Education4. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F. and Lorensen, W. Object-oriented Modeling and Design, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1991.5. Zwicky, F. “The Morphological Method of Analysis and Construction,” Courant Anniversary Volume, New York Wiley-Interscience, 1948.6. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer-Verlag, 1996.7. Ullman, D.G. The Mechanical Design Process, McGraw-Hill, 1997.8. Diker, M.F., and Roux, S. Air Vest - Senior Capstone Project Report, Fairfield University, April 1995.9. Weber, R.G. and Condoor, S.S. “Conceptual Design Using a Synergistically Compatible Morphological Matrix,” Frontiers in Engineering Education, 1998.Sridhar S. CondoorSridhar Condoor is an Assistant
. Skills and knowledge become more and more closely tiedas the student learns to see the world using the epistemic frame of the profession. Examplesinclude capstone design courses in undergraduate engineering programs, medical internships andresidencies, or almost any graduate program in STEM disciplines. Prior work has also shownthat epistemic games—learning environments where students game-play to develop the epistemicframe of a profession—increases students’ understanding of and interest in the profession3-5. In this paper, we present a detailed description of the virtual internship, the important role ofthe design advisors/mentors in the simulation, and preliminary results of the first semester ofNephrotex. Our results show the potential of
: Project 2061. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 5. National Education Goals Report. (1993). Summary guide -- the national education goals report: Building the best. Washington, D. C. 6. Anderson, R. (1995). Curriculum and reform: Dilemmas and promise. Phi Delta Kappan 1, 33-36. Page 6.1107.8 “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2001, American Society for Engineering Education” 7. Yager, R. (1991). The constructivist learning model -- towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58 (1), 52
each semester. One primarygoal of the evaluation will be to obtain feedback that can be quickly implemented. Furthermore,students exiting the new courses emphasizing mechanics-materials links will be tracked in othermechanics courses with regard to their performance, percentage of students using such principlesin capstone design projects, undergraduate research, and percentage of students pursing graduatestudies in the area of mechanics and materials. Thus, the total impact of the developedcurriculum will be known clearly over a span of about 4-5 years.5. AcknowledgementThe authors acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation under grant no. NSFDUE 9972394. Any opinions, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper
: GraduatingAccomplish other non-courseassessment instruments - OIA ã ã ã ã ã ã ã ã seniors will complete OIA Survey Each spring, at the completionSenior Project Self-Evaluations ã ã ã ã of Senior Design capstone courseAssess Program Outcomes A-F ã
Session 2341 Engineering Design: the Information Component James A. Van Fleet, Michael E. Hanyak, Jr. Bucknell UniversityAbstractThe curriculum of the Bucknell University Chemical Engineering Department includes arequired senior year capstone course titled Process Engineering, with an emphasis on processdesign. For the past ten years library research has been a significant component of thecoursework, and students working in teams meet with the librarian throughout the semester toexplore a wide variety of information resources required for their project.The assignment has been the same
institution. Facultyand representatives from the Dean’s Offices in both Science and Engineering became involved in thisproject because a significant fraction of the “freshman engineering experience” is delivered by facultyin the Departments of Chemistry, Mathematics, and Physics within the School of Science. From thebeginning of this project it was clear that the first step toward making significant, worthwhile, andlasting changes in the freshman engineering experience involved obtaining a better understanding ofthe lived experience of freshman engineers from the perspectives of both the students, the faculty whoteach courses taken by these students, and the faculty who teaches courses that build on thisfoundation. A significant fraction of the first
. The Control System Toolbox, MATLAB, and SIMULINK has been the platformused at Bradley. Once the control system is optimized in simulation, the controller is then converted tosoftware or hardware for implementation.The optimum phase margin approach has been used in senior capstone projects which have consisted ofphase-locked loops, switching power supplies, and a temperature controller. It is currently being appliedto a small robot arm system by two senior students and to an industrial hydraulic application by a Page 6.152.11 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
be carried out. There is not a single “right answer” that will serve all organizations, butthere may be a “best answer” for a particular organization. For example, some may choose touse the capstone design process as their primary focus of their assessment process, while othersmay use the Fundamentals of Engineering examination, an in-house developed comprehensiveexamination, a set of core courses, or a portfolio of artifacts. The complexity caused by thisrange of choices is compounded by the multiplicity of ways of judging the artifacts, which mayrange from objective scoring schemes to subjective scoring schemes such as rubrics. Thedevelopment of scoring rubrics can also compound the complexity because of the possibility ofusing holistic
During the summer of 2023, at the University of Cincinnati, 48 students attended the Men ofColor high school engineering camp. This camp involved work with students who identified asbeing African American/Black Asian, Hispanic/Latinx, and/or mixed races. The majority ofparticipants self-identified as Black and only one student as white. These students wereimmersed in a week-long experience wherein they toured campus facilities, spoke with industryprofessionals, toured local engineering companies, and completed hands-on STEM andcommunication activities. The week culminated in a final presentation on Friday where families,partners, and staff were invited to view capstone presentations where participants presented theirvision of a prompt: The
. In 2011, began as an Assistant Teaching Professor in First-year Engineering Program where she redesigned the curriculum and developed courses with sustainability and clean water themes. In 2017, she moved to ChE Department where she has taught core courses and redesigned the Capstone design course with inclusion pedagogy practices. She has also developed and ran 9 faculty-led, international programs to Brazil focused on Sustainable Energy. She has won several teaching awards including ChE Sioui Award for Excellence in Teaching, COE Essigmann Outstanding Teaching Award, and AIChE Innovation in ChE Education Award. She also won best paper at the Annual ASEE conference in both Design in Engineering Education
. He has published 16 papers in peer-reviewed journals, 28 papers in peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and given 12 technical presentations on various topics including: additive manufacturing, mechatronics, biomechanics, and engineering education. He currently teaches the Engineered Systems In Society, Mechanical Engineering Professional Practice, and Capstone Design I and II courses. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Exploring the Impact of Study Sheets on Students' Performance in an Engineered Systems in Society CourseAbstractThe purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of study sheets on second-year engineeringstudents' performance in an
desire to solve problems can be used to create value for others. Groups likeKEEN have been supporting and encouraging EML in engineering education, with thepublication of the “The KEEN Framework” that includes examples of student outcomesassociated with entrepreneurial mindset [6]. Most often, these EML outcomes are incorporatedinto first year and capstone courses that emphasize the engineering design process. Courses, suchas statics, dynamics, and thermodynamics, make less frequent use of EML, possibly becauseinstructors feel like they do not have enough class time to include these elements. The aim of the“Clippers Worth the Cost” activity is to incorporate EML with course content in such a way thatstudents’ experience with the content is more
AC 2011-1916: USING THE COMPUTER AS A TOOL ACROSS THE CUR-RICULUMLaura J Genik, Michigan State University Dr. Genik teaches in the Thermal Fluid Sciences at Michigan State University at the undergraduate and graduate level.Craig W. Somerton, Michigan State University Craig W. Somerton is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Michigan State University. He teaches in the area of thermal engineering including thermodynamics, heat transfer, and thermal design. He has also taught the capstone design course for the department. Dr. Somerton has research interests in computer design of thermal systems, appropriate technology, and application of continuous quality improvement principles to engineering
Academics, an alternative arts high school.Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor in the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of bridging engineering and education, capstone design, and introductory materials engineering. His research interests are evaluating conceptual knowledge, miscon- ceptions and their repair, and conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge of students in introductory materials engineering classes. He is cur- rently conducting research with NSF sponsored projects in the areas of: Modules to Promote Conceptual Change in an Introductory
increasingly forced into satisfying certain ABETcategories. For instance, many schools, under ABET scrutiny, were shown to be lacking inengineering design credits. Most institutions, so identified, changed their programs byeliminating free electives in favor of electives or required courses having design content. Manyschools added a capstone design course.Simultaneously, internal pressure was often exerted from the rest of the university on theengineering curriculum. The national thinking in education, at all levels, was moving toward Page 4.450.2ever-increasing core requirements in response to, "why isn't Johnny learning ________ (fill inthe blank)?" At
curriculumEnvironmental 1 ChE 170: Introduction; Yes B Grade in courselaws & ChE 451: Formal instruction Yes AregulationsCapstone design 2 ChE 451: Design project Yes C Grade on projectwith safety/environmentalconsiderationsThe information summarized in Table 4 for Attribute 7 is the result of much discussion and Page 4.379.8several iterations. Note that a mastery level of 3 was assigned for HAZCOM training, meaningthat our students will be required to pass the HAZCOM test as a condition for graduation.HAZCOM training has not been generally required of our students to
-members could discuss their effort as they presented theirsolutions to complex design and analysis problems. In this paper, the assessment tool utilized toassess these courses and the impact on student outcomes is presented.Assessment ToolBefore Fall 2004The assessment tool before Fall 2004 was primarily based on the following metrics: 1. Capstone senior design reports and presentations 2. Engineer-in-training exam 3. Senior exit interviewsThe main disadvantage was that the assessment was based on metrics that were obtained longafter the students had completed the courses.After Fall 2004The department developed a new rubric in summer of 2004 that would assess each courseaccording to the ABET outcomes so that the assessment could be
. Page 15.1378.91. Leadership Roles: Faculty can discuss leadership during any discussion about thedifferent leadership roles students will assume in the corporate world while working onvarious engineering projects. When discussing the future leadership roles engineering andtechnology students will assume throughout their careers, faculty can help to makestudents aware of the importance of leadership and its effects on employees, the projectand the organization.2. Teamwork Assignments: When students are given group assignments that require themto work together, the instructor can use the opportunity to discuss teambuilding and otheraspects of leadership.3. Other opportunities for faculty to raise the issue of leadership in their courses
Ethicsand Character Education curriculums, including the Character Counts! Coalition (1993),the Child Development Project (1981), and the Positive Action Model (1998). Inaddition, a presentation of a senior research paper on Character Education highlighted thenational call for educators to address this arena in classrooms.Students were actually relieved to be able to openly discuss these issues and garnerresponses to thoughts and questions from peers and faculty. They left that day feelingrefreshed by the honesty in their own personal evaluation of morals, values, and ethics.Students also felt energized by having taken this first step in understanding the role ofEthics and Character Education in today’s public school classrooms.Due to this positive
. Page 7.1134.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society of Engineering EducationSpecifically, in Mechanical Engineering, approaches have varied from more hands on learningexperiences - for example, product dissection courses at Stanford3 and the MEEP! coalition4, andindustry-sponsored capstone senior design courses – to the adoption of different teaching stylesin the classroom2,5.Despite these efforts several problems still remain. These include:1. A majority of mechanical engineering students graduate with a poor feel for how common mechanical devices work and the rationale behind their design4.2. A majority of
coursewas 66 for biology, 144 for chemistry, 77 for physics, 11 for environmental science, 214for calculus and 17 for statistics (See Table 1).Table 1. AP Enrollment by Science and Mathematics Courses in SY 2000-2001Biology Chemistry Physics Env. Science Calculus Statistics Total66 144 77 11 214 17 529V. ResultsIn answer to the Research Question - Are students who take AP courses in high schoolmore likely to pursue college majors in engineering than students who do not take APcourses? – The following data was collected for projected college majors. In the six APscience and mathematics courses, only career data for seniors in AP physics was
Units 1. General Education 72 2. Mathematics, Science, and Computer Programming 105 3. Freshman Engineering 24 4. ECE Core 24 5. ECE Breadth 36 6. ECE Depth 12 7. ECE Coverage 24 8. ECE Capstone Design (This can be a course used to satisfy ECE Depth or ECE Coverage) 9. Engineering Elective
was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Southern University-Armstrong Campus, Savannah GA. He received his Ph.D. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and his B.S. in Mechanical Engineering (Cum Laude) from Louisiana State University. He has published 16 papers in peer-reviewed journals, 28 papers in peer-reviewed conference proceedings, and given 12 technical presentations on various topics including: additive manufacturing, mechatronics, biomechan- ics, and engineering education. He currently teaches the Engineered Systems In Society, Mechanical Engineering Professional Practice, and Capstone Design I and II courses.Dr. Dominik May, University of Georgia Dr. May
they have installed the student version of Matlab. Many of them have done that. Feedback about the lab from students, including official course evaluations, has been almostuniformly positive, which we attribute largely to the fact that many students consider the Arduinoto be something like state-of-the-art, want to know more about it, and feel that this lab gives themgood exposure to it. Another major factor in student satisfaction is that on the relatively rareoccasions when technical problems do arise, they are fairly easy to understand and to fix. Severalstudents have gone on to use the Arduino in other projects, such as Senior Capstone projects.References[1] D. Wilcher, “Physical Computing and DC Motor Control” in Learn Electronics
Paper ID #7101Teaching Architecture, Engineering and Construction Disciplines: Using Var-ious Pedagogical Styles to Unify the Learning ProcessJill Nelson P.E., California Polytechnic State University Jill Nelson is an Assistant Professor for the Architectural Engineering Department at California Polytech- nic State University (Cal Poly), San Luis Obispo, CA. Professor Nelson came to Cal Poly with over 25 years of structural design and project management experience. She is a registered Professional Engineer and Structural Engineer in the states of California and Washington. Jill Nelson received a B.S. degree in Civil
Paper ID #39687Board 188: Student-centered and led approaches for improving Mental HealthCody Petitt, Ohio UniversityDr. Greg Kremer, Ohio University Robe Professor and Chair of Mechanical Engineering, founding director of the ”Designing to Make A Difference” ME senior capstone design experience, and PI for the Stacking the Deck for Career Success Initiative.Dr. Timothy CydersEmily McCartyRobert F. LindseyRyan Pytosh ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Student-centered and led approaches for improving Mental Health (Work in Progress)Introduction:Engineering
coursework outside of the capstone that integrate multiple concepts, experimentation, and problem-solving approaches.MethodsThe blast load laboratory is one of ten labs offered in a course that is cross-listed as a senior andgraduate elective at a small public polytechnic institution. Course enrollment is usually aroundten students. The instructor has offered this course five times in the last ten years and this is thefirst year a lab devoted to blast loading was offered. Prior labs at this point in the course hadbeen devoted to comparing theories and methods: Duhamel’s integral, Newmark’s Method, andother time-stepping procedures to solve for structural response to arbitrary loading, a prerequisitefor further study of seismic ground motions
,” Proceedings of the2020 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #30221, 2020.[15] Tally, K., “Lights, Camera, Action! Peer-to-Peer Learning through Graduate StudentVideos,” Proceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #59900, 2013.[16] Demoret, K., “Students Teaching Students: An approach to improving Capstone design,”Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #34707, 2021.[17] Cummings, M., Darbeheshti, M., Simon, G., Schupbach, Jocobson, M., Altman, T.,Goodman, K., “Comparing Student Outcomes from Four Iterations of an Engineering LearningCommunity,” Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper #33192, 2021.[18] Dennis, N., “Experiential Learning Exercised Through Project Based Instruction,”Proceedings of the 2001 ASEE Annual
. Speakers will be faculty, career centerstaff, and members of industry. The initial title of the series is “Surviving and Thriving in Tech.” Component 12: Leadership and Soft Skills: These students are expected to enter theprogram with good interpersonal and communications skills – skills that are highly needed andcan give them a competitive advantage in the high-tech workplace. Leadership skills willexplicitly be addressed as part of the architecture and requirements courses. Throughout thecourse work, and especially in the design/build courses, these skills will be practiced andreinforced through class work and team projects. Component 13: Technical Skills: These students will gain excellent technical skills fromtheir classes and work