Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge developed in specific courses in the core curriculum to the more complex, authentic problems and projects they face as professionals. Dr. Koretsky is one of the founding members of the
ARCE curriculum requires upper-division students to complete three structural design labcourses on steel, timber/masonry, and concrete. In each, students have a culminating projectwhere they assemble a complete calculation and drawing package for an assigned building; thesesubmittals often involve 2-3 students and hundreds of pages of documents. The ARCE 451faculty elected to grade student submittals in Bluebeam (a tool utilized in the industry review andpermitting process) to provide feedback to the students. Adopting this grading methodologymeant that hardcopy paper student submittals were replaced by PDF files containing drawingsand scans of hand calculations, which the students organized in Bluebeam and then uploaded toPolyLearn.Student
majority of the overall populationof students from a non-STEM field came from Liberal Arts/Humanities (51.7%). This was alsothe most highly ranked prior major for International women (41.7%) and White women (32.7%),as articulated in Table 4. This presents an opportunity to think about how computing can becombined with such fields or cover topics related to these areas.Increasingly, institutions are beginning to consider “CS+X” options, where X refers to anemphasis in another discipline, allowing for students to complete a core curriculum in computerscience while considering intersecting fields as well. At the University of Illinois, options rangefrom areas like “CS + Advertising,” “CS + Economics,” and “CS + Music” [35]. Apart from theemergence of
substantially to meet new challenges of the 21st Century. A noticeabledecline in the number of domestic graduate students pursuing engineering has occurred and just underhalf of those who are pursuing the doctorate are foreign nationals. But the drop in Americans engaging ingraduate studies in engineering is also being perceived by industry and by a growing proportion ofgraduate schools as a reflection of a lack of opportunity for lifelong learning and of an insufficiency ofU.S. graduate education to serve the full professional spectrum of engineering. This deficiency isaffecting U.S. competitiveness and the nation’s long-term capacity for innovation. The ASEE-GraduateStudies Division has established a National Collaborative to address the compelling
the nation’s schools. Currently NCATE has about 656 members. (8) • TEAC (Teacher Education Accreditation Council) was founded in 1997 and currently has about 220 members. (9) Page 23.582.3 2Both NCATE and TEAC are recognized by the US Department of Education and CHEA(Council on Higher Education Accreditation). In 2010 NCATE and TEAC announced that in2013, their two organizations would join to form CAEP (Council for the Accreditation ofEducator Preparation). (2)Teacher education accreditation at the national level plays an integral role in
Incorporating 3D RP Process in Biomedical Engineering Design Jonathan Cefalu, Timothy Roemer, Pawel Kosakowski and Shankar Krishnan, Ph.D. Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MassachusettsAbstractDesign, prototyping and analysis are vital skills to be obtained by Biomedical Engineering(BME) students. These skills should be taught to the BME students during their design courses.Introducing the design process with prototypes gives students a better visualization of a finalproduct in three dimensions. While machining the designed part would be the ideal method, it isnot always practical within the confines of an academic term. The most
Paper ID #36668Measuring Change in Students’ Development of GlobalCompetency in Two Global Engineering CoursesNicholas Dang Nicholas Dang is a graduate student of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests are misconceptions and difficult concept learning, particularly in the topic areas covered by mechanical engineering.Kirsten Davis Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores the intentional design and assessment of global engineering programs, student development through experiential learning, and
1995 he joined New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, as an Assistant Professorof Electrical and Computer Engineering. He teaches courses in electronics and analog and digital integrated circuitdesign. His research interests include analog image processing and low-power circuit techniques. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Education Page 6.261.7
mentoring, as its efficacy depends on multiple factors specificto a particular university, such as school size, proportion of students to mentors, etc.This work in progress aims to understand the needs and expectations of students who aresupported by a faculty mentoring process in an Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE)department in a large public university. The goal of the program is to offer additional andpersonalized support to students supplementing the departmental academic advising servicededicated to addressing curriculum-related questions. The topics covered during these sessionsare diverse, as mentioned earlier.In Fall 2023, the ECE department had 2,310 undergraduate students. Typically, each facultymember is randomly assigned around
eightsemesters with a GPA over 3.0, pointing to the need for qualitative research of that population tolearn if they are leaving because the early curriculum failed to give them an accurate impressionof what lay ahead. There is also evidence that students who are the least likely to succeed inengineering are the least aware of their predicament, which has implications for engineeringadvising and academic policymaking.II. Prior research on predicting engineering attritionThe graduation rate of undergraduate students who matriculate in engineering is not muchdifferent from that for the general student population, and the rate increases significantly afterstudents reach a ‘threshold’ of progress in engineering.1 The pool of students graduating highschool
is one of the largest factors influencing a student’s decision to leaveengineering [1]. This can often be exacerbated for underrepresented students when compoundedwith existing structural and systematic issues such as the lack of visible professional role models,exposure and/or access to science, technology, engineering and math (STEM), under-resourcedpublic schools and inadequate preparation to matriculate into a university-level engineeringprogram. Efforts to answer the call to increase diversity and inclusion in engineering should startwith an understanding of how people from groups marginalized in engineering experienceengineering. Experiences in engineering include reception to the curriculum, classroomdynamics, interactions with
engineers. Senior engineers commonlymentioned working extra hours on writing tasks when they started in practice, knowing that thehours could not be billed to a client but trusting that the effort would pay off later in being able towrite more quickly and easily. Finally, all the practitioners referred to looking at previousdocuments produced by the firm, using them at first to learn typical organization andexpressions, and later using them as templates for new documents. For most firms, much work isroutine. Thus, it is rare that an entirely new document with new organization and new ways ofdescribing content has to be created from scratch.Teaching ApplicationsBased on the findings of our research, we believe it is important to integrate writing
Paper ID #19822Flipping STEM Classrooms Collaboratively Across Campuses in CaliforniaDr. Laura E. Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University Dr. Laura Sullivan-Green is an Associate Professor and Department Chair in Civil and Environmental En- gineering at San Jos´e State University. She obtained her BS from the University of Dayton (Dayton, OH) in 2002 and her MS (2005) and PhD (2008) from Northwestern University (Evanston, IL). She teaches in the areas of Geotechnical Engineering, Engineering Mechanics, and History of Technology. Her research interests include evaluating crack age in construction materials, forensic
their work. The first thing to work on is thetask planning sheet. Tasks must be identified and the individual responsible for finishing each taskis assigned.A series of two courses were introduced into the Mechanical Engineering curriculum at theUniversity of Memphis beginning with the Fall 1998 semester. Among other things, these coursesserve as an introduction to Mechanical Engineering and will hopefully aid our retention efforts.One of the ideas tried in Fall 2001 and carried through to Fall 2004 was to get the freshmeninvolved with the seniors. Seniors can provide valuable insights to the freshmen and provide themwith a perspective about the University that faculty cannot provide. The seemingly ideal way to dothis was to have the senior
Eng Educ. 2012;101(2):187–219. 13. Carr RL, Bennett LD, Strobel J. Engineering in the K-‐12 STEM Standards of the 50 US States: An Analysis of Presence and Extent. J Eng Educ. 2012;101(3):539–564. 14. McGrath RG, MacMillan IC. The entrepreneurial mindset: Strategies for continuously creating opportunity in an age of uncertainty. Harvard Business Press; 2000. 15. Bøhn JH. Integrating rapid prototyping into the engineering curriculum-‐a case study. Rapid Prototyp J. 1997;3(1):32–37. 16. Bodnar CA, Anastasio D, Enszer JA, Burkey DD. Engineers at Play: Games as Teaching Tools for
teaching and research. He has received numerous teaching awards and authored five widely-used text- books on embedded microcomputer systems. He has co-founded a successful medical device company called Admittance Technologies. His research involves integrated analog/digital processing, low-power design, medical instrumentation, and real-time systems.Dr. Ramesh Yerraballi, University of Texas - Austin Ramesh Yerraballi is a Distinguished Senior Lecturer in the Departments of Electrical and Computer Engineering, at The University of Texas at Austin. He received his Bachelors degree in Computer Science and Engineering from Osmania University, India, in 1991 and his PhD degree in Computer Science from Old Dominion
the author's steps. Take special note when the author heads in a different direction than your normal inclinations. This is an opportunity to learn a new technique. 2. Note the order of the basic steps the author uses to solve the problem. 3. Note any special tricks the author uses. By tricks I mean clever short cuts that save time or calculus. (Recall the use of implicit integration when we had y=f(x) and we wanted x- dot and y-dot?)Your journal should be a short paragraph(s) that answers these questions: 1. What types of things appear in your notes about learning from examples? Give a sample or two from your notes. 2. How did taking notes about solving problems affect your actual solving problems? 3
of the reasons to consider changes in the PLC courses and especially inthe senior course where complaints were most severe. While change was necessary, thecapital for buying any new equipment seemed an insurmountable challenge. However,steps taken to upgrade the coursework had to be taken.Observations of teaching the two courses over a number of years have been reviewed atthe conclusion of each class. The evaluations received with each class were noted andcomments were scrutinized to update labs and the class experience. It was noticed thatstudents were struggling more in the advanced course than the sophomore class. Thereseemed to be a division between those who desired a job in the manufacturing
, Mankato Rebecca A. Bates received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Washington in 2004. She also received the M.T.S. degree from Harvard Divinity School in 1993. She is currently Professor and Chair of the Department of Integrated Engineering program at Minnesota State University, Mankato, home of the Iron Range and Twin Cities Engineering programs.Dr. Deborah K. Nykanen P.E., Minnesota State University, Mankato Deborah K. Nykanen is a Professor of Civil Engineering at Minnesota State University, Mankato. She received her Ph.D. degree in civil engineering from the University of Minnesota in 2000. Her teaching, research and professional experience focus on water resources, hydrology and
AC 2009-1628: DO INTROVERTS PERFORM BETTER IN COMPUTERPROGRAMMING COURSES?Kyle Lutes, Purdue University Kyle Lutes is an Associate Professor for the Department of Computer & Information Technology (CIT) at Purdue University. Kyle joined the department in 1998 and is the chair of the department’s software development curriculum. His teaching and scholarly interests cover a broad range of software development areas including software applications for mobile devices, data-centered application development, and software entrepreneurialism. He has authored/co-authored numerous papers and two college textbooks on various software development-related topics. Prior to his current
2006-942: INNOVATIVE METHODS IN TEACHING FUNDAMENTALUNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING COURSESAmir Rezaei, West Virginia University Inst. of Tech. Dr. Amir Rezaei is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California State Polytechnic University,Pomona. His research interests include Anisotropic Elasticity, Composite Materials, Vibration, and Stability. He is an active member of American Society of Engineeirng Education (ASEE) and is currently serving in Design Division (DEED) of this society. He has taught across the mechanical engineering curriculum as well as developing new courses in graduate and undergrduate levels.Marco Schoen, Idaho State UniversityGurdeep Hura, West Viginia University
the United States Naval Academy, and served for more than a decade as a naval aviator in the Navy, flying F/A-18s from aircraft carriers. Mr. Pegues hails from rural Virginia and is married to the former Kathryn Kennedy of Olympia, Washington. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Stimulating Student Preparation in Introductory Engineering MechanicsAbstractEngineering mechanics is the foundation for an engineering curriculum. It is crucial to comprehendand retain this knowledge to be successful in advanced courses such as structural analysis andmachine component design, as well as to pass the fundamentals of
Paper ID #37252Developing Design Thinking in Senior Capstone Bioengineering StudentMr. Brandon K HarrisonMr. Michael Alexander Phelan I am a PhD student in Bioengineering at Temple University and a predoctoral fellow at the National Eye Institute. My research primarily focuses on the design and testing of bioreactors to enhance the growth and differentiation of stem cell-derived retinalVahid AlizadehAratrik GuhaDr. Yah-el Har-el, Temple University Dr. Har-el is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the Department of Bioengineering at Temple Uni- veristy.Dr. Ruth Ochia, Temple University Dr. Ruth S. Ochia is a
analysis and design principles that need to be mastered instructural design. Enhancing World Wide Web developments, the new opportunities for Page 11.1435.2interactivity and flexible access to various media format (text, sound, static illustrations, 2D and3D dynamic illustrations, Virtual Reality worlds) challenge the traditional experience in shapinglearning environments for web-based education.It is essential to use alternative modes of instruction to create an ‘almost real’ environment whichenables students to better understand the construction concepts. In today’s computer age, it iscrucial to use multimedia as effective tools of teaching
experimentation, and finally, concrete experience(feeling). We believe students learn better when "hands-on" applications (activeexperimentation) are presented concurrently with classroom theory. Traditionally, students oftenwait between 1– 2 years to apply previously learned theory to an actual application in anexperimental laboratory setting. At the University of Kentucky, we offer an undergraduatecourse in the Chemical & Materials Engineering curriculum called "Heat and Mass Transfer".Recently, our department has been making a concerted effort to bring more experimentalapplications back into the classroom. One such experiment we are incorporating into theclassroom environment is the study of heat and mass transfer and how it applies to such a
)education, according to a 2007 report2, “Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing andEmploying America for a Brighter Economic Future”. Additionally, other concerns about thequality and effectiveness of teaching learning environments in the U.S. are also registered.Educational paradigms that served us well in the past may not be adequate for the future. Welive in a rapidly changing world, with a global job market, global educational competition, aglobally integrated economy3, conflicting educational values, increasing multicultural trends,burdening educational cost, rising security crisis, growing ethical and moral conflicts, wideningincome gaps, and unstable financial conditions. Some strategic actions are needed for preventingfurther
Education, November 1994, San Jose, Calif. 6. M. E. Parten, "Progressive Design for Instrumentation Development in Project Laboratories," 1993 ASEE Gulf- Southwest Annual Meeting, Austin, TX, April 1-2, 1993. 7. M. E. Parten, "Digital Signal Processing in a Junior Electrical Engineering Design Laboratory,” Proceedings of ASEE 1992 Annual Conference, Toledo, Ohio, June 1992. 8. M. E. Parten, "Design and Research in Project Laboratories,” Proceedings of Engineering Education: Curriculum Innovation and Integration, Engineering Foundation Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, January 1992. 9. M. E. Parten, "Design in the Electrical Engineering Laboratory," 1988 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, March
variables that may allow to fathom whystudents do not persist in university education. For example, a study analyzes how the fulfilmentof first year university expectations influences the consolidation of student persistence during therest of their years at university [7]. Factors such as student mental health and well-being and howthese were affected by student motivation during their first year were studied. Although thesefactors are not leading players in this present study, it is worth reviewing how they have beenaddressed in the literature, since they have an important influence on results expected bystudents.The study cited above concludes that first year university studies correlated highly with studentcontinuity if they are not compromised
among the respondents might teach a type of course and not include ethics/societalimpact issues.The surveys include a lot of additional information that was not analyzed and presented in thecurrent paper. The goals of the larger study include identifying exemplars for teaching differenttopics in different courses using various pedagogies and assessment methods. Thus, many surveyrespondents provided some of this basic information for one or two of their courses. In responseto an open-ended question, a number of the survey respondents indicated that societal impact andethics issues should be integrated into courses across the curriculum. Given the large number ofexamples provided by survey respondents, it appears that there are opportunities to
., “Engaging Freshman Experience: The Key to Retention?”, Proceedings of the 2009 ASEE Annual Conference on Engineering Topics Covered in this Course: Education, Austin, TX, June 14-17.[6] Sheppard, S. D., 1992, "Mechanical Dissection: An Experience in 1. Overview of Mechanical Engineering Profession How Things Work," Proceedings of the Engineering Education: 2. Engineering problem solving Curriculum Innovation & Integration, Santa Barbara, CA. 3. Forces, Materials, and Stresses[7] Sheppard, S., 1992, "Dissection as a Learning Tool," Proceedings of