look at the lives of minority mathematics studentsin college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(5), 362-372.9 Treisman, P. U., & Surles, S. (2001). Systematic reform and minority student high achievement. Washington,DC: Institute of Medicine (NAS). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 460199)10 Collins, Rachel E., General Engineering home page, as of January 12, 2003, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/ge/11 Clemson University College of Engineering and Science History, http://www.ces.clemson.edu/about/history.htm12 Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange report, http://www.occe.ou.edu/csrde/13 Clemson World, Winter 2002, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, p. 31.14 Consortium for Student Retention Data Exchange report, http
6 5 4 3 2 1 0 n ip ce s t
N Are BME Curriculum Committee Review PEOs with PEOs (faculty, students, alum(s)) BME Advisory Board and appropriate? revises PEOs other constituent groups in fall of even years Y BME Curr. Com. develops outcomes for each PEO Outcomes N are assessable and measurable? Y Y
faculty participants To develop a § Run pilot freshman courses o Faculty/students feedback freshman pr ojects § Refine material s based on on adapted curriculum course to introduce feedback o Document implementation new students to § Determine scalability process technical § Develop sustai nable
ofthese Case Studies taken from the author’s Instructional Lecture Notes, keep in mind thegeneral common features that are intended to attract the attention of the reader (thestudent engineer):1. The attempt to seamless integrate (some would say “sneak up on the student”) theengineering problem or life situation into a cultural setting,2. The clear references to names and dates in a readable style that is done in a writingstyle that is less of the sterile engineering that is often found in technical papers and textsand more of a common language.3. The action item(s) at the end of the Case Study presentation that attempts to have thestudent study or at least appreciate the human or social content of the situation as well asengineering content.4
, Guan S. Examining the range of student needs in the design and development of aweb-based course. In: Abbey B, ed. Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education. Hershey, PA: IdeaGroup Publishing; 2000. 7. Rogers PL. Layers of navigation for hypermedia environments: designing instructional web sites.In: Abbey B, ed. Instructional and cognitive impacts of web based education. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing;2000.BiographyDR. PHILLIP R. ROSENKRANTZProfessor at California State Polytechnic University, Pomona since 1982. IE and IE supervisor for General Motorsfor 9 years prior to entering academia. He holds a doctorate in organizational leadership from PepperdineUniversity; MS in Statistics from UC Riverside; MS in
and Exposition, Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”20. Sivertsen. M. (1993). State of the art: Transforming ideas for teaching and learning science. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Education, OERI Education Information.Biographical InformationWILLIAM JORDAN is Professor and Program Chair of Mechanical Engineering at Louisiana Tech University. Hehas B.S. and M.S. degrees in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines. He has an M.A. degreefrom Denver Seminary. His Ph.D. was in mechanics and materials engineering from Texas A & M University. Heteaches materials oriented courses and his main research area deals with the mechanical behavior of compositematerials. He is a registered
internet education: a progress report. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. Volume 34, Issue 1. Page 8.260.14Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering EducationGreenbaum, J. and M. Kyng (1991). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, New Jersey.Prupis, S. (1998). Introduction to creating online courses. Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services, October 1998
werehypothetically selected from this process, with mean x and standard deviation, s, how manyindependent readings would it represent? This approach leads to control limits plotted on theb In fact, the failure of this algorithmic approach led to resistance at Digital towards Page 8.595.9implementing SPC, and motivated the solution reported in this case study.Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education Session
levels. Each team will be supplied with one IR receiver and may purchase additional IR receivers capable of detecting the beacon(s). UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE MAY A ROBOT EMIT AN IR SIGNAL at either of the two possible marker beacon frequencies of 100 Hertz or 125 Hertz. A robot may emit an IR signal as a result of using an approved sensor that incorporates an IR light emitting diode. Examples of such permitted sensors include shaft encoders, optosensors, and the Sharp Model GP2D12 IR ranging device. Budgetary – Each team will have a discretionary budget of $150. Each team will also be loaned a programmable controller board and issued a set of basic sensors. The actual cost of purchasing parts
of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education3. Ferren A S, Margolin C, “Review of Liberal education at Miami University”, April 25, 20004. Mark Van Doren; “Liberal Education”, New York, 19435. No Author; Board approved statement on Liberal learning, published by AAC&U6. No Author, The ASME guide in FIRST and Universities.7. Douglass E. Oppliger, “University-Pre College Interaction through FIRST Robotics competition”. August 6- 10, 2001 Oslo, Norway.8. V. Wilczynski, T. W. Kowenehoven / M. Giblin, “FIRST: An industry-University-High school partnership to excite our next generation of engineers”, presented at the 1995
to discuss the assessmentplan, set performance standards, discuss the assessment results, and suggest improvements to thecourse.Step 1: Defining E101’s Mission, Objectives and OutcomesAssessment of E101 began formally in the fall of 2001, by the faculty defining the course goalsand outcomes (See Table 1). In this case, the overall goal of the course can be seen as its mission. Table 1: Goals and Learning Objectives of the E101 Course, Fall 2001 Goals and Objectives of the Course: This course is designed to introduce students to the field of Engineering and the study of Engineering. Objective: Students will be able to integrate computer usage, teamwork, problem solving, and verbal/written language into a design project within the
Conference Proceedings. p.F1C-7(1).5. Enbody, Richard J. (1998). Our experience developing CQI procedures for ABET2000 accreditation. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings. p.878(6).6. Feisel, Lyle D., George D. Peterson. (2002). A colloquy on learning objectives for engineering education laboratories. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings.7. Finelli, Cynthia J., Allen Klinger, Dan D. Budny. (2001). Strategies for improving classroom environment. Journal of Engineering Education. V90, n4, p.491(6).8. Fisher, P. David, James S. Fairweather, Lisa A. Haston. (2000). Establishing learning objectives and assessing outcomes in engineering service
). (2002). "Graduate Mentoring of Underrepresented Minority Students", MGE@MSA Mentoring Institute, Salt Lake City, August 8, 2002. 15. National Science Foundation (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators 2002, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2002 (NSB-02-1). 16. Haag, S (2002). ABET entering freshman survey academic year 2001/2002freshman influences in their selection of engineering as a major gender and ethnicity study. Tempe AZ, Arizona State University. 17. Seymour, E. & Hewitt, N. (1997). Talking About Leaving. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Page 8.378.11 11Proceedings of the
Session 1455 Growing the National Innovation System: Defining the Characteristics of Innovative Professional Graduate Education at the Master, Doctor, and Fellow Level for Technology Leaders in Industry D. D. Dunlap, 1 S. J. Tricamo, 2 D. H. Sebastian, 2 D. A. Keating, 3 T. G. Stanford 3 Western Carolina University 1 / New Jersey Institute of Technology 2 University of South Carolina 3 AbstractThis is the third paper in the special panel session on reshaping
sacred by the local, native Apache people.The University news officials report that in the mid 1980’s the Forest Service carried outcultural surveys on Mt. Graham. Two shrines were located on Hawk and High Peaks.Additional surveys were carried out on Emerald and Plainview Peaks, and nineteen localtribes were contacted to see if they had concerns. Four tribes, the Ak-Chin, Hopi, Zuni,and the San Carlos Apache responded but raised no objections to the proposed plans forthe telescopes. The shrines were protected and the telescopes were located near EmeraldPeak on a site with no known adverse cultural impact. In 1990, two years after thecompletion of the final environmental impact statement, some members of the San CarlosApache tribe raised
Session 1455 Growing the National Innovation System: Assessing the Needs and Skill Sets for Innovative Professional Graduate Education Defined by the Tasks and Responsibilities of Engineer-Leaders in Industry S. J. Tricamo, 1 D. H. Sebastian, 1 J. M. Snellenberger, 2 D. D. Dunlap, 3 D. A. Keating, 4 T. G. Stanford 4 New Jersey Institute of Technology 1 / Rolls-Royce Corporation 2 Western Carolina University 3/University of South Carolina 4 AbstractThis is the second paper in the special panel
Page 8.1307.6 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society of Engineering EducationThe in-learning strategies may also be categorized by a similar set of three phases: for-dealing-with-stress (before), in-dealing-with-stress (during), and on-dealing-with-stress (after) (Fig. 2).The for-dealing-with-stress strategies helped to avoid unnecessary stress before inner and inter-personal conflict arose. The in-dealing-with-stress strategies helped to reduce stress as conflictwas building. The on-dealing-with-stress strategies helped to detect and reduce stress after theevent(s) causing the conflict had happened. phase