Work in Progress: Development of a Simplistic Agent-Based Model to Simulate Team Progress within an Innovation-Based Learning CourseAbstractThis work in progress discusses the development of a simplistic agent-based model used tosimulate probabilistic team behavior within an Innovation-Based Learning (IBL) course.Innovation-Based Learning is a non-traditional learning model that encourages students to learnboth technical and entrepreneurial skills by working on a team project. The course pushesstudents to think innovatively, especially on problems with “unknown unknowns” typical ofcomplex systems. In IBL, students are expected to learn and then apply the core concepts theylearn into their innovation projects and track all
Paper ID #35460Building Informed Designers with Engineering Problem Framing ToolsDr. Todd France, Ohio Northern University Todd France is the director of Ohio Northern University’s Engineering Education program, which strives to prepare engineering educators for grades 7-12. Dr. France also helps coordinate the first-year engi- neering experience at ONU. He earned his PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder in Architectural Engineering, and conducted research in K-12 engineering education and project-based learning.Dr. J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University Dr. Hylton is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical
experiential learning is to have a positive atmosphere, to allow students to make and learn1. Introduction from their mistakes, and to provide the freedom thatSince the 1960s there have been lots of efforts to develop students need to experiment during the task. A lot ofcurriculum projects for science and mathematics Efforts to students can and has benefited from experiential learning.improve science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) education in grades K–12 are not new. Yet, In
of students pursuing engineering related majors, the University of North Carolina atCharlotte has adopted a comprehensive and integrated approach involving three separate National ScienceFoundation (NSF) funded projects. Together, the projects are designed to raise the engineering awarenessof middle and high school students, teachers and guidance counselors.The central project is the Enhancing Diversity in Engineering Technology (EDIET) project which focuseson the establishment and support of North Carolina Junior Engineering and Technology (NCJETS) clubsat local area high schools. In order to receive project support, a high school club must have a populationof at least 50% non-traditional engineering student types. The clubs compete in
had worked briefly(about 1-½ years) as a structural engineer in a fairly large engineering firm specialized inhydropower projects, the author still felt inadequate when attempting to relate the engineeringconcepts to engineering practice. Her work was focused on finite element analysis of varioussections of a dam. As a junior faculty in a research oriented university, the first author felt thepressure of “publish or perish”. Early in her career, she was contacted by ASCE regardingopportunities available for faculty members like herself to engage in practical engineeringexperience in the summer. The caller also indicated the lack of interest among faculty membersin this opportunity. The first author offered her dilemma of “publish or perish
know. The accuracy ofthe cost estimate increases as the design cycle progresses (Figure 1). Typically a knowledgeable designershould be able to estimate the cost of a plastic part to within + 30°/0 to t50°/0 at the initial feasibility stage. Asthe project progresses and the design team spends more time they can increase the accuracy of the estimate.Increased effort in engineering design and cost estimation results in increased accuracy. A *500/o Variation in cost 0/0 o } Design Budget
Network Analysis,and additional elective courses that are offered as separate Honors sections or taken on a contract basis.The Honors program culminates in an Honors research project and thesis, which is defended before afaculty committee. The emphasis in the Honors program is not on more advanced work or material,but upon a different pedagogical style that involves more discussion and active learning, consideration oflarger issues in science and technology, has a larger project and design component, and allows the studentto participate in exploratory research and analysis.Requirements Students are eligible for the honors program in electrical engineering if they maintain a GPA of3.25 with junior or senior standing or have received
this objective. These examples illustratehow several readily available computer programs along with traditional hand computationalmethods may be used to enhance and enliven the subject of mechanisms analysis.Traditional computational methods augmented with computer programs familiar to allengineering technology students, are used to compute kinematics and kinetics quantities. Strongemphasis is placed on the verification and accuracy checking potential of this computerintegrated approach.IntroductionA typical course in mechanisms analysis frequently requires the use of traditional computationalprocedures that may place unnecessary limits on assigned projects. This paper suggests onepossible alternative to the “snap-shot” approach to the
auditory system. Page 11.567.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Engineering for Everyone: Charging Students with the Task of Designing Creative Solutions to the Problem of Technology LiteracyIntroductionThe first year Introduction to Engineering course at Smith College, “EGR100: Engineering forEveryone,” is designed to be accessible to all students, regardless of background, yet it alsoserves as the foundation for students who choose to major in Engineering Science. In this course,students are introduced to the engineering design process via “mini-projects” that
Paper ID #19299Evolution of an Introductory Electrical Engineering and Programming CourseProf. Branimir Pejcinovic, Portland State University Branimir Pejcinovic received his Ph.D. degree from University of Massachusetts, Amherst. He is a Pro- fessor and former Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education at Portland State University, Electrical and Computer Engineering department. In this role he has led department-wide changes in curriculum with emphasis on project- and lab-based instruction and learning. His research interests are in the areas of engineering education, semiconductor device characterization, design and
investigates the adaption of the Competing Values Framework (CVF) for use instudying behavioral complexity and leadership in engineering students working in project teams.Based on a foundation of other studies that leverage the CVF in an engineering educationcontext, the CVF survey was slightly modified to be appropriate. Data were collected fromstudents working on projects both in curricular and co-curricular settings. The data demonstrateslevels of complexity among example student profiles and draws comparisons between curricularand co-curricular settings as well as between genders. Results show that while there are genderdifferences in the curricular setting, there are no significant differences in leadership rolesbetween genders in the co
require Grand Challenges Scholars to work ininterdisciplinary teams. To foster such collaboration and lay a foundation bridgingengineering and the liberal arts, we developed a linked pair of first-year-seminars addressinga “grand challenge.” Building on the WPI Great Problems model [2], these two First YearSeminars are team taught by a mechanical engineer and a political scientist, each addressingthe problem of global hunger. Students from both sections work together in project teams andparticipate in discussions of course topics and shared readings. The course includes acommunity-based learning component as well as the development of a research &development plan for future engagement.Table 1. The 14 Grand Challenges issued by the National
Laura Hirshfield is a postdoctoral researcher and lecturer at the University of Michigan. She received her B.S. from the University of Michigan and her Ph.D. from Purdue University, both in chemical engineering. She then transitioned into the engineering education field by completing a post-doctoral appointment at Oregon State University investigating technology-aided conceptual learning. She is currently doing research on self-efficacy in project-based learning.Prof. Debbie Chachra, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Debbie Chachra is an Associate Professor of Materials Science at the Franklin W. Olin college of Engi- neering. Her education-related research interests include self-efficacy, design, intrinsic
curriculum. Therefore, practical methods of design integration toexisting curriculum may prove more useful to these institutions. This paper includes a review ofpractical methods used to incorporate design in various engineering courses. Specific designintegration methods reviewed in the paper include examples of project-based learning, inquiry-based learning, design competitions, case study modules, reverse engineering, and design-basedlearning. Assessments of these methods are qualitative in nature thus the comparisons are alsoqualitative. The goal of this research effort is to provide a brief review of current methods foundin the literature. While a qualitative comparison of the methods is discussed, providingassessments of each method lies
Paper ID #12312Aesthetics of Design: a Case Study of a CourseMs. Katherine Goodman, University of Colorado, Boulder Katherine Goodman is currently a graduate student at the University of Colorado Boulder in the ATLAS Institute, working toward a Ph.D. in Technology, Media, and Society. Her research is in engineering education, with a focus on fluids and design courses. She holds a B.S. in mathematics and a masters of professional writing. She has previously worked as a technical writer and project coordinator, and as an instructor in composition at the University of Southern California and the Community College of
having taught at in the departments of chemical engineering, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa, depart- ment of food technology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria and conducted research at Institute Nationale Polytechnique de Lorraine in Nancy, France, at Gesselschaft Biotechnologie Forschung in Braunschweig, Germany and Industrial Biotechnology Center, University of Waterloo in Waterloo, Canada. He currently teaches Environmental Engineering, Water and Wastewater treatment, Environmental Impact and Risk Assessment and Project Management and Sustainable energy development courses at the undergraduate and graduate levels at Morgan State University. His research areas are application of biological systems in the solution and
Paper ID #13710Incremental Self-Assessment Rubrics for Capstone Design CoursesProf. James Trevelyan, University of Western Australia Professor James Trevelyan works part-time as a Winthrop Professor in the Mechanical and Chemical En- gineering School at The University of Western Australia, Fellow of Engineers Australia, and also practices as a mechanical and mechatronics engineer developing new air conditioning technology. His main area of research is on engineering practice, and he teaches design, sustainability, engineering practice and project management. He is well known internationally for pioneering research that
including the different areas in ECE, faculty, undergraduate and graduate programs, class sizes, and salaries of graduates. Dr. Smith also answered the girls’ questions such as application requirements and curriculum design. 2 ECE-GIRLS 2014 Activity Dec. 8, 2014, Monday 4:15 pm Orientation (Long-Sleeve Shirt and Flash Driver Pick-up) 4:30 pm – 5 pm Meeting Department Chair Dr. Scott C. Smith 5 pm – 5: 40 pm Meeting Female Professors in Engineering 5:40 pm – 6:45 pm Demonstration and Discussion of Senior Design Project by Dr. Mark Schroeder
engineering program at UniversidadTecnològica Boliviana in La Paz.The program commenced with a campus-wide solicitation of participation. While thisprogram is designed to draw students from two existing sustainable developmentprograms, the undergraduate program was only recently approved by the University; Page 12.375.2hence for this first year, all undergraduates could apply. Six students were notified inmid-December, and had until mid-January to accept the offer.The American student teams and one faculty member will reside in Bolivia for all of June2007. Before then, teams and projects will be developed. To aid in the first, monthlymeetings will be used
Paper ID #10735An Implementation of Innovative Thinking in The Entrepreneurship Cur-riculum for EngineersDr. S. Jimmy Gandhi, California State University, Northridge Dr.S. Jimmy Gandhi is an assistant professor at California State University, Northridge and is also The Director of The Ernie Schaffer Center for Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Dr.Gandhi teaches classes and has research interests in entrepreneurship, lean thinking, quality management, six sigma, project management and sustainability. Prior to coming to Cal State University, Northridge, Dr. Gandhi taught at The City University of New York and also at The Stevens
listed undercriterion III; “Program Outcomes and Assessment”. In particular, attempts are made to exposethe student to a number of important features of engineering profession in the 21 th century.Specifically, three important issues of globalization of engineering practice, the need for life-long learning, and the role of technical communications skills are addressed in this course.Moreover, the design of an engineering experiment is included in this course. In this article,following a detailed account of the structure of this course, we provide a list of several designprojects that have been selected for this course. A sample design project on fabrication andtesting of a simple AM radio receiver is described in some detail. Finally, a sample
IMAGE & MARKETING OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION: A Follow-up to A National Agenda for the Future of Engineering Technician Education (Funded by National Science Foundation Grant, NSF 99 – 53) George H. Sehi, Kathy L. Franck, Surinder M. Jain Sinclair Community College 444 West Third Street, Dayton, OH 45402-1460The Engineering and Industrial Technology Division of Sinclair Community College (Dayton,Ohio) administered a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) from January 1, 1995through December 31, 1996. The grant project sponsored a workshop at Sinclair CommunityCollege held on October 26 - 28, 1995 to
, and SAEFormula SAE are well established regional and national engineering competitions designed toencourage good project-based engineering education and designed to demonstrate thatengineering can be fun along with being challenging. They are designed to allow students tolearn elements of design, organization, planning, teamwork, manufacturing, and competition. Atthe South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, multidisciplinary teams are established forall of these competitions as well as for solar car competitions and formally supported through theCenter for Advanced Manufacturing and Production (CAMP). Team leaders are typicallychosen from students who are members of CAMP. The teams are comprised of students at allclass levels from
in the School of Applied Engineering and Technology at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He holds a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas - Austin, an MS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California, and a BS in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India. Dr. Shekhar also holds a Graduate Certificate in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Prior to his current appointment, he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher and Assistant Research Scientist at the University of Michigan. He is the recipient of the 2018 Outstanding Postdoctoral Researcher Award at the University of Michigan; and serves as a PI/Co-PI on multiple projects funded by the National
(constituents, customers) into the team responsible for developing the project. This integrationallows the project requirements to be adjusted during the development process, providing anopportunity to adapt and respond to the needs of the stakeholder in a timely manner. In addition,the regular reviews by customers, and other stakeholders, and the continuous feedback resultingfrom these reviews improves the quality of the final product. Figure 1. Scrum Process (Sutherland and Schwaber, 2007)Figure 1 presents the major components of the Scrum framework. In this framework, there areseveral opportunities for the stakeholders to provide feedback throughout the projectdevelopment process [5]. The following is the list of these feedback
Natascha Trellinger Buswell is an associate professor of teaching in the department of mechanical and aerospace engineering at the University of California, Irvine. She earned her B.S. in aerospace engineering at Syracuse University and her Ph.D. in engineering education at Purdue University. She is particularly interested in inclusive teaching conceptions and methods and graduate level engineering education.Jacqueline L. Huynh, University of California, Irvine ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Preparing the Future Aircraft Design Workforce: Filling Knowledge Gaps Using Engineering Design ToolsAbstractUpholding the current and projected growth in the aerospace industry
AC 2010-2310: EMPHASIZING MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAMWORK ANDENHANCING COMMUNICATION SKILLS THROUGH DEVELOPMENT OF ACONCEPTUAL BUSINESS PLANMohamad Ahmadian, Eastern New Mexico University Mohamad H. Ahmadian, Eastern New Mexico University Mohamad H. Ahmadian is a professor of Electronics Engineering Technology at Eastern New Mexico University. He also serves as ABET/TAC program evaluator for electronics and computer engineering technology programs. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Columbia. Before starting Ph.D. work, he worked three years as a project engineer.Tom Brown, Eastern New Mexico University Tom Brown, Eastern New Mexico University Tom
Page 22.1285.2expensive, making them inaccessible to many in our society. Service-learning can help fill thisgap by leveraging the time and energy of students and their professors, teachers and mentors. Participants in early engineering-related service-learning experiences do not have to belimited just engineers nor those who think of themselves as future engineers. In the universityprograms, multidisciplinary teams are required and the same goes for high schools. For examplethe EPICS program at Purdue University draws from 60 majors, across engineering and outside.These kinds of projects need students who think of the people first and can react and evaluate asa user who is not as familiar with technology. While high school students
Course for Engineering StudentsAbstractFor Spring 2011, a senior-level robotics course (first taught in Spring 2010) had been revisedaccording to principles for “Smart Teaching” described in the book “How Learning Works”.Homework, laboratory sessions and anchor projects had been redesigned to provide betterscaffolding for students with 2 different but complementary engineering backgrounds, and alsofor a better flow towards the theme of humanoid robotics. The e-portfolio tool EMMA wasintegrated into this course as a collaboration and feedback tool between instructor and students tohelp improve student algorithm development work, but EMMA was not found to be responsiveenough nor useful for this kind of use.IntroductionIn the Summer 2010, the
leveraged in such a way that the students produce, as a final project, anengaging, interactive demonstration of a basic ECE concept; many of thesedemonstrations have already found their way into the classroom in other courses. Theresult is a course with dual, complementary goals: teaching Java-based programmingconcepts and developing computer-enhanced educational courseware.I. MotivationEngineering topics, especially those in Electrical and Computer Engineering, are oftentaught by first presenting the underlying equations and then, by exploring thoseequations, revealing the topic’s fundamental principles. This approach, while common,has the unfortunate effect of postponing intuitive understanding of the topic until wellinto the process, when the