2020, 28 withdraw from the course in lieu oftheir poor performance. Due to the impact of COVID in Spring 2020, the withdrawal deadline forour institution was pushed back significantly and also students planned to utilize the alreadyadvertised pass/fail policy. These reasons could seem to explain the low withdrawal rate and highfailure rate. In Fall 2020, students were offered to take the pass/fail policy on any two courses, butthis was announced much later in the semester. By then most students had already withdrawn fromthe course. Figure 5 shows the pass/fail/withdraw grade break down for FED101 for all threesemesters. A significant number of students (more than half of the class) failed the class duringSpring 2020. Fall semesters overall
(e.g., low-income, gap in the backgroundknowledge…) to come up with inclusive solutions.Moreover, special attention needs to be directed towards understanding students’ motivation. Forthat, educators should define what students are willing to achieve through the program, what theirdreams are, and how they plan to achieve their goals.For the institution context:In this category, we define three elements to take into account, namely, the organization resources,the learning objectives, and the constraints. Indeed, education designers seeking implementablesolutions must tap into the available resources of the institution and know the local conditions. Forthis category, we identified four themes that could be considered: the workspace and
team placed great emphasis on contactingcampus and industry professionals who possessed experience with similar products. Duringinterviews, project team members were asked why they hadn’t contacted environmentalorganizations or homeowners associations that often address the algae problem upon which theirwas based, which may have helped them locate a source of algae, which had posed a problemfor them. Team members indicated they hadn’t thought in terms of approaching such resourcesbecause they were focusing more on their business plan. This failure to identify resourcesdemonstrates narrowness of perception regarding stakeholder engagement that is guided bystudent experience rather than project purpose. The primacy given to successfully
lecture notes, textbooks,and in-class research review discussions to build their portfolios.Course Project was a semester-long assignment in which students conducted a usability study ona product of their choice. Students developed a full usability testing plan, a detailed design ofexperiments, a research methodology, then they recruited human subjects to test the usability oftheir chosen product. Students presented their project to the class and submitted a written reportto document their work.Two exams were administered throughout the semester. Exam questions included multiple-choice, true or false, fill in the blanks, and short answer questions. Exam questions covered allthe topics discussed in the classroom with a focus on how knowledge can
research focuses on areas of automated rea- soning in Artificial Intelligence; specifically, automated planning, search and knowledge representation. He is also interested in the development of teaching approaches and systems that promote the wellbeing of students.Miss Constanza Melian, Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chilev Constanza Melian is Assessment and Evaluation Coordinator for Division of Engineering Education at Pontificia Universidad Cat´olica de Chile. Constanza is sociologist, interested in issues of education, social inequality, poverty and gender gaps. Methodologically his interests and work is in survey design, construction of quantitative instruments, statistical data analysis and evaluation
innovations; and diversity in the STEM fields, particularly for women.Dr. Craig J. Scott, Morgan State University Dr. Craig J. Scott received his Ph.D. and B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Howard University and a M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University. He is currently serving as professor and chairper- son of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at one of the nation’s preeminent public urban research institutions, Morgan State University. His career spans over twenty-eight years of progres- sive scholarly experience in such areas as research administration/ implementation, pedagogical inno- vation, international collaboration, strategic planning, promoting community engagement and
as Project Lead the Way [3]. Project Lead theWay is a well-established program providing an engineering-specific curriculum and training tohigh school educators.This program can also be seen as a school-university partnership; however, most partnershipsfocus on teacher professional development. Brady describes that some of these partnershipsinclude supervision and mentoring, collaborative teaching initiatives, action research, jointprofessional development, shared planning, and school enrichment and support [4]. This programis a partnership focused on students.Ultimately, this program is innovative, as it is a university offering a high school class. The courseis unique to the university’s community. The course material is essentially the
Information Modeling (BIM). The following isthe catalog description of the Introduction to Graphics course: Introduction to architectural and construction graphics using hand drawing/drafting and Computer Aided Drafting (CAD). Hand drawing/drafting topics include: lettering, technical sketching, use of drafting instruments, the fundamentals of orthographic projection, plan, section, elevation development and pictorial drawings to develop the student’s abilities to visualize and describe objects graphically. CAD topics include software commands and drawing strategies for 2-D and 3-D CAD work, plans, sections, elevations, and details, information management, assembly of drawings and scales. Note: This
important point, which is to say that increasing the numbers of women and underrepresentedminorities in engineering is best done, not by working to change the students, but by changingourselves. The plan for a garden is laid out and anchor plants, maybe trees or bushes, are selected first.These plants need to be diverse themselves to ensure the overall health of the ecosystem. They serveas shade for seedlings not yet ready for full sun and even serve as a kind of existence proof themselves.The metaphor corresponds to a diverse faculty, which needs to be a deliberate part of a strategic plan,and all of the faculty need to focus on broadening participation. The ASEE Diversity RecognitionProgram [11], for example, includes attention to the
. What do people need to do/do differently today to make tomorrow different from yesterday? (4) Describe how we/we will hold ourselves and others in our environment accountable?This presentation also describes how experiential learning has been incorporated within each of the four interventions in order to improve learning and promote an inclusive, vibrant academic environment as well as detailed descriptions of each activity, workshop evaluation results, and future plans. 11Reiterate the sessions title, “Creating an Inclusive, Vibrant Learning Environment within a Large Software Engineering Program ‐Experiential Learning Experiences
student cohortgroup related to combatting imposter syndrome, strategic planning for a career (who andwhat do want to be when you grow up), recognizing and managing micro and macroaggressions in the workplace and laboratory setting, and training in an asset-basedapproach to mentoring emphasizing growth versus fixed mindset in our training. Studentsalso focused on team building, communication training particularly in regard to “bragging”about one’s accomplishments, time management, how to give presentations utilizingtechniques in improvisation, college readiness related to applying for college and thetransition from high school to college, as well as building self esteem through effective selfpromotion.The activities for WRAMP was to not only
better understandthemselves and the context of their aversive experiences [5], due to its association withcounterfactual thinking.Counterfactual thinking can benefit future behavior by offering a behavioral script for self-improvement [6]. The functionality of regret is related to its affective and cognitive components;the negative affect aroused by counterfactuals can increase strategic planning and motivation topromote future improvement [7], whereas the cognitive component is related to functionalconsequences like planning and self-improvement [4]. However, regret and counterfactualthinking can also be dysfunctional. The affective component of regret is often associated withnegative outcomes like reduced well-being and avoidant responses to
] 2 Overview According to the CSU Office of Institutional Research, Effectiveness, and Planning [11], the 2018‐2019 Enrollment Statistics for CBE were: 322 Students Enrolled 33% Females and 67% Males 17% Pell Recipients 21% First Generation 36.6 % Minority and International Statistics and figures for all departments in Walter Scott Jr. College of Engineering available in [11].Weber and Atadero. 2020 Annual CoNECD Conference. 3Minority includes students who self‐report a minority status; nonminority
using game-based learning will demonstrate higher mathematicsGPA than the control group of students in the construction science and management program.For the second test, the study will divide students into adequate numbers of control andexperimental sample size groups.The research team plans to add more modules to the PCLG. The additional modules will bebased on the game leveling concept. The PCLG will use the student’s level of Pre-Calculusknowledge as a way of measuring the average statistics of their character – making questionseasier or harder to compensate their learning. To motivate student learning, the game willaddress the psychology of getting the rewards of leveling up.As a pilot study, the research team plans to include this game
-PBH students.Inspired from the first round of PBH implementation in Dynamics, the authors plan to refine thePBH implementation process in future offerings of this course. Specifically, the authors plan toconduct a multiple semester based study. In the second round of implementation, the PBHassignments will be kept optional in the first semester. The students who do not opt to completethe PBH assignments will serve as the control group of students for data comparison for the PBHstudents. The incoming grades of all students will be looked at by obtaining student grades fromthe previous “Statics” course in sequence through the University IKM (institutional knowledgemanagement) database to gauge the type of student and their interest. The
statements of support of a similar nature were not recorded from the virtual event.Given that students indicated a preference for an in-person event, whether they be a student or analumnus, our plan is that Senior Design Day should return to being an in-person event but withimproved and expanded digital content. We plan to continue to probe our research questions andtake steps to increase the number of responses we receive.References[1] Wilder, Laura Ingalls, 1867-1957. Little House on the Prairie. New York, N.Y.:HarperCollins, 1963.[2] Talley, A., and Compeau, C., “Senior Design Day – Multi-discipline and Multi-departmentCapstone Presentation Event,” 2018 American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3
question’s coupled explanation was free response for this experiment, sowe could collect additional data for the CMR reasoning question. In the future, we will give theCMR pre- and post-IBLA to allow us to compare the changes in student reasoning due to theIBLA. We will also use the survey responses to modify the IBLA and consider making theactivity shorter for students. In the future, we also plan to analyze the performance of students inrelation to their ethnicity, gender, etc. to identify possible correlations between studentperformance and feelings of belonging in the classroom.AcknowledgementsThe work was funded in part by a grant from the California Governor’s Office of Planning andResearch Learning Lab (https://calearninglab.org
the Thomas O. Spicer EndowedScholarship In Chemical Engineering for the 2021-22 academic year. She plans to work inindustry upon graduation in May 2022.Trent PorterfieldMr. Porterfield is a chemical engineering undergraduate at the University of Arkansas and isfrom Houston, Texas. He has been named to the Chancellor’s List in each semester from Spring2020 to Spring 2021. He plans to work in industry upon graduation in May 2022. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceW. Roy PenneyDr. Penney is a Professor Emeritus of Chemical Engineering at the University of Arkansas. Hisresearch interests include fluid mixing and process design, and he has
hiring of strongresearch faculty which resulted in little to no emphasis on practical application and a heavyemphasis on math and sciences theory [7]. In 1976, Harrisberger and Others, as a part of the American Society of EngineeringEducators expressed that a experiential learning program should support the following: “problemsolving skills, interpersonal awareness, creative expression, communication skills, technicalskills, self-confidence building, computation skills, engineering fundamentals, organizationalskills, leadership skills, planning skills, professional ethics, engineering judgment” [6, p. 7]. Inthe late 1980s, the clash between higher education engineering or engineering technologyprograms and employers emerged. Feedback
engineering education through a design-focused, project-rich curriculum that engages students through collaborations with industry and society across all eight semesters. A first-generation college student, Kurt earned his Ph.D. in Environmental Engineering from the Univer- sity of Iowa. He has served as chair of ASEE’s International Division, and was founding chair of ASEE’s Community Engagement Division. He is recipient of best conference paper awards for the 2009 and 2016 ASEE Annual Conferences.Dr. Justin J Henriques Justin Henriques is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering at James Madison Univer- sity. He holds a Ph.D. and M.S. in systems engineering, a masters in urban and environmental planning
did “Twin Cities groups.” There was an absence of managers’ in- depth knowledge and as such, authority accrual through “expert power” (Badawy 1995) could not occur. Also of interest in Figure 5 is the greater dissatisfaction, albeit by a small amount, of “Twin Cities groups” with eventual project outcomes than “Duluth teams.” One might argue that the groups from the Twin Cities, unbeknownst to them, had a richer project management experience than their Duluth counterparts who did not require the same level of detailed plans and execution per trip to client locations. The twin cities groups were, thus, arguably more involved and better equipped at the end of the exercise and were less satisfied with the
router, some computers and a wirelessaccess point. Eventually, they create larger models using OPNET software. The high levelbehavior of different applications in IEEE 802.11 networks will be simulated on discrete eventsimulations. This allows students to measure several performance characteristics such as end-to-end delay, aggregate throughput, congestion, number of retransmissions, etc. in such kind ofnetworks.Course outline for Lab:The topics are scheduled for a 14-week semester with laboratory assignments. The subjectscovered are [12, 13]: ▪ Wireless LAN Devices and Standards ▪ How Wireless Works ▪ IEEE 802.11 Physical Layer Standards ▪ IEEE 802.11 Medium Access Control and Network Layer Standards ▪ Planning and Building a Wireless
need to go to such detailed organization of documentation is because of the vastamount of information that students need to go through in a very short amount of timeduring the start of the semester. Besides the Projects’ Description package, copies of theCourse of Study, a Bidding Form for each team to bid on the projects, and a StudentSchedule Table to help plan field trips to sponsors’ locations need to be ready to bedistributed to the students on the first day of class. The Course of Study documentationis very detailed (typically ten pages long) and contains information on the following:* Class room and meeting dates / times* Office hours of the instructor* Purpose and objectives of the course* Assessment and grading policy* Team formation
hour in the city and you are searching for a parking spot. Once you find one, you willhave a brief moment to pull up and back your car in. With automated parallel parking – noproblem! – but with horns blaring, what is your back-up plan if the automated system fails?Could you take over and park the car flawlessly? Have you ever done that? Could you even dothat now?In engineering, we are depending more and more on computer tools to model and analyze thesystems we conceive. If we do not use these tools correctly, or if the assumptions on which thesetools are based do not match our needs, or if the tools have a bug, or …, could we take over andapply basic mathematics and physics to the problem at hand, at least to gain insight, if not theexact
wereshipped. More than 95% of mobile phones, 90% of hard drive controllers, 40% digital TVs andset-top boxes, 15% microcontrollers, and 20% mobile computers are using the ARM processors.To keep up with the embedded industry change, we have updated the contents of ourmicrocontroller courses with the goal to keep up with the technology change and make ourgraduates more marketable. We have taught the ARM Cortext-M4 MCU in our secondmicrocontroller course and plan to also teach the simpler version of the ARM Cortex-M MCU inour first microcontroller course.Three major issues must be addressed in order to teach a new microcontroller. First, we need tochoose an appropriate Cortex-M4 demo board for students to perform laboratory experimentsand design
where the underlying theory and mathematics of the coursecontent was taught. These lessons were presented in a traditional classroom setting with shortactive learning exercises included into the lesson plan meant to keep students engaged, such aspolling, discussions, and think-pair-share exercises. On Fridays, students would attend a 50 minuteno-lecture Friday session that would take place in a classroom specifically designed for activelearning sessions. This classroom had large communal tables to best facilitate collaborative learn-ing and display monitors at every table. Students were asked to self-select groups during the firstno-lecture Friday sessions and then sit with this group each Friday.During the first few minutes of these sessions
Paper ID #35261A Reconfigurable and Modular Hardware for Remote Learning of AnalogCircuit DesignMr. Yixin Xiong, Penn State University Yixin Xiong is a senior student at the Pennsylvania State University, majoring in Electrical Engineering with a concentration in circuits and electronics. His interests in circuits were developed in a music pro- cessing circuit design project in a major course, and enhanced in later higher-level circuits design courses. He is planning to attend graduate school after graduation to study deeper in this field.Stephen Porter, Penn State University Stephen is a recent graduate of Penn State
able to form the plan for the application phase. Phase 3: Application – Next Steps in the Project EvolutionAs this project is a work in progress, the undergraduate research project is not complete.Utilizing the information from the questionnaire and the information gathered in the Reflectionphase, the researchers will narrow down the brainstorm ideas to the most suitable options. Next,work on the initial prototype design will begin. The research will continue on to CAD drawing,software simulation, and prototyping as well as important analyses of the chosen device design.ConclusionThe student found the research project to be advantageous, especially during a semester ofmostly online courses. The project created a connection
(PI) for each student outcome (SO) asmandated by ABET [6] and used to measure the CO, and the mapping of each CO to the properSO (student outcome). Section 2 provides a summary of each laboratory experiment and theequipment used. Section 3 summarizes the project activities. Section 4 outlines the remoteinstruction during the health pandemic. Section 5 discusses the learning outcomes assessment,and Section 6 includes conclusions and plans for future work.Section 1: IoT Course SetupThe course is an introduction to IoT at the system, subsystem, and component level. Studentswill gain hands-on experience assembling and testing IoT devices to achieve node to clientcommunication, node to node communication, and peer to cloud communication. The
5.96 Team Project: Oral Presentation 5.90 Team Project: Dimensioned Layout Drawings of Parts 5.90 Introduction to Engineering and Teamwork 5.83 Team Project: Project Re-Design 5.76 Team Project: Sketching Project Parts and Assemblies 5.63 Team Project: Written Proposal 5.61 Team Project: Planning Charts and Diagrams 5.57 Team Project: Materials and Manufacturing 5.56 The MBTI and Assigning Teams 4.56