Asee peer logo
Displaying results 8641 - 8670 of 8968 in total
Conference Session
Early Engineering Design Experiences
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Douglas Oppliger, Michigan Technological University; Jean Kampe, Michigan Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
to real-world expertise and mentoring from professionals in academia andindustry. HSE teams write business plans, solve real-world problems, perform testing andanalyses, build prototypes, manufacture parts, operate within budgets, and manage their projects.Each spring, HSE teams showcase their work alongside college students at the University’sUndergraduate Expo. At the conclusion of their HSE experiences, it is expected that the studentswill demonstrate proficiency in applied workforce skills, they will be more disposed to enterSTEM careers, and they will be prepared to undertake the training and education needed to enterthose careers.HSE is modeled after Michigan Technological University’s highly successful and nationallyacclaimed
Conference Session
Capstone Design Pedagogy I
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
results. Competitions should be "against nature" rather than against peers. Finally,for middle school students beginning design projects with a clearly outlined prototype design Page 15.371.3rather than with a "blank slate" improves engagement. Similar considerations are brieflydiscussed in project selection in a college freshman design course8.For capstone design courses (typically taken by college students in their senior year) a number ofpapers have mentioned aspects of successful design projects as part of a summary of theeffectiveness of capstone courses. The factors reported as leading to a successful project include"being viewed as
Conference Session
Engaging Students
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Junko Munakata-Marr, Colorado School of Mines; Jennifer Schneider, Colorado School of Mines; Barbara Moskal, Colorado School of Mines; Carl Mitcham, Colorado School of Mines; Jon Leydens, Colorado School of Mines
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering
. During the almost weekly discussionsof the case study, both the regular (technical) course instructor and the liberal arts (nontechnical)instructors met with students in class to coach them through the process of writing a case studyas well as to elicit feedback on the case-study module process. A timeline of the case-studymodule activities is summarized in Table 1. The weeks without content in this timeline coveredtechnical course material. As the timeline indicates, elements of the case-study module spannedmost of the semester, allowing students the opportunity to revisit these concepts throughout thecourse. Page 15.26.5Table 1. Case-Study
Conference Session
Concurrent Paper Tracks - Session I
Collection
2015 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Renetta G. Tull, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Maria Nandadevi Cortes-Rodriguez, ​ Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute Center for Conservation and Evolutionary Genetics National Zoological Park
Tagged Topics
Diversity, International Forum
Education Forum (WEEF) – Cartagena, Colombia) 2013 UMET-Puerto Workshop: Writing for Dr. Kevin Omland, Dr. Rico Publication Renetta Tull, Nandadevi Cortes (UMBC) 2014 UMBC Panel: Global Pathways to Representatives from The Careers Fulbright Program, the U.S. Department of State, and Instituto Tecnológico y de
Conference Session
Reception & Poster Session
Collection
2013 ASEE International Forum
Authors
Ruth Rodriguez Gallegos, Tecnológico de Monterrey
Tagged Topics
ASEE International Forum
of potential variables to study. It aims to highlight the step in the diagrammodeling the “real” situation or pseudo-concrete (Text of the exercise) to a graph / qualitativerepresentation of the evolution of the amount of interest.Part II: Idenitification of the Mix Mathematical Model in its analytical representation (DE).Through the writing of the activity, the students are guided in the theoretical explanation of thetank model (chart-> DE). What is mainly discussed is the way in which the concentrationchanges over time according to the law of conservation of matter. In this step, based on themodeling diagram, the student goes from the Pseudo Concrete Model (statement) to the physicalmodel (diagram tank) and / or the "virtual physical
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Tia Sharpe; Robert Maher; James Peterson; James Becker; Bradford Towle
questionnaires, student performance with oral and writtencommunication, and peer review of course materials and grading policies. Page 10.447.10 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education (Excerpt from "ECEBot Assembly Guide"…) Soldering Step 1: Attach the 32-pin Socket (Back of Board) First, hold the board with the front side up and oriented so that you can read the printed silk screen labels from top to bottom, like in the next figure. Now turn the board over
Conference Session
Assessment Issues in 1st-Yr Engineering
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Eric Soulsby
of experience in teachingFreshman courses lamented the inability of many current students to manipulate even simplealgebraic expressions, such as Ohm’s Law (V = IR), or the Ideal Gas Law (PV = nRT), andrelated how this lack of ability has hindered teaching the conceptual ideas represented by theseequations.The question became one of whether the University should make an effort to write a “new andimproved” Q-course Readiness test with questions aimed at evaluating students’ abilities inquantitative reasoning. The Committee immediately realized this process would be fraught withdifficulties. What would be the areas of coverage of the new exam? How would the test beconstructed and delivered? How would it be graded, and by what standard would it
Conference Session
Emerging Trends in Engineering Education
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Toshiyuki Yamamoto; Kazuya Takemata; Masakatsu Matsuishi
Copyright ø 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationin groups to tackle an engineering topic relating to daily life. Each group chooses an engineeringtopic related to daily life, defines its domain, and solves problems that may have multiplesolutions. After choosing a topic, the students in a group hold brainstorming sessions, define thedomain of the topic, work on the most optimal solution and its design, refine the design, presentthe results in class, and evaluate each group member’s contribution by peer evaluation. Mostgroup activities go beyond the in-class meeting hours. The following photos are snapshots takenin the study lounge. Students are actively engaged in their projects. Figure 1. Snapshots of Group Activities in the 24-hour
Conference Session
Engineering in High School
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Jessica Harwood; Al Rudnitsky
because they had developed many curiosities over the course of theunit. Many students designed their own projectiles with fins of all different shapes and sizes;two groups tried to test the precision of the system; and one student worked on trying to apply aformula to predicting the length of the launch.At the Campus School on the second to last day, I mixed the students up into groups of four withstudents from different research groups. The goal that the students had was to look at their dataand graphs and write down a hypothesis for each of the variables to help them with their Page 10.873.7consequential task. This activity was very
Conference Session
K-12 Poster Session
Collection
2005 Annual Conference
Authors
Jessica Harwood; Al Rudnitsky
because they had developed many curiosities over the course of theunit. Many students designed their own projectiles with fins of all different shapes and sizes;two groups tried to test the precision of the system; and one student worked on trying to apply aformula to predicting the length of the launch.At the Campus School on the second to last day, I mixed the students up into groups of four withstudents from different research groups. The goal that the students had was to look at their dataand graphs and write down a hypothesis for each of the variables to help them with their Page 10.874.7consequential task. This activity was very
Conference Session
Teaching Materials Sci&Eng to Non-Majors
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Mark Palmer
. Palmer M., Bell J: Teaching Writing Skills in a First-Year Engineering Course, Liberal Education Division, ASEE Conference 1996 Page 7.218.11 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2002, American Society for Engineering Education14. Flemings M. C., Sadoway D. R.: Frontiers of Materials Education; MRS Proceedings v66, ©1985.15. Linden B., Vanasuppa L., Heidersbach R.: The Structure of Materials Engineering: A New Model for Materials Engineering Curricula; TMS Annual Meeting, Education Symposium (1996).16
Conference Session
Managing and Funding Design Projects
Collection
2002 Annual Conference
Authors
Loc Vu-quoc; David Mikolaitis; Norman Fitz-Coy; R. Keith Stanfill
. Much coaching was needed to guide the team, as mentioned above, andthese students, in particular.The mid-project review, called the System Level Design Report (SLDR) presentation to theindustry participants, was a success, as reported to us by the industry participants themselves,and by representatives of LMCO, in particular. Another point worth mentioning is that before theformal SLDR presentation, the team had to go through a practice presentation before facultycoaches and other IPPD students, and to receive critiques about their presentation. Such apractice (or peer-review) session instilled a sense of competition among the teams, and helpedthis team to improve their own presentation.Most other IPPD projects funded by LMCO had physical
Collection
2024 ASEE North East Section
Authors
Sunil Dehipawala, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Kelvin Kai Yao; Philip Park, City University of New York, Queensborough Community College; Tak Cheung
encourage “To encourage “To remember” with two remember” with one analogy examples analogy exampleFor the above “block on circular ramp with attached spring” problem solving task, a self-assessment rubric for a class-student was formulated with the following deliverables, afterreceiving full problem solving credit with the help of a learning assistant in the case of at-riskstudents or the help of a student-peer in the case of average students. They are (1) Described thedifficulty of assigning the arithmetic operations, (2) Classified the difficulty as absent-mindedness related mistake or a misconception in a pre-requisite topics, and (3) Described the“To remember
Collection
2024 ASEE North Central Section Conference
Authors
Christopher Joseph Gioia; Louis Edward Christensen, The Ohio State University
same design efficacy of interest to this research studyand will serve as a foundation to the data collection.The other tool used is coding responses to open questions. This method asks participants torespond to open or close-ended questions verbally or through written responses. The responsesare then classified into pre-determined categories based on the participants’ descriptions.Hutchison-Green et al. conducted semi-structured interviews and analyzed the responses in thismanner23. They investigated the self-efficacy, expectancy, values, and career plans of first-yearengineering students. Through their 12 interviews they found that their first-year students weresusceptible to basing their self-efficacy on comparisons to their peers rather
Conference Session
WIED: Faculty and Gender Issues
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sara Wadia-Fascetti, Northeastern University; Jan Rinehart, Northeastern University; Simon Pitts, Northeastern University
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
. Page 24.1044.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Northeastern ADVANCE Research Leadership Development Initiative: A Program to Strengthen the Leadership Skills of Mid-Career FacultyAbstractAs part of the ADVANCE program, Northeastern University launched the Research LeadershipDevelopment Initiative (ReDI) in the fall of 2012 as a leadership program for associate and earlyfull professors. The goal is to prepare these rising research scholars to lead collaborativeresearch teams of peers in activities to create or grow centers, institutes, and/or multi-institutional collaborations. Through participation in the different program components
Conference Session
Enhancing Engineering Management
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jonathan Philip Mayhorn, Univerisity of North Carolina, Charlotte; Ertunga C Ozelkan, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Management
tenured faculty and four part-time facultyalong with one faculty jointly appointed with the Electrical and Computer EngineeringDepartment. The BS in Systems Engineering was ABET accredited in 2012. Both theundergraduate and graduate programs are also accredited by SACS (Southern Association ofColleges and Schools). In addition, the online program is certified by the USDLA (United StatesDistance Learning Association). The program has been growing by about 15-20 students per yearmainly due to growth in the undergraduate program since 2008 and due to the introduction of theonline MS in Engineering Management in 2009. To support this growth the program is recruitingtwo tenure-tracks and several part-time faculty at the time of this writing. SEEM has
Conference Session
FPD 9: First-Year Engineering Courses, Part III: Research, Sustainability, and Professionalism
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dirk Colbry, Michigan State University; Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Paper ID #6188STEM inSight: Developing a Research Skills Course for First- and Second-Year StudentsDr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State UniversityDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she received her Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational
Conference Session
iSTEM
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stacy S Klein-Gardner, Harpeth Hall School and Vanderbilt University; Crystal Tricia Chukwurah, Duke University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
Makes An Authentic Research Why Do I Have to Know This?Program for Girls Work?Awareness of College Scholarships Robotics Supports STEMUsing the Legacy Cycle to Challenge Leadership, Persistence, Mindset andStudents in STEM STEMEngaging Girls In STEM Beyond The Finding Your Passion – Presenting theClassroom Possibilities with STEMClues to becoming a STEM Major: How the Write Less, Think MoreSAT Questionnaire and AP exam takingpatterns & performance can predict STEMmajorsFlowers, Food, and Farms: An Edible Expanding STEM Options ThroughGarden STEAM Project Online ClassesThe Innovation Portal and the
Conference Session
NSF Grantees' Poster Session
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steven W Villachica, Boise State University; Anthony Wayne Marker, Boise State University; Donald Plumlee, Boise State University; Linda Huglin; Amy Chegash, Boise State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
ability to control. Consequently, they intend to share their knowledge with other students. However, Tohidinia and Mosakhani [8] contend that knowledge sharing involves both knowledge collection and donation. Entering students seem more willing to collect knowledge from their peers than donate to it. This situation represents a potential opportunity to target learning activities towards building knowledge sharing skills and confidence.  Survey of the motivational design of the assignments themselves. Keller [9-12] contends that effective instruction employs a motivational design that (1) attracts and maintains student attention; (2) demonstrates the relevance of what students learn to important personal goals
Collection
2024 ASEE Midwest Section Conference
Authors
Adam C. Lynch; Ridge Towner
development and operations teams to improvecollaboration, automate processes, and accelerate delivery. DevOps practices, such as continuousintegration and continuous deployment, enhance efficiency and reliability. [29]1.3.4 Test and Behavior-Driven ModelsTest-Driven Development (TDD) Test-Driven Development (TDD) involves writing tests before implementing code,ensuring that the system meets specified requirements. TDD promotes high-quality code andreduces the likelihood of defects. [30]Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) extends TDD by focusing on the behavior of thesystem from the user's perspective. BDD promotes collaboration between developers, testers,and stakeholders to ensure that the system meets
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 13
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Greses Perez, Tufts University; Lise Clara Mabour, Tufts University; G. R. Marvez, Tufts University; Ymbar Isaias Polanco Pino, Tufts University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
value of tinkering, upcycling, and fixing objects using the resources in their surroundings. She graduated top of her class in a school with a predominantly Latine population. The story is different in college where she is often the only Latine student in her classes. There, she hides the competencies learned in her community as they do not look as cutting edge as the robotics and design examples in the models of engineering portfolios. Her ideas are powerful yet frequently misunderstood by her peers, most of whom grew up in affluent communities. During her last engineering design project, her team dismissed her ideas about how to design a low- cost but durable automatic seed plotter – despite her
Conference Session
Graduate Studies Division (GSD) Technical Session 2: Graduate Student Pipeline and Workforce Development
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
aptitude forgraduate study. To establish that a good undergraduate institution confers an unwarrantedadvantage, one would have to show that, once admitted to graduate school, students fromselective undergraduate institutions perform below expectations relative to their peers fromlower-ranked schools. And there does not seem to be any research addressing that question.2.1 The issue of costCost figures into the impact of the GRE in two separate ways. First, some students might bediscouraged from applying because they can’t afford the $205 fee—or because they can’t affordto to take it multiple times in an effort to improve their score. The American PsychologicalAssociation reported that as schools dropped their GRE requirements, their applications
Conference Session
Aerospace Division (AERO) Technical Session 4
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Dustin Scott Birch, Weber State University
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace Division (AERO)
Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM). • Process control, repeatability, and reproducibility studies. • Test plan writing. • Test report writing.Having advanced training in specific areas will always provide an advantage over their peers as theytransition into the workplace. The Industrial Advisory Boards (IAB) representing the degree programspreviously noted, have often voiced their desire for more specialized training in the areas noted, andthis project is an excellent mechanism to accomplish that. The testbed project provides students aneffective forum for learning these skills and mastering them at a professional level.6.0 STUDENT OUTCOMESOne of the primary goals of the initial phase of the Hybrid Rocket and High-Temperature
Conference Session
Industrial Engineering Division (IND) Technical Session 1
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Corey Kiassat, PhD, MBA, PE, Quinnipiac University
Tagged Divisions
Industrial Engineering Division (IND)
policies of the United States, Canada, and Australia? o What aspects of each policy stand out to you the most and why? o On the international scale, Canada and the United States are similar in many ways. Are the environmental policies of these two similar and neighboring countries similar? Pick any one of the main Canadian initiatives that you think would be difficult to implement in the United States. Discuss your reasons for this perceived difficulty.By 11:59pm on 10/16, each team should upload their write-up to Bb. Assignments submittedafter the due date, but before noon on 10/17 will receive a 20% penalty. Assignments submittedafter noon on 10/17 will
Conference Session
AI and Tools for Transdisciplinary Work
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Elana Goldenkoff, University of Michigan; Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division (LEES)
. Onestudent stated that, “using ChatGPT to smooth over your writing is definitely a positive”especially for students for whom “English is not their first language” (P57 White man domesticstudent). Similarly, another student used AI to translate “niche technical terms” from lecturesinto more easily understood descriptions (P55 Black woman domestic student). There wasgeneral appreciation for AI technologies and a sense that “AI is not going to replace humans. AIis just going to become a tool that humans are gonna coexist with” (P42 Asian man domesticstudent). This student described unique opportunities for “collaboration” between humans andAI. When sharing about a situation in which a professional board game player watched AlphaGo,a computer programmed
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 2
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Huan Gu, University of New Haven
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)
questions, likely attributable to286 the PSS sessions and training they received. For instance, during the modeling for pump size287 selection, a less defined problem, 8 students from Session A proactively sought the instructor's288 help to establish connections. Among the 6 students who achieved a high degree of connection289 (80% or higher), 5 actively collaborated with the instructor during lectures and office hours, while290 the sixth student worked closely with two of these peers. Additionally, in addressing the complex291 question of profitability, four students in Session A specifically inquired about the ski area's capital292 either from the instructor or the field tour guide, demonstrating engagement in PSS activities.293
Conference Session
ELOS Technical Session 4 - Design, Participation, and Projects
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohammad Heshmati, Mississippi State University; Bill B. Elmore, Mississippi State University
Tagged Divisions
Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)
“Collabora on”, “Project Management”, and “Reflec on”. Some of the criteria proposed by HQPBL are70 similar to the ones proposed by Thomas [28] and others [30, 31]. Based on HQPBL, a PBL experience71 requires mul ple-answer, complex problems that engage students in cri cal thinking. The problems need72 to be authen c, meaning they could have a real-life impact on people and communi es outside the73 school se ng. Students need to share the results of their projects with their peers and present them to74 the public. Public may include experts and people outside the classroom. Teamwork skills are a necessity75 in a professional workplace; therefore, projects should be collabora ve. Collabora on is not only limited76 to students’ team
Collection
2007 ASEE Midwest Section Conference
Authors
Lawrence Whitman; Zulma Toro-Ramos; Steven Skinner
skills in talking through material with peers, listening with realskill, knowing how to build trust in a working relationship, and providingleadership to group efforts [17].” Leadership skills are vital to become a successengineer. Leadership is here defined as the knowledge and practice of skillsnecessary to lead a team to accomplish a common goal. Students participate informal instruction and lead a project or have previous leadership experience. Thestudent completes a project report and submits to the Director of EngineeringEducation.To satisfy the Leadership criteria each student must: • Take some formal instruction on leadership • Propose and demonstrate a leadership experience • Submit a short report on the
Collection
2008 Spring ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Conference
Authors
6. AutoCAD exposureThe laboratory portion of the course continued to provide time each week for students towork on their specific capstone design, but this designated lab time became slightly morestructured. The first month of the semester, the course instructor guided the students tofocus on the planning aspects associated with their project. This phase of the courseconcluded with Planning Presentations and a chance for the students to share theirresearch and project goals with their peers and instructors. The rest of the semester, thestudents spent in the design/build (depending on the project) phase of their capstoneexperience. The semester still concluded with a final presentation where the studentsreported their results and summarized
Conference Session
Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 2
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah A Goodman, Stevens Institute of Technology; Emily L Atieh, Stevens Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Materials Division (MATS)
campuscommunity. This final project was selected for several reasons. First, it is designed to encouragestudents to tap into their funds of knowledge, or their unique perspectives imparted by family,community, and peers [1]. The funds of knowledge framework, which was originally developedby Vélez-Ibáñez and Greenberg in 1992 in Tucson, Arizona [2], [3], views students’ priorknowledge and life experiences as an asset that augments student learning [4] rather thanexpecting students to adapt to a way of thinking imparted by the course or college environment[5]. The implementation of asset-based frameworks in STEM courses at the K-12 and post-secondary level aims to “change the ways of knowing that are valued within engineering.” [6]Second, research suggests