the summer prior tostarting at the university. These activities include a summer bridge program, a freshmanengineering success program, an introduction to engineering design course, a guaranteed paidinternship program, a service-learning project, two professional development seminars, and anenhanced capstone experience. In addition, students are supported by peer, faculty, and industrymentors.MotivationThe challenge of recruiting and graduating low-income engineering students is multi-faceted. Ofparticular importance to the University of Illinois at Chicago as a Minority Serving Institution, isthat racial and ethnic minoritized are often also low-income students. Solutions have focusedprimarily on broadening access via outreach, aggressive
Paper ID #9848Research Experience for Teachers Site: A Work-in Progress ReportDr. Vikram Kapila, Polytechnic Institute of New York University VIKRAM KAPILA is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering. His research interests are in control system technology, mechatronics, and K-12 STEM education. He directs an NSF funded Web-Enabled Mechatronics and Process Control Remote Laboratory, an NSF funded Research Experience for Teachers Site, and an NSF funded GK-12 Fellows project. He received NYU-Poly’s 2002, 2008, and 2011 Jacobs Excellence in Education Award
Engineering Education. As a member of the Integrated STEM Education Research Center (ISERC) at LaTech, Ethan’s primary research area is engineering design education with a focus on developing prototyping skills through both class-based projects and extra-curricular clubs, competitions, and activities. This includes a focus on hand-drawn sketches and how they are used as tools for generating ideas and visual communication, es- pecially when it involves the skill to generate quick and realistic sketches of an object or idea. He has also conducted research on the impact involvement in academic makerspaces has on students in engineering programs.Dr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Dr. Robert Nagel is an Associate
? Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 41-55.[4] Law, J. (1987). Technology, closure, and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In W. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technical systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 111-118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.[5] Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2005). Integrated engineering curricula. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147-164.[6] Kotys-Schwartz, D., Knight, D., & Pawlas, G. (2010). First-Year and Capstone Design Projects: Is the Bookend Curriculum Approach Effective for Skill Gain? Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education.[7] Cornwell, P
their cams to produce a final product in machinable ABS plastic.3.3 Capstone Design and Other Project-Based CoursesA variety of capstone projects exploited the CNC laboratory to manufacture wax and foam moldsfor products. Projects include wind turbine blade mold manufacturing, molded fixtures for plas-ma torches and molds for composite parts of a human-powered boat. These activities have allyielded hands-on CNC experiences that enrich the student experience by enabling direct studentparticipation in the build process.In addition to the courses that directly use the CNC laboratory, there are several other courses(Design Lab I and Design Lab II) that use recently acquired three-dimensional printing and lasercutting equipment in their projects
ofengineering scenarios, in particular focusing on participants’ thinking related to socially engagedaspects of engineering. In this study we sought to explore the extent to which our pre/postscenario-based study would enable us to address the following research question: How does whatindividual engineering students attend to vary from prior to receiving SET training to after? Wefocused on analyzing participants’ attention to people and context, two pillars of sociallyengaged design [12], [13].Participants. Participants were recruited from public institution in the Midwest. We advertisedour study to students in a mechanical engineering required capstone course by having instructorsshare our recruitment message with students via the university’s
equipment as required for class projects • Voluntary Involvement - students who self-reported using makerspace equipment for projects not required for class, such as personal projectsThe engineering design self-efficacy (hereafter EDSE or self-efficacy) questions on the survey,developed by Carberry, Lee, and Ohland [10], sought to understand student perceptions regardingtheir abilities to conduct engineering design tasks. From the scores reported by students on thesequestions, we were able to get a quantitative measurement for their confidence, motivation,expectation of success, and anxiety surrounding engineering design tasks. The scores wereanalyzed across different comparison groups to see existing trends.University
engineering at the University of Colorado Boulder. Scott’s research relates to accessible and inexpensive engineering equipment for laboratory education.Wendy Cagle, Western Carolina UniversityDr. Andrew Ritenour, Western Carolina University Andrew Ritenour is currently an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering + Technology at Western Carolina University (WCU). In addition to teaching in the field of electrical engineering, he coordinates the senior engineering capstone program which is a multidisciplinary, two-semester course sequence with projects sponsored by industrial partners. Within this role, he focuses on industrial outreach and the teaching and assessment of professional skills. Prior to joining WCU in 2018
World Technologies, a company started by former students of the capstone class that he teaches. His interests include engineering and entrepreneurship pedagogy and assessment, technology development, and clinical applications of biomedical instrumentation.Dr. Shane A. Brown P.E., Washington State University Shane Brown conducts research in conceptual and epistemological change, social capital, and diffusion of innovations. In 2011, he received the NSF CAREER Award to investigate how engineers think about and use concepts that academics consider to be important.Dr. Brian F. French, Washington State University Brian F. French is an Associate Professor of educational leadership and counseling psychology and Co- Director
’ Design Process Concept MapsIntroductionIn our ongoing exploration of this EAGER EEC NSF-funded project, we share results of thedesign concept maps part of our research project. This paper is intended to share formativedevelopment of a coding scheme to assess and evaluate drawings by undergraduate engineeringstudents of their engineering design process. There is a spectrum of student responses anddeveloping a taxonomy, or categorization, is helpful to better understand where students beginand end from a design project learning experience. This can then inform and illustrate the waysin which students balance breadth and depth and learn and apply their engineering know how.Design may appear throughout a curriculum or be substantiated as a capstone
been completed. These surveys aimed toaddress a range of inquiries, including participant learning experiences, program alignment withprofessional goals, and perceived impact on student learning. The surveys also exploredparticipant experiences with Network Improvement Communities, Capstone Projects,satisfaction ratings, and suggestions for improvement. Findings from surveys administeredacross three cohorts were presented, with some noted discrepancies in respondent numbers dueto survey instrument inconsistencies. Analysis consisted of summary statistics and T-tests wereused to assess the significance of difference between pre-, post-, and follow-up responses.The external evaluation consisted of a mixed-methods approach for data collection and
consensus to furtherenhance certain aspects of the program. In areas of quantifiable disagreement, faculty involvedwith the REU will discuss issues to determine a method to move forward. Ultimately, thismathematical algorithm will provide a tool for faculty to make decisions about the future of theREU program in the presence of uncertainty and limited survey data.The second concept is based on graph theory and is motivated by recent discussions at a NationalAcademy of Engineering, 2013 Frontiers in Engineering Education meeting attended by Oates.The concept, known as Epistemic Network Analysis, has been implemented at the University ofWisconsin3 in which a capstone design project included documentations of student interactions
, P.h.D., P.E., is the professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Mas- sachusetts Lowell and has previously lectured at University of Pennsylvania’s EXMSE Program and at the University of California Irvine. He is the coordinator of the Design and Manufacturing Certificate, the Quality Engineering Certificate, the ME senior Capstone Projects and COOP education at UML. He is a past chairman of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME) Robotics/FMS and a founding mem- ber of the Massachusetts Quality Award. He is the founder of the New England Lead Free Consortium. He is the author of several best-selling books on Concurrent Engineering, Six Sigma, Green Design and Engineering Project Management. He
. E. 2008. CII Research Needs: An Academic Perspective. Construction Industry Institute. Houston, Texas US< https://www. construction-institute. org/scriptcontent/rtc2008_acl. pdf>(date accessed: 06 April 2010).BRUNDIERS, K. & WIEK, A. 2011. Educating students in real-world sustainability research: vision and implementation. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 107-124.DANCZ, C., KETCHMAN, K., BURKE, R., HOTTLE, T., PARRISH, K., BILEC, M., & LANDIS, A, 2016. Utilizing Civil Engineering Senior Design Capstone Projects to Evaluate Students Sustainability Education Across Engineering Education. Manuscript submitted for publication.ELZOMOR, M., MANN, C., PARRISH, K. & CHESTER, M. 2015. Positioning Students
objects.Dr. Scott T. Huxtable, Virginia TechMr. Sathyanarayanan Subramanian, Virginia Tech I am a Graduate Mechanical Engineer at Virginia Tech, specializing in Thermal-Fluid Sciences.Prof. Zahed Siddique, University of Oklahoma Zahed Siddique is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering of University of Oklahoma. His research interest include product family design, advanced material and engineering education. He is interested in motivation of engineering students, peer-to-peer learning, flat learning environments, technology assisted engineering education and experiential learning. He is the coordinator of the industry sponsored capstone from at his school and is the advisor
the other 80%: engineering hope, Journal for Australasian Engineering Education, 14(1): 1-12.10.Bielefeldt, A.R., B. Amadei and R. Sandekian (2008). Community service attitudes of engi- neering students engaged in service learning projects, American Society for Engineering Edu- cation (ASEE) Conference and Exposition Proceedings, Paper 2008-2430, June 23-25, Pitts- burgh, PA.11.Bielefeldt, A.R., M.M. Dewoolkar, K.M. Caves, B.W. Berdanier, and K.G. Paterson (2011). Diverse Models for Incorporating Service Projects into Engineering Capstone Design Courses. International Journal of Engineering Education. 27(4):1-15.12.American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). (2008). Engineering Data Management System. Available at
for assessing student application on sustainability topics in engineering and includesquestions on the cognitive levels achieved, linkage between sustainability pillars (environmental,economic, social), quantitative versus qualitative incorporation of sustainability, and thesustainability topics students may have been exposed to during their undergraduate engineeringcareer18,21. The TUES 2 research team is in the process of publishing results from the applicationof the expanded version of this rubric on students’ senior design capstone and sustainableengineering course projects. The results will be used to inform student learning across acurriculum that integrates sustainability via stand-alone course, module, or blended methods.Table 1
iteration. This project isdescribed in more detail elsewhere.10 Students work in teams on to determine the best (optimal)input parameters to a industrially sized virtual CVD reactor, which deposits thin films onpolished silicon wafers. The experiments student teams design are performed virtually, through acomputer simulation. Thus, student teams are provided opportunities to practice the complete,iterative cycle of experimental design where they develop and refine their solution based onanalysis of experiments. Integral to their success is the ability to develop and operationalizemodels and identify appropriate strategies. This project has most commonly been delivered aspart of the senior-level capstone engineering projects course, but also has
formulate, solve, and properly tacklemultidisciplinary problems.Particularly, this paper addresses the effectiveness of combined virtual and physical hands-onactivities in students’ learning which was infused in the capstone senior design project. Seniordesign projects are open-ended and are similar to the research that scientists perform toward amore comprehensive understanding of nature or new scientific knowledge. As a reinforcedlearning methodology to greatly assist students’ reasoning and problem-solving skills, virtuallearning was first integrated at the planning stage of their projects. This approach is in contrastwith the typical senior design courses where only limited resources are available for planningexperiments. Using virtual learning
others metin-person. The content of the professional development also evolved over time. In yearone, the equity content was covered in isolation from the engineering projects with oneweek of equitable and inclusive STEM environment content followed by a week oftechnical experiences with the project-based engineering curriculum. In each subsequentyear, the leadership team recognized the need to better integrate these topics in futureyears to better emphasize the need for equity work to be embedded in STEM pedagogy,and not as something entirely separate. Perhaps the most important component of theprofessional development model was the Action Research for Equity Project (AREP) thatall participants engaged in as a capstone project for the year
always get that. But I think it is unique.Dominik had a similar observation about the long-term timeline for these projects andpartnerships, contrasting that timeline with more traditional design projects within the university. For example, most engineers go through a capstone program that's either six months or 12 months. That's a lot shorter than four years. And your horizon for things to go wrong and your horizon to get very deep technical in that timeframe is much less than a four- year project. So, I think it affords the opportunity to go deeper, broader, and gain skill in bringing new people into the fold, solving more technically complex problems. And it really gives the time horizon to work through
any area [21]. The Gallup-Purdue index went on to find how satisfied alumni were with their alma maters.It was found that if the alumni felt that their college prepared them for life, their engagement atwork was tripled. The important ways that the university environment prepared them for lifeincluded six elements. The student needed a professor that supported them, got them excitedabout learning, and encouraged their dreams. The more engaged employees also had meaningfulinternships, worked on a project that took a year or more, and were actively engaged inextracurriculars during their college career. Others continued the research to determine whattypes of interactions created the most impactful faculty-student interactions. They agreed
continues into the second year.These positive results indicate that it would likely be advantageous to transition this program to amulti-university project to more effectively demonstrate the robustness of the process for RisingScholar students.I. Background and structure of the Rising Scholars ProgramThe project, NSF S-STEM 1644143: Rising Scholars: Web of Support used as an Indicator ofSuccess in Engineering, is a research/scholarship program that was initiated in September 2016at Purdue University. The research portion of the program was designed to determine whetherhaving a strong support network could outweigh high school grades and test scores in predictingsuccess in STEM majors, particularly engineering. ‘Rising Scholars’ (RS) is the
impacts are not primary learning goals for the course Graduate-level course 34 Senior capstone design 28 First year introductory course that include ethics among other topics 24 First year design-focused course that includes ethics among other learning 21 goals Professional issues course (any level; e.g. project management, 14 communications) Other 14 Full course
Paper ID #8971Assessment of Product Archaeology as a Framework for Contextualizing En-gineering DesignDr. Kemper Lewis, University at Buffalo, SUNY Kemper Lewis is a Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University at Buffalo - SUNY. He is the project PI for the collaborative NSF TUES grant, ”Assessment of Product Archaeology as a Framework for Contextualizing Engineering Design”. The project is a collaborative effort between the University at Buffalo - SUNY, Arizona State University, Penn State University, Northwestern University, Bucknell University, and Virginia Tech.Dr. Deborah A. Moore-Russo
gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation awardnumber 1626362. Dr. Abby Ilumoka is the program manager. The authors offer their sincerethanks to all of the students that have participated in the Vertically-Integrated Projects team onHands-On Learning at Georgia Tech..References:[1] N.G. Holmes and C.E. Wieman, “Introductory physics labs: We can do better,” PhysicsToday, Vol. 71, No. 1, 38 (2018); doi: 10.1063/PT.3.3816[2] M. Koretsky, C. Kelly, and E. Gummer, “Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory:Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories,Journal of Engineering Education, Vol 100, No. 3, pp 540-573, 2011.[3] A. Hofstein and V.N. Lunetta, V.N., "The Laboratory in
of the “hardware” for the HPT (air engine,planetary gearset, tachometer, etc.) in earlier semesters. The control system is the “capstone” forthe five-semester design project, which has been described in an earlier publication [1]. Thispaper describes the development of the “faculty prototype” of the control system, and givespreliminary results of implementing the control system design project in the classroom.IntroductionToyota has been recognized for developingcutting-edge hybrid systems. Specifically, theyhave developed and implemented the ToyotaHybrid System (THS) which combines agasoline engine and an electric motor, with theadvantage of not requiring external charging.According to the Toyota [2] the THS II systemachieves nearly twice
problems, developing knowledge that supports designers and decision-makers. Dr. Layton is an expert on bio-inspired systems design, with a focus on the use of biological ecosystems as inspiration for achieving sustainability and resilience in the design of complex human networks/systems/systems of systems. Examples include industrial resource networks, makerspaces, power grids, cyber-physical systems, supply chains, innovation processes, and water distribution networks. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Quantitative Network Analysis for Benchmarking and Improving Makerspaces: Project OutcomesAbstract: Makerspaces on university campuses have seen
Paper ID #12742Dispelling Student Myths about Writing in Civil EngineeringDr. Susan Conrad, Portland State University Susan Conrad, Professor of Applied Linguistics, is the head of the Civil Engineering Writing Project, in which engineering faculty, engineering practitioners, and writing specialists collaborate to improve writ- ing instruction in civil engineering courses. She has written numerous articles and books about English grammar, discourse, and corpus linguistics. Page 26.552.1
following metrics will be used to compare thedifference between the two groups throughout the 4 years of the project: retention in engineeringand major, graduation rates, GPA, design self-efficacy, demographics (gender, race, andethnicity), and idea generation ability.A quasi-experimental approach will be used to compare students that are highly engaged inuniversity maker spaces to those that are not. This study will be performed at the GeorgiaInstitute of Technology, James Madison University, and Texas States University. Participantswill be recruited from multiple engineering design classes (e.g. capstone courses) and they willself-report their engagement in the university maker space throughout their career. This data willbe used to separate the