these, some colleges run classes on weekends or in the evenings. Thisonly partially satisfies the need for some people, as there are still some who have difficultygetting to a college campus. Many universities have responded by developing distance education,a means of delivering academically rigorous courses to students in their own homes. A goodexample of this is The Open University in the United Kingdom, which was established in the late1960’s. Since then, distance education has gone through significant development. This includesdelivering distance eduction in science and engineering.1,2Australia is a large continent with a population of around 20 million people. Although the vastmajority live in one of the seven major cities of Brisbane
. For a society which ismoving rapidly towards globalization, ABET assessment process is an effective system toconnect with international engineering education. Furthermore, the implementation ofinternational accreditation will facilitate the mobility of engineers in the global market.VI. Reference[1] Ran, A. (2001). Traveling on parallel tracks: Chinese parents and English teachers, Educational Research Vol. 43 No. 3 Winter 2001, 311-328.[2] Han, M. & Yang X. (2001), Educational Assessment in China: lessons from history and future prospects, Assessment in Education, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2001, 5-10.[3] Wang, C. T. (1995) Summary Report of Engineering Education Programs (Unpublished). NSC 85-2511-S-002-032, National Science Council, Taiwan
“Body of Knowledge”for computer engineering graduates. This list is rather lengthy, and inevitably in a hybridprogram some topics from both electrical and computer engineering will not be addressed.Nevertheless, having such a list is helpful in designing the ECE curriculum. Also quite helpful isanother, more general statement from the same reference on the desired characteristics of allComputer Engineering graduates: 1. System Level Perspective Graduates must appreciate the concept of a computer system and the processes involved in constructing or analyzing it. They must have an understanding of its operation that goes to a greater depth than a mere external appreciation of what the system does or the way(s) in which it
Design specification of cut-off frequency: fco := 1000Hz ω co := 2π ⋅fco • Low pass filter design and evaluation: 1. Choose a capacitor: C := 1µF 1 2. Design a resistor for cut-off frequency requirement: R := R = 159.155 ohm C ⋅ω co ω1 ( ω ) := 2π 10 ⋅s H ( ω
concepts of the course, and theoverall organized nature of the course. Nonetheless, students identified ways to improve theonline course experience.The key to successful online and traditional classrooms is to analyze course material, determinehow well existing material will translate online, creating new approaches to communicating withstudents, and evaluating and rebuilding the course as problems arise.AcknowledgmentI would like to thank all the students that took part in the survey.Bibliography1. Charp, S. (1998). Any time, any place learning. T H E Journal, 25(8), 6.2. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. In3. A. W. Chickering & Z. F. Gamson (Eds.), Applying the Seven
thecourse objectives to determine whether or not or even how much technology should beincorporated into each course. Pedagogy should dictate technology use rather than selecting thetechnology and then building the course around it. These issues will be addressed further in asubsequent paper.Bibliographic Information1 Wankat, Phillip C., Richard M. Felder, Karl A. Smith, and Frank S. Oreivicz, The Scholarship of Teaching andLearning in Engineering, in Disciplinary Styles n the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring CommonGround, Eds. Huber and Morreale, AAHE, 19972 ABET (2001). CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING PROGRAMS. Baltimore, MD, AccreditationBoard for Engineering and Technology, Inc.Biographic InformationThomas J. Siller is the
by 2/3 (2 semesters = 3 quarters) (lower number) ** Average excludes NJIT *** Either no lab course or lab incorporated into lecture course(s) Page 9.1346.7 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education” Table III. NJIT Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum (Part 1 - Freshman Year) (Changes in RED (italics); * indicates a new or
met to a reasonable level. As this seminar did notrequire any equipment which typically cannot be found at most engineering programs, it is likelythat this idea for a three-week introduction to drug delivery and biotransport can be implementedat other universities where appropriate.Bibliography1. Saltzman, M. A., Drug Delivery: Engineering Principles for Drug Therapy, Oxford University Press, (2001).2. Farrell, S and Hesketh, R. P., An Introduction to Drug Delivery for Chemical Engineers”, Chemical Engineering Education, 36(3), 198, 2002.DANIEL P. CAVANAGH is an assistant professor of biomedical and chemical engineering at Bucknell Universityin Lewisburg, PA. In addition to currently holding the Emmitt Memorial Chair in Biomedical
about 10 kN was used for this test. A minimumof three tests are carried out for each test. The speed of the penetrator is 0.2 mm/s, but the speedis reduced to lower the limit in order to more accurately determine the end point. The preferredmethod for determining is by the drop-in load on the specimen. In general this indicates the onsetof necking in the dome. Since the size of the test specimen in the present case is very small,sufficient care is taken to determine the end point. Comparison of ball punch deformation testresults shows compliance with the specification of biomaterials regarding formabilitycharacteristics.3.4 Determining the inclusion content by automatic image analysis8 (ASTM E1245-2000)TWO measurements are performed for
High Attrition Rates Among Science andEngineering Undergraduate Majors". Ethonography and Assessment Bureau of Sociological Research, Universityof Colorado, Boulder, (83-95).[5] Tinto, V., 1993, “Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition”, Second Edition,University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.[6] Touton, S., McDonald, C., Monte, A., Hein, G., June, 2004 “Engineers Need Mentors Too!” Proceedings of the2004 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society ofEngineering Education, Salt Lake City, Utah.AMY E. MONTE – Amy E. Monte is a lecturer in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at MichiganTechnological University. She received her BS and MS in
, http://www.ncrel.org/ tandl /build2.htm.5. Jones, S (2001), 'Collaboration - a threat to academic autonomy', Proceedings ASCILITE Conference, Meeting at the Crossroads, Melbourne http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/nov03/jones2.htm.6. ABET (2003) “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effective for evaluations during the 2002-2003 accreditation cycle.” (Jan. 16, 2003).7. Koehn, E. (2001) “Assessment of Communications and Collaborative Learning in Civil Engineering Education.” Profl. Issues in Engrg. Educ. And Pract., ASCE, 127(4), 160-165.8. Splitt, F. G. (2003) “The Challenge to Change: On Realizing the New Paradigm for Engineering Education.” J. Engrg. Educ., ASEE, 92(2), 181-187.9. Wankat, P
economists frequently treat all GLDs as OI, but there are situations in whichthe GLD becomes a capital gain or loss (CGL). If a firm is a corporation, then the error intro-duced by treating a GLD as OI will be seen to be either non-existent or minimal, but this mightnot be the case for engineering firms operating as sole proprietorships, Sub-chapter S corpora-tions, limited liability corporations, or partnerships. These organizations are called pass-throughentities since their revenues and expenses and gains and losses are passed through to the ownersor partners who pay taxes on them as individuals. Computing the tax effect of GLDs requires determining the type of asset disposed, theholding period of the asset, the character of the GLD, and
along with the calculated fuel consumption rates andcalculated developed engine power. Developed engine power was calculated using the set speedand the set torque values. As seen from the power calculations, the maximum calculated 28 hp isnot close to the engine’s rated power of at least 100 hp. Since there were severe vibrationTABLE 1. The Recorded Data and The Calculated Fuel Consumption Rates and PowerEngine Torque Mea. Fuel Measured Fuel DevelopedSpeed, rpm Ft-lb Volume, ml Time, s Consumption Power, hp ml/min1000 20 50 65.5 45.80
andcalculated developed engine power. Developed engine power was calculated using the set speedand the set torque values. As seen from the power calculations, the maximum calculated 28 hp isnot close to the engine’s rated power of at least 100 hp. Since there were severe vibrationTABLE 1. The Recorded Data and The Calculated Fuel Consumption Rates and PowerEngine Torque Mea. Fuel Measured Fuel DevelopedSpeed, rpm Ft-lb Volume, ml Time, s Consumption Power, hp ml/min1000 20 50 65.5 45.80 3.811000 40 50
Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education3. Green, L.W. and Bonollo, E. “Understanding design methodology as a basis for its teaching”. Proceedings of 4th UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, 7-10 Feb. 2001.4. Banky, G.P. and Wong, K.K. “Engaging engineering students for active learning: structuring a project subject for first year engineering students. Proceedings of 14th Annual AAEE Conference, 29 Sept.-1 Oct. 2003.5. Cao, Z; Kwong, K and Senini, S. “Teaching control system design via hybrid teaching modes.” Proceedings of 12th Australasian Conference on Engineering Education. 7th Australasian women in engineering forum. 26-28 Sept. 2001.6. Karri, V., Bullen, F and Rossmanek, P. “Design
2004-995 Engineering Ethics – A Collaboration between Engineering and Philosophy JoAnn S. Lighty, Margaret P. Battin, Angela R. Harris, Gordon B. Mower University of Utah, College of Engineering/ College of Humanities, Department of PhilosophyAbstractThe College of Engineering at the University of Utah has recently initiated a Center forEngineering Leadership, born out of a recently-awarded grant from the Hewlett Foundation,CLEAR (Communication, Leadership, Ethics, and Research). The Center’s goals are toincorporate communication skills, team building, and
other people the pr ofessional engineer1 as a complex as a complex and negotiation, critically reflecting on the social process, layered social diplomacy and analyzing roles of engineers in rules understood institution capable argumentation in a ways other s the organization and and utilized (?) of organizational wider context (?) use to be the wider learning (?) effective community, finding a professional voice
Ross Kastor, “Adapting the Studio Critique to Large CapstoneDesign Courses” (paper presented at the 2004 Annual Conference and Exhibition of the ASEE, June 20-24, 2004,Salt Lake City, Utah).13. A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby and C. D. Sorensen, “A Review of Literature on TeachingEngineering Design through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education 86, no. 1 (1997): 17-28.Biographical InformationJENNA TERRY
place the artist with his/her work.The instructor may group the submissions according to the point(s) to be made that dayor the submissions may be discussed individually. In any event, the instructor willusually solicit initial input and comments from the class for each grouped or individualsubmission. The comments may be accepted, commented upon, discussed by the class,or rejected, all under the watchful eye of the instructor. Many times the discussion willlead to the inclusion of other submissions and expansion or reduction in the sizes of thegroupings. When the class discussion on a given submission is over, the instructor willusually present a summary of the discussion and possibly an “edited” set of suggestionsfor the artist. But perhaps
engineering students. Proceedings of the 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 1999.12. Montgomery, S. Addressing diverse student learning styles through the use of multimedia. Proceedings of the 25th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 1995.13. Zywno, M. and Waalen, J.K. The effect of hypermedia instruction on achievement and attitudes of students with different learning styles. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education. 2001.14. Kuri, N.P. and Truzzi, O.M.S. Learning styles of freshmen engineering students. Proceedings of the ICE 2002 Manchester International Conference on Engineering Education. 2002.15. Blumner, H.N. and Richards, H.C. Study habits and
! Montréal, Québec ,Canada, June 16-19, 20023 Barry S. Fagin, Technology and the Values of a Liberal Education, Academic Questions, Fall 1999.BiographiesALBERT J. ROSA is a Professor of Engineering at the University of Denver. He earned his BEE from ManhattanCollege, NY, his MSEE from the University of Missouri, Columbia and his PhD from the University of Illinois,Urbana. He was the Chair of the Department from 1986 to 2001 and charged with the task of rebuilding a newengineering school. He currently is on leave as a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the USAF Academy inColorado Springs in the department of electrical engineering.PAUL K. PREDECKI is a Professor Emeritus at the University of Denver. He attained the PhD from theMassachusetts
History Are Doomed to Repeat It or, Why I Study the Historyof Computing”, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1996.[5] Seely, Bruce, E., “SHOT, the History of Technology, and Engineering Education”, Technology and Culture,Vol. 36, Number 4, October 1995. Page 9.183.10[6] Bissell, C. and Bennett, S., “The Role of the History of Technology in the Engineering Curriculum”, EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education, Vol. 22, Issue 3, Sept. 1997. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2004, American Society for
displayed in Figure 3, an incorrect form for thecubic feet per second units was used. LON-CAPA would have recognized units expressed as“ft^3/s”. No penalty is assessed for responses that are in an incorrect form. Notice that the triescounter still registers zero of a maximum of 2 tries for this problem. (The instructor can setmaximum tries as high as 100.) For an incorrect answer, LON-CAPA responds with an“incorrect” message followed by the counter displaying the number of tries used and themaximum allowed.It is advantageous to write some problems in the forms shown in Figures 2 and 3 rather than as inFigure 1 so that multiple answers are submitted all at once with a single push of the submitanswer button because a computer response of “incorrect
psi From measured strains in 1,596 -3,549 mechanics lab From simple beam theory 1,633 -3,924 (hand calculations) From ALGOR analysis 1,633* -3,924 with beam elements From ALGOR analysis 772 -3,146 with solid elements* Ratioed from stress at bottom of beam – results are calculated only for worst stress based onvalue of S (I/c) input for the cross-section.The hand calculations agreed exactly with the beam element results. This was expected
: National Academy Press.3 Bloom, B. S., “The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring,” Educational Researcher, 13 (6), 1984, pp. 4-16.4 Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American EducationalResearch Journal, 31, 104-137.5 Bennett, R.E., Jenkins, F., Persky, H., & Weiss, A. (in press). Assessing complex problem-solvingperformances. Assessment in Education.Biographical InformationKAY HOWELL, Federation of American Scientists, is the director of the Information Technologiesprogram and project manager of the Learning Federation. She previously served as Director of theNational Coordination Office for Computing, Information, and Communications for
-based education methods as a link for stimulating and strengthen engineering Page 9.943.12 excellence in the academic and the professional world. 6th EDA Conference, august 4-7, 2002.“Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copy- right 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”5. Kjersdam, F. and Enemark, S.: The Aalborg Experiment, Project Innovation in University Education. Aal- borg University Press ISBN 87-7307-480-25. 1994. (The book contents a long bibliography of further pub- lications).6. Kiip, Hans: M.Sc.Eng. in
withglobally dispersed development teams [Refs 2 and 3]. As mentioned above the MBAprogram now offers a certificate program in entrepreneurship called the Venture series. Inaddition, our Manufacturing System Engineering offers a graduate course for newproduct development within a corporate framework.Entrepreneurship teaching – undergraduate: Since the mid 1990’s Lehigh has offeredan award winning cross-disciplinary program in Integrated Product Development (IPD)for students in engineering, business and the design arts. For the past six years, theprogram has focused on technical entrepreneurship through new product development,with industry sponsorship of cross-disciplinary student teams [Ref 4]. The IPD programhas also engaged local entrepreneurs and
11As can be seen in Fig 2, higher FC causes higher TC which results in a higher BE point.This is the concern when comparing the traditional courses with online courses. Twoways to compensate or correct for this higher BE Point is to charge a higher course feefor the online course or increase the number of students in the online course at the oldfee.Twigg’s Cost for his Online course within a Mature SystemUsing data collected by the authors and applying them to Professor Twigg”s onlinecourse, we calculated the fixed costs for his online MET 111 course. Twigg’s Start-up Costs (Fixed cost) Hours Course Development $8,000 One course reduction 3,000