interpolation, regression, numerical integration and solving linear systems ofequations. This course is not intended to cover all numerical methods students may need insubsequent courses in their degree plan but rather to provide a basic skill set they can build onthroughout their education. Table 1 lists the topics covered in the Introduction to Engineeringcourse. The first section of Table 1 lists the topics related to numerical methods and the latersection lists the topics related to programming. Page 24.1223.3Table 1. Introduction to Engineering Course Topics Course Topics Geometry and Trigonometry Review
of the Most Popular on Campus?AbstractTraditionally, less than 1% of all American college students in any degree level studyabroad, but study abroad became very popular at Stevens Institute of Technology in2013.5 In 2013, the Engineering Management Program at Stevens instituted a new studyabroad program which was reported about generally in an article presented at the 2013ASEE Conference9. The Engineering Management Study Abroad program consisted of atwo-week intensive Stevens course, taught by a Stevens professor in Italy. To furtherenhance the experience, students from the University of Mexico, Guadalajara and theUniversity of Naples also participated in the 2013 course. It ended up being one of themost popular study
place the teachersin the learner's role, where they will be introduced to STEM through modules developed byengineering students.Distance education can be successful on a small scale if the six core elements of the teachersupport system are considered (Figure 1). This model is intended for the development of astudent support system--adapted for teachers. In this case, paying particular attention toflexibility and differentiating the management of services will be imperative if the modules wereimplemented elsewhere 7. Teacher Support Cohort Scale Characteristics System Course or Program
environmentgiving the students more feedback on how the controllers would behave on a real system. Thenew “realistic” lab exercise’s efficacy is demonstrated through each of the student’s increasedunderstanding of control system concepts.1. Introduction“Autonomous Unmanned Vehicle (AUV) Workbench [1]-[5] was developed as a modeling andsimulation environment to enable physics based real time simulation of autonomous vehicles,such as surface, underwater, land and air [6].” This or similar software allows a lower costproblem based learning (PBL) capability as compared to “the high cost of large scaleunderwater, land and air vehicles [6].” PBL has been shown to engage students more therebyincreasing student involvement and understanding of lecture materials [7
. Page 24.8.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014The Effects of Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Completing a Radiological Engineering Design Project Page 24.8.2IntroductionAn important skill for engineers to obtain is the ability to perform on cross-disciplinary teams.In fact, the accrediting organization ABET has deemed this a key student outcome for nuclearengineering programs.1 The nuclear engineering program at the United States Military Academy(West Point) offers a unique perspective on the ability of students to perform on cross-disciplinary teams because non-engineering majors are required to take a 3-course
Page 24.25.3of entry for European immigrants. On Sept. 8, 1900 this hurricane made landfall, with littlewarning, resulting in 8,000-10,000 deaths (20-25% of the total population). This was the mostdeadly natural disaster to strike the U.S. An amazing recovery ensued, based onrecommendations of a board chaired by BG (ret) Henry Martyn Robert, former Chief ofEngineers of the U.S. Army. Recommendations included the following: (1). A 4.8km curved seawall constructed to +5.2m mean low tide. (2). A hydraulic fill to 5.5m for a 61m distance behind the seawall. (3). A brick pavement 10.7m back of the seawall, soil and bermuda grass for another 18.3m back.The seawall was 5,362m long; 4.9m wide at the bottom, and 1.5m wide at the
-centered teaching practices are known to have a positive impact on student success. There isincreasing evidence that using techniques such as active learning in the classroom and working toincrease student motivation can improve student learning, knowledge retention, and persistence (9, 10).Despite the large body of research supporting these effective teaching practices, there are several barriersto faculty’s adoption of them. Such barriers include, but are not limited to, lack of familiarity with thepractices, inadequate time to apply new teaching practices to their courses, and the possibility of studentresistance (1, 4, 7).In order to support engineering faculty in adopting effective teaching practices, we designed andimplemented the “Teaching
simulated with MATLAB softwaretool. The lab exercise demonstrates to the students the increased utilization of WSNs for variousapplications such as control systems.1. IntroductionIncreased student involvement with the design process and more immediate feedback in the formof two dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) simulation environments such asAutonomous Unmanned Vehicle (AUV) workbench [1]-[3] or MATLAB results in improvedunderstanding of and engagement in the material. Problem based learning (PBL) continues to bea successful method for increasing student involvement [4]-[8]. The students are provided withan open problem where the students are expected to explore a path planning technique based onpotential fields where regions of
, the timing of the content delivery, and context, play a significant role in theeffectiveness of this delivery model. Initial results indicate that students are demonstratingmastery of applied ethics-based knowledge and abilities between beginner and intermediatelevels by the end of the cooperative education program.IntroductionDemonstration that graduates of an engineering program have met student learning outcomes isrequired to be compliant with ABET expectations for accreditation. Professional skills constitute Page 24.69.2a significant part of these learning outcomes.[1] There are many ways to demonstrate mastery ofthese learning outcomes
reported in this paper. Comparison of differentsession’s opinion regarding the mastering physics will also be analyzed in the paper. Thisparticular study was done for Engineering Physics 2, which covers mainly electricity andmagnetism.IntroductionIncorporating online based techniques with traditional teaching is an interesting idea and is inpractice at several institutions1-2. How these activities impact learning varies 3-5. Like othercolleges, at our institution most of the engineering students take Engineering Physics 1 and 2. Aspart of Engineering Physics 2 course requirement6-7, weekly homework assignments were given.Grading homework assignments submitted by a large student body by Teaching Assistants is notpractical. To deal with this issue
component to involvehundreds of local middle school students in solar energy projects.The case study discussed in this paper describes the collaboration strategies that haveshaped NNMC’s involvement in the project. In particular, the paper addresses thefunding model; the role of faculty, students, and PNM’s personnel; project marketing;project sustainability; the interplay of these strategies to create a win-win relationship forNNMC, PNM, and the local community.Examples of curriculum developed and implemented are presented throughout the paper.A summary of statistics and results of the collaboration is also presented.I) IntroductionIn recent years, the literature has addressed the importance of boosting collaborationamong industry and academia 1-6
thefirst two years. It summarizes the results of extensive discussions that were required to identifyand agree upon course content, the different pedagogical methods used, team teaching efforts,and faculty roles and responsibilities. Methods of evaluating student learning as well asidentifying and managing the course team projects are also discussed. The paper concludes withsome brief lessons learned to help others who might be interested in pursuing a similar project.1. IntroductionThe importance of developing a skilled and knowledgeable STEM (science, technology,engineering and mathematics) workforce is now well-recognized2. By 2020 the US will require123 million highly skilled workers to fill positions in the STEM fields for which there will
plausible that this factor may besubstantially influential for a wide variety of institutions offering distinctive or unique academicprograms.IntroductionPrevious research into what influences a high school student’s selection of a college or universityfor undergraduate study have found that many factors may impact this decision.1-7 Dozens ofpotential candidate factors have been identified and tested, some of which have been found to behighly influential in several studies and can be considered to have substantial evidence behindthem3,4,8-10. This body of evidence supports the assertion that several important school choicefactors are known. Examples of such factors include the cost of tuition, the overall academicreputation of the institution, and
turn out over a million engineers every year 1. The country hasemerged as a major player in the global arena and has produced engineers who have contributedsignificantly to the economic and technological development at international levels. Thesecontributions have been made not only in the information technology sector – as is largelyperceived – but also in various engineering disciplines and in hi-tech research and developmentin automotive, telecommunication, healthcare, solid-state electronics, communications andembedded systems sectors.The Indian engineering education system has tremendous potential and national value. Cognizingthis, the government and the business community are showing a strong commitment toimproving the system. It is
engineeringin the workplace and prepare them with workplace competencies, in this study, weinterviewed 22 engineering Co-Op students about their problem solving experiences andexplored: what are the different ways in which Co-Op students experience workplaceproblem solving? In order to answer this question, we conducted a phenomenographicanalysis on our interview transcripts to capture the variation in students’ experiences. Theanalysis results show that students experienced workplace problem solving in sixdifferent ways, which are: 1) workplace problem solving is following orders andexecuting the plan; 2) workplace problem solving is implementing customers’ ideas andsatisfying customer needs; 3) workplace problem solving is using mathematical
to encourage and enable academically talented but financially needy studentsto complete STEM degrees and enter the workforce. The SIIRE project addresses NSF’sprogrammatic goal by integrating external (industry supported) intern or co-op experiences ofstudents with ongoing on-campus engineering research activities to provide a guided pathway toa graduate engineering degree. The requested scholarship funds defray student educational costsduring their sophomore, junior, and senior years of undergraduate study and during 1.5 years oftheir graduate studies.The SIIRE program addresses the following objectives:1. To provide underrepresented and financially needy undergraduate students with information on the benefits and opportunities associated
Figure 1. Vygostky’s activity theory model for this study. Page 24.582.4Research Design and MethodsInstructional ContextThe course entitled “Introduction to Rechargeable Batteries” is an elective course for upper levelundergraduate and graduate students interested in developing an understanding on the materialsscience of rechargeable batteries. This course included an introduction to basic electrochemistry,principles of electrochemical devices, and electroactive materials as used in rechargeable batterysystems. The instructional goal for the course was to provide students expertise regarding thefundamental analytical and computational modeling
is accomplished wirelessly from shorevia computer.Many researchers have been developing different autonomous dynamic positioning systemsaround the world. Ker-Wei, Yu and Hsu used the particle swarm optimization method for a shipcoordinate system [1]. Alarҫїn used a neural network based on an internal model to control theroll motion of a ship [2]. Moan developed the safety and challenges of station-keeping systems inthe view of in-service experience [3]. Fu, Ning, and Wei developed a method of on-linereconfiguration of a dynamically positioned vessel’s controller by using a virtual thruster in theinstance of thruster failures [4]. Xia, Shi, Fu, Wang, and Bian used hybrid Proportional IntegralDerivative (PID) controllers with a neural network
adifference in student’s perception of the importance of types of skills used in the capstonecourse?” We do not have a large enough data set to apply statistical analysis to the results, so afrequency chart will display the results.Research DesignFor this study, the authors designed a survey to determine in what categories of knowledgestudents felt they had experienced the greatest challenges in the course and in what categories thestudents felt they had gained the most knowledge. The survey was administered to students in theCapstone course during the Fall 2013 semester. The Capstone course was a 1 credit course that isheld concurrently with another Project Management course (2 cr.). These two courses werecoordinated so that the students could use
create interest for the Geoscience workforce of the future.IntroductionIt is well-recognized that early engagement and challenge-based instruction of students includingunderrepresented students in cutting-edge research is the key in promoting their learningopportunities and outcomes [1]. A team of undergraduate students from North Carolina A&TState University under the guidance of faculty advisors participated in a two-semester research,design, assembly and demonstration project named Perseus II, sponsored by the Office of theSecretary of Defense’s Rapid Reaction Technology Office (RRTO). The overarching goals ofthis initiative were multi-fold: (a) to expose undergraduate students including freshmen,sophomore and minorities to ocean
community of practice. Consequently, theseresearchers may be unable to adopt best practices from and exchange relevant information withthe greater community. Page 24.279.21. IntroductionResearch collaboration often occurs between colleagues working within similar as well asdifferent disciplines. Collaboration is known to boost creativity, increase access to relevant skillsand knowledge, provide intellectual companionship, and grow researcher network size.1-3Through collaborations, social capital is leveraged as a transfer of information and knowledge isfacilitated through formal and informal networks.4 Additionally, future opportunities
benefits both the students and the industry sponsor. Students mayhave a chance to interact with industry standards and regulations17 and sometimes even with thelegal system and the local community.18 Industry sponsors also benefit from involvement inthese projects. They receive valuable work they may not have the time to do otherwise. They arealso able to see how the students work on a real project, which is a type of extended interview,and may consider them for potential employment.These benefits are best achieved through the right types of projects. Todd et al. (1993) providedsome useful criteria for selecting industry-sponsored projects:19 1. Should solve a specific need for the company. 2. Company should dedicate adequate financial and
students are required totake Calculus II while the Applied Tech students must complete Precalculus II, the prerequisitefor the course. The topics in Table II are covered in detail and you will note that two of theobjectives are on both lists. Table II Course Objectives related to Spreadsheet Use 1. Use spreadsheet software to design structured, efficient, well-documented workbooks with data entry cells, summary results, statistics cells, and commented cells. 2. Create graphical presentations of data in standard technical formats and fit a curve to a data series. 3. Transfer data between text files, word processor, spreadsheet, database, and project. 4. Track and account for cost information for your
research that was conducted to examine trends in pre-engineering assessment exams (academic indicators) using results from a longitudinal study offirst-year engineering students that spanned just over a decade.1 In the previous study,mathematical skills for the period 2000-2011 were tested using a 20-question, multiple-choice,pre-calculus Math advisory exam, administered to first-year engineering students (withoutcalculators) prior to entering first-year. Engineering skills were also evaluated during the period2007- 2011, using the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) Exam, which is a 30-question, multiple-choice exam2. Earlier work had indicated that there was little variation in these assessment scoresduring the time period considered. Furthermore, the
development processes in thestudied Design and Development of Food Products and Processes capstone course2-5.Assessment of creativity was grounded on the Consensual Assessment Technique6 (CAT), whichis based on the idea that the best measure of creativity regardless of what is being evaluated, isthe assessment by experts in that field. Therefore, a group of experts in the FE field were invitedto evaluate capstone course final projects and developed food products by means of the CreativeThinking VALUE Rubric, which is made up of a set of attributes that are common to creativethinking across disciplines1, 7. Possible performance levels were entitled capstone or exemplar(value of 4), milestones (values of 3 or 2), and benchmark (value of 1). Instructor
industrialengineering students at Penn State University. A link to this specific questionnaire is provided inthe bibliography. The goal of this assessment was to determine the breakdown of learning stylesof the undergraduate industrial engineering junior and senior level students. Table 1 displays theraw results from the results of the Felder’s Index of Learning Styles. Table 2 displays the overallresults of the assessment. Figure 1 shows the learning style preferences of males and femalesseparately using a spider graph. From Table 2 and Figure 1, of the 51 students that completedFelder’s Index of Learning Styles Analysis, the majority of the industrial engineering studentssurveyed at Penn State University were Active, Sensing, Visual, and Sequential learners
engineering educa- tion.Prof. Sanjeev Arora, Fort Valley State University Dr. Arora holds a B.Sc. (Honors) and M.Sc. degree in Physics from University of Delhi, India, and a M.S. and Ph.D. degree in Physics from University of Delaware. Dr. Arora’s research interest is experimental atomic physics and he is well-versed in the use of the van de Graaff accelerator, scalars, MCAs, and other physics instrumentation. He has been instrumental in acquiring, through various grants, computers, and software for the physics laboratory at FVSU. Some of his funded grant proposals are as follows: 1) Establishing a Nuclear Science and Engineering Minor at Fort Valley State University 2) Establishing an Undergraduate STEM Teaching and
offeredutilizing either hybrid or fully-online courses. Planning began for the new Master ofEngineering Management (MEM) Program at Rowan University in January 2007 with acomprehensive online review of 41 engineering management programs nationwide (Table 1).The goal of this review was to determine the most-common practices regarding engineeringmanagement programs and courses nationwide and the key courses required for a successfulengineering management program. The information gathered during this review included lists ofcore courses, specialization courses, and elective courses within these 41 existing programs; alist of specializations within these existing programs; a list of participating colleges within theseexisting programs; and a list of topics
engineering problems” 1.While many courses in different engineering curriculums have a focus on problem solving,statics is typically the first course in many students’ undergraduate engineering coursework thatrequires them to use an engineering problem solving process. Many researchers have spentsignificant resources investigating how students learn in statics and how to effectively teachproblem solving in statics courses. For instance, Steif, Lobue, Kara, and Fay developed anintervention where students where engaging in talk about salient features of the statics problem2.Steif and team found that students that were engaged in body centered talk were better atrepresenting unknown forces on free body diagrams than students that did not participate in
revised theoretical understanding is gained through the researchprocess. This framework does need additional exploration within engineering and thephysical sciences. Additional findings will contribute to engineering education’s currentdiscourse on graduate education and identity.!!!![1] Mann, L., P. Howard, F. Nouwens, F. Martin (2008). Professional identity: A framework for research inengineering education. Proceedings from 2008 Australasian Association for Engineering Education,Yeppoon.[2] Case, J. M., G. Light. (2011). Emerging methodologies in engineering education research. Journal ofEngineering Education, 100(1), 186-210.[3] Meyers, K. L., M. W. Ohland, A.L. Pawley, C.D. Christopherson. (2010). The Importance of FormativeExperiences for