-CSR Dis- tinguished Service Award, the 2013 IEEE ComSoc MMTC Outstanding Leadership Award, and the NSF American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33720 CAREER Award in 2010. He is a co-recipient of the 2021 IEEE Communications Society Outstanding Pa- per Award, the IEEE Vehicular Technology Society 2020 Jack Neubauer Memorial Award, the 2018 IEEE ComSoc MMTC Best Journal Paper Award, the 2017 IEEE MMTC Best Conference Paper Award, IEEE SECON 2017 Best Demo Award, Best Paper Awards from IEEE GLOBECOM 2019, IEEE GLOBECOM 2016, IEEE GLOBECOM
strategize this way. Pre-tenure faculty or graduate students would not be wise to contact some track coordinatorsbecause, depending on the conference, this can get early-career scholars blackballed or labeled as“difficult,” especially white women and scholars of color. Similarly, early-career scholars cannotalways risk withdrawing a paper that has been accepted for publication simply because thereviewer doesn’t accept their methodological or linguistic choices.Second, the power of the reject in most cases (as in this one) is that it is a coalitional move—thepurpose of a reveal is to seek out others who might be willing to work with you to replace unjustbehaviors, procedures, etc. In this case, the lead author was able to reveal directly to
relationships with theirpeers, near-peer counselors and tutors, and faculty and staff within their college. Small cohortsizes and highly structured programing have given the AT&T Summer Bridge Program areputation for being an intensive and immersive pre-engineering experience. Alumni of theprogram report greater confidence in their preparedness for their transition to life on campus andthe engineering curriculum, as well as greater familiarity with engineering majors, expectations,and career paths [1,2].In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the University of Oklahoma suspended on-campusprograms and instruction during the summer 2020. Therefore, program designers decided totransition the engineering Summer Bridge Program to an online format. The
the stereotypes experienced.This study has limitations that should be noted and used to provide future studies with researchdirection. First, this data has been collected through self-report measures. Despite the datacoming directly from the source (the individual), there is still a risk of the participant choosingnot to explicitly report all experiences. Additionally, this data was collected from various pointsin students’ academic careers, which could influence their perspective and experiences. Futureresearch would benefit from data collect via methods other than self-reporting, as well as anextended timeline of data collection (possibly following students through all years of theirundergraduate career).ConclusionThe engineering workforce
pairs are encouraged to attend the events with their mentor, but itis not required. Each event has about 40% to 45% participation. In the Fall of 2019, there were44 mentor pairs, and, in the Fall of 2020, there were 50 mentor pairs. This indicated a 14%increase in program participation.Literature Review A literature review was conducted on existing research to explore the lack of women inengineering, the impact mentoring programs have on women in engineering, and the impact ofCOVID-19 on college students. As of 2019, there continues to be a significant underrepresentation of women in theengineering fields with only 13% of engineering careers held by females [6]. One of the mainreason’s women leave the STEM field or switch to a
Paper ID #34703Understanding Key Student Perspectives in an InterdisciplinaryFlex-model Sustainability Course as Compared to a Traditional In-personCourseDr. Tony Lee Kerzmann, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Tony Kerzmann’s higher education background began with a Bachelor of Arts in Physics from Duquesne University, as well as a Bachelor’s, Master’s, and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh. After graduation, Dr. Kerzmann began his career as an assistant professor of Mechanical Engineering at Robert Morris University which afforded him the opportunity to research, teach, and advise in numerous
evidence that Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) and female students are more likelythan racial majority groups and men in engineering/STEM majors to transition to non-STEM degreeprograms. Scholars cite several individual and institutional factors that impact BIPOC student success inengineering/STEM, including: 1) Interest in a non-STEM career (Carpi et al, 2013); 2) Negativeinteractions with faculty (Figueroa et al., 2013); 3) Engagement with peers on campus (Strayhorn et al.,2013); 4) Pre-college preparation (Figueroa et al., 2013); and 5) Campus climate (Palmer & DuBord, 2013).Research on undergraduate engineering education reveals similar challenges, including disinterest in thefield, loss of self-confidence, classroom climate
.[11] R. M. Stwalley III, "Definition, mission, and revitalization of cooperative education programs," in ASEE 2006 Chicago Proceedings, 2006.[12] G. Bolton, "Narrative writing: reflective enquiry into professional practice," Educational Action Research 14, no. 2, pp. 203-218, 2006.[13] M. Haddara and H. Skanes, "A reflection on cooperative education: from experience to experiential learning," Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education 8, no. 1, pp. 67-76, 2007.[14] R. M. Stwalley III, "Professional career skills in senior capstone design," in ASEE Capstone Conference - Columbus, Washington, DC, 2016.[15] R. M. Stwalley III, "Assessing improvement and professional career skill in senior capstone design through course
first programming experience • A Likert-scale to rate their programming skills • Their previous programming/computer science experiences • Which programming languages they consider themselves minimally proficient in • Whether they have used an online programming tutorials or resources (such as Code.org, Khan Academy, etc.) • A Likert-scale to rate whether they would like to take more computing courses • A Likert-scale to rate if they believe the skills taught in their FYE course will be useful in their life and/or career • A Likert-scale to rate if they know how to use programming to communicate with others and/or other programmers • How many times they have seen the MCS1/SCS1 assessment beforeResults and
learning and knowledge assessment systems. Currently, he is involved as a knowledge engineer in various private and publicly funded projects. Dr. Iseli holds a PhD and an MS in electrical engineering from UCLA and from ETH Z¨urich, Switzerland.Ms. Tianying Feng, University of California, Los AngelesDr. Gregory Chung, University of California, Los AngelesZiyue RuanMr. Joe Shochet, codeSpark Joe Shochet has been developing award-winning interactive experiences for 25 years. In 2014 he co- founded codeSpark, an edtech startup to teach kids the ABCs of computer science. His career started at Disney Imagineering building virtual reality attractions for the theme parks and designing ride concepts. Joe was a lead designer and
experiences develop essential skills needed tosucceed in the ever-increasing global marketplace and are appreciated by prospective employers.Also, students with international educational experiences have increased awareness of careeroptions and a clearer idea of their career goals [8,9]. Braskamp [1] suggested that study abroadexperiences enhance global learning and development, which has become the core of holisticstudent development.One of the most important goals of any study abroad program is to broaden students’ globalperspectives and train future leaders to be more effective, respectful of other cultures. Studieshave demonstrated that these programs have the potential for nurturing a global citizenry ifeffective pedagogical techniques are
Investigator Program (2017), NASA Heliophysics Early Career Investigator (2019), and NSF CAREER (2019) awards.Eric Shaffer, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Eric Shaffer is a Teaching Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science. He teaches a revolving set of courses including Virtual Reality, Computer Graphics, and Scientific Visualization. In addition to teaching, he has done research in the areas of scientific computing, computer graphics and visualization. He has served as a PI or co-PI on grants from a variety of sponsors, including Exxon- Mobil, the Boeing Company, Caterpillar, and the US Department of Energy. He holds an MS in Computer Science from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities and a
Paper ID #34926Design and Manufacturability of Medical Ventilators from the Perspectiveof a Global Automotive FootprintDr. H. Bryan Riley, Clemson University H. Bryan Riley Ph.D., joined Clemson University in July 2019 and currently teaches controls and man- ufacturing processes courses. He has taught courses in signal processing, electrical communication sys- tems, EE capstone design, electric machines, adaptive signal processing, and hybrid and electric vehicles. Riley, who spent his early career in the automotive industry, has managed multi-disciplined and global en- gineering teams responsible for introducing advanced
lab projects. The assessment also involves the averagescores for this test. Both the lab reports and tests are graded over 100 points. These grades willthen be converted to 0-4.0 scale for comparison purposes.The program will also use a selection of qualitative and quantitative measures from the list belowto measure the impact on students’ careers and employer satisfaction. We will performassessment using one or more of the following of qualitative and quantitative measures forevaluation of the entire RET program: ● Student feedback through end-of-semester student evaluations and other targeted student surveys on using the equipment asking students to rank different aspects of the course and labs; ● Employer feedback through
Shiloh James Howland is a doctoral candidate at Brigham Young University in Educational Inquiry, Mea- surement, and Evaluation. She received a master’s degree in instructional psychology and technology as well as a bachelor’s degree and master’s degree in geology. Her current research interests are in educa- tional assessment and measurement.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and
administered in the last studio sessionof the semester as an assignment (points were given for completing the survey). This surveycontains questions related to enjoyment, student lesson preparation practices, the usefulness ofthe course structure, activities, and resources to their learning, as well as how the course supportscurrent and future courses and career options. The other two surveys were administered byMichigan Tech's Center for Teaching and Learning as part of the course evaluation process. Thestudent rating of instruction is administered using an online evaluation system that is embeddedin the course Learning Management System. There was one survey for the studio session andinstructor, the other was for the LEAP sessions and LEAP Leader
Physical Assurance and Inspection of Electronics (PAINE), and the ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI (GLSVLSI). He serves on the State of Maryland Cybersecurity Council and the National Academy of Sciences Intelligence Community Science Board Cybersecurity Committee. He is the recipient of numerous awards, including He is the recipient of multiple awards, including the NSF CAREER Award, IBM Faculty Partnership Award, National Semiconductor Faculty Development Award, and the General Motors Faculty Fellowship Award. He is currently a senior member of the IEEE and a member of Eta Kappa Nu and Tau Beta Pi engineering honor societies. American c Society for
specific pedagogical methods and development of campus resources/programsto enhance comprehension, student engagement, and scholarship abilities.Authors such as Pascarella & Terenzini, Tinto, and Thomas have argued that student success willtranspire in higher education if all learners are integrated into the social and academic fabric of therespective institution [18], [21], [22]. Research suggest that having additional resources on campussuch as peer tutoring, academic advising, personal and career counselling, and disability servicesmay be compensatory in various ways [19]. It can assist disadvantaged students overcomepotential lack of academic information, cultural capital, or academic preparedness [2], [21]. In astudy conducted by Bauman
situations. Since a college education is apreparation for a career, it is important that references be made tofuture work whenever possible.Communication SkillsEngineers appear to be under constant accusation of having poorcommunication skills, and perhaps many of these accusations arejustified. The faculty claim there is no room to add communicationscourses to the engineering curriculum. However, they could place moreemphasis on communication skills within the existing engineeringcourses.HomeworkAssigning and grading of homework was perceived as very important tothe majority of survey respondents. Unfortunately the trend has beentoward less homework, particularly grading of homework. Facultymembers should take a close look at the effects of this
toapproximately 100 students in the last three years, a student Branch of the IEEE (Institute of Electricala E c c E ) a ,a a a c Ma 2012. Sof the issues and considerations encountered during the early development phase were described in aprevious ASEE paper1. In this paper thorough description will be provided regarding programdevelopment, course and laboratory development, student and faculty recruitment and development andaccreditation issues with the goal of providing a clear picture of what is involved in establishing a newengineering program.BackgroundThe University of Wisconsin Stout has a rich history of preparing students for professional careers ina variety of applied fields
instructors’ adaptability as a central factor ineffective teaching and learning, particularly in K-12 (e.g., [8, 11, 13]).In higher education, career change, academic achievement, engagement, and life satisfactionhave all been examined through the lens of adaptability. However, many of these studies haveexplored undergraduate students’ adaptability [12, 14-16]. In regard to instructors’ adaptability, astudy by Holliman et al., [17] examined university lecturers’ perceived autonomy support (jobresource), adaptability, organizational commitment (feeling towards employer/institution), andpsychological wellbeing. The authors found that perceived autonomy support was positivelyassociated with lecturers’ adaptability, organizational commitment, and
University of Seattle managing degree and certificate programs and teaching various CS courses. Her current research interests are related to teaching in STEM fields. She advises the cyber security club, and is a member of several organizations including OWASP-Portland Chapter. Dr. Dvorak is passionate about teaching, technology, career pathways and student success.Mr. John L. Whiteman, University of Portland John L. Whiteman is a security researcher for Intel Corporation and a part-time adjunct cybersecurity in- structor for the University of Portland. He also teaches the UC Berkeley Extension’s Cybersecurity Boot Camp. John received a Masters of Science in computer science from Georgia Institute of Technology, a
Paper ID #33373A Combined Online Learning / In-Class Activity Approach to Teach SystemsThinking and Systems Engineering Skills to Freshman Engineering StudentsDr. Mark David Bedillion, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Bedillion received the BS degree in 1998, the MS degree in 2001, and the PhD degree in 2005, all from the mechanical engineering department of Carnegie Mellon University. After a seven year career in the hard disk drive industry, Dr. Bedillion was on the faculty of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology for over 5 years before joining Carnegie Mellon as a Teaching Faculty in 2016. Dr. Be- dillion’s
, Tianjin University Hu Dexin graduated from Institute of education, Tsinghua University in 2019 and received a doctorate in management. At present, he is an associate professor of School of education / Institute of new engineering education, Tianjin University. His main research directions are higher engineering education, education policy and evaluation, graduate education, etc.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to
the NSF Innovation through Institutional Integration (I-3) project, and co-principal investigator for Engineering Modeling and Com- putational Research (EmCoR) REU at NCA&T. Marcia is also the program director for the College of Engineering’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program. She has served as councilor for the Council on Under- graduate Research (CUR), and member of its Broadening Participation Task Force. Advisory participation on STEM-related boards include the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Undergraduate Program (HBCU-UP), the NIH Minority Access to Research Careers (MARC) program, the NIH Research Intern- ships in Science and Engineering (RISE) program, the Institute for Broadening
/ reputation/ career. Affirmations can also help break down barriers betweenthe student and staff/ faculty when students hear that their worth is valued and recognized.In the participants own words, they have learned new ways of being and conversing with students: “This course was life changing. It has changed how I relate with other people. I feel much morecomfortable having difficult conversations with students and am learning to identify change talk.I have heaps still to learn and practice, but I feel confident that I will keep improving my skillsover time.” “It completely changed the way I think about and approach conversations withstudents.” “Discovering a better method to have awkward conversations.” “I still need to practicemy skills, but it
affirming, inclusive, and diverse education program that helps preparestudents to face the complex challenges they will meet in their post-graduation careers” (VirginiaTech Graduate School, 2019). A depiction of the alignment of course topics and the inclusionand diversity requirements can be found in Appendix A.Building on these two purposes, the following learning outcomes were developed for theGSSME course: 1. Developing effective interpersonal communication skills 2. Establishing and maintaining professional relationships 3. Dealing with personal differences in multicultural environments 4. Advancing equity and inclusion in professional environments 5. Developing responsible and ethical professional practices 6. Developing
improved self-efficacy among the students will better prepare them for acareer after graduation. Studies have shown that improved self-efficacy can influence a person’sperformance, intrinsic interest, and career pursuits [8], [9]. Beier [10] showed that project-basedlearning can have an effect on STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) careeraspirations.Courses Using Tensile-tester ProjectThe basic design of the tensile tester assembly is used in two courses in the engineering program.The first is the sophomore-level Statics and Mechanics of Materials course that is required for allundergraduate engineering disciplines. The second course is Applied Mechanics of Materials,which is a sophomore-level course for the engineering technology
onlinewithout the standard use of pencil and paper sketching. Upon closer investigation of the data, male studentsimproved more than female students did. Further study is needed to determine if these results arerepresentative of typical trends and how the training could be modified to result in more equitable outcomesfor all the students.IntroductionDecades of research has consistently shown that spatial skills are one of the strongest predictors of futuresuccess in STEM coursework and STEM careers independent of math and verbal ability. Wai et al. [1] andShea et al. [2] reviewed numerous longitudinal studies with many thousands of participants to concludethat spatial skills are critical to developing expertise in STEM. Additionally, visualization
thereal Arduino.4. DiscussionThe goal of this project was achieved. Rather than classroom-based lessons, this program was meant tobe fun as well as a one-week learning experience for the students. Therefore, no pre-tests or post-testswere given or deemed necessary. Hence, only a qualitative study was done of the students’ experiencesin the workshop. This introduction to a STEM field that they may not have experienced previouslywould hopefully increase their interest in considering a STEM career in the future.[4]The participants were surveyed before and after the workshop. Prior to this workshop, 75% ofthe students had little or no programming experience and only 4 students had experience with atext-based programming language. Over 80% of the