Conference Session

Construction Classroom Development

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dennis Audo, Pittsburg State University; Seth O'Brien, Pittsburg State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

) 2. Attention to detail (1-10 points) 3. Use of provided material(s) (1-10 points) 4. Oral presentation (1-25 points) 5. Enthusiasm (1-10 points) 6. Reason for participation (1-10 points) 7. Bonus points (Judge must state reason) (1-10 points) Students constructing their projectsEach grade level is awarded prizes for first, second and third place. Prizes awarded include toolboxes, tools, toy construction equipment, hats, pizza coupons, and gift cards. Then all the firstplace winners are judged to determine first, second and third overall. The prizes for overallwinners have been $100, $75, and $50 U. S. savings bonds

Conference Session

Thinking, Reasoning & Engineering in Elementary School

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Bedward, North Carolina State University; Eric Wiebe, North Carolina State University; Lauren Madden, North Carolina State University; James Minogue, North Carolina State University; Mike Carter, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

kits that are never truly tackled within science instruction classroom experience.References1. Barger, M., Gilbert, R., Little, R., et al, Teaching Elementary School Teachers Basic Engineering Concepts. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2007.2. Engstrom, D., AC 2008-641: Invention, Innovation, and Inquiry—Engineering Design for Children. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 2008.3. Etheredge, S., et al., To Pop or Not to Pop: Elementary Teachers Explore Engineering Design with Pop-up Books. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 2005.4. NRC, National Research Council., National Academy of Sciences. National Science Education Standards

Conference Session

Teaching College Algebra and Using Mathematics Tutoring Tools

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hyounkyun Oh, Savannah State University; Asad Yousuf, Savannah State University; Sujin Kim, Savannah State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

/paper.pdf5. Hoar, Robert H., “The College Algebra E-tutor”, Teaching with Technology today, Volume 8, Number 9: June 27, 20026. “Interactive College Algebra: A Web-Based Course, Student Guide with Student CD”, M2 Presswire; Nov 3, 20097. Hauk, Shandy, Powers, Robert A. , Safer, Alan, and Segalla, Angelo, “A comparison of web-based and paper and pencil homework on student performance in college algebra”, at http://hopper.unco.edu/hauk/segalla/WBWquan_060307.pdf8. Hagerty, Gary and Smith, S, “Using The Web-Based Interactive Software Aleks To Enhance College Algebra”, Page 15.317.14 Mathematics and Computer

Conference Session

Design Projects across the Curriculum

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tom Thomas, University of South Alabama; Michael Doran, University of South Alabama; James Sakalaukus, University of South Alabama

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, and problem solving skills.Although the goal of the SGER JagBot project was to design and build a tour guide robot, themain result was enhancement of engineering and computer science education at the University ofSouth Alabama.6. References[1] Fritsch WB J, Sagerer G. “Bringing it all together: Integration to study embodied interaction with a robotcompanion.” In: AISB 2005 Symposium – Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction; 2005.[2] Pineau J, Montemerlo M, Pollack M, Roy N and Thrun S. “Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes:Challenges and results.” Special issue on Socially Interactive Robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 2003; 42:271-281.[3] Birgit G, Matthias H, and Rolf S

Conference Session

Opportunities and Challenges in Developing International Engineering Research

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin McGarvey, Rowan University; Michael Panko, Rowan University; Michael Kerbaugh, Rowan University; Gabriel Posluszny, Rowan University; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University; Anthony Cavalier, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

International

theseprojects and exposes students to Principles of Development of Appropriate and SustainableTechnologies. The redesign of the device to control costs and with end-user feedback is avaluable lesson for students, which cannot be taught in traditional engineering classes butthrough such Experiential Learning courses. The benefits to students include learning the designprocess, learning about traditions and constraints in developing countries, developing devicesthat will be beneficial to a large number of end users, and the joy derived from lending a helpinghand to people around the globe.Bibliography1 Dewey, J. Experience and Education, NY, Collier, 19382 Weil, S. and McGill, I. A Framework for Making Sense of Experiential Learning In S. Weil and I

Conference Session

Professional Graduate Education and Industry

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas Stanford, University of South Carolina

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

. Keating, T. G. Stanford, A. L. McHenry, E. M. DeLoatch, D. R. Depew, N. Latif, G. R. Bertoline, S. J. Tricamo, H. J. Palmer, K. Gonzalez-Landis, E. Segner, J. P. Tidwell, D. H. Quick, J. M. Snellenberger, R. N. Olson, J. O’Brien, L. A. Hammon, J. Spencer, J. Sargent, “Enabling a Strong U.S. Engineering Workforce for Leadership of Technology Development and Innovation in Industry: Critical Skill- Sets for Early Career Development Leading to the Professional Master of Engineering,” Proceedings of the 2006 National Meeting of ASEE, Chicago, IL, June, 2006.5. Dunlap, D. D., D. A. Keating, T. G. Stanford, A. L. McHenry, E. M. DeLoatch, P. Y. Lee, D. R. Depew, G. R. Bertoline, M. J. Dyrenfurth, S. J. Tricamo, I. T. Davis, J. P

Conference Session

Frontiers in Engineering Economy

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neal Lewis, University of Bridgeport; Ted Eschenbach, TGE Consulting; Joseph Hartman, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Economy

. Page 15.607.9References1. Titman, S. and Martin, J.D. (2007) Valuation, Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston.2. Newnan, D.G.; Lavelle, J.P.; and Eschenbach, T.G. (2009) Engineering Economic Analysis, 10th edition, Oxford University Press, New York.3. Sullivan, W.G.; Wicks, E.M.; and Koelling, C.P. (2009) Engineering Economy, 14th edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.4. Hartman, J.C. (2007) Engineering Economy and the Decision-Making Process, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.5. Park, C.S. (2007) Contemporary Engineering Economic Analysis, 4th edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.6. Blank, L.T. and Tarquin, A.J. (2005) Engineering Economy, 6th edition, McGraw Hill, Boston.7. Canada, J.R

Conference Session

Trends in Mechanical Engineering I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yunfeng Wang, The College of New Jersey; Christopher Ault, The College of New Jersey; Teresa Nakra, The College of New Jersey; Andrea Salgian, The College of New Jersey; Meredith Stone, Independent Evaluator

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

authors would like to thank the orchestra of The College of New Jersey and its conductorDr. Philip Tate for their collaboration and support. This work was supported by the NationalScience Foundation under Grant No. 0855973.References1. Holley, K. A, 2009. Understanding Interdisciplinary Challenges and Opportunities in Higher Education, ASHE Higher Education Report, 35(2), 1-129.2. Klein, J.T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. Page 15.166.143. Moran, J. 2002. Interdisciplinarity, New York: Routledge4. Rhoten, D., and Pfirman, S. 2007. Women in

Conference Session

Innovations in Power Education in ECE

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Radian Belu, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

2007.8. C. Elliott, V. Vijayakumar, W. Zink and R. Hansen, National Instruments LabVIEW: AProgramming Environment for Laboratory Automation and Measurement, Journal of the Associationfor Laboratory Automation, Volume 12, Issue 1, February 2007.9. R. Krishnan, A. Bharadwaj, and P. Materu, Computer aided design of Electrical machine forvariable speed applications, IEEE Trans. Ind.Electron., vol. 35, no. 4, Nov. 1988.10. S. Linke, J. Torgeson, and J. Au, An interactive computer-graphics program to aid instruction inelectric machinery, IEEE Comput. Applicat.Power, July 1989.11. N. Kehtarnavaz and N. Kim, LabVIEW Programming Environment, Digital Signal ProcessingSystem-Level Design Using LabVIEW, 2005.12. N. Kehtarnavaz and N. Kim, Getting Familiar

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jorge Valenzuela, Auburn University; Jeffrey Smith, Auburn University; Ben Reece, Auburn University; David Shannon, Auburn University

AC 2010-408: INTEGRATING COMPUTER PROGRAMMING TECHNOLOGIESINTO THE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMJorge Valenzuela, Auburn University Jorge Valenzuela received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh in the year 2000. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. His recent research involves stochastic models for the evaluation of production costs and optimization of electric power generation. He teaches courses on Operations Research and Information Technology.Jeffrey Smith, Auburn University Jeffrey S. Smith is Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Auburn University. Prior to

Conference Session

Design Projects in Mechanical Engineering I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Post, Bradley University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

paradigm.Bibliography1. Brickell, J. L., Porter, D. B., Reynolds, M. F., and Cosgrove, R. D. Assigning Students to Groups forEngineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods. July 1994 Journal of Engineering Education, pp.259-262.2. Seat, E., and Lord, S. Enabling Effective Engineering Teams: A Program for Teaching Interaction Skills.October 1999 Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 385-390.3. Haag, S. Teaming Backlash: Reframing Female Engineering Students. Proceedings, 2000 ASEE Conference,St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.4. Kanter, E. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses in tokenwomen. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965-990.5. Cohen, L.L., & Swim, J.K. (1995). The differential impact of

Conference Session

International Study Abroad Programs & Student Engagements

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Evans, Bucknell University; Jablonski Erin, Bucknell University; Buffinton Keith, Bucknell University; Richard McGinnis, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

International

paper.Specifically, for each of the programs’ learning objectives the students had to identify anddescribe an experience (or collection of experiences) and examine how the experience(s) ledthem to accomplish the objective. For those learning objectives not met, the students describedhow their experiences fell short of meeting the objective. In addition, students had to describehow the course is likely to impact their future and their professional careers.Assessment of the CourseIn addition to the assessment of the students by the faculty, an assessment of the course by thestudents was undertaken. The exact assessment tools used varied from year to year given thenumerous faculty involved and the varied venues for the course. In total, three different types

Conference Session

Innovations in Materials Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cindy Waters, North Carolina A&T State University; Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Materials

on their support of student learning.More importantly the techniques were found to be quite easy to adapt and required minimalpreparation before teaching, in fact the day-to-day teaching was fun! Gone were the days ofputting one self to sleep at the board and on top of all of this, they were so easy a “caveperson”could do it! Page 15.1390.12Bibliography1. Vygotsky, L. S. Thought and Language, Cambridge Massachusetts, The M.I.T., 19622. Von Glaserfield, E. Learning as a constructive activity. In C. Janvier (Ed.),Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics, Hillsdale New Jersey, 19873. James H. Fetzer Journal

Conference Session

Aerospace Technical Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Roger Forsgren, NASA Headquarters; Lauren Miller, NASA Headquarters

Tagged Divisions

Aerospace

Learned course. Two former,distinguished NASA engineers/managers review and critique more than 30 aerospaceengineering examples in the classroom. Through the use of case histories such as Apollo 13 andthe Space Shuttle Challenger “Normalization of Deviance” concept2 to lesser-known examplesfrom archives throughout the Agency, NASA engineers learn first hand from these highlyexperienced thought leaders who were there since the 1960’s, and worked through difficult featsand challenges to acquire invaluable experience.The goal of the SSD course is to examine the root causes of aerospace-specific mishaps, and theapplicable lessons that can be derived from these historical incidents. The majority of spacemishaps can be traced to easily recognizable and

Conference Session

Technological Literacy and K-12 Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rene Reitsma, Oregon State University; Paul Klenk, Duke University; Malinda Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jacquelyn Sullivan, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

standard. The document provides interesting and important background material related to Content match Background the standard. The grade level of this material is appropriate for this task or else I can easily adapt Object match Grade level the materials in this document to my grade level. I can use a non-textual component(s); e.g., figures, tables, images, videos orSituational match Non-textuals graphics, etc.Situational match Examples I can use the real-world examples provided in the

Conference Session

Design in the First Year

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Pacella, University of Maryland, Baltimore County; Taryn Bayles, University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

access to typical laboratorymaterials to use during the construction of their design projects, whatever they may be. Iknow for a fact that this acquired knowledge of fluid machinery will aid them greatly intheir upper level engineering classes, especially fluid dynamics. Page 15.93.10References: 1. Rice, J., T. M. Bayles, G. Russ, and J. Ross, “Preparing Freshmen for Future Energy Issues”, Paper AC 2007-1748 published in the 2007 ASEE proceedings and presented in the Hands-on & Real World Studies Session in The Freshman Programs Division Session. 2. Carletta, J., Bayles T.M., Kalveram, K., Khorbotly, S., Macnab, C

Conference Session

Computer Education Innovations I

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Ahlgren, Trinity College; Igor Verner, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

RoboWaiter: ____ Contestant ___ SupporterContestant details: Robot name(s) ____________________Contest division(s) _____________________Institution _____________________________ Professional or student position _______________________Form of your participation in the RoboWaiter: ____ Curricular ____ ExtracurricularSupporter details: ___ Individual ___ Organization member (specify)___________________________________Forms of support: Current ______________________________ Future__________________________________Your experience with assistive technology & assistive robotics___________________________________________2. GoalsPlease present your view of the goals of the assistive robotics

Conference Session

CE Capstone: Innovations in Learning & Assessment

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael McGinnis, University of Texas, Tyler; Ronald Welch, University of Texas, Tyler

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

/ 314.0 89.1 278.3 / 314.0 88.6 264.3 / 314.0 84.2 274.1 / 314.0 87.3 9e 132.2 / 163.2 81.0 120.0 / 163.2 73.5 130.9 / 163.2 80.2 127.7 / 163.2 78.2 Page 15.260.11 104.0 ConclusionsDoes a program need to include industry partners in their senior design course to besuccessful? Obviously not, since few programs use industry partners; however, manyprograms have gone to using adjuncts with large amounts of industry design experienceto teach their senior design course (meet ABET requirements) since not all full timefaculty are P.E.’s and

Conference Session

Enhancing K-12 STEM Education with Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Hunter, Tennessee Technological University; Jessica Matson, Tennessee Technological University; Margaret Phelps, Tennessee Technological University; Roy Loutzenheiser, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

20, Issue 5, 1983.7. Cawelti, G. (editor), Handbook of Research on Improving Student Achievement, 2nd edition. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service, 1999.8. Committee on Science and Mathematics Teacher Preparation, National Research Council, Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Technology: New Practices for the New Millennium, National Academies Press, 2000.9. Wenglinsky, H., How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back into Discussions of Teacher Quality. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 2000.10. Loucks-Horsley, S., P. W. Hewson, N. Love, and K. E. Stiles, Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 1998.11

Conference Session

Developing Systems Engineering Curricula

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Satinderpaul Devgan, Tennessee State University; Sachin Shetty, Tennessee State University; Saleh Zein-Sabatto, Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Constituent Committee

  shortage  of  experienced  systems  analysts  and  system  integrators,  the  graduates  from  such programs  will  be  in  great  demand  and  command  higher  salaries.  We  believe  the  demand  for engineers with background in systems engineering will be in even more as the systems become more complex and critical technologies in energy and environmental quality are developed. References  1.  Fabrycky, W. J. and McCrae, E.A. (2005) "Systems engineering degree programs in the united states." In  Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Symposium, INCOSE 2005, Rochester, NY, USA,  July 10­  15, 2005.  2.  B. S. Blanchard, W. J. Fabrycky, Systems Engineering and Analysis. Prentice Hall, 4th. Ed. 2006.  3.  Andrew P. Sage

Conference Session

Enhancing K-12 STEM Education with Engineering

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tirupalavanam Ganesh, Arizona State University; John Thieken, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

Settings, NationalScience Foundation. Opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF).References[1] National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning with additional material from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[2] National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. Pelligrino, J., Chudowsky, N., and

Collection

2010 ASEE Zone 4 Conference

Authors

Said Shakerin; Camilla Saviz

Oreovicz, F. S. Teaching Engineering, McGraw Hill, NY, 1993.2. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop Seminars, 2009. http://www.asce.org/exceed3. Mironer, A., “A Couple of Fluid Mechanics Teasers,” Proceedings of the 1999 ASEE Annual Conference, Session# 3268.4. Parker, P., “Significant Learning Experiences in the Fluid Mechanics Classroom,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEEAnnual Conference, Paper # 2006-1331.5. Welch, R. and Klosky, J., “An Online Database and User Community for Physical Models in the EngineeringClassroom,” Proceedings of the 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper # 2006-1106.Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV ConferenceCopyright © 2010, American Society for Engineering Education6. Shapiro, A. H. “Bathtub

Conference Session

Faculty Development for Distance Learning

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gene Dixon, East Carolina University

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development

achieved both professional AND academic credentials equal to or higher than those of the individuals involved in the P&T process. These "Peer Reviewers" serve as "Quality Assurance Evaluators" to insure the standards of the discipline and the academic community are being sustained. By having individuals who are neither professionally and/or academically qualified to serve in a Peer Review process, we would begin to see that the quality of the program(s) and the academic faculty (over time) would become "watered-down" and "ineffective". Furthermore, it would provide our true academic peers with an opportunity to ridicule and denigrate a system that uses outside "experts" as a key component of our

Conference Session

Educational Research

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Lattuca, Pennsylvania State University; David Knight, The Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Design Projects across the Curriculum

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan Cernusca, Missouri University of Science and Technology; Ghulam Bham, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Conference Session

POTPOURRI

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Information Systems

forinstructors to imagine all the variations of how a word or phrase can be written. In the code,the list of alternatives becomes long, hindering readability. And still some correct answersare marked wrong. Either the instructor needs to examine each answer individually, or (s)heneeds to wait until students complain. There is no easy way out.When answers are longer than a single word, the difficulties compound. Many of myclasses involve programming. My students had problems with Moodle, which treatsembedded blanks as significant. For example, a blank after a parenthesis in an expressioncan cause the system to give zero credit for the answer. Moreover, several specialcharacters, including “” are discarded by the system1 before answers are graded.Worse

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephen Krause, Arizona State University; Jacquelyn Kelly, Arizona State University; Dale Baker, Arizona State University; Amaneh Tasooji, Arizona State University

-based ActivitiesVarious hands-on activities were used throughout the bonding module. Students were able tohold items made of materials with the representative bonding type(s). The material thuscontextualized information about bonding. The activity was done in teams where students wereencouraged to discuss observations and explain relevance to bonding. To further demonstrateand provide analogies for bonding in polymers, students were given Velcro to model van derWaals bonding and were able to see the difference in difficulty of pulling it apart under differentconfigurations. To observe the anisotropic behavior of polymers as a result of their bonding,students applied tension along various axes to plastic bags by pulling them apart by hand

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching II

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beverly Jaeger, Northeastern University; Corey Balint, Northeastern University; Christopher Wishon, Northeastern University; Colleen Fritze, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

approaches described in the earlier Collaborative and Team-BasedLearning section. Further, traditional peer-assisted teaching is not typically conducted bycontemporaries/classmates of the enrolled students. This arrangement has been operationallydefined as “the use of undergraduate teaching assistants, usually students who recently weresuccessful in the course, and are useful because they provide a means to supplement large lecturecourses with small discussion groups.”11 Historically, first reports of students teaching studentsappeared in the 1960’s when faculty dissatisfaction emerged in response to large lecture coursesin which the student’s role was largely passive. Similar to the historical use of archons describedabove, undergraduate students

Conference Session

Best Practices in K-12 Engineering Panel

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stacy Klein-Gardner, Vanderbilt University; Marlene Aviles, Dr. Ercel Webb School # 22, Jersey City School District; Jennifer Case, East Middle School; Augusto Macalalag, Stevens Institute of Technology; John Brockway, East Middle School; Christie O'Hara, Colorado School of Mines; Michael Asheim, Colorado School of Mines; Barbara Moskal, Colorado School of Mines; Brian Lien, Princeton High School; Eugene Rutz, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

engineeringengagement and knowledge acquisition by K-12 students through age appropriate activities andlessons. Best Practices Partnership Panel winners' papers are authored collaboratively betweenengineering and technology education faculty and K-12 teachers. Details on the partnership'sstructure and goals and the successful strategies employed to overcome challenges and obstaclesare included. Each partnership's description includes sample student product(s) and conveys howother partnerships may emulate the project.One proposal winner was chosen by a panel of reviewers at each of the following levels:preschool or elementary school; middle school; high school. The three winning abstracts havebeen used to create a conference paper for this session

Conference Session

Nuts and Bolts of Cooperative Education

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander Yin, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative & Experiential Education

Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., Harper, B.J., & Yin, A. C. (2009). Academic environments in detail: Holland’stheory at the subdiscipline level. Research in Higher Education.xiv Lattuca, L. R., Lambert, A. D., & Terenzini, P. T. (2008, March). Academic environments and student learning:A finer-grained examination. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association. New York, NY.xv Donald, J. G. (2002). Learning to think: Disciplinary perspectives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.xvi Devon, R., Bilen, S., McKay, A., De Pennington, A., Serrafero, P., & Sierra, J. S. (2004). Integrated design: Whatknowledge is of most worth in engineering design education? International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 424