discussed how some high schools lacked proper and effective career guidance programsthat were deemed necessary when students were choosing their college major [6]. Academiccommunities and international conferences embraced the importance of women’s representationin engineering by adopting topics pertaining to women as main session themes [3].The gender gap in engineering, although shrinking, may extend into the professional sector withsome women globally reporting challenges related to gender disparities [13], peer pressure [6],and financial barriers [3]. Some women engineers faced social stigma in the engineering industry[14, 15, 16, 17], including access to male-dominated networks, negative attitudes from male peers[6], and some degree of
Engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). He received his BS in 2007 from WPI and his PhD in 2013 from Stanford University. He has co-authored over 50 peer-reviewed articles that have appeared in Advanced Energy Materials, Nano Letters, Flexible and Printed Electronics, and other journals, and have collectively been cited over 4,000 times. His work on printed flexible and stretchable electronics has been funded by the U.S. Department of Defense through the NextFlex Manufacturing USA Institute and the SEMI-FlexTech program; and by the Commonwealth of MA through the Massachusetts Manufacturing Innovation Initiative. His work on photo-catalytic materials for water treatment and clean hydrogen production
utilization and application of their STEM knowledge. Networking with their peers - bothwithin their program and the national network - amplifies the experience and has the potential tocontribute to future career development. Participants, in the work itself, are given the opportunityto take ownership in the development of curriculum development and classroom management,building potential for self-efficacy development. Finally, the three interconnected strands holdmany connections to the Actua Future Skills Framework; “delivering results” requiresintellectual development, “working with others” draws from networking skills and institutionalknowledge; and future readiness draws from the three strands and makes connections to theparticipant’s future
influences design cognition more broadly.Prof. Patricia K. Sheridan, University of Toronto Professor Sheridan is an Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream at the Troost Institute for Leadership Ed- ucation in Engineering (ILead) and the Institute for Transdisciplinary Studies in Engineering Education and Practice (ISTEP), and is cross-appointed to the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. Prof. Sheridan teaches teamwork and leadership in the first-year corner- stone design courses and oversees the integration of teamwork and leadership learning into the upper-year courses. She previously designed an online team-based self- and peer-assessment system that was used in multiple
methodology for making thisconversion was available, which became a key motivation for writing this paper. A number ofworks chronicled the relative advantages and disadvantages of the quarter and semester systems.Bostwick et.al. [4] contended that conversion to the semester system negatively impacts on-timegraduation rates and specifically lowers first-year grades, decreases the probability of enrollingin a full course load, and delays the timing of major choice. Johnson and Kestler [5] conducted amixed methods study, involving a sample of Midwestern university students’ favoritism towardquarters and semesters, the students’ predicted and perceived changes to their motivatedbehaviors, and their self-reported motivation/learning strategies during the
to the youth participating in engineering outreach.Keywords: Role models, engineering education, outreach, elementary, career planningIntroductionIn this paper, we use data from a three-year study of an engineering outreach program tochallenge the notion that youth engaged in engineering outreach programming readily take upnear-age peers or adults as role models. This is not to say that this does not occur in certaincases, but we do not think that it occurs as readily nor at the magnitude that we and others in thefield have believed that it does.Outreach programs for youth often attempt to position adults as role models, usually with thegoal of inspiring youth by messaging that they, too, can be like the role model or do what theydo. In
, philanthropic efforts, college courses, and research grants and publications. She currently holds the following Quality Matters Certifications: Master Reviewer, Peer Reviewer, Ac- celerated Designing Your Online Course F2F Facilitator, Accelerated Improving Your Online Course F2F Facilitator, Reviewer Course for Program Reviews, and Applying the QM Rubric Face to Face Facilitator. She is a board member of the Winston-Salem State University Foundation, National Girls Collabora- tive Project, American Association for the Advancement of Science National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists, an advisory member for Nvolve, Inc, and several grants. She is also a member of sev- eral associations, including the Alpha Zeta Omega
states have outlawed race-based AAsince the mid-1990s: California, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire,Oklahoma, and Washington. At the time of writing, the US Supreme Court had heard oralarguments in two separate court cases brought against Harvard University and the University ofNorth Carolina; the court’s decision will likely be decided in June 2023 and will have far-reaching consequences on the state of AA within the US [4].The nine state-level affirmative action bans occurred through a variety of methods in twobranches of the government: executive and legislative. The AA ban in the state of Florida is theonly ban to be enacted via the executive branch; this ban was implemented via an executiveorder by the governor in
effectively, efficiently” (9941). Somearticulated how they themselves or their peers had more difficulty with this as they had notdeveloped these capacities prior to university, contrasting those who “already are, like, whateversemi-genius person, then you'll be fine, it'll be great, like, all opportunities afforded to you”against those “in a situation where, like, for whatever reason … just random factors cause you tobe in a bit more of a sink or swim kind of situation, then that can be very difficult and painful”(9955).We also identified connections (10 participants) between lifelong learning abilities and theprogram’s emphasis on teaching from first principles or scientific and mathematicalfundamentals. There is some distinction between the
, 20-22].Various assessment approaches have been proposed and applied, in concert or individually, topromote more effective and equitable learning, such as portfolio assessment, peer review andself-assessment, appraisal of research and design work, evaluation of oral presentations,reflective essays and videos, and interviews [12, 22, 23]; yet multiple choice and traditionalwritten exams persist as the dominant mode of assessment in undergraduate STEM [24-26].Occupying a distinct position among alternatives to traditional assessment are oral exams.Although strictly speaking traditional themselves, with a history spanning centuries [21, 27], ifnot millennia [28-30], oral exams have fallen out of favor in the technical subjects, especially inthe
problems. While analytical skillsare important and are not mutually exclusive to inventiveness, curricular activities and problemsthat are highly focused on developing specific analytical skills rarely leave room for rewardinginventiveness.Evidence of Inventiveness in the Engineering Education LiteratureA keyword search of the American Society for Engineering Education PEER database for thewords “invention education” grouped together yields only 8 articles since 1996. Of those 8, thepairing of these words is not intentional in 4 articles; that leaves 4 articles applying the label“invention education” to describe a program or curriculum. However, a search for “invention”and the attributes of inventiveness described by the Lemelson foundation yields
Paper ID #37235Faculty-Student Interaction and Its Impact on Well-Being inHigher Education for STEMCortney E Holles (Teaching Professor) Cortney Holles is a Teaching Professor in the Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences at Colorado School of Mines where she has taught and developed the required first-year ethics and writing course for STEM majors since 2004. She also teaches science communication and service learning. She defended her educational criticism/action research dissertation on “Faculty-Student Interaction and Impact on Well-Being in Higher Education” and earned her Ed.D in 2021. She is now engaged in
, which is a methods-based paper published inthe International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, employed critical theory as a guidingframework. In this work, Mobley et. al. [73] employed Veteran Critical Theory [62] as an “organizingframework” to describe qualitative methods (key event timeline and the identity circle) used in researchwith military undergraduates in engineering to elicit rich narratives and counter narratives of experience.At the time of writing this manuscript, only one other publication, a doctoral dissertation in the field ofengineering education written by Sheppard [41], that employed critical theory could be found. In thispaper, Sheppard [41] employed the socio-educational justice framework FoK to a support a
).Each LC ideally consists of three change leader teams (CLTs). CLTs are matched based onsimilarity in institutional and program context to facilitate learning from each other’sexperiences. An Extension Services facilitator leads teams through a series of approximately 12monthly online meetings aligned with an academic calendar. During the online meetings, CLTsbuild community with peers, share knowledge, explore ideas, and support each other’s planningand implementation. Meeting topics, which are aligned with the Undergraduate Systemic ChangeModel, provide CLTs with knowledge to conduct self-assessment, develop strategic recruitmentand retention plans, and utilize evaluation data. Outside of the online meetings, an ExtensionServices Consultant
thatpositively impacted instructor and student collaboration included comfortable and flexible(movable) furnishings, sufficient space between collaborative groups, an abundance of white-board surfaces, and digital technology for sharing ideas. Providing a flexible, open design allowsfor easier movement and encourages social interaction among peers and students, enablesstudents and instructors to share knowledge, and creates a feeling of community and engagement[6].Flexibility in the university classroom is becoming increasingly important to meet limitedclassroom space needs and support multiple learning and instructional methods. Studies haveindicated positive perceptions of students and instructors when furnishings allow for moving andadjusting to
University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Synthesizing Indicators of Quality across Traditions of Narrative ResearchMethods: A Procedural Framework and Demonstration of Smoothing FramesAbstractThe purpose of this methods paper is to describe and discuss one of the main indicators ofquality in narrative analysis, which is the process of narrative smoothing. Narrative analysisrefers
deliberately build good working relationships based onthe personal interests and needs of others. A common objective of working with others was theneed to learn something. Additionally, one expressed that, “if you’ve got good relationships withyour techs and your site managers and your boss and your peers it’s a lot easier to get stuff doneand I think a lot more enjoyable to get stuff done” (Newcomer-06-experienced hire).There were also comments indicating that having empathy for others was important to theirwork. The comment of ‘being in another’s shoes’ or ‘knowing what it is like on their side’expressed the idea that a deeper understanding of another person’s situation was an importantrequirement for work. One participant described that, “each site
] writes, “In the Nazi regimethe technology served both the purposes of the state and the ethical values of the technologicalprofessionals.” This brings Katz to the question, “how does an engineer know that the values[they] embod[y] through [their] technological products are good values that will lead to a betterworld?”The contemporary use of technologies such as facial recognition and predictive algorithms in thecontext of law enforcement and incarceration make Katz’s question both relevant and urgent.Software such as the predictive policing tool PredPol reinforces biases within U.S. lawenforcement [5]; as one study noted, “PredPol is a tool for that aids law enforcement as itcurrently exists, and around the country, law enforcement targets
: Figure 5 shows that students who received an A used resubmissionless often than their peers (averaged 0.89 resubmissions per assignment), with those receiving a Chaving the largest number of resubmissions (averaging 1.27 resubmissions). The students whoreceived Fs had very few resubmissions, but they also had very few initial submissions. Thesample size is not high enough to gain deeper statistical insight; however, from the facultyobservation, resubmissions for those students who received an A were typically simple fixeswhile the resubmissions for the students who received a C were often much more involved,requiring more work on both the part of the instructor and student. This feedback-resubmissioncycle often resulted in feedback being
sciences and engineering at VT during 2007-19. This site has 100+ alumni to date. He also led an NSF/Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) site on interdisciplinary water research during 2016-19 with 30+ alumni. He also led an NSF-funded cybersecurity education project and served as a co-PI on two International Research Experiences for Students (IRES) projects funded by the NSF. He has published over 90 papers in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.Dr. Landon Todd Marston, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityDr. Christopher P. Vanags, Vanderbilt UniversityDr. Kang Xia, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Kang Xia received her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin-Madison (1997), M.S
areplacement for professors and peers when they needed help. Nearly all students (96%) providedfavorable ratings about the trustworthiness of the video library and most students trusted the MEOnline videos more than other videos available online. They were particularly happy whenfinding videos by their favorite instructors who were clear, engaging, and knowledgeable. Moststudents plan on using ME Online as alumni for both professional and personal reasons – 88% ofthe students reported they expect to use ME Online to study for licensing exams, graduate schoolwork, professional work, and/or just to learn new things.The study also explores the potential for video libraries like ME Online to help addressachievement gaps among historically disadvantaged
.” Kelsey further noted that her decision to utilize counselingservices was bolstered by her fear that discussing these feelings with her administrators, boss,or peers would cause her to appear incompetent. For April (CTD), she recalled that thethought of seeking counseling services initially caused her to feel hesitant and “ashamed.”Yet, when her experiences in her doctoral program “got bad enough,” she felt that counselingwas the only option that would grant her emotional resolve. She reported, It was that whole imposter syndrome situation where I was just like I slipped through the cracks. I don't really belong here, or I look good on paper, but that doesn't mean anything now that I'm being put to the test. Initially, no, it
students’ shirking and toimprove the accuracy of summative assessment is an ongoing challenge. For instance, Marin-Garcia and Lloret introduced a teacher-driven observation tool and reported overall improvements[53]. Similarly, self and peer assessment tools have been found to improve student engagementand satisfaction [54]–[56]. But these methods still require assessment of student contribution byothers (teacher or other students). Further, student participation in team projects is a complex topicthat includes motivation. We see the integration of a professional competency focused reflectionas an approach that can be part of an assessment
engineering identities“must negotiate the roles they play within the community of engineering as a discipline, ingroups with their peers, and within the classroom.” Tonso [25] describes identity development as“a complicated process through which campus engineer identities (cultural knowledge learned oncampus) provided a lens of meaning through which to “recognize” (or not) performances ofengineer selves as engineers.” Particularly for women and students of color, engineering identitycan be very malleable and susceptible to change, with persistence and career plans able to be“strongly swayed” by even small interactions or experiences as undergraduates [29].Institutions themselves foster engineering identity development through displays of solidarity
and professional development along with academic development, theseparticular HIP became a focus of our study. Collaborative Assignments & Projects Writing- Common Intensive Intellectual Courses experiences Senior First Year Culminating
engineering design through all Voices of our Studentsfour undergraduate years. Highly selective colleges implementing flexible engineering programsinclude Olin College of Engineering, Dartmouth College, and Harvey Mudd College. Theseprograms are in the top 5 schools with the highest percentage of their bachelor’s degreesawarded to women [8]. BSU’s approach is informed by the efforts of our institutional peers,adapted to meet the unique culture and resources for our campus, and has been introducedpreviously [9].We are guided by the literature as we create a curriculum and employ instructional practicescorrelated with increasing diversity and inclusion. Thus we have made
stoplight,” therebyusing his personal interest in public health to broaden his coworkers’ thinking and potentially theimpact of their research. Likewise, undergraduate Gretchen’s interest in mechanical engineeringinspired Kate to think more broadly about her research. Kate told Gretchen about a grantproposal she was writing about alloys. She detailed, in technical terms, the experiments shewanted to include, then added, “I’m trying to make it relevant to the navy” to improve theproposal’s chances of being funded. Gretchen asked whether the navy could use these alloys tobuild engine turbines. Kate answered thoughtfully, “Yes. Oh, maybe I’ll put a picture of a shipturbine blade in there.” While the PI was thinking about lab-based specifics, the
College of Basic Sciences both provide a residentialeducational program for high school students. The minority engineering program within theCollege of Engineering has offered an induction program, Recruit into Engineering of HighAbility Minority Students (REHAMS), for approximately 8 years. Each summer approximately35 to 40 high school students reside on the university campus for 3 weeks for an intensiveacademic “boot camp” to prepare students for the challenges of university life. Students arerequired to take a math course, either calculus or college algebra, physics and chemistry.Students are also introduced to resume and portfolio writing, study skills, and the academicentrance policies. Participants tour several engineering labs and
. The first presentation had each student focus on a specific scientist of significance that hasmade one or more significant contributions to topics of interest for the course. The second and thirdpresentations required each student to read a contemporary research article related to astronomy,or space exploration. Science was often used as an appropriate source since it’s articles are writtento be understandable to a wide readership. Students were asked to present the topic of the researcharticle, the significance of the research and findings in the article and the background informationnecessary to clarify the significance of the research results.Student presentations were rated by other students using peer review sheets. The review sheet al