on the undergraduate coaches themselves(Appendix B). This survey included a series of questions, also used a five-point Likert scale, thatasked how being a coach helped the student to prepare for their future career and to developtechnical and soft skills. Both surveys are still collecting data that will be presented during thepresentation at the annual meeting.Prior to implementing the formal assessment instrument in the spring 2023 semester, theeffectiveness of the coaches was assessed informally during mid-semester evaluations and finalcourse evaluations. The questions related to the coaches were more qualitative, asking forgeneral feedback. The most common responses from the students were (i) they were able toanswer questions, (ii) easy
complete the same General Education sequence.The articulation of engineering with the liberal arts was considered from two perspectives. Thefirst is the obvious benefit of a liberal arts education to the engineering student [15]. Whileadvances in knowledge and technology are creating excitement in science and engineeringeducation, tomorrow’s engineer must also be able to write and communicate well; considerethics and social responsibilities; understand business; and live and work in teams as a globalcitizen. They must be able to think critically and problem-solve. The faculty of RMC pridesitself on producing graduates with all of these so-called “soft skills” as well as the breadth ofknowledge obtained by completing a large General Education
knowledge of high school teachers and students. The correspondingobjectives were similar to the prior work 10: 1. Engage participants in a hands-on engineering experience that leverages their prior STEM knowledge to develop a deeper understanding of STEM concepts applied to engineering design and 3D printing. 2. Increase the pipeline and diversity of students interested in STEM fields relevant to Georgia Southern University and NASA. 3. Enhance participant’s soft skills applied to the presentation of technical content. 4. Leverage participation for the increase in the local community's awareness of NASA related topics and Georgia Southern University STEM education opportunities.Six high school teams were provided with a
; Mekala, S. (2020). Fostering 21st century skills in the students of engineering in ESL classroom. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 14(2), 59-69.10. Lee, S., Lee, J., & Ahn, Y. (2019). Sustainable BIM-based construction engineering education curriculum for practice-oriented training. Sustainability, 11(21), 6120.11. Seemakula, M., Liao, G., Ellis, D., 2010, “Closing the Competency Gap in Manufacturing Processes As It Applies To New Engineering Graduates”, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.12. Jiang, Z., Caicedo, J. M., & Petrulis, R. (2020, June). An NSF REU Site with Integrated Academia-Industry Research Experience–Development, Implementation, and Lessons Learned. 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.13
spring semesters, respectively. Thispaper presents course structure 1.0 and the preliminary data of student feedback on learningoutcomes of the first course that was completed in the fall semester of 2021.2. Methods An elective, two-semester course was offered by TTU WCOE—IE 4331: BiomedicalInnovation. The first semester (fall) prepared undergraduate students to identify, explore, andanalyze the authentic problem as well as develop soft skills necessary to effectivelycommunicate as team members. Team-based learning (TBL) was the instructional method usedto develop team communication, organize a specific sequence of individual and group work, andprovide immediate feedback and accountability for the learner [15]. TBL pedagogy differs fromthe
evolve, you continue to work in the space of ambiguity, which means you have to be able to adapt to all these things and all this information that's coming in to then sift through and find that solution.” [Manager 18, Promotion]Comfort Ability to navigate changing job roles, “…trying to tap on those soft skills is probablywith change situation, and responsibilities or change where adaptability would show through … some directions with comfort and ease of the
; Carberry, A. R. (2021, January). Practicing Engineers’ Definition of Their Expertise: Emergent Themes and Frequency by Gender Identity and Role Change into Management. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.[10] Miskioglu, E., Martin, K. M., Carberry, A. R., Bolton, C., & Caitlyn, A. (2021, January). Is it Rocket Science or Brain Science? Developing an Approach to Measure Engineering Intuition. In ASEE Annual Conference proceedings.[11] D. R. Laker and J. L. Powell, “The differences between hard and soft skills and their relative impact on training transfer,” Human Resource Development Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 111–122, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20063.[12] Cech, T. R. (1999). Science at liberal
through the program’s faculty aboutresearch and internship opportunities, many of them becoming the students’ first opportunity toapply their soft skills and technical engineering knowledge into real problems and community-based projects. By visiting communities throughout the island, students can learn firsthandthrough experiences, strategies, and projects that promote resilience and could be incorporated aspossible options to be echoed in equivalent situations across Puerto Rico.3. Conclusions.We have developed RISE-UP to respond to the challenges posed by extreme natural conditionsin Puerto Rico and the role that the creators of infrastructure play into developing a moresustainable and resilient environment. In reaching this goal, we have
performance, but also in thinking critically and providing usefuland actionable feedback to their peers. This adds another layer of learning to the overall goals ofthe course or project.In addition to the benefits provided to both the assessor and assessee, peer assessment andfeedback offers the opportunity for students to develop “soft” skills, including teamwork, whichare transferable to real-world work environments [7]. Further, both self and peer assessment canmodel workplace evaluations that students may encounter in their occupation, which makes peerfeedback a valuable activity that carries beyond the classroom [10].Feedback Reliability and Instructor ConcernsIt was noted that providing peer feedback is a beneficial activity for students [9
engineering, basic sciences,selected humanities, and social sciences subjects containing more than 56,000 hours of videocontent [38]. Access to the course material is free while the certification exam is optional andcomes at a minimal course exam fee. NPTEL has also extended its work in initiatives such aslaboratory workshops, internships, soft skills workshops for improving employability, and othernon-technical classes. Figures 5 and 6 present some of the latest courses offered in AM and CM. Figure 5: Course offered on NPTEL–Fundamentals of AM Technologies Figure 6: Course offered on NPTEL–Mechanics of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite StructuresUdemyAs several universities were shuttered because
through the problem. This process has been shown to increase studentmotivation, allowing them to apply the knowledge learned in engineering classes, in aninteractive environment. Students get a chance to discuss concepts with each other andcollaborate on projects working towards a common goal – this is also representative of a real-world project. Hadim et. al. [4-7] suggest that project-based learning facilitates the developmentof many of the “soft skills” demanded from engineering graduates.Research GoalsThis research project aligns with the university wide Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) initiative.The course makes it clear that the undergraduate research experience provides appropriatescaffolding. In other words, students learn some
, at juliepmartin.com.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com WIP: Think-Aloud Interviews for Assessment of Engineering Students’ Opportunities to Practice Professional SkillsIntroductionIncreased levels of interdisciplinary collaborations and globalization have altered the skillsneeded for today’s engineering workforce. Non-technical professional skills—once relegated to“soft skills”—have become equally important as technical fluency. These evolving workforceneeds have been widely recognized and reflected in educational standards by ABET (theaccreditation board for engineering) and reports by organizations such as the National Academyof Engineering and the American Society for
available tothe participants, coaches, and sponsors. Example topics include: • Articulating complex technical points of view and solutions • Technical leadership branding • Building social technical eminence (internal and external) • Building “soft” skills such as (leadership, negotiations, communications • Networking across the enterprise and externally • Career advancement planning • Identifying and correcting derailing behaviors that could delay career progression • Discovering passions and purpose for both personal and professional • Understanding dimensions of diversity, equity, and inclusion, unconscious bias© Copyright IBM 12IBM Pathway
(CAE) courseto construct a CAD model via ANSYS for an old truss bridge. The motivation for this projectwas for students to help determine the load-carrying capacity (or reverse engineer it) of thebridge for safety purposes going forward. Krishnan & Nilsson (2015) [7] discuss a course titled“Engineering Projects for the Community” at their institution to engage students in communityprojects. Projects cover a wide variety of engineering majors including civil, mechanical,electrical, bio and computer. This course also emphasizes the need to interact with civic bodiesor public organizations which is a new soft skill set for the students involved. Nagel et al. (2019)[8] discuss in their paper design courses at James Madison University intended
results (right)4.0 Assessment and Learning OutcomesLearning can be categorized into developing skills in the cognitive, affective, and psychomotordomains. Higher education focuses largely on the cognitive domain following Bloom’s taxonomy– knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation [11]. ABEToutcomes for engineering education integrate developing student abilities in both the affectivedomain by emphasizing soft skills and the cognitive domain by promoting critical thinking andcreativity [12]. While lecture-based instruction is essential from the point of view of deliveringcontent knowledge appropriate for an engineering curriculum, blending active, cooperative, andproblem-based learning with course lectures
mopping the floor.” This quote paints a picture of the wide andvaried roles that engineers take on within ag-tech start-ups.Initial findings also point to skills that participants felt that engineers and engineering internsneeded in order to succeed in the industry. One participant said, “soft skills, and or the projectmanagement, or the business side that I think are critical.” “They probably come with a little bitwork experience, but I think I think those skills are just as important as technical skills.” Anotherparticipant mentioned “Personally, I would want them to have a good math background, goodsoftware like good understanding of Python and I want them to have some experience withmachine learning and then probably some knowledge of
barriers to graduate education specific to underrepresented minorities have beenidentified [14-20]. To address some of these challenges, the BTD program as envisioned wouldprovide continuity for the Level 1 students participating in the NYC LSAMP. The design of theBTD programs attempts to actively remove some of these barriers for high performing students(GPA of 3.0 or higher). The cohort model is used to create a learning community with facultymentorship, a stipend and educational allowance to remove the financial barriers, GREpreparation to address preparation for doctoral programs requiring the GRE scores, developmentof communication/soft skills, as well as the opportunity for international research experiences.NYC LSAMP Level 1 undergraduate
. • Collaboration with local schools to create pipeline to the degree. • Support activities to ensure the creation of a close-knit community with national peer to peer connections. • Support activities to promote and develop soft skills among participants including leadership, communications skills, and teamwork. • By presenting our efforts, we hope that other institutions who are considering expanding their programs of study can benefit from our experience by adopting best practices while avoiding pitfalls.Keywords:Cyber Security, Cyber Security Education, Collaborative Degrees, Career Pathways, NISTIntroduction and MotivationAs cyber security is becoming an integral part of every business and personal digital asset, thedemand for
and encourages the interest of students in the areas of science, technology, enginee-ring, arts, and mathematics is needed. This methodology allows for the development of diffe-rent soft skills in students, from real situations to problem-solving.In this sense, the objective of this research was to measure how students react to the incorpo-ration of a prototype of a didactic module called CubeSat that was used as a support tool forSTEAM teaching.Therefore, the didactic modules proposed pedagogical resources that favor the teaching-lear-ning process, which consisted of incorporating into the classroom a challenge to be solvedwith the CubeSat prototype and assembling a satellite in the undergraduate engineering cour-se under the supervision of
mentors fortaking time out of their busy schedules and for sharing their expertise. They felt like they nowhave a better understanding of chemical engineering and their futures after graduation andimproved their soft skills as well.Preparations are currently being made for the second year of the mentoring program. Mentorsfrom the first year of the program will be invited to participate again. After existing mentorshave been given the opportunity to participate again, invitations will be sent to other alumni tocomplete the mentor group. Student participation will again come from the sophomore, juniorand senior classes regardless of whether they participated in 2021-22 or not. As part of planningthe 2022-23 program, the Steering Committee will
from accepting job offers was an unwillingness to work at theoffered compensation level. Entry level applicants were most frequently not hired because oftheir poor soft skills that limited their success. For anyone looking towards machining as a career path, the implication is that it is importantto start with a formal training program. One of the most common paths is an associate degree ata community college, which gives the student the necessary skills to begin working as amachinist. With over half of the responding companies valuing a degree, completing collegeprior to employment will allow a new employee to quickly begin growing their skillset. Helpingthem to advance rapidly, not only in their position but in pay and benefits as well
learning proposed challenges in the implementation of this course.Students and faculty were surveyed about the challenges that they faced during the pandemic.These challenges are summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Challenges from COVID-19 pandemic Perspective Specific Challenges Students’ • Fewer check-ins with faculty and peers; virtual space removes the need. specific Email is used more frequently, barriers to • No opportunities to make new friends or interact with new people—without optimal which exposure to new ideas is lessened. learning • In person interaction with diverse faculty and students also helps students develop “soft skills” needed for industry jobs so not
Secretary’s Commission on Necessary Skills (SCANS) surveyed industry to identifythe most important workforce skills [3]. The commission identified several skills includingcreativity, teamwork, budgeting skills, communication, leadership, project management, andseveral others. In education these are sometimes referred to as industry “soft skills.” They havebeen consolidated into the 4 Cs. The 4 Cs in education are collaboration, communication, criticalthinking and creativity skills [4]. Most preK-12 education is focused on content knowledgebecause it can be listed in standards and tested easily. Skill development is not as easy toobjectively test. As a result, there are no tests for the 4 Cs and they do not reside in academicstandards, and therefore
experiences) 3.57 Community support (e.g., family, religious groups) 3.39 “Soft skills” such as ability to network, negotiate, resolve conflicts 3.37 Academic aptitude (e.g., IQ, mastery of content knowledge) 3.32 Peer support 3.25 Faculty support and interactions other than with advisor 3.20 Relationship with Advisor 3.18 Ability to deal effectively with ambiguity 3.18 Prior knowledge about graduate school, graduate
, but incorporate complementary topics that can potentially strengthen the professional, personal, employability and soft skills of pre-college students. 2. As reported in [13], minimizing the gender stereotype in a teaching and learning environment enables a sense of belonging and an increases engagement. The use of female role models was actively adopted by this program to mitigate the gender stereotype and increase the engagement of Hispanic female pre-college students. The workshop facilitators and mentors were female individuals from either academia or industry. From the post-workshop survey for pre-college students, having female role models and mentors contributed to increasing the confidence of
team. The responsibilities of eachposition help to develop soft skills that are necessary for engineering practice upon graduation.[14] Not only do these organizations provide necessary skills and networks for student success,but a higher level of student involvement through out-of-class experiences, in general, promotesthe development of a better-quality learning environment, an essential aspect of promoting 1student success in engineering. [1] Moreover, a viable student organization can foster cohesionthat benefits the program and institution at large while at the same time accommodating thenontraditional student’s challenging time constraints
selected apps, products, or interfaces of their choice.They learned how to apply heuristics to evaluate UI designs as they pertain to usability, utility,and desirability, etc. with individual user interface elements and interactions, concerning howthey impact the overall user experience. Students also learned a new vocabulary as it relates tocommon heuristics in the field as well as best practices in UI design. Further, students gainedexperience with industry-facing tools such as Figma where they built their high-fidelity UIredesigns and worked collaboratively to help critique the UI designs of peers, simultaneouslydemonstrating growth in technical and soft skills. These experiences helped students build notonly their expertise and skillset, but
higher levels of career advancement[4] andsurveys indicate that practicing engineers spend a large portion of their work time writing orspeaking; however, feedback from industry indicates a lack of communication skills in manyengineering graduates.[5] Therefore, so-called “soft” skills, recently redefined as “professional”skills, need to be learned within the engineering curricula and be transferable to the engineeringworkforce. As expected, communication is recognized as a core transferable professionalskill,[2] which is reflected in current ABET criteria[6] and publications such as The engineer of2020,[7] prompting pedagogical changes in engineering curricula.[8, 9] At the author’sinstitution, feedback from alumni surveys and the departmental
Internship Preparation Phuong Truong, Karcher Morris, Nicholas Stein, Katie Hsieh, Ravi Patel, Farnia Nafarifard, Chen Du, Kien Nguyen, Truong Nguyen Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of California San DiegoAbstractIn this paper, we present a five-week summer internship preparatory program for electrical andcomputer engineering transfer students that addresses technical and professional internshippreparatory needs through distance learning format. The program was delivered virtually andprovided a comprehensive experience of technical skill building (Python, electronics, machinelearning, app development) and professional development (soft
andcolleagues in campus offices. In part, these elements make us good teachers. Prior to March2020, face-to-face interaction was the way we taught, collaborated, served and learned. Then,COVID-19 became real and, within a week, we could no longer be physically present with ourstudents and peers. We shifted instruction to Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT). We alsoshifted the way we collaborated in our scholarship and service. Informed by research, this paperhighlights aspects of our journey, challenges along the way and lessons learned to apply to thefuture.As educators in a predominately engineering university, the courses we teach address identifiedgaps in traditional engineering education and focus on the “soft skills” [1]. Team-based learningand team