engineering students enrolled in a workexperience course, 47% of the students described the task of finding technical reports as difficult[7]. In addition, undergraduate students often have erroneous perceptions about the ethical use ofinformation found on the web and the need to include citations [12].Literature ReviewLibrarians and engineering professors have tried many approaches to solve the problemspreviously noted in student assignments. Some notable examples have shown success inredesigning an assignment to emphasize information fluency skills in combination withinstruction from a librarian. Williams, Blowers and Goldberg [14] incorporated informationfluency into a thermodynamics course by revising assignments to require students to find data
projects can support diversestudents to begin developing an understanding of professional ethics and empathy as central tothe work of designers. Our purpose is to examine student learning connected to a designchallenge in two first-year courses: one in the chemical & biological engineering department andone in community & regional planning program within the school of architecture and planningdepartment; both courses were taught in the same research university in the southwestern US,which serves a very diverse population. We conducted two iterations in a design-based researchprocess. Design-based research involves testing both theory of and designs for learning underreal world conditions. Our learning theory is that diverse populations
] “Problem solver” [5] “Problem Solving”Problem solving (E) X X [6] “Adaptive” [5] “Learning Organization”Continuing Education (S) X X [15]Work Ethic (S) X X “Ethics” [28] “Ethical Leadership” [29]Decision Making (M) X “Decision Making” [30] “ROOT and Business” [31] “BusinessBusiness Acumen (M) X
program, continuing education, experience,and mentoring: material sciences, mechanics, experiments, problem recognition and solving,design, sustainability, contemporary issues and historical perspective, risk and uncertainty,project management, breadth in civil engineering, and technical specialization.(C) Professional outcomes achieved through the degree program, experience and mentoring:communications, public policy, business and public administration, globalization, leadership,teamwork, attitudes, and professional and ethical responsibility.Detailed commentaries on these outcomes, along with their rubrics in the cognitive domain andthe desired level of achievement can be found in the report published by the BOK2 TaskCommittee [1]The BOK3TC
Paper ID #22414From ’Empathic Design’ to ’Empathic Engineering’: Toward a Genealogy ofEmpathy in Engineering EducationDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Ohio State University Xiaofeng Tang is an Assistant Professor of Practice in the Department of Engineering Education at the Ohio State University. He worked as a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 From “Empathic Design” to “Empathic Engineering”: Toward a Genealogy of
industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Bevlee A. Watford, Virginia Tech Watford is Professor of Engineering Education, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity. She is currently President of ASEE.Dr. Christian Matheis, I concurrently serve as Visiting Assistant Professor in the School of Public and International Affairs, and as Director of the Graduate School Office of Recruitment and Diversity Initiatives at Virginia Tech. My research specializations include ethics, political philosophy, and philosophy of liberation. Within these areas, I concentrate on public policy, feminism, race, migration and refugees, and similar topics.Dr. Kim Lester
engineer and project manager on projects throughout the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, nonverbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Revising the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (BOK): The Application of the Cognitive Domain of Bloom’s TaxonomyAbstractIn October, 2016, The American Society of Civil Engineers
in the P-20 realm,individuals will be required to ethically decide the profit margins derived from emergenteducational processes. Innovative solutions are needed to address the rising cost of education. EngineeringTechnology programs were started as a cost effective and innovative method to fill neededtechnology positions within engineering technology job fields (Ford & Ball, 2011). P-20 leadersneed to be aware of policies that affect the ability to pay for college. The availability of grantsand federal loan programs help students to cover costs. However, there is data that suggestsWhite and Asian students benefit from these programs at a higher rate than underrepresentedminorities such as African American or Latino students (St
engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a
pursued byengineers to gain visibility, achieve relevance, and influence the public. The profession ofnursing offers three advantages as compared to the profession of engineering in terms ofeffective public engagement, including: 1) trust (i.e., Gallop shows nursing as the “most trusted”profession for 15 years running); 2) gender bias (i.e., the profession of nursing is primarilycomposed of females, which the engineering profession claims is an important target audiencefor marketing efforts); and 3) professionalism (i.e., the canons of ethics for nurses emphasize theimportance of the patient – and hence the value of the individual – while the canon of ethics forengineers emphasize the importance of the nameless “public” – and hence looses the
“ademonstrated capacity to think critically, communicate clearly, and solve complex problems ismore important than [a candidate’s] undergraduate major.” More than 90% of those surveyedsaid that it is important that those they hire demonstrate ethical judgment and integrity;intercultural skills; and the capacity for continued new learning. Other motivators come fromsources such as Academically Adrift [1] and Creating Innovators [5] whose focus is on the needfor demonstrated learning on college campuses [1] and the need to create learning environmentsto foster collaboration and creativity, allowing for and embracing “failure” [5]. Nearly 40 faculty were selected through an application process to participate in whatwould eventually become the
number and type of design criteria comprising the rubric. The completed rubric willprovide engineering educators and students with a learning and assessment tool to enhancesustainable design outcomes of projects.IntroductionDuring the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, a special session posed a question about howengineering educators can assess “difficult to measure” learning outcomes like sustainability,ethics, entrepreneurship, etc. Panelists presented numerous examples of assessment tools andmethods that could be used to benchmark and measure learning gains in each difficult area. Afollow-up systematic literature review focused on “sustainability assessments” in ASEEproceedings identified twenty-nine recent publications describing various tools and
computing-based solution to meet a given set of computing requirements in the context of the program’s discipline. 3. Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts. 4. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles. 5. Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in activities appropriate to the program’s discipline.• Criterion 5, Curriculum Now Required • Principles and practices for security for all computing programs 9Program Criteria: Highlights• CS • Required additional student outcome • Curricular changes – highlights
Engineering Endorsement Responsibility Matrix. The Delphiparticipants reviewed the taxonometric structure and identified and prioritized the core conceptsand sub concepts for each content area to serve as the foundation for the knowledge dimension ofengineering literacy. Participants were organized into four focus groups, one for each Fundamental ContentArea: Quantitative Analysis, Engineering Design, Ethics and Society, and Materials Processingand then each Technical Content Area: Mechanical, Electrical, Chemical, Civil. Each focusgroup was comprised of at least one high school teacher and one engineer or engineeringeducator. Participants were asked to revise the core and sub concepts for each content area as agroup based on the following
in their own section(s) anddivide the classes up into student groups of 4-5 students. Our instructional team consistscompletely of teaching professionals (non-tenure track faculty) with a variety of backgroundsand industry experience. In order to make mentoring 10 to 20 teams tractable, all students teamscomplete the same design challenge. Creating a “good” design challenge is crucial, as the coursedoes more than simply teach the design process (see Figure 1). Teaming and leadership skills,project management, ethics, and technical communication are important outcomes for the course.All of these “Soft-skill” areas are made more palatable to our students if our design challenge isengaging and fun.With eleven different engineering disciplines
Professional Practices in Engineering and Engineering in the Humanistic Context which are courses focused on exploring a wide range of leadership, management & ethical issues confronting engineers and engineering students on a day-to-day basis. Prof. Falcone is a registered professional engineer, a diplomat in the American Academy of Water Resources Engineers, a retired Captain of the U.S. Navy, a former William C. Foster fellow at the U.S. Department of State and a consultant for the U.S. Department of State in the field of International Arms Control. In 2017, he was awarded the EDUCATOR OF THE YEAR Award from the American Society of Civil Engineers, Philadelphia Section.Dr. Andrea L. Welker, Villanova University Dr
spreadthroughout the semester and weekly lectures which focused for five weeks on areas ofbiomedical engineering with the remaining lectures being divided between professionalism,ethics, and curriculum information. A final design project was included but it was entirelytheoretical with minimal instruction provided on the design process. The 2016 class included 51students who attending lecture together but were divided across 3 sections for workshops.In the fall of 2017, the course was restructured. The lectures were mostly recreated to focus on asemester-long design project, but a handful were maintained to cover professionalism, ethics,and curriculum information. Students attended weekly two-hour workshops instead of 3 persemester which were used to
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He received his B.S. in Computer Engineering from Sharif University of Technology in 2008 and his M.B.A. from University of Tehran in 2011. He has presented his research in past years at multiple conferences including American Evaluation Association, International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, and Academy of Human Resource Development. In His dissertation, he focused on ethical decision making processes among computer majors. His research interests include ethics educa- tion, computer ethics, talent development, online learning, and evaluation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
Paper ID #21686Environmental Considerations in Engineering: Students’ Goals and JourneysDr. Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder Angela Bielefeldt is a professor at the University of Colorado Boulder in the Department of Civil, En- vironmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE). She is a licensed PE and has served as the ABET assessment coordinator in her department since 2008. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in en- gineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg
engineering education.Dr. Qin Zhu, Colorado School of Mines Qin Zhu is Research Assistant Professor in the Ethics Across Campus Program and the Division of Hu- manities, Arts & Social Sciences at Colorado School of Mines, where he is also helping with managing the Daniels Fund Faculty Fellows Program that provides scholarly and grant support for faculty to explore ways to integrate ethics into their applied science and engineering curricula. Qin is also completing his second PhD degree in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Qin holds a bachelor’s degree in Materials Engineering and a PhD in Philosophy (concentration in Ethics of Technology and Engineering) from Dalian University of Technology (DUT
distinction between technical and professional is often blurred.Initially the committee attempted to classify all 21 proposed outcomes using both the cognitiveand affective domains. However, it proved difficult to distinguish the difference betweenTable 4. Example of Actions Demonstrating Affective Attainment. Level Example Receiving Individual reads a book passage and recognizes the relationship to ethical behavior. Responding Individual participates in a discussion about the book, reads another book by the same author or another book about ethical behavior, etc. Valuing The individual demonstrates this by voluntarily attending a
professional and ethical development activities. A course brick is a course structurewith ABET student outcomes embedded in it. In the second dimension, the communitycreation, students pursue a diverse set of opportunities unique to their personal interests andgoals such as clinical, research, and entrepreneurial experiences to be realized in partnershipwith other academic divisions including the medical school, business school, college ofveterinary medicine, college of design, or college of arts and sciences. In the third dimension,professional development, students assimilate a rich set of professional skills. The pedagogicaltheory behind the 3D Undergraduate Experience is competency-based learning (CBL). CBL isespecially effective in
-project so students can apply EM knowledge to a real(istic) scenario and the resulting consequences. Students focus on technical aspects and analyze social and technical consequences. • Redesign classroom assessment rubrics to incorporate engineering habits of mind. Include sections for systems thinking (technical aspects), innovation (design aspects), adaptations and improvements (iterative processes), socio-cultural and ethical considerations (social aspects), communication (understanding the problem and considering multiple perspectives), collaboration (teamwork and fostering new strategies), and finally sociotechnical integration (understanding emergent factors).The Projects course taught at
values commitments. From where we sit in 2018, wehave the opportunity to incorporate lessons learned from past efforts, to use the most effectivecurricula and pedagogy, and fight for the values we hold dear. The alt-right is trying to instillvalues of hate in our students, values that run contrary to those of our institutions and ourprofession. We need to band together and say Not in Our Town, Not on Our Campus. 20Review of Arguments for Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice in EngineeringAt their core, arguments supporting diversity, inclusion, and social justice are ethical arguments;they contain a moral “ought,” and articulate an aspirational state for which we strive. Somearguments are made from appeals to enduring principles like
number and data structure (Big Idea #3: Data and Information) A simple tour in programming (Big Idea #4: Algorithms, Big Idea #5: Programming) Construct a simple website (Big Idea #1: Creativity) Computer hardware organization in a regular desktop computer (Big Idea #2: Abstraction) Different types of operating systems (Big Idea #2: Abstraction) Cutting-edge computing technologies such as Cloud Computing and Internet of Things (Big Idea #6: The Internet) Ethics in Computer Science (Big Idea #7: Global Impact)Our online course is divided into eight units. Each unit includes three theoretical sessions andone hands-on session. The course also includes four online discussion sessions. The four-weekonline course
easier to meet than the existingrequirements and present increased flexibility for many programs.Criterion 3 ChangesThe current Criterion 3 (a)-(k) student outcomes1 which have been unchanged since theywere adopted as part of EC2000 are:Student outcomes are outcomes (a) through (k) plus any additional outcomes that may bearticulated by the program.(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs withinrealistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, healthand safety, manufacturability, and sustainability(d) an ability to
importance of traditionallearning pedagogies combined with experiential learning has been shown to increase overallcognitive competency [7] - [9]. To maintain relevancy and competitiveness in engineeringeducation, hands-on learning experiences with a global perspective needs to be integrated intothe curriculum [10], [11]. We believe critical skills such as empathizing, weighing ethicalconsiderations and effective communication are needed by graduates to navigate the 21st centuryglobal societal needs [12] - [17]. These learning opportunities could allow them to learn andpractice empathetical and ethical decision making with people from diverse backgrounds.Central to this capability is to provide the students with experiential learning opportunities
design and conduct experiments, as engineering, science, and mathematics well as to analyze, and interpret data 2) an ability to apply engineering design to producec) an ability to design a system, component, or process solutions that meet specified needs with to meet desired needs within realistic constraints consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, such as economic, environmental, social, political, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and and economic factors sustainability 3) an ability to communicate effectively with a ranged) an ability to function on
, and tools for interrupting implicit bias. In addition, the curriculum incorporates ethics in engineering and engineering social responsibility. The paper will describe our experiences, strategies, and challenges in developing and implementing diversity and inclusion curriculum within the engineering living and learning programs, and discuss ways to consider incorporating diversity and inclusion programs and practices in various engineering contexts. 1 The mission and vision of the Women in Engineering Program at the University ofMaryland College Park (UMD) is to cultivate inclusive and diverse
wewant to increase the diversity of the cybersecurity workforce because one good indicator ofcareer interests for adolescents is their choice of leisure and extra-curricular activity3.Tangentially, we also recognize that while computer-skills are critically important to acybersecurity professional, professionals in cybersecurity also are required to have a widebreadth of skills. This broader set of skills include critical thinking, teamwork, communication aswell as being well versed in privacy, ethics, and legal aspects of cybersecurity.To expand demographic participation in cybersecurity and the diversity of the cybersecurityworkforce, we believe that cybersecurity competitions at the formative ages should focus on abroader set of cybersecurity