AC 2008-1603: DEVELOPING A JOINT ENGINEERING/BUSINESS SCHOOLENTREPRENEURIAL CURRICULUMTimothy Faley, University f MichiganPeter Adriaens, University of Michigan Page 13.384.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Approach to Building a Graduate-level Engineering and Business collaborative entrepreneurial curriculum American Society of Engineering Education AC2008-1603 re-submitted March 2008AbstractTechnology-based entrepreneurship, regardless of whether it takes place within a largeorganization or in a startup, requires a mixture of technological and business skills. Our aim indeveloping a joint graduate
solid foundation for the duration of astudent’s professional life, which will span several decades. With this in mind, there are severalreasons we believe that ECE should be defined and widely recognized as a unified undergraduatediscipline. Page 13.477.3Breadth of ECE TechnologiesIt would be difficult today to describe any of the most interesting or important problems,challenges, or technologies that practitioners of ECE address as falling cleanly into either EE orCE. We can see this in any of a large number of examples, some of which are shown in Figure2. For example, engineers involved in today’s energy systems must of course understand
, M.M. Morcos, “Hands-on, minds-on electric power education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 1, Jan. 2001, pp. 93-99.12. C.J. Finelli, A. Klinger, D.D. Budny, “Strategies for improving the classroom environment,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 90, no. 4, Oct. 2001, pp. 491-497.13. S. Shooter, M. McNeill, “Interdisciplinary collaborative learning in mechatronics at Bucknell University,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 91, no. 3, July 2002, pp. 339-344.14. T.W. Simpson, “Experiences with a hands-on activity to contrast craft production and mass production in the classroom,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 19, no. 2, 2003, pp. 297-304.15. R.S. Ascough
to jog their memories -- and discourage them from, as often happens with engineeringstudents -- and engineers -- from just building whatever comes to mind. We tried to encourage athoughtful and analytical design phase before building started -- but we were not alwayssuccessful.4 Course AssessmentThis course has, in various altered forms, been offered six times over the last eight years.Originally, it used Handy Board - based Lego robots. Over the years the processor technologyhas improved along with the platform tools available to the students. Creates were added to the Proceedings of the 2008 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education
Australiaand Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3(2), 101-134.20. Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-actionrepertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313-332.21. Pink, D. (2005). A Whole New Mind: Moving from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age. Bob Land:Amazon Remainders Account.22. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1),57-72.23. Clewell, B. C., & Campbell, P. B. (2002). Taking Stock: Where We've Been, Where We Are, Where We'reGoing. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 255-284.24. Watson, K., & Froyd, J. (2007). Diversifying the U.S. Engineering Workforce: A
. Figure 3: Students who are not interested in pursuing Study Abroad possibilities (2005-07)It is evident that students enter the engineering program with an open mind for pursuing studyabroad programs. It is the responsibility of educators to motivate and prepare them for globaleducation. In fall of 2007, we encouraged our students to attend The Engineering EducationAbroad Fair hosted by the Student Engineers Abroad Council at this university. Two posterswere presented by the Department of Engineering Education at this fair- “Internationalizing theFreshman Engineering Program” xviand “Implementation of International Activities in aFreshman Engineering Course”xvii. Many of our freshman students attended this fair and wereexposed to numerous on
, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.3. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K. (1988). “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education,” Engineering Education, Vol. 78, No. 7, 674-681.4. Herrmann, N. (1995). The Creative Brain, The Ned Herrmann Group, Lake Lure, North Carolina.5. Dunn, R. (1990). “Understanding the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model and the need for individual diagnosis and prescription,” Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 6:223-247.6. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, HarperCollins Publishers, New York.7. Klosky, J. L., Ressler, S. J., and Erickson, J. (2005). “AIM for Better Student Learning: Using Instant Messaging to Facilitate Improved
AC 2008-1195: IN-CLASS CREATIVITY EXERCISES FOR ENGINEERINGSTUDENTSJonathan Weaver, University of Detroit MercyKarim Muci-Küchler, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Page 13.723.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 In-Class Creativity Exercises for Engineering StudentsAbstractThe flattening of the world is rejuvenating the call for engineering educators to better developstudents that are creative and innovative so that they can have a clear advantage in a verycompetitive global economy. Much has been written and many exercises developed in responseto this calling. Unfortunately, while many such exercises are fun and engaging and serve
the challenges and lessons we, theSTEM professionals on the team, learned in our struggle to build a mutually respectful, trust-based, and symbiotic relationship with our social science partners. In the spirit of an authenticpartnership, our anthropology colleague also faced challenges and grew intellectually through theexperiences of this collaboration, but that story is for a different audience. Hopefully our storywill inspire other engineering education researchers to not just use social science techniques andtheories when expedient to do so, but to open their minds to new ways of thinking, investigating,and reporting.The Research Institute for STEM Education (RISE) [22] grew from conversations in fall 2001around ideas for a proposal to
AC 2008-134: SURVIVING ENGINEERING: FROM A MINORITY FEMALEPERSPECTIVEJacquelyn Mobley, Ecology & Environment, Inc. Page 13.1125.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Surviving Engineering: From a Minority Female Perspective Jacquelyn R. Mobley, P.E.Abstract – As a practicing female under-represented minority in the field of engineering, I have wonderedwhat I could do to help in the retention and development of minority and women engineering students. Ihave always felt that I represented a unique perspective as one who has lived through the struggle andsurvived. This paper highlights my struggles
AC 2008-2230: A PRACTICE-INTEGRATED UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUMIN MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGMark Yim, University of Pennsylvania Mark Yim is the Gabel Family Term Junior Professor in Mechanical Engineering and MEAM Undergraduate Curriculum Chair. His research interests include: Modular reconfigurable robots and locomotion, PolyBot; flying robotic mechanisms and haptic devices.Katherine Kuchenbecker, University of Pennsylvania Katherine J. Kuchenbecker is the Skirkanich Assistant Professor of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics at the University of Pennsylvania. Her primary research interest is the design and control of haptic interfaces for virtual environments and teleoperation
AC 2008-725: LEARNING THROUGH ERROR RECOGNITION USING THETHREE STRIKES METHODGary Steffen, Indiana University-Purdue University-Fort Wayne Page 13.846.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Learning Through Error Recognition Using the Three Strikes MethodAbstractFrom the collapse of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, to the crash of the Mars Climate Orbiter,simple mistakes can have catastrophic effects. From the ashes of such mistakes, come importantlessons learned and the hope of never repeating them. Discovery of mistakes can be a valuablelearning tool that can leave a lasting impression on those who make the discovery.Throughout
Development (MIDFIELD), compiles institutional data,including demographic and academic transcript records and Fundamentals of Engineering (FE)scores, from nine universities from 1987-2005. In this paper, we propose a design to combinedata from the two databases to assess the correspondence between the self-reported studentlearning outcome measures in the Engineering Change study and the MIDFIELD dataset'sinformation on program-level performance on the FE examination, the only objective test ofstudents’ engineering knowledge.IntroductionThroughout its history, U.S. higher education has been mindful of questions about educationalquality and institutional accountability. Formal accreditation mechanisms emerged in the early20th century. Although the
AC 2008-924: TEACHING CRITICAL THINKING USING UNDERSTANDING BYDESIGNSergio Sgro, Eastern Kentucky UniversitySteve Freeman, Iowa State University Page 13.1155.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Teaching Critical Thinking using Understanding by Design Curriculum Development Methods“It is only when students apply what they are learning to actual situations or problems that theycome to see the value in what they are learning”2 (p. 4).IntroductionAcademia is buzzing with the idea of teaching students to think critically and creatively. Thisarticle introduces the reader to the use of the Understanding by Design5 methodology, alsoknown
be asked to transcend traditional engineering design inorder to participate in the design of sustainable societies. With that image in mind, the Centerfor Sustainable Engineering defines “sustainable engineering” as “engineering for humandevelopment that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needs.” (17)With these thoughts in mind, and a defined focus on sustainability and engineering design in ournew curriculum, we defined the “sustainable design process” in our curriculum to be theintegration of four distinct elements into teaching the engineering design process. Theseelements are the: technical requirements, economic requirements, environmental requirements,and social
physical world with the analytical world of engineering. And based on both student andalumni feedback, the models played a significant role in their learning process.It is the hope of the author that using models helps students better understand structures andbetter understand the role of the architectural engineer. There is no scientific method to proclaimthis is the answer for training young architectural engineering minds about structures andbuilding technology, but in all of the courses the students become engaged when they work withtheir hands and minds in a creative environment. And personally, this is the first hurdle tolearning. If these classes were taught in a pure lecture setting, topics such as tolerances andconcrete finishes could be
. Page 13.958.85. DiscussionIn light of the above assessment results and student feedback, our initial LF adaptation wasmodified. The modification was made to address two themes that clearly arose from theevaluations and feedback from focus groups, namely: to allow students more time to carry outthe required machining tasks, and to expose students to additional manufacturing processes. Withthis in mind, the product made by the students was changed from a model engine to the modelmachine vise shown in Figure 2. The vise entails simpler machining work while still exposingstudents to the same types of hands-on operations. The simplified project can therefore becompleted in less time and the balance of the time used to give students more hands
outcomes in the Foundational category underpin the remaining technical andprofessional outcomes as well as form the basis for a well-educated civil engineer of the 21stcentury. They align with the four core areas of liberal learning (learning that frees the mind fromconstrained thinking): Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences. Theeducation of civil engineers formerly emphasized Mathematics and Natural Sciences and the firstedition of the Body of Knowledge (BOK1) has three outcomes for these two areas including oneeach for Mathematics, Chemistry and Physics. There are no specific outcomes for Humanities orSocial Sciences in BOK1. The new Civil Engineering BOK2 recognizes the importance of thefour foundational areas of
practice.Appendix – II: Student Feedback“Machine Design class was one of my first experiences with the “real world” engineering in a schoolapplication. This class was integrated to provide us with real life situations, that engineers encounterevery day. All of the four learning objectives were touched in this project, with more weighing more thanthe other. The first learning objective of this course was to develop, set-up and solve mechanical component designproblems based upon given upon given data and requirements. Each person was given a starting point(design requirements) and an end point (common goal of making a complete subsystem). The stuff inbetween was solely up to each group. With that in mind, our group was responsible for setting up andsolving
AC 2008-1419: KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY’S ELITE SCHOLARSHIPPROGRAM:ENHANCING LIVES THROUGH TECHNOLOGY ANDENGINEERINGRaju Dandu, Kansas State University at Salina Raju S. Dandu is the program coordinator and professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Kansas State University at Salina. He teaches courses in CNC Machine Processes, Material Strength and Testing, Advanced CAD/CAM, Industrial Instrumentation and Controls, and Automated Manufacturing Systems II. He is active in offering workforce training in reliability centered maintenance, CE certification, process instrumentation and PLCs. His areas of interest are: Product risk analysis, Reliability Centered Maintenance, Energy Efficient Lighting
AC 2008-1229: TECHNOLOGIES OF NANOTECHNOLOGYHelen McNally, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. McNally is an assistant Professor or Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University. She is a member of the Birck Nanotechnology Center and the Bindley Bioscience Center (BBC) at Purdue’s Discovery Park. Dr. McNally currently directs the BBC Biological Atomic Force Microscopy (BioAFM) Facility. Dr. McNally’s research interests involve the development and integration of scanning probe technologies for fluid applications. She is currently developing BioAFM short courses and courses in nano and bio technology at the graduate and undergraduate levels. Her interest also includes
AC 2008-348: USING E-PORTFOLIOS FOR PROGRAM ASSESSMENT: SOMEOBSERVATIONSVirendra Varma, Missouri Western State University Virendra Varma, Ph.D., P.E., is Professor and Chairman of the Department of Engineering Technology at Missouri Western State University.Tina Varma, University of Central Missouri Tina Varma, Ph.D., is Assistant Professor of Curriculum and Instruction at the University of Central Missouri. Page 13.1336.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Using E-portfolios for Program Assessment: Some ConsiderationsAbstractIn the Internet age, electronic portfolios (e-portfolios) are
AC 2008-499: INTEGRATING APPLICATIONS IN THE TEACHING OFFUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTSPatricia Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc Patricia B. Campbell, President of Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc, has been involved in educational research and evaluation with a focus on science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education and issues of race/ethnicity, gender and disability since the mid 1970's. Dr. Campbell, formerly a professor of research, measurement and statistics at Georgia State University, has authored more than 100 publications.Eann Patterson, Michigan State University Eann Patterson taught Mechanics of Solids for twenty years at the University of Sheffield
AC 2008-1282: WATCHING VIDEOS IMPROVES LEARNING?Jakob Bruhl, United States Military Academy Major Jakob Bruhl is an Instructor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy at West Point. MAJ Bruhl received his B.S. and in Civil Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology (1996). He earned a M.S degree in Engineering Management from the University of Missouri at Rolla (2000) and a M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign (2006). He is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri.James Klosky, United States Military Academy Led Klosky is an Associate Professor and Director of the Mechanics Group in
AC 2008-1411: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO TRANSPORTATIONEDUCATIONGreg Waidley, University of Wisconsin - MadisonJason Bittner, University of Wisconsin - Madison Page 13.188.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 An Interdisciplinary Approach to Transportation EducationAbstractOur current transportation system is a manifestation of the decisions made by transportationprofessionals in our somewhat recent past. Those decisions were influenced by the education thattransportation professionals received and by their approaches to problem solving set forth by aculture imbedded in them throughout their professional lives.We are now acutely aware of the
engineering software packages. The wide availability of MS Excel contributes toits use. With this in mind, an Add-in for MS Excel is being developed to provide a usefulpackage of engineering functions for heat transfer instruction. The initial Add-in was developedto calculate the dimensionless temperature for 1-D transient heat conduction in a solid. TheAdd-in includes 4 functions which handle a plane wall, infinite cylinder, sphere and semi-infinitesolid. Additional modules have been developed to calculate the local or average Nusselt numberfor internal or external flows and the view factors for different 3-D radiation heat transfer set-ups. Currently, these three modules are presented separately as part of a Heat Transfer course,but could be
Page 13.1123.4 graduates in these countries with respect to their population. Of course, other importantfactors, such as quality of education and the level of country development, must be takeninto account for the comprehensive analysis of the problem, but these numbers show therelative volume of brain power produced by two main fast-developing countries. We need tobear in mind that other developed and developing countries also educate a great number ofengineers to fully satisfy their world. In contrast, according to Mark Hurd, chairman andCEO of Hewlett-Packard, the world’s largest technology vendor in terms of sales, theUnited States “is graduating more sports management professionals than engineers, whichisn’t good in a global economy where
AC 2008-1900: INCORPORATING AND ASSESSING ABET “SOFT SKILLS” INTHE TECHNICAL CURRICULUMTimothy Skvarenina, Purdue University Tim Skvarenina was born in Chicago, Illinois. He received the BSEE and MSEE degrees from the Illinois Institute of Technology and the Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Purdue University. During his college career he worked four summers at U.S. Steel as an assistant electrician, rewinding motors and installing electrical equipment. He served 21 years in the U.S. Air Force, including six years designing, constructing, and inspecting electric power distribution projects for a variety of facilities. He spent five years teaching and researching pulsed power systems
AC 2008-2543: ENHANCING ENGINEERING EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMESTHROUGH INTEGRATION OF NEW VISION FOR CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURESWITH NANOTECHNOLOGY INTO UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM ANDITS IMPLEMENTATION RESULTSWei Zheng, Jackson State University Dr. Wei Zheng currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering at Jackson State University. He received his Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Madison in 2001. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Wisconsin and has over10-year industrial experience.HuiRu Shih, Jackson State University Dr. HuiRu (H.R.) Shih is a Professor of Technology at Jackson State University (JSU). He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering
supervisor. Dr. Schaffer has received numerous awards and recognitions in his academic career including Rookie of the Year and Faculty of the Year awards at North Georgia State University and the Trustee’s Teaching Award, the Outstanding Teacher Award, and the Faculty Colloquium on Excellence in Teaching at the Purdue School of Engineering and Technology at IUPUI. He is published in a variety of outlets including the Journal of Engineering Technology, Journal of Business and Management, and Journal of Management Education.Joseph Dues, Purdue University-New AlbanyTimothy Cooley, Purdue University-New AlbanyDamon Sisk, Purdue University-New Albany