Computing Identity and Persistence Across Multiple Groups Using Structural Equation ModelingAbstractDespite the projected growth of computer and information technology occupations, manycomputing students fail to graduate. Studying students’ self-beliefs is one way to understandpersistence in a school setting. This paper explores how students' disciplinary identity sub-constructs including competence/performance, recognition, interest, and sense of belongingcontribute to academic persistence. A survey of 1,640 students as part of an NSF grant wasconducted at three South Florida metropolitan public universities. A quantitative analysis wasperformed which included a structural equation model (SEM) and a multigroup SEM. The
beliefs about math, English, science, and social studies. Other research interests of hers include the formation of career aspirations, the school- to-work transition, and the differential participation in science, technology, engineering, and math fields based on social identity groups such as gender and Racial/Ethnic identity.Dr. Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University at West Lafayette Nathalie Duval-Couetil is the Director of the Certificate in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Program, Associate Director of the Burton D. Morgan Center, and a Professor in the Department of Technology Leadership and Innovation at Purdue University. She is ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023
Paper ID #28898Building Early Elementary Teacher Confidence in Teaching ComputerScience Through a Low-Cost, Scalable Research-Practitioner CollaborationJustin Lee Clough, University of Southern California Justin L. Clough is a PhD student at the University of Southern California studying Mechanical Engineer- ing; his advisor is Assad A. Oberai. He received his Bachelors of Science from the Milwaukee School of Engineering and Masters of Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, both in Mechanical Engineering. He holds a DOD:SMART scholarship and works closely with the AFRL/RQHV teams at Wright-Patterson
chance to do it yourself. Okay so [our university] started a course, we piloted it...which attempted to give that experience, hands on experience, guided towards innovation, to undergrads. And it’s a delightful thing...it is exactly what we need to inspire these [students].” (00:47:56–00:49:15)This quote provides another example of Leo seeing a problem and trying to solve it, with obviouscurricular implications for engineering education at his university.Lisa (Education)Lisa’s interview transcript narrative followed the overall structure of the interview protocol,connecting repeatedly back to interrelated themes of social justice, equity and inclusion,macroethics, fixing structural factors, and authenticity. We observed both
Paper ID #37179Fostering Community at the Graduate Level: One University’s Student-ledApproachHaroula M. Tzamaras, Pennsylvania State University Haroula is a 3rd year PhD candidate studying human factors at Penn State and is the current president of GradWIE.Sierra HicksGabriella M. Sallai, Pennsylvania State University Gaby Sallai is currently a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering department at Penn State. She is working under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL) studying the experiences of engineering graduate students. She received her Bachelor’s degree from
link these surveystogether. As a result, the student’s identity is not known, but the pre/post surveys can be linkedfor the same student. Three instruments (1-3, below) comprised the survey and tookapproximately 5-10 minutes to complete. Each section of the survey provided data tooperationalize study variables identified in the PEERSIST model (Fig. 1), namely, engineeringself-efficacy, engineering identity, institutional identity, and supports and barriers.(1) Engineering Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Three items comprised this variable, adapted for this studyfrom Lent et al. [19]: confidence to (1) pass all remaining technical courses in the engineeringmajor, (2) pass all remaining design courses in the engineering major, and (3) graduate with
?”; and coping and help-seeking behaviors (six questions), for example, “What resourcesand support are there on campus or in your department for students who are stressed?”.Participants were asked to describe any interactions with other students and faculty regardingmental health issues and to share any other additional information about engineering-relatedstress. The interview protocol was developed from the results of a quantitative surveyadministered at the same institution in the fall of 2017, which included metrics of stress, anxiety,depression, inclusion, and engineering identity, as well as an open-ended response opportunityfor participants to share additional thoughts [8]. The interview was piloted with three participantsexternal to the
collected during this study were both qualitative and quantitative, making this a mixedmethods study. The data we collected to extract creativity were mainly qualitative. Though therewere 11 instruments in total that we could use to extract data, and 13 graduate engineering studentsparticipating in the study (in 5 groups: G1 to G5), we had only nine complete sets for all 11instruments. As a result, we used a critical case study approach for our analysis.RQ1: How do engineering students perceive the importance of creativity in their leadershipdevelopment before and after creativity instruction?To answer our first research question, we examined the pre-course questionnaire and comparedthe participants’ ratings and reasons with their post-course self
. Bork and J.-L. Mondisa, “Engineering graduate students’ mental health: A scoping literature review,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 665–702, 2022, doi: 10.1002/jee.20465.[13] Council of Graduate Schools, “Completion and Attrition in STEM Master’s Programs: Pilot Study Findings.” Council of Graduate Schools, 2013.[14] G. C. Fleming et al., “The fallacy of ‘there are no candidates’: Institutional pathways of Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino doctorate earners,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 170–194, 2023, doi: 10.1002/jee.20491.[15] E. Hocker, E. Zerbe, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Characterizing Doctoral Engineering Student Socialization: Narratives of Mental Health
. After each lesson and after thelesson series, students completed a written reflection on what they had learned, totaling to fivereflections over the semester. Their responses will be explored with a thematic qualitativeanalysis to answer the research questions above. The lessons continue to be adapted to thiscontext and are being taught to all sections of the course this semester. A rollout to all incomingfirst-year engineering students is planned for the Fall of 2023, so this analysis is ongoing, and allconclusions drawn so far are from Fall of 2022 and are denoted as a WIP.Definition of EmpathyDuring a pilot study in the Fall of 2022, 59 first-year students in the honors sections of“Introduction to Engineering” at a large R1 university
Leadership Program, Fish Aides, Horizons Consulting Guild, and Engineering Honors. Upon graduation, Kiersten hopes to use her internship, study abroad, and organization experience to pursue a career in the energy sector. Having grown up abroad, she hopes to live internationally again sometime in the future.Jiacheng LuLori L. Moore, Texas A&M University Dr. Lori Moore is an Associate Professor in the Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications at Texas A&M University. Dr. Moore teaches introductory leadership, leadership the- ory, adult education, and methods of teaching courses and supervises students completing their supervised American
Paper ID #12803Comparing Disparate Outcome Measures for Better Understanding of Engi-neering GraduatesMs. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. She completed her graduate work in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Her research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and prac- ticing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering
], many universities and colleges have sought to introduceglobal programming to engineering as part of extracurricular or formal programming. Many ofthese are framed around global study abroad experiences, with scholars noting that even short-term experiences can lead to heightened understandings of globalization and cultural awareness[37]-[39]. However, the continuous limitations of privilege, cost, and time additions on degreecompletion continue to be evident, and rarely have extended to graduate student populations (withthe exception of a few instances noted in literature via NSF IGERT programs and similar, such asthe study performed by Berdanier et al. [40]). Literature documenting these programs also considerwhether and how intercultural
Surveys B and D at the end of each semester for the next fivesemesters. Statistical analyses similar to those performed for Cohort 2024 will be conducted forCohort 2025. Additionally, the availability of data from both cohorts will allow us to comparetheir outcomes at corresponding points in time. A key distinction in the experimental setupbetween Cohorts 2024 and 2025 is that Cohort 2024 did not have access to the engineeringworkshop during their first semester, whereas Cohort 2025 will have access from the outset.Works Cited[1] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. Li, D. R. Economy and M. S. Kennedy, "Measuring undergraduate students' engineering self-efficacy: A validation study," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, p. 366–395
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Di- vision Apprentice Faculty Grant. She has also been recognized for the synergy of research and teaching as an invited participant of the 2016 National Academy of Engineering
the potential ofthis approach for increasing (1) learners’ capacities to engage in both far transfer (innovation)and direct application (efficiency) and (2) the formation of STEM identity. This new study willuse a mixed methods approach, including a quasi-experimental research design incorporatingboth quantitative and qualitative data analytic methods. A combination of measures includingstandards-based science unit tests, existing district student and administrative data sources,student pre-post surveys, and a preparation for future learning (PFL) assessment tool.VI. ConclusionsWe have applied the theory of Imaginative Education to develop Through My Window, atransmedia learning environment for engineering education. Evidence indicates that
Paper ID #40727An Ecosystem of Support Initiatives for BIPOC, Women, and DomesticGraduate Students in STEMDr. Andrew Edmunds, Clemson University Dr. Edmunds is a Coordinator for Graduate Recruitment and Inclusive Excellence in the College of Engi- neering, Computing, and Applied Sciences at Clemson University. With more than 10 year of experience supporting both graduate and undergraduate students in engineering his research focuses on sense-of- belonging, part-time graduate students, and the future of land grant universities.Dr. Melissa Smith, Clemson University ©American Society for Engineering
Shore. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Envisioning Equitable Pathways to STEM Graduate Education: Creating a Coalition including two public HBCUs and a public Research 1 University to Make It HappenAbstractTwo public HBCUs and a public Research 1 University established a coalition to developpathways to STEM M.S. and Ph.D. programs among Black, Latinx, and Native Americanstudents. Through a mixed-methods research project, the team: (1) identified Faculty Championsto support and advocate for the students; (2) developed a Memorandum of Understanding forSTEM programs between the institutions to facilitate sustained effort by our coalition; and (3)identified Pilot
Paper ID #40784Self-Advocacy Professional Programming as a Framework to SupportNon-Academic Outcomes of STEM PhD Graduate EducationProf. Carmen Maria Lilley, The University of Illinois at Chicago Dr. Lilley’s research interests in engineering education focus on professional development of engineering students at the undergraduate and graduate level. She is interested in studying the effects of the intersection of gender and race/ethnicity on the professional formation of engineers and how institutions of higher education can transform to support student’s sense of belonging. ©American Society
humanitarian engineering topics in research. Currently, she is investigating the connections between humanitarian engineering projects, professional formation, and views of diversity and inclusion.Courtney Deckard, Lipscomb UniversityHannah Duke, Lipscomb University Hannah Duke is an undergraduate student in the Raymond B. Jones College of Engineering at Lipscomb University. Hannah is studying mechanical engineering and plans to continue on to graduate school, following the completion of her undergraduate degree, to get a master’s degree in Architectural Design. She is currently researching the effects of humanitarian engineering projects on views of diversity and inclusion and professional development.Makenzie CohnNatalie
avoidance, and masculinity. A semi-structured interview is beingconducted in order to understand how engineering students define their disciplinary engineeringculture using Hofstede’s dimensions as the guide.An initial interview protocol was developed based on the answers that students provided in thequantitative study, the information collected on the systematic review of the literature, and alsoinformed by theory proposed by Bradbeer [51] and Nulty and Barrett [52]. The initial protocolwas piloted with 2 graduate students. Revisions were made and a pilot study was conducted were5 undergraduate electrical and computer engineering students were interviewed for one hour. Thepreliminary results were analyzed using the qualitative data analysis
Graduate School Preparation Program,” J. Black Stud., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 95–112, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0021934715614206.[20] L. J. Donovan et al., “An NSF-LSAMP Model for the Successful Transition of Underrepresented Students into STEM Majors and Beyond,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Jan. 01, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/an-nsf-lsamp-model-for-the-successful-transition-of- underrepresented-students-into-stem-majors-and-beyond[21] S. F. Bancroft, S. K. Benson, and E. Johnson-Whitt, “McNair Scholars’ Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Graduate Experience: A Pilot Study,” -West. Educ. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3–27
population Research, pages 1–16.McGee Banks, C. A. and Banks, J. A. (1995). Equity pedagogy: An essential component of multicultural education. Theory into practice, 34(3):152–158.Oda, S., Yamazaki, A. K., and Inoue, M. (2018). A comparative study on perceptions of cultural diversity in engineering students. In EDULEARN18 Proceedings, pages 5224–5230. IATED.Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2022). Healthy people 2020: Disparities. US department of health and human services website.Pfeifer, J. H., Masten, C. L., Borofsky, L. A., Dapretto, M., Fuligni, A. J., and Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Neural correlates of direct and reflected self-appraisals in adolescents and adults: When social perspective-taking informs self-perception
engineeringprofessionals, women will need to engage and persist in engineering educational pathways. Thepurpose of this pilot qualitative case study was to examine the educational pathways andexperiences of three undergraduate women who are on track to graduate during the 2019-2020academic year a large, public university located in the southeast region of the United States. Byusing social cognitive career theory, the pilot study examined how and why three womenauthored their engineering identities through their secondary and post-secondary educationalexperiences to gain insight on their pursuit and attainment of an engineering degree and toinform a larger case study. Three themes, congruent with social cognitive career theory emergedfrom the data: eagerness to
Paper ID #22953New Engineers’ First Three Months: A Study of the Transition from Cap-stone Design Courses to WorkplacesChris Gewirtz, Virginia Tech Chris Gewirtz is PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests revolve around how culture, history and identity influence assumptions made by engineers in their design practice, and how to change assumptions to form innovative and socially conscious engineers. He is particularly interested in humanitarian engineering design, where many traditional engineering assumptions fall apart.Dr. Daria A. Kotys-Schwartz, University of Colorado, Boulder
.[15] C. Poor and S. Brown, “Increasing retention of women in engineering at WSU: A model for a women’s mentoring program,” Coll. Stud. J., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 421-428, Sept. 2013[16] P. R. Hernandez, B. Bloodhart, R. T. Barnes, A. S. Adams, S. M. Clinton, I. Pollack, E. Godfrey, M. Burt, and E. V. Fischer, “Promoting professional identity, motivation, and persistence: Benefits of an informal mentoring program for female undergraduate students,” PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2017, Art. no. E0187531, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187531.[17] O. Pierrakos, T. K. Beam, J. Constantz, A. Johri, and R. Anderson, “On the development of a professional identity: Engineering persisters vs engineering switchers
POGIL Employed in aOne Semester Engineering Materials Technology Course. In 2017 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, 2017.[32] Phillips, J., Use of POGIL Methodology in Undergraduate Mechanical EngineeringCourses. In 2022 ASEE Illinois-Indiana Section Conference, 2022.[33] Aedi, W. and Masitoh, L., Development of POGIL Based Calculus Module forInformatics Engineering Students. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 5(2), pp.225-228, 2020.[34] Gopal, B., Bockmon, R. and Cooper, S., POGIL-like learning and student's impressionsof software engineering topics: A qualitative study. In PPIG (pp. 154-163), 2022.[35] Gopal, B. and Cooper, S., Pogil-like learning in undergraduate software testing anddevops-a pilot study. In Proceedings of the
and identity in engineering change after this research experience ● How interaction and communication with graduate student mentors contributes to student sense of belonging.Further, this study raises questions that deserve future study, such as: ● How does mentoring undergrads impact grad students? ● How might training better prepare grad and faculty mentors to supervise REU students? ● Does doing research work contribute to students’ perception of research as a human practice? Given this ability to focus on the nuanced meanings that students draw from theirexperiences, we suggest that this method can better empower students from underrepresentedgroups, whose voices can be buried in large datasets of quantitative
enrollment and persistence in college STEM fields using an expanded P-E fit framework: A large-scale multilevel study.,” J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 915–947, 2014.[13] K. E. Winters and H. M. Matusovich, “Career goals and actions of early career engineering graduates,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1226–1238, 2015.[14] J. P. Martin, D. R. Simmons, and S. L. Yu, “Family roles in engineering undergraduates’ academic and career choices: Does parental educational attainment matter?,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 136–149, 2014.[15] R. L. Kajfez, K. M. Kecskemety, E. S. Miller, K. E. Gustafson, and K. L. Meyers, “First- year engineering students’ perceptions of engineering
touse on a practical and tangible project, and witness first-hand how to apply math and science tosolving an open-ended problem. Additionally, completion of the program and participation inresearch is intended to bolster applications for graduate school and competitive internships/careertracks as well as increase confidence and interest in the field of engineering [3,4,22] and personalidentification with engineering [6]. Professional identity has been studied in STEM fields as ameans of understanding the motivations, interests, and expectations of collegiate students [34]. A secondary focus is to improve retention rates and recruitment of students, especially thosewho are traditionally underrepresented in STEM fields. Prior research shows