videoconferencing softwarelike Zoom or Teams. In the first meeting, the coaches asked the participants to complete aleadership wheel in which they rated their level of satisfaction in ten competencies:academics/work; communication; assertiveness/confidence; organization skills; work/schoolrelationships; self-regulation; clarity/focus; building networks; conflict management; andresilience. The participants scored each competency on a scale of 1-10, based on how satisfiedthey were with their ability in that area. The coach and participant then talked over the scoresand identified competencies to work on together. Subsequent meetings were organic in nature,as participant and coach together discussed current challenges or growth competencies, what
help studentsunderstand their design environment and identify possible prejudices before they are an issue;they also help create a more globally aware student who is prepared for positive and engagedcitizenship.Introduction and BackgroundRecent research in the fields of engineering and design pedagogy has highlighted the importanceof social consciousness in undergraduate education [1]. Yet much of the curriculum for studentsin engineering and design majors remains focused solely on science and mathematics without thenecessary extension of situating the design process in relevant social contexts [2]. Severalresearchers have reported on their efforts to consider social consciousness in the engineeringcurriculum. Examples include adding Socially
National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Ohio Department of Education. Also, he frequently serves as an invited editorial board member, referee or panelist for various international journals, funding agencies, and professional associations. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Pilot: Ways of Viewing Student Success – “Success is a State Function 1ABSTRACTMost literature in engineering education focuses on the problems or barriers to teachingundergraduate engineering students [1]. In professional settings, it has been implied beingsuccessful is having the ability to get the job
customers. Our aims for this project are two-fold: 1) to helpundergraduate students see that engineering decisions made during the design, production, oreven after launch of a product can have larger consequences than originally anticipated; 2) todetermine if hands-on ethical problem-solving activities in the classroom increases studentcapability in ethical decision making.We have introduced this choose-your-own adventure activity in two courses: the college-widefirst-year Introduction to Engineering Problem Solving course and the second-year chemicalengineering Process Calculations course. This work-in-progress will present initial feedbackfrom students who have participated in the activity and an assessment of student ethical decision-making
machine. Topics includebasic I/O, interrupts, timers, communication methods and protocols, driver circuitry, actuator(stepper motors, dc motors, solenoids, servos) control, user interface, and reactive state-machinedevelopment. We specifically discuss how the lessons and labs build upon themselves over the (a) Side View (b) Playfield Figure 1: Course Pinball Machinesemester to culminate in a complete, functional machine. A custom designed pinball machine,shown in Figure 1, and custom node based embedded system architecture, shown in Figure 3,were developed specifically for this course. The course pinball machine includes both traditionalpinball mechanisms
Paper ID #33461Pivot to Remote Teaching of an Undergraduate InterdisciplinaryProject-Based Program: Spring–Fall 2020Dr. Amitava ’Babi’ Mitra, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Amitava ’Babi’ Mitra linkedin.com/in/babimitra|+1-617-324-8131 | babi@mit.edu Dr. Amitava ’Babi’ Mitra is the founding Executive Director of the New Engineering Education Trans- formation (NEET) program at MIT. His expertise and interest are in setting up and leading innovative ’start-up’ educational initiatives; he has over twenty-five years’ experience in institution building, higher education, corporate e-learning, and distance education
available in thecoming months.Keywords: podcast, flipped classroom, ICT, geology, higher education, motivation, satisfactionIntroductionActive Learning methodologies are a way to improve conceptual understanding and thinkingskills in science areas. Although evidence regarding their benefits is clear-cut, teachers are stillresistant to adopt them [1], [2].In the particular case of geology, this adoption has also been patchy. Few experiences aredescribed that use teaching-learning methodologies that differ from conventional ones, in somecases complemented with field trips [3].Having the Covid-19 pandemic in our midst and having to transfer the teaching-learning processto an online context meant that opportunities were generated which forced
of abilities required to succeed professionally in theinformation age. The top four of these skills include critical thinking, creative thinking,collaboration, and communication [1]. In a typical engineering education curriculum, criticalthinking is addressed effectively. Also, students develop their collaboration skills via project-basedcourses that have become increasingly widespread in engineering education in the last twodecades. Furthermore, communication skills are often addressed through the inclusion of atechnical communication course or by otherwise satisfying the communication component ofestablished general education requirements. Laboratory experiences and project-based coursesemphasize the development of technical communication
paper willdescribe the program elements and explain the effects of these activities on our students withpreliminary outcome data and formative evaluation results about the program.1 IntroductionAccording to the 2020 report "STEM and the American Workforce" [1], STEM supports 67% ofU.S. jobs and 69% of the Nation's GDP. Computer occupations play a critical role in STEM.The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projected that about 600,000 or 67% of all new jobs inSTEM between 2018 and 2028 would be in computing. Average annual openings in computeroccupations during the decade were projected to be about 450,000 [2]. Although the number ofstudents who graduated with a bachelor's degree in computer and information sciences in 2016was more than 70,000
facilitate and lead STEMlearning programs, providing younger youth with positive role models and direct access to thepost secondary experience. Hiring is normally on a seasonal cycle, with recruitment taking placein December and hiring in January and February. Although it varies from year to year andprogram to program, typically 1 in 3 instructors return for a second or more work term. In 2020there were more returning instructors than in 2019 (40% in 2020 vs 29% in 2019).These instructors receive training and deliver programs, and in doing so, they also gaininvaluable employability and leadership skills as they launch their careers in STEM. Trainingtypically consists of 40-80 hours of onboarding, which includes training in program operationsand
Future workefficacy of such application usage amongst K12 students. The goal is to develop immersiveapplications and use them to address four of the fourteen engineering challenges. Figure 7: Waterfall Model A virtual camp, conducted online due to Covid-19, wasn’t quite effective to quanti-A literature by Pombo, L. and M. M. Marques [1] presents a survey study regarding use of
commonlyfail in higher education institutions [1], and this failure is typically attributed to facultyresistance, ineffective leadership, competing values, and conservative traditions [2]. Recentnationwide National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded efforts to revolutionize engineeringdepartments provide insight into the salience of power dynamics as drivers of or barriers toequitable, lasting change. REvolutionizing engineering and computer science Departments(RED) grants specifically required the unit lead (chair or dean) to serve as the principalinvestigator (PI) and required inclusion of social scientists with expertise in organizationalchange and engineering education researchers. This interdisciplinary team composition provideda venue for examining
Engineering Education and Outreach. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Practicing Engineers’ Definition of Their Expertise: Emergent Themes and Frequency by Gender Identity and Role Change into ManagementIntroduction & BackgroundThis full paper seeks to characterize how gender identity and role change into management affectpracticing engineers’ descriptions of their expertise. Expertise is defined through three mainattributes: (1) expert knowledge – depth of knowledge (2) expert reasoning – deductive processthat is inferentially based on an expert’s knowledgebase, (3) and expert memory – workingmemory rather than short-term memory [1]. Development of
Progress)IntroductionThis study examines the experiences of two pre-service teachers (PSTs) as they implement anengineering curriculum in their practicum field experience. Portraiture methodology wasemployed to frame the entire research process, from protocol development and data collectionand analysis to presentation of the findings as an “aesthetic whole”, or final story that capturesthe unique classroom contexts and processes faced by the PSTs [1]. This study is part of a largerproject focused on increasing awareness and preparedness of youth to pursue engineeringcareers. The first portion of the project involved working with elementary pre and in-serviceteachers in rural communities to connect local funds of knowledge (FoK) with
pushed out (forms of latent diversity that are difficult to see but foster equity andinclusion nonetheless). Second, it can allow us to better tailor courses to fit students’ interestsand needs, thus increasing student belonging, innovation, and adoption of new ideas.To this end, we explore two research questions: (1) Do students’ engineering beliefs, careerpriorities, and field interests predict interest across several disciplines of engineering?; and (2)Are the relationships between students’ beliefs and discipline interests moderated by patterns ofrepresentation and parity?Data for this study were collected from 32 U.S. ABET-accredited institutions, with a totalsample size of 3,711 undergraduate engineering students. We focused on students
becomeacclimated to their chosen undergraduate institution, and more. Accordingly, experiences gainedthrough differing pathways (e.g., FYE programs, transfer programs, major specific courses)impact students’ community and engineering identity development in different ways during thefirst year and beyond.Nationally, there is no standard format, content, or timing with regard to FYE experiences.However, engineering education researchers have created ways of classifying FYE differences(e.g., [1], [2]). We used those existing classifications to identify diverse engineering pathwaysand understand how those pathways impacted engineer formation with respect to participation inengineering communities and developing engineering identities. The knowledge our
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Preparing Future Engineers Through Project Based LearningAbstractA significant amount of research suggests the common reasons students leave an engineeringmajor include lack of faculty mentoring, lack of a sense of belonging, financial hardships, andcourse difficulties in the prerequisite STEM courses [1]. Project-based learning (PBL)potentially addresses several of these reasons and increases the chances of a student completingan engineering major.Engineering students are more likely to persist when they feel a sense of belonging andcommunity engagement, when they have early interactions with faculty mentors, and when theyexperience a series of successes [2]. The research question involves whether
Engineers (ASCE) has employed a methodicalapproach to aligning its standards for education and practice with the needs of the civilengineering profession [1]-[9]. The primary tools involved in this approach are the CivilEngineering Body of Knowledge and the Civil Engineering Program Criteria (CEPC) which areapplicable to all baccalaureate-level ABET EAC-accredited civil engineering programs [10].Both are periodically updated through a rigorous process incorporating input from a broad cross-section of practicing civil engineers, civil engineering educators, and accreditation experts. Toenhance predictability and promote effective change management, these updates are performedon a published eight-year cycle [11].The most recent iteration of this
feeling better informed aboutcollaborative robots, how they are used in manufacturing, how to program them, as well as how to operateindustry standard machine tools. This work in progress study may serve as a valuable guide for K-12 STEMeducators and policy makers interested in developing programs which inspire and equip pre-collegestudents to pursue engineering careers. Future work will enlarge the sample size of participants throughadditional offerings and include quantitative evaluations of instructional effectiveness in addition to thestudent surveys.IntroductionGlobal manufacturing is undergoing a paradigm shift towards flexible automation in the form of internet-enabled machinery and collaborative robots (cobots) [1]. Previously, due to
Curriculum, Teaching, and Educational Policy graduate program at Michigan State University in 2010. Her current research focuses on three key areas: (1) de- signing, developing, and conducting validation studies on assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) science; (2) examining and understanding validity issues associated with measures designed to assess science teachers’ instructional quality, including observational measures, value-added measures, student surveys, and performance-based tasks; and (3) extending and studying the use of these knowl- edge and instructional practices measures of science teaching quality as summative assessment tools for licensure purposes and as formative assessment tools
Educational Policy graduate program at Michigan State University in 2010. Her current research focuses on three key areas: (1) de- signing, developing, and conducting validation studies on assessments of content knowledge for teaching (CKT) science; (2) examining and understanding validity issues associated with measures designed to assess science teachers’ instructional quality, including observational measures, value-added measures, student surveys, and performance-based tasks; and (3) extending and studying the use of these knowl- edge and instructional practices measures of science teaching quality as summative assessment tools for licensure purposes and as formative assessment tools integrated within teacher education
-related design processes and factors.Keywords: Engineering Education, Civil Engineering Design, Human-Centred Designing,Priming, Empathy, Social Consciousness, Personal Values, Engineering ValuesIntroductionMany have discussed the technocentric engineering curricula [1] – [5], that tend tomarginalise [3] and devalue [6],[7], the less technical and more ‘socially-involved’ aspects ofengineering, and have thus stood with Cech’s [2] call for the integration of public welfareconcern and social consciousness in engineering curricula.An aligning call/prompt for the integration of empathic [8] – [10], compassionate [11],‘socially-just’ [12],[13], and/or human-centred designing [14] – [18] in engineering curriculahave also risen. This is reflected in
Chicago and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all in chemical engineering. His current research involves the rheology of complex fluids as well as active learning, reverse engineering online videos, and interactive textbooks. His website is: http://www.utoledo.edu/engineering/chemical-engineering/liberatore/ American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Problem Solving and Difficulty Perception in YouTube Problems Involving Reacting Systems with RecycleUchenna Asogwa1, T. Ryan Duckett2, Amanda P. Malefyt3, Lindsey Stevens1, Gale Mentzer2 andMatthew W. Liberatore1(1) Department of Chemical
implications toward broadening participation in engineeringthrough school counselor professional development. BackgroundThe engineering education system across the world still struggles to be more inclusive despitenumerous calls to increase representation of women and minorities. In 2016, women accountedfor only 21% of students pursuing a bachelor’s degree in engineering [1], while Hispanicsaccounted for approximately 10% of students studying engineering and African Americansaccounted for just under 4% of all engineering undergraduate students [1]. According to Katehi,Pearson, and Feder (2009), the lack of diversity present in undergraduate engineering has itsroots in the K-12 system where “access and
Digital Logic courses in Computer Science curriculum, andfor recruiting undergraduate researchers in cybersecurity related disciplines. We relate anecdotalsuccess in using the tool for such engagements and context for student involvement as part of anobject-oriented and agile software engineering project.1. IntroductionDigital logic instruction is typically a core component of Computer Science (CS), ElectricalEngineering (EE), and Computer Engineering (CpE) curricula. Most often, students are exposedto digital logic concepts early in their programs as a foundational steppingstone. CS students donot typically explore digital logic concepts further during their programs except as backgroundknowledge for courses like Computer Architecture or
interactivestudent learning.IntroductionThe goal of this NSF IUSE is to catalyze inter-institutional STEM community transformation to createmore experiential, effective, and engaging hands-on interactive learning environments. Our specific ob-jectives are to: (1) implement a multi-hub and spoke model with dissemination hubs around the USreachinng out to approach regional instutitions (spokes) to facilitate the adoption of light-weight, portable,ultra-Low-Cost Desktop Learning Module (LCDLM) Equipment to enable understanding of thefundamentals of momentum, heat and mass transfer. The goal is to allow students to engage in anexperiential hands-on systems to illustrate the physics that underlie transport processes and tounderstand how such thermal energy and
Engineer of 2020 attributes. This study will also be ofinterest to educators considering how the attributes described in 2004 remain relevant in 2020and may spark conversation about how these attributes may need to be adjusted in the future.The study will be of particular interest to those responsible for recommending and implementingcurricular changes in engineering programs.BackgroundThe report titled The Engineer of 2020, published in 2004, is a product of the National Academyof Engineering[1]. The committee responsible for writing the document included 18 people: 12affiliated with academic institutions, 4 affiliated with technology-based companies (IBM, HP,Telcordia, and Reliant Energy), 1 affiliated with a national laboratory (Sandia), and 1
manually, while some schools used custom-built auto-graders, or made use of thefreely-available Web-CAT tool [1]. However, in the past few years, several cloud-based commercialauto-graders have appeared, such as zyBooks [2], Gradescope [3], Mimir [4], Vocareum [5], CodeLab[6], and MyProgramming-Lab [7], many emphasizing ease of use and immediate score feedback tostudents. Based on public information from and direct discussions with those companies, we canconservatively state that at least 500 universities and at least 1,000 courses have switched from manualgrading to auto-grading in recent years, impacting well over 250,000 students per year. According to arecent whitepaper from zyBooks, there is a steep rise in the use of auto-graders in recent
to Los Alamos where he worked on modeling the transient dynamic attributes of Kinetic Energy munitions during initial launch. Afterwards he was selected for the exchange scientist program and spent a summer working for DASA Aerospace in Wedel, Germany 1993. His initial research also made a major contribution to the M1A1 barrel reshape initiative that began in 1995. Shortly afterwards he was selected for a 1 year appointment to the United States Military Academy West Point where he taught Mathematics. Following these accomplishments he worked on the SADARM fire and forget projectile that was finally used in the second gulf war. Since that time, circa 2002, his studies have focused on unmanned systems both air
targetdemographic of these kits ranges from middle school to first-year college students. This paperhighlights our results from our flagship Family Program and community outreach. The FamilyProgram and Library Program deploys these kits through a series of workshops aimed at raisingawareness in electrical engineering for parents and children and encourages teamwork in familiesthrough hands-on projects. Both programs encourage participants to become the teachers of theircommunity further proliferating the efforts to encourage STEM.IntroductionIt is an exciting time in STEM education as more technologies have become affordable andreadily available with online support structures and forums [1-4]. Teaching and engaging theyounger generation of students to