPOWER Scholars at the two community college partners are encouraged to enroll. The summer program implemented was highlighted by Truong et al. in [20]. ● A multi-year research and mentoring program that introduces students to research experience with faculty in Engineering departments at UCSD. The students are encouraged to explore graduate studies in the BS/MS, MS, or PhD program
driver was employed toregulate two DC motors. In [6], a sun-tracking system was designed by using an AtMega 328pmicrocontroller, an array of photo resistive sensors, a double H-Bridge driver, and two gearedmotors. In [7], a sun-tracker system was developed by utilizing an Arduino UNOmicrocontroller. The control program activated the servo motor in the direction of the maximumsunlight intensity detected by a pair of light dependent resistor (LDR) sensors. In [8], a sun-tracking system was designed by using a deep recurrent neural network with long-term short-term units. The prediction algorithm could predict the best solar path for each day of the yearbased on location. In [9], a dual-axis sun-tracking system was designed by using a fusion
emerging themes. rustworthinessTReporting on the quality, credibility, and validation of qualitative research is the best practice to ensure the study's trustworthiness[47]. In engineeringeducation, Walther et al.[48]provide validation strategies to ensure the quality and trustworthiness of qualitative research. heoretical validation of a study should reflect the complexity of the lived experience underTinvestigation. This can be validated through the use of an opposing case analysis. As can be seen in the findings, different factors had opposing narratives emerge. Considering alternative or opposing perspectives is particularly important to ensure the reliability of a case study[43]. Communicative validation of
their interest in pursuing aSTEM-related discipline in their future. Data was collected from multiple STEM summer campsduring 2017-2023 (except for 2020 & 2021). The summer camps were intended to exposestudents to STEM. The data collected is used in a qualitative and quantitative analysis todetermine if self-efficacy is related to and has any impact on students’ interest in STEM.Program DescriptionStudents and teachers coming from multiple school districts in (state in the mountain westregion) were invited to attend a week-long summer engineering camp. The camps took place inthe summers of 2017, 2018 and 2019. Another similar camp was scheduled for summer 2020 butwas cancelled due to the Covid pandemic.The camps were designed to increase
expectations set forth by ABET.IntroductionThe landscape of undergraduate engineering management programs in the United States hasexperienced an evolution captured by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology's(ABET) recognition of the need for traditional engineering disciplines alongside a morecomprehensive discipline that integrates leadership, communication, and teamworkcompetencies as seen in (Figure 1. Engineering Managers manufacture fiscal and enterprisevalue in creating, designing, and implementing technical projects, products, or system solutions[1]. The West Point Engineering Management (EM) Program embodies this approach. It ishoused in the Department of Systems Engineering at the United States Military Academy(USMA) as one of
engineering faculty’s lack offamiliarity with non-ABET professional skills, like entrepreneurial mindset and cultural agility,the difficulty of making changes in technical classes, and the limitations in assessing professionalskills. The researcher aims for the recommendations derived from this pilot study to raiseawareness of professional skill development within engineering curricula, fostering collaborationwith industry, and stimulating further research into enhancing the engineering curriculum with afocus on these essential skills.IntroductionTo succeed in the 21st-century workplace, engineering graduates need more than technical skillsor risk losing their jobs to automation [1, 2]. Professional skills complement a technicaleducation and are part
. Third, they have aninherent ambiguity that requires a deliberation of alternative solutions, allowing students to usetheir moral imaginations. And finally, they offer rich possibilities for analysis, critical thinking,and problem-solving, essential skills required of engineers.This paper focuses on using cases in the classroom, including a brief background, tips, and awalk-through of a major engineering case, the Challenger disaster. Specific details regardingChallenger are provided as a research shortcut for instructors.Background of Case MethodologyWhile use of cases date to the peripatetic teachers of antiquity, modern usage begins withChristopher Columbus Langdell, dean of Harvard Law School from 1870-1895. A firm believerthat the then
Foundation under grantnumber 2130326. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthese materials are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] P.M. Yanik, C.W. Ferguson, A. Ritenour, W. Cagle, and S. Rowe. “Fostering Leaders in Technology Entrepreneurship (FLiTE): Program Goals and First-Year Activities.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, 2013.[2] M.H. Davis, J.A. Hall, and P.S. Mayer, P.S. “Developing a New Measure of Entrepreneurial Mindset: Reliability, Validity, and Implications for Practitioners.” Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 2015.[3
-STEM Award (#2030665) which hastaken this into consideration by developing regular family gatherings designed to includescholars’ families in supporting their students’ degree completion.Summer bridge programs are often cited as one of the best practices for increasing first yearstudent retention and thus we are not surprised with the change in identities that we found inscholars upon completion of Engineering Ahead. Not only did all scholars self-report a change inidentity from that of a high school student to a college student, but they also all identified asengineering college students following the summer bridge program. This change in identityseemed to develop from a combination of the opportunities they had to engage in
community.IntroductionEngineering Technology programs, including both two year and four year tracks, continue togrow. Engineering and Engineering Technology by the Numbers [3] published that there were14,312 degrees awarded in the year 2019 alone. These degrees come from 111 institutions thatgrant Engineering Technology degrees [3]. Despite the considerable number of degrees awardedin Engineering Technology disciplines, there is little research conducted on the experiences ofEngineering Technology students.Like Engineering Science degree earners, Engineering Technology students may test forprofessional engineering licensure in 35 states. Although the procedures in testing for a licensemay vary, Engineering Technology graduates may pursue careers as professional engineers
modelingenvironment designed specifically to have a “low threshold” to make it easy for novices to startmodeling, while still having a “high ceiling” of what is possible [32]. To start, students canengage in inquiry through modifying small amounts of code in existing models. This can eitherbe a form of open-ended “tinkering” with the code to explore what happens, or more directedmodifications to model a new phenomenon [33]. There have been many successful examples ofhigh school and college students learning to use NetLogo and successfully building incisivemodels in subjects such as biology [34] and MSE [35], [36].Prior research has shown increased student understanding of core concepts in MSE through theuse of computational models [36] as well as in related
classroomactivities and participation. As such, three components of climate enhancement have been reportedin the literature: 1) managing learning activities, 2) encourage participation, and 3) supportingstudent learning [11]. Research indicates that this concept of instruction is more effective,continuous, and sustainable than the traditional learning management concept [2], [11], [15].To this end, a model termed ECNQ (e.g., acronym for Engage, Communicate, Names, Questions)was developed and implemented by Marquez and Garcia in 2019 (Figure 1) to disrupt traditionalnormalized, ineffective teaching practices in engineering education [14]. The model is based onfour communication strategies incorporated to create a healthy learning environment
Martínez, D. Hernández Alcántara, and R. Morales-Menendez, “Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences,” Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. IJIDeM, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 909–922, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8.[14] L. Bot, P.-B. Gossiaux, C.-P. Rauch, and S. Tabiou, “‘Learning by doing’: a teaching method for active learning in scientific graduate education,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 105–119, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/03043790512331313868.[15] P. C. Brown, H. L. Roediger III, and M. A. McDaniel, Make it Stick: The Science of Successful Learning. Cambridge, MA, and London, UK: Belknap Press, 2014.[16] C. Wieman, Improving How
protocols for educational action-research. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/146978741773561427. Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Mestre, J. P. (2013). Toward a model of transfer as sense-making. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 184-207. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2013.80755628. Nokes, T. J., & Belenky, D. M. (2011). Incorporating Motivation into a Theoretical Framework for Knowledge Transfer. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 109–135. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00004-129. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.30. Braun, C., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Davey, L., & Jenkinson, E. (2023