endemic, students simply did not feel comfortable publiclyconfronting teammates with poor ratings in the report, worrying about hard feelings andretribution from slighted teammates. Another drawback was the considerable effort required toproduce the report, coming precisely at the crux of team effort, where teams were struggling tofinish up projects at term’s end.3.2 Version 2: Anonymous Evaluation, Individual ReportsIn the next iteration of our system, the peer evaluations were made anonymous, and restricted tothe one-page questionnaire of ratings and comments; no Teamwork Report was required.Students were explicitly promised anonymity of peer evaluations in the course syllabus, and peerevaluations were emailed directly to the instructor by
targetcourse, and John Leonard analyses student data for the College of Engineering; WendyNewstetter and Sneha Veerdagoudar Harrell do research in cognition and learning; andJanet Murray, the project manager, is a professor of digital media. Most of the studentswho have worked on the project, including Calvin Ashmore, the lead programmer andsystem designer, have been drawn from Georgia Tech’s graduate program in DigitalMedia.MaterialsInTEL Toolkit.The InTEL software was developed to support students’ capacity to learn the process ofstatics problem solving and develop more expert like habits of mind (Nasir, XXXX) overthe course of the semester. The problems developed within the toolkit reflect the GeorgiaInstitute of Technology Statics course syllabus
process parameters, and optimize the CNCmachining process.BackgroundIn the United States, undergraduate curricula in Engineering Technology (ET),Mechanical Engineering, Industrial, or Manufacturing Engineering generally include acourse in Computer Numerical Control (CNC). The course syllabus comprises topicsmainly on machining and CNC. At Drexel University (DU), all the students in theEngineering Technology Program learn the basics of machining, Computer Aided Designand Manufacturing (CAD/CAM), dimensioning and tolerancing, and statistical processmeasurement in a CNC course. In machining process planning, selection of machine toolsand process tolerances is critical as they directly affect the part quality and the machiningtime. An optimum process
courses discussed ethics. There were two lectures onethics and then the students completed a homework assignment on ethics that was worth 20% oftheir overall course grade. The assignment required students to consult the ASCE and/or NSPEcodes of ethics (http://www.asce.org/Content.aspx?id=7231;http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html), answer questions regarding one to threecases from the Online Ethics website (http://www.onlineethics.org; the specific cases selectedvaried each year), and compare the CU student honor code and the engineering professionalcodes of ethics. The assignment also allowed the students to learn about one “moral exemplar”from the Online Ethics website (http://www.onlineethics.org/); some of these individuals can
summative assessment scheme, in which some of the work could be subject tointerpretation of the ethical theory when applied to case studies, rather than assessment ofempirical facts and procedures which may be constrained to a teacher‟s implicit development,interpretation and assessment of the syllabus content.The assessment procedure was redesigned in 2008 for classes of 150 plus, comprising aformative assessment and feedback through essays, a formative feedback by the in-class case-studies and summative assessment by examining the major case studies and theirunderstanding of the course material in a final examination.IntroductionTo receive accreditation of undergraduate engineering degrees the Institute of ProfessionalEngineers of New Zealand
course survey was very positive. Over 78% of thestudents in the course agreed or strongly agreed that the API was a means for learning conceptson the syllabus, 71% felt it provided a source of motivation or increased their interest level in theclass, and, for 71%, the API provided a sense of personal engagement on the assignments. TheAPI was also introduced into the introductory CEEN 1030 course taught by Roger Sash. In thiscourse, all CEEN students build a CEENBoT™ and take it with them for applications in follow-on courses. The CEENBoT™ API exposed these students to embedded system concepts andbasic C programming as students in this class had never taken a programming course, or wereconcurrently taking their first programming course in Java
to enhance the student learning experience. He also is a part-time faculty member at BYU, teaching a variety of courses including ”The History of Creativity in the Arts, Sciences, and Technology”, and a part-time faculty member at Capella University, teaching online PhD learners in instructional technology and design. Dr. Halverson regularly presents at academic conferences and recently published a book on instructional design theory and practice.Rollin H. Hotchkiss, Brigham Young University Rollin H. Hotchkiss is a professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Brigham Young University (BYU) and holds the Ira A Fulton College of Engineering and Technology Leadership chair within the College. Dr. Hotchkiss
, mentoring program, andAccess For All training to determine if they have altered how they teach their courses to be moreinclusive for students with disabilities. These same faculty members will also be asked if theyhave noticed an increase in interest of students with disabilities in STEM fields.Assessment Method G: Syllabuses from Access For All training Professors’ CoursesThe faculty that are to attend the Access For All training will be required to submit their currentsyllabus for each course that they actively teach along with a description of the modes andmethods of instruction used. Six months after the training the faculty will again submit theircurrent syllabus for each course that they actively teach along with a description of the modesand
required to enter the lab, so they have access to the lab off hours.The subject has been offered three times in this format, teaching a total of 36 students. Ourresults and conclusions are derived from informal surveys, observations, and discussions with thestudents, as the small number of students taking the subject does not provide a good statisticalbasis for assessment surveys. The class is included in MIT's standard assessment process, and theresults are summarized at the end of the paper. Page 22.90.3In the next section we present the 3-part structure of the course, and discuss each part in turn. Wethen describe our preliminary findings, and
ample time in a common-core syllabus**.In the following, we present one model for the structure and content of such a course. Othermodels are possible, and educators will no doubt recognize the difficulties in designing a new§ A complete list of the ABET criterion 3 student outcomes is in the Appendix.** Some advanced optional courses already exist in graduate engineering programs and their Page 22.1363.9contents are tailored to specific departments and industries (e.g., chemical hazards and safety,nuclear criticality safety engineering).course subject to a variety of constraints. It is hoped that the following discussion will
AC 2011-537: R U ALL THERE? TEXTING, SURFING, AND E-TASKINGIN THE CLASSROOM AND ITS EFFECTS ON LEARNINGRichard Whalen, Northeastern University Rich, Beverly, and Sue are core members of the Gateway Team of full-time faculty in the College of Engineering at Northeastern University in Boston, MA. While they concentrate on first-year engineering courses teaching across all engineering disciplines, they also teach specialty courses in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at NU. Each of the NU team has published and presented papers on approaches and techniques in engineering education. Combined, Rich, Beverly, and Sue have earned several teaching awards and are proponents of active, engaging, and
. The mainpurpose of the lecture was to introduce key statistics concepts appropriate to the laboratoryexperiments. Initially, the coordination between lecture material and laboratory experiments wasweak due to the sequence by which student teams rotated through the experiments. Inevitably,some teams would conduct the experiments most suited for statistical applications before theappropriate material was covered in lecture. In addition, as is frequently the case in many typicalunit operations laboratories, obtaining a meaningful number of data points for statistical analysiswas and continues to be a problem. However, a few years of experience, input from students, andadjustment of the statistics topic sequence in the course syllabus has led to
] Elrod, Cassandra, Susan Murray, Barry Flachsbart, Karl E. Burgher & Drew M. Foth. (2010). Utilizing Multimedia Case Studies to Teach the Professional Side of Project Management. Journal of STEM Education (Special Edition), pp 7-17.[8] Engineering Student Retention, Retrieved Jan. 18, 2011, http://www.virtualpet.com/engineer/retent/retent.htm.[9] Fini, Eli H. (2010). Incorporating a Real World Case Study into the Syllabus of a Senior Construction Engineering Course. Journal of STEM Education (Special Edition), pp 18-23.[10] Fosko, D.J. (2003, April). Case Studies and Methods in Teaching and Learning. Paper Represented at the annual meeting of the Society of Educators and Scholars
department she worked as a Senior Consultant for Ernst and Young and as an Industrial Engineer for General Motors Corporation. She teaches undergraduate courses in engineering economics, engineering management, and probability and statistics in Industrial Engineering as well as engineering computing in the freshman engineering program. Dr. Bursic has done research and published work in the areas of Engineering and Project Management and Engineering Education. She is a member of IIE and ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Pennsylvania.Natasa Vidic, University of Pittsburgh Assistant Professor Industrial Engineering Department Swanson School of Engineering University of Pittsburgh
. (Iowa State University 2000), all in civil engineering. He has been on the faculty of the de- partment of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at Iowa State University of Science and Technology since 2001, and currently holds the rank of Associate Professor and is the holder of the Weg- ner Professorship. Dr. White is the Director of Earthworks Engineering Research Center at Iowa State University and is in charge of the Iowa State University Geotechnical Mobile Laboratory. Dr. White has taught graduate and undergraduate courses in introduction to soil engineering, foundation analysis and design, experimental testing, soil behavior, and soil stabilization and compaction. Dr. White has research interests
. Williams, G. (2009). Narrative Statement for entry to Association of American Colleges and Universities Greater Expectations Institute. Unpublished manuscript, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis. Page 22.1353.13 Appendix ASample ScheduleMonday, 1st week 9:00-9:15am Bridge Kickoff All Bridge Sections 9:25-10:25am Icebreakers and Introduction to course Review Syllabus 10:35-11:35am Difference Between High School and College 11:45-12:30am Lunch(Campus Center) 12:40-1
follows then, that for students to havesustainable engineering literacy they must have knowledge about the subject, show concern forthe natural environment, and show behavior consistent with this knowledge and concern, forexample by developing technology with the ecological footprint in mind. Several studies onenvironmental behavior have found links between knowledge, attitudes, and behavior orbehavioral intentions, suggesting that as knowledge about an issue increases, so will subsequentattitudes or behaviors15.Previous studies have examined how knowledge about the environment affects environmentalattitudes or behaviors: An undergraduate course in environmental science can increase students’sense of concern for the environment and their
the reports, saying that they containedproprietary information. At the time, faculty decided to share the rubric used to evaluate studentpapers with mill supervisors so that they would have a standard by which they could rate papers,as well as an evaluation form to provide feedback on student work in the mill.In 2010, we developed a new approach to assessing these internships. Taking advantage of thecapabilities of the online course management system Desire2Learn®, students now respond to 16questions about their internship work while they are in the mills. These responses help studentsto remember activities performed during the entire internship. When they return to campus,students provide two pieces of work to satisfy academic requirements
designsituations. With the conversation as a backdrop, students were then introduced to the notion of adesign rationale and asked to draft a sample design rationale as a way to introduce them to thisconcept.Case 2: Graduate multi-week projectThe journal landscape project was a multi-week project in a graduate level course entitledEmpirical Traditions in Human Centered Design and Engineering. Per the syllabus, the task was Page 22.1116.3as follows: “Working in teams of two or three, you and your teammate(s) will characterize oneyear of articles in a major journal in our field in terms of five to seven dimensions of yourchoosing and then prepare a summary of
Master of Arts Degree in Education and Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in instructional design and instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for engineering teaching assistants.Sarah E Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Dr. Sarah Zappe is Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at Penn State. She holds a masters and a doctorate in educational psychology, where she
) – Indicates a Work in Progress Friday, April 1, 2011 (Morning)08:30 – 09:45 AM Concurrent Session Presentations Experiential Learning Jim Helbling, et al., Configuration Of Senior Capstone Course Using Team- 1 Teaching To Maximize Communication Skills And Minimize Team Conflict Mohammad Amin, et al., Investigation of a Masters Research Project for 13 Validation of Program's Goals and Student Learning Outcomes Jennifer Van Donk, et al., Developing a low cost prosthetic foot for the Vida Nueva 30 Clinic: A multidisciplinary senior design project Instrumentation & Lab Studies Ricardo Medina, et
course instructors, teaching assistants (TA), and students, thecourse syllabus, instructional materials and lesson plans, major assignment guidelines, andmaterials used for training the TAs. In fall 2009, eight selected ENGR 1201 lecture and lab Page 22.1461.7sections were observed in full (1 hour 15 minutes per section). The classroon observation wasconducted using an observation protocol created to document several key social and culturalaspects of the classes. Some key interaction patterns between the instructor and students as wellas interactions among students were also recorded during the observation. In-depth interviewswith ENGR 1201
. Hill, D. 1984. A History of Engineering in Classical and Medieval Times. La Salle, IL: Open Court.8. Pacey, A. 1974. The Maze of Ingenuity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Page 22.148.149. Parsons, W. B. 1939. Engineers and Engineering in the Renaissance. Cambridge: MIT Press.10. Singer, C., Holy, E. J., and Holmyard, E. J., and Hall, A. R., eds. 1954. A History of Technology. Oxford: Ox- ford University Press. Attachment A AE Studio - Winter 2011 Course Syllabus (Minor editing and formatting changes