making the learning experience engaging and motivatingfor students. This paper addresses results of a series of pilot studies that utilized hand-held devices,specifically an Analog Discovery (AD) Board, to support experimental centric, hands-on learningin introductory engineering classes. Pilots of use of the AD Boards were shown to be successfulacross a variety of instructional settings. The research undergirding the findings for this paper isderived from a collaborative grant-funded project supporting a consortium of 13 publicHistorically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) investigating the impact of using hands-onexperimental-based pedagogical techniques on instruction to teach circuits concepts inintroductory engineering
incorporate the constraints of global health technologies within engineering design at the undergraduate and graduate levels. She is the recipient of a CAREER Award from the National Science Foundation, a Teaching Innovation Prize from the UM Provost, and a UM Undergraduate Teaching Award. While at MIT, she was a winner of the MIT $50K Entrepreneurship Competition.Grace Louise Cravens Grace Cravens is a junior undergraduate student at the University of Michigan studying Industrial & Operations Engineering. She is from St. Joseph, MI, and has worked for Sienko Research Group since 2013.Ms. Linh Huynh c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Evaluating best practices when
” passive lecture methods. These pedagogies include challenge-basedlearning (e.g., problem-based learning (PBL), project-based learning, case-based learning,inquiry-based learning)1 and a multitude of active/collaborative techniques (e.g., think-pair-share,quick think, jigsaw, and gallery walk). All of these learning methods excel in student learning ofcontent as well as a variety of process skills such as critical thinking, higher-level reasoning,differentiating views of others, and teamwork.2, 3 They are also highly effective with individualstudent accountability. In addition, they have proved to be successful pedagogies within STEMeducation, in particular with regards to achievement, persistence, and attitudes.4In 2008, it was noticed that the
Professor 2010 to 2011. Task -Design, Fabrication and Testing of 2 & 3 Bladed Ultra-Low Speed Wind Turbines for Modular Applications • Post-Doctoral Fellowship sponsored by Sci- ence & Engineering Research Council, England 1980-1983. Designed, Analyzed and Simulated A 2-D Separation Bubble in a Subsonic Wind Tunnel. • Summer Research PI, at NASA-Glenn Research Lab, Cleveland, OH, 1991- 1996. Designed Student Recruitment, Nurturing, Retention, Graduation & Track- ing for Cleveland, Ohio community schools for Central State University benefit. Modeled flow transport processes in conical diffusers and turbine nozzles. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE (Summaries) Jan- uary 2013 – Present Adjunct & Research Professor
and the student working together to physically change the student’s brain.Zull reinforces the physical change idea by referring to the “biology of learning” as a wayof encouraging teachers to study the human brain.Educator Hardiman takes a similar tact in her book Connecting Brain Research withEffective Teaching: The Brain-Targeted Teaching Model23. She urges educators to“become better consumers of the mountains of research that have emerged since the1990s.” For example, she highlights the important role the physical environment plays inteaching and learning.We’ve all heard a struggling engineering student say “I don’t have the brains for this” orsomething similar. Perhaps you, like me, have said it to ourselves or others. Whateveryour or my
arousal.27,283 Methods and ToolsThe research performed under the NSF Engineering Education Grant #1158728: Research intoInstructional Content and Methodologies for Teaching Sustainability has been divided into twokey phases. During the first phase of the research, a multi-disciplinary team of researchersrepresenting engineering, science and technology studies, social sciences, education, andhumanities worked together performing catalyst studies to explore and identify effective cross-disciplinary methodologies for integrating instruction focused on aligning students’ personalvalues and behaviors in sustainability into existing course materials. Following these catalyststudies, larger case studies have focused on assessing scalable and
published in Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, International Journal of Public Administration, and Energy Policy.Dr. Rachel R. Stoiko, West Virginia University Dr. Rachel Stoiko is a postdoctoral fellow at West Virginia University. She is interested in the intersections of gender, work, and family. Specifically, she works on projects related to career decision-making and development, institutional diversity and inclusivity, and student success in STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 1 Dialogues toward Gender Equity: Engaging Engineering
Center dedicated to engineering education related initiatives and research focused on building diversity and enhancing the educational experience for all engineering students. Dr. Shehab teaches undergraduate and graduate level courses in ergonomics, work methods, experimental design, and statistical analysis. Her current research is with the Research Institute for STEM Education, a multi-disciplinary research group investigating factors related to equity and diversity in engineering student populations.Dr. Deborah A. Trytten, University of Oklahoma Dr. Deborah A. Trytten is a President’s Associates Presidential Professor and Associate Professor of Computer Science and Womens’ and Gender Studies at the University of
materials, 95% thought they were a "good value." Over half of the class did not use the discussion boards. Among those who used the discussion boards, o 67% "slightly agree" or "strongly agree" that the discussion boards helped them learn the material. o 63% "slightly agree" or "strongly agree" that the discussion boards created a sense of community. o 57% "slightly agree" or "strongly agree" that their questions on the discussion boards were answered in a reasonable amount of time. o 56% "slightly agree" or "strongly agree" that the student assistants were helpful in answering their