Asee peer logo
Displaying results 811 - 840 of 8955 in total
Conference Session
Liberal Education and Leadership
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julia Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Richard House, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Anneliese Watt, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education
AC 2009-1610: COMMUNICATION PEDAGOGY IN THE ENGINEERINGCLASSROOM: A REPORT ON FACULTY PRACTICES AND PERCEPTIONSJulia Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Julia M. Williams is Executive Director of the Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment & Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Terre Haute, Indiana. Her articles on writing assessment, electronic portfolios, ABET, and tablet PCs have appeared in the Technical Communication Quarterly, Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, The International Journal of Engineering Education, Journal of Engineering Education, and The Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen
Collection
1998 Annual Conference
Authors
Paul D. Schreuders; Arthur T. Johnson
to be performed in a short period oftime, just prior to the due date.An alternate strategy is to assign a number of short projects throughout the semester. In thisapproach, three high intensity, short duration projects are assigned. The students must buildexpertise in an area in a matter of only a few days, requiring them to develop both research andtime management skills. In addition, because multiple projects are assigned, projects may beassigned in different disciplines and the students have several opportunities to correct theirmistakes and polish their report writing skills. However, because of their short duration theprojects must be somewhat limited in scope. Furthermore, because of the short duration of theprojects, the students
Conference Session
Capstone Design II
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Karen Davis
weeks. The techniques described here could be adapted in a straightforwardmanner to a semester system by splitting the winter term assignments. The class meetsonce a week for 2 hours, and assignments are due on non-class days to increaseturnaround time on grading and returning them. The fall term is devoted to the formationof teams and the writing of a complete design report via weekly incremental writingassignments. Peer-assessed design reviews, project implementation and current eventsassignments take place in the winter quarter, and the writing assignments for projectdocumentation are due every other week. In the spring term, testing, refinement, writingfinal self-assessments, and a peer-assessed presentation and demonstration are done.An
Conference Session
CoNECD Session : Day 3 Slot 2 Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 CoNECD
Authors
Emily Knaphus-Soran, University of Washington; Tiffany D. Pan, University of Washington; Eve A. Riskin P.E., University of Washington; Sonya Cunningham, University of Washington; Saejin Kwak Tanguay, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
of color who might nototherwise see themselves reflected in the larger engineering community. Students who are thefirst in their family to attend college may benefit most from the aspects of the program that helpthem develop institutional knowledge and strategies for navigating the university system, andprovide them with community and peers from similar backgrounds. Students who havedemonstrated their academic achievement relative to their peers by receiving a high GPA in highschool, but were not taught the critical reading and writing skills or were otherwise preventedfrom demonstrating their achievement due to cultural/language barriers, benefit from theacademic curriculum provided through the program
Conference Session
Curriculum Development and Applications
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jana Whittington, Purdue University Calumet; Kim Nankivell, Purdue University Calumet; Joy Colwell, Purdue University Calumet
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Design Graphics
upongraduation. By implementing experiential learning in various courses at various levels aneffective program-wide assessment method can be established and faculty will have theopportunity to learn and implement the EL standards both in coursework and throughout theprogram.Communication BenefitsThe students benefit from the multifaceted learning experience, which is strengthened by peer-to-peer interaction, employer-to-learner interaction, and teacher-to-learner interaction. Theteacher-to-learner interaction takes place in scheduled face-to-face meetings and through weeklylogs submitted by the learner. The instructor has the opportunity to respond to logs for moreclarification. The learner, through log submissions, has the opportunity to synthesize
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division: Capstone Design Practices
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kimberly B. Demoret P.E., Florida Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
working). These peer comments and thenumerical peer feedback grade are used along with reported hours as part of the instructorevaluation grade described below.Instructor Evaluations. In aerospace senior design classes, 20% of the grade comes from"Individual Participation", which consists of two instructor evaluations each semester along withattendance, in-class exercises, and individual writing assignments. As stated in the syllabus, "Theinstructor evaluation considers time card data, input from staff members, faculty and industryadvisors, feedback from student leaders and peers, and the subjective assessment of the courseinstructor." To come up with a grade, first the instructor develops a formula using a weightedcombination of hours worked
Conference Session
Supporting Biomedical Engineering Students in Holistic Development
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Tristan McCarty, University of Florida; Sarah Corinne Rowlinson Furtney, University of Florida
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering
to account forreader perceptions and clarity on what the requirements are for the opportunities they apply to.As we have shown with this work, even untrained readers can examine the information present inresumes and determine the type of career someone is interested in. The more likely the untrainedaudience is able to perceive intended pathway, the more likely the resume is to be consideredstrong by our BME competency model. A possible teaching implication of this concept is peer-reviewed resume writing exercises for freshman engineering students. Teaching them theimportance of applying to specific positions with resumes clearly and deliberately designed forthat position, and the use of peer review for determining clarity and a sense of
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Christine Wittich; Shannon Bartelt-Hunt, University of Nebraska - Lincoln
environmentalinfrastructure in rural areas. This site has hosted over 60 students over 5 years, including 1 yearof virtual participation due to travel restrictions associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.Detailed discussion and results are provided with respect to the recruitment approach, includingparticular attention to first-generation college students, and the potential negative impacts of theCOVID-19 pandemic on first-generation applicants. This site also incorporates targetedinstruction on technical writing, which occurs over several weeks throughout the first half of thesummer and culminates with a final conference paper deliverable. This approach has yieldedover 20 peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, or national conference presentations,which
Conference Session
The Senior Experience: Capstone and Beyond
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer Large Seagrave
Tagged Divisions
Civil Engineering
: Responding to Needs of Industry in a Capstone CourseAbstractResearch has shown that consulting engineering firms need newly graduated junior engineers tobe skilled in communication, especially writing. In response to this plea from the civilengineering industry in Salt Lake Valley, University of Utah has designed a capstone course inits Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering that focuses on written, oral and teamcommunication besides technical and design elements. The course incorporates communicationinstructors from the CLEAR program who collaborate with faculty, lecture in the class, consultwith students and assess assignments in an effort to ensure a higher level of communicationcompetency in graduates.IntroductionUndergraduate
Collection
2000 Annual Conference
Authors
John C. Anderson; David Kelso; Charles Yarnoff; Barbara Shwom; Penny Hirsch
may be patented by the students) • several prosthetics for a local woman whose hand was injured in a fire, allowing her to play tennis, cross country ski, and write with a pen.In both quarters of EDC, we make the problems faced by the student teams as open-ended aspossible. We emphasize conceptual design rather than detail design: students are responsible forcoming up with the best range of ideas they can, developing a good understanding of what theusers’ real needs are, and revising their concept until they strike a good bargain between thepossible and the desirable. And at every stage of the process students must explain, clarify, andillustrate their ideas for real audiences: users, clients, peers, and
Conference Session
Faculty Development Toolkit
Collection
2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
William Jordan, Baylor University; Bill Elmore, Mississippi State University; Walter Bradley, Baylor University
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
technologies will become our masters ratherthan our tools. The first two authors presented a paper in 2005 that dealt with that issue4.The authors of this paper are certainly not the only ones who have reflected on the issue ofmentoring. The next section describes some recent work done by others.Previous work done by othersPeer mentoring is the first kind of mentoring we would like to discuss. Peer mentoring occurswhen tenure track professors provide advise and support for each other. There are two ways thiscan be done. Younger faculty can write papers and make presentations describing theirexperiences to try to help other young faculty who may be facing the same situations. Thisenables the faculty member to benefit by presenting/publishing his work
Conference Session
Professional Development for Graduate Students
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Michael A. Matthews P.E., University of South Carolina; Gina M. Kunz, University of South Carolina; Kevin Brock, University of South Carolina; Darin Freeburg, University of South Carolina
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
, and criticallyreading the research literature relevant to their new project. Course 2 is for graduate studentswho are preparing to write or present their work in a professional venue. The second coursefocuses on writing, in the standards of the discipline, but with an explicit view of meeting criticalthinking standards. These courses were developed to address common faculty concerns abouttheir graduate students, e.g. poor writing skills; inability to comprehend and act on the literature;inability to develop independence of thought; etc.This paper summarizes course syllabi and typical assignments and approaches to assessingstudent work. Work has begun on the efficacy of these courses, addressing several key questionsconcerning skill
Collection
1996 Annual Conference
Authors
Ian A. Waitz; Edward C. Barrett
hands-on learning, cooperative education, writing-to-learn, and mentoring. The courses jointly serve to educate students in a variety of aspects of professionalengineering practice including solving open-ended problems, integration of disciplinary coursework, projectdevelopment and planning, oral and written communication, peer review, and teamwork. The Experimental Projects Lab is similar to an undergraduate thesis in scope. Each team of two stu-dents chooses an original research project and is guided by a faculty advisor over the span of two semesters.The students participate in all aspects of experimental research including project definition, proposing, design ofthe experiment, construction of apparatus, completion of the experiment
Collection
1999 Annual Conference
Authors
Keith V. Johnson
, document yourclassroom instructions, student outcomes, student testimonies, attend effective teaching workshopsand utilizing constructive criticism.Peer observers/evaluators. Have a faculty member come observe, evaluate your classroominstructions, and write a summary of their evaluations. Request that your peer observer evaluates youon the following areas: knowledge, organization, instructional materials, task assignments,instructional methods, enthusiasm, clarity, student participation, and comprehension. Ask your peerevaluator to be candid and provide as many critical responses as possible. If you get a poorevaluation, discuss potential ways to improve, making sure that your efforts are documented. At alater date, request that same faculty
Collection
2000 Annual Conference
Authors
Nickolas S. Jovanovic
that purpose. The students work harder on their writing with this approach, not onlybecause they do not want their peers to see a poor effort, but also because they get excited aboutseeing their work on the web and about learning about how to create web sites.Finally, this approach to writing is a lot like the engineering design process. In this case, theproducts being designed are, at the very least, a web-based written report and an oralpresentation. Writing the proposals corresponds to the ideation phase of the engineering designprocess. Writing, modifying, and editing the drafts correspond to the refinement phase of theengineering design process, and the production of the final reports corresponds to theimplementation phase of the
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Stani Vlasseva; Valentin Razmov
, American Society for Engineering EducationHere we report on our experiences with a third approach that combines the benefits of bothworlds while suffering from the drawbacks of neither. The idea is to use several sources offeedback – the student herself, other (peer) students, external domain experts, and projectartifacts – to augment feedback coming from instructors. The benefit of doing this is that itreduces the time demands on instructors while providing students with additional feedback, ofteneven more trustworthy, to help them learn.We have implemented this idea in two courses so far, both in software engineering, taught tojunior undergraduate students at the University of Washington in 2002 and 2003, respectively.One contribution of this
Conference Session
Technical Session 11 - Paper 4: Living, Learning & Growing Together: Engineering Your World
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Ana M Dison, University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
create a partnership with the College of Natural Sciences to develop and deliver bias and inclusion workshops and training across the colleges for students, staff, and faculty. She continues to be active in service to the UT community working with peer and professional mentoring programs. She presents to numerous groups on a variety of leadership, inclusion, and career-focused topics. A member of the Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) since 2006, Ana completed a three-year appointment to the WEPAN Board of Directors as Communications Director. Ana received the Eyes of Texas Award in 2011, the University’s Outstanding Staff Award in 2012, and the Cockrell School of Engineering Staff Excellence Award. After
Conference Session
Faculty Attitudes and Perceptions
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University; Lisa Brooks, Texas A&M University; Christine Ehlig-Economides, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Page 13.1039.5constructing artifacts such as building a bridge or designing an engine. Partly becausemany undergraduate engineering courses are heavily involved with concepts ofmathematics and physics, students do not develop a well-informed understanding ofengineering practice. Discussing and writing about engineering science offers a means todevelop critical thinking and communication skills that many engineers struggle with.As mentioned earlier, a review of literature suggests that peer-teachers can effectivelymotivate students to engage in science8 and engineering fields9,10, partly because of theirclose ages with the students, and partly because of the freshness of their learningexperience with the same concepts students are about to
Collection
1997 Annual Conference
Authors
Lynn G. Mack; James C. Wood
,and partnerships with industry. The project began a series of faculty development activities tocreate on each campus an interdisciplinary faculty team to develop and implement a new andreformed curriculum. The first step in the process was the selection at each campus of exemplaryfaculty from the disciplines of mathematics, science, communications and technology.The first year concentrated on encouraging and empowering faculty to work together and withtheir peers across traditional departmental and institutional boundaries. The activities challengedthe faculty to rethink their teaching methodologies and to design new, interdisciplinary activelearning approaches for the classroom.This process began with a retreat and then proceeded with three
Conference Session
ASEE Multimedia Session
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Marilyn Dyrud
Session 2793 Communication and Civil Engineering: An Integrated Approach to Senior Projects Marilyn A. Dyrud Oregon Institute of TechnologyFor the past year, Oregon Institute of Technology’s Civil Engineering and CommunicationsDepartments have been developing a creative curriculum venture: a unique senior designexperience that would combine the content of what had previously been three distinct classes:engineering design, technical writing, and group dynamics. Students would work in teams on areal design project, and the nine faculty
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Randi Sims, Clemson University; Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Karin Jensen, University of Michigan; Evan Ko, University of Illinois, Urbana - Champaign; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
working with their mentees. All mentees increased their confidence forparticipating in mock review panels and writing grants, with most saying that their confidenceimproved greatly. Both mentees and mentors also felt that there was a significant connectionbetween their peer reviewing skills and their ability to conduct engineering education research.The majority of program participants felt that the workload was reasonable and that the activitieswere well-paced within the program.Although both mentees and mentors indicated positive feelings for the program overall, manyalso felt that program logistics could be improved. The largest issue between both mentors andmentees was the clarity of instructions given by the project team. Many felt that
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Chip W Ferguson, Western Carolina University; Paul M Yanik, Western Carolina University; Yanjun Yan, Western Carolina University; Sudhir Kaul, Western Carolina University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
scheduled based on results from scholar surveys and journaling responses, whichincluded: WCU’s Career Services; Writing and Learning Commons, Math Tutoring Center,Library Research Liaison, and the Honor’s College. Additionally, peer-to-peer workgroups wereestablished to discuss and journal the anxiety themes within each groups’ activities.Year-one activities also included the development of peer-to-peer and faculty-scholar mentorshipgroups. These student lead groups sought to build foundational support for each scholar byestablishing learning communities with shared goals. The formation of these groups were bothorganic, with students self-selecting group membership, or highly structured by the programdirectors. Structured group membership was based
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session II
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mary G. Noonan, Merrimack College; Marc Veletzos, Merrimack College; Cynthia Baker McGowan, Merrimack College; Maureen Walsh Sakakeeny P.E., Merrimack College
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
-freshman andmatriculated students by fostering collaborations between faculty and students and students andtheir peers. The project is expected to increase the number of engineering and CS graduates andaccelerate their progress toward completing their degree and will make significant positivecontributions to the STEM workforce and the new global economy. The results will provide arich assessment of approaches to retention that can be applied to all STEM disciplines.GoalsThe primary goals of this five year project are to, increase first year retention to 80% by Year 3,increase second year retention to 71% by Year 3, and increase the five-year graduation rate to65% by Year 5. To accomplish the project goals, the FS2 program is divided into four
Conference Session
Systems Engineering Education and K-12
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pablo Biswas, Texas A&M International University; Runchang Lin, Texas A&M International University; Ramesh Hanumanthgari, Texas A&M International University; Sri Bala Vojjala
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management, Industrial Engineering, Systems Engineering
Web toenhance students' learning has been recognized, and to this end a pilot web-based system hasbeen developed as an online interactive resource for the teaching and learning of anundergraduate module on Communications within the Department of Electrical Engineering andElectronics. Rüschoff and Ritter[28] discussed the current state of the art with regard to the use ofnew technologies in the classrooms. Lu and Bol[20] found that peer review has becomecommonplace in composition courses and is increasingly employed in the context oftelecommunication technology. The results of their research from both semesters showed thatstudents participating in anonymous e-peer review performed better on the writing performance taskand provided more
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 7: Teamwork, Reflection, and Wellness
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Abdulrahman Alsharif, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; David Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Saleh Alatwah
evaluate textual data and hasbecome a popular topic in educational research, with a growing body of published work. SA hasbeen employed in educational research to investigate student satisfaction, attitudes, topics ofconcern, or to evaluate instructors' teaching performance. However, there has been littlediscussion of applying SA as an assessment approach to evaluate teamwork textual feedback(i.e., students rate their teammates by writing comments on them) in engineering. The purposeof this research is to investigate the possibility of using SA as a method for evaluatingcollaborative textual feedback (e.g., comments) from students and to show its potential inassisting teachers in evaluating teamwork dynamics in their classrooms. Teamwork is
Conference Session
Embedded Systems & Cybersecurity for ECE
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Nader Rafla P.E., Boise State University; H. Shelton Jacinto, Boise State University; Luka Daoud, Boise State University
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer
presented the need for an implemented hardware variant of securealgorithms with small footprint to help add protection while reducing processing time/overheadon a standard processor.In this work we present two hands-on projects that are designed specifically to teach these twoconcepts using project-based learning techniques in an innovative cooperative learningenvironment. The learning environment served to combine both student-peer learning and jigsawstrategies.The technical contents of the first project teach students the process and methodologies ofdesigning and testing the hardware implementation of a block cipher encryption, the AdvancedEncryption Standard, on a field-programmable gate array. The second project builds on the firstby
Conference Session
Computing and Information Technology Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Natasha Smith P.E., University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Computing and Information Technology
of the summer course. Otherhomework assignments were peer-graded within the learning management system. Lectures weredelivered as ‘live’ notes using PDFAnnotator. Note taking has been shown to improve learning,so this was preferred over using premade slides. At the same time, traditional board notes wouldnot have been easy for online students to read. The final instructor notes were then made availableto all. Students were able to join the lecture via Zoom, a video conferencing platform. Pauses inlecture allowed for questions and comments from both the live class and via the chat feature withinZoom. The versatility of Zoom was also critical for evening office hours. The ability to screenshare was especially valuable for addressing errors in
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kavon Karrobi, Boston University; Angela Lai, Tufts University
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
of Biomedical Engineering. I am involved in mentoring students in both the laboratory and in the classroom and have research interests in peer feedback, team dynamics, and incorporating more translatable skills to my classes. Currently, I teach senior capstone, research and experimental design, and medical device design. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work in Progress: Towards Self-reported Student Usage of AI to Direct Curriculum in Technical Communication Courses1. IntroductionThe use of AI by students in biomedical engineering courses has rapidly grown in the past year[1]. Courses that prioritize critical thinking and technical writing have seen students relying
Conference Session
Technical Session 4: Modulus Topics 1
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ashwin Satyanarayana, New York City College of Technology; Karen Goodlad, New York City College of Technology, CUNY; Jennifer Sears, New York City College of Technology, CUNY; Philip Kreniske, Columbia University, The HIV Center; Mery F. Diaz, New York City College of Technology; Sandra Cheng, New York City College of Technology
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
a PhD in Computer Science from SUNY, with particular emphasis on Data Mining and Big data analytics. He is an author or co-author of over 25 peer reviewed journal and conference publications and co-authored a textbook – ”Essential As- pects of Physical Design and Implementation of Relational Databases.” He has four patents in the area of Search Engine research. He is also a recipient of the Math Olympiad Award, and is currently serving as Chair Elect of the ASEE (American Society of Engineering Education) Mid-Atlantic Conference. He also serves as an NSF (National Science Foundation) panelist.Prof. Karen Goodlad, New York City College of Technology, CUNY Karen Goodlad is an Assistant Professor specializing in
Conference Session
Graduate Student Experience
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel P. Dempsey, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Carol Barry, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Joey Mead, University of Massachusetts Lowell
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies, Student
their specific needs. After considerableconsultation with industry human resource representatives, university professors, and theuniversity’s career counselors, a professional development program was formed to address threemain areas of interest: the improvement of core research abilities, the development of skillsrequired for transition from academia to industry, and the necessity of projecting a professionaldisposition in the workplace. The graduate students organized a yearlong series of workshops inwhich university and industry professionals addressed each of the three areas of interest. Theprogram was evaluated through a combination of peer and self-reviews, writing improvementrubrics, and industry representative criticisms. The results