of Pattis’ approach atStanford prompted the committee to recommend adoption of Karel by ENCMP 100.Bergin et al.’s implementation2 of Karel, called Karel++, was adapted by the senior FSO for usein ENCMP 100. Because the course focused on procedural C++ (C programming with C++input/output streams), the object-oriented nature of Karel++ was hidden via preprocessor macros.Students were provided a Visual C++ starter project, which included a precompiled Karel++ Page 23.624.3library, and a C++ stub file for task programming. The project was configured to load Karel’sworld from a text file. Students were also provided a Windows application with
] K. Soria, J. Fransen and S. Nackerud, '"Library Use and Undergraduate Student Outcomes: New Evidence forStudents' Retention and Academic Success," portal: Libraries and the Academy, vol. 13, no. 2.[2] M. Oakleaf, '"The value of academic libraries: A comprehensive research review and report,", 2010.[3] J.L. Jones, '"Using library swipe-card data to inform decision making," Georgia Library Quarterly, vol. 48, no.2, 04/15, pp. 11-13.[4] G. Haddow and J. Joseph, '"Loans, logins, and lasting the course: academic library use and student retention,"Australian Academic & Research Libraries, vol. 41, no. 4, 12, pp. 233-244.[5] G. Stone, B. Ramsden and D. Pattern, '"Looking for the Link between Library Usage and Student Attainment,"Ariadne
clínica de parasitología," in Encuentros en educación superior y pedagogía 2005, Cali, Universidad del Valle, 2007, pp. 45 - 51.[5] A. Kaufman, S. Mennin and R. E. Waterman, "The New Mexico Experiment: Educational Innovation and Institutional Change.," Academic Medicine, vol. 64, pp. 285 - 294, 1989.[6] D. Guerrero, Modelo de aprendizaje y certificación de competencias en la dirección de proyectos de desarrollo sostenible, Madrid: Tesis Doctoral (no publicada), 2011.[7] J. W. Thomas, A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning, San Rafael, California: The Autodesk Foundation, 2000.[8] B. F. Jones, C. M. Rasmussen and M. C. Moffitt, "Real-life problem solving.: A collaborative approach to
an input to the table, such as temperature, the properties are less certain than the 5or 6 digits. When a modest uncertainty of 0.2% for temperature is assumed, the properties arecertain to at most 3 to 4 digits, but not more. The same can be shown for steam.Uncertainty of Steam PropertiesIn the superheated steam tables, property data (v, u, h and s) is often given in pressure “blocks.”Students find the correct pressure block, then the line for the appropriate temperature to look upthe other properties. Although two other intensive properties can be used to fix the state, the Page 23.746.8most common are pressure and temperature; hence
, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.2 Kolodner, J.L., Camp, P.J., Crismond D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by DesignTM into Practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol.12, No 4, pp. 495 – 548.3 Project-Based Inquiry Science. It’s About Time. Herff Jones Education Division, NY.4 Kolodner, J.L. (1993). Case-Based Reasoning. San Mateo, CA.: Morgan Kaufmann.5 Bell, R.L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005) Simplifying Inquiry Instruction. The Science Teacher
be offered. Further investigation on the social Page 23.806.21background especially of engineering students shall be undertaken in order to analyze thespecial needs of this group of students.The survey has also shown that students seem to be mainly motivated to go abroad byimproving their social competences and language skills. Thus, information and counselingshould focus on those issues but should also point out the positive effects on an internationalexchange on the development of discipline-specific skills and the professional career.7 Bibliography1. Jeschke, S., Petermann, M. & Tekkaya, A. E. in TeachING-LearnING.EU Fachtagung
. This activity will also naturallyserve as a strong advertisement for the success of the partnership between project hosts and theinstitutions providing the student.References[1] Prados, J., “Engineering Education in the United States: Past, Present, and Future,” Proceedings, InternationalConference on Engineering Education, ICEE-1998.[2] Lang, J., Cruse, S., McVey, F., and McMaster, J. “Industry Expectations of New Engineers: A Survey to AssistCurriculum Developers,” Journal of Engineering Education, Jan 1999, pp 43-51.[3] Seely, B. “The Other Re-Engineering of Engineering Education, 1900-1965,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, July 1999, pp 285-294.[4] Magee, C. “Needs and Possibilities for Engineering Education: On Industrial/Academic
Page 23.871.14ELLI project. Assessment in Education, 11(3), 247-272.13. Wielkiewicz, R. M., & Sinner, A. S., (2010). A Life-Long Learning Scale for student development research andevaluation, Personal communication held on August 2010.14. Robinson, M., Fadali, M. S., Carr, J., & Maddux, C., (1999). Engineering principles for high school students,Paper presentation at the 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, Nov 10-13, 1999, San Juan, Puerto Rico.15. Fadali, M. S., Henderson, N., Johnson, J., Mortensen, J., & McGough, J., (2001). On-line engineeringmathematics testing and assessment, Paper presentation at the 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001,Oct 10-13, 2001, Reno, NV
cutting-tools design. His research interests include Design-Based Research in technology-enabled learn- ing contexts, technology-mediated problem solving, applications of dynamic modeling for learning of complex topics, and the impact of epistemic beliefs on learning with technology.Prof. Clayton E Price, Missouri University of Science and Technology Professor Price has varied interests in the sciences, having earned degrees in geology/geophysics, math- ematics, and computer science. He has taught at S&T for 32 years, currently in the computer science department. He teaches introductory programming classes in C++ and the numerical analysis courses. As assistant to the chairman, he advises freshmen and transfer students
), Retrieved January 10, 2011, from SIAM: http://www.siam.org/news/news.php?id=50. 10. Alexander, B. B., Foertsch, J. A., & Daffinrud, S.,1998. Spend a Summer with a Scientist program: An evaluation of program outcomes and the essential elements of success. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, LEAD Center. 11. Foertsch, J. A., Alexander, B. B., & Penberthy, D. L.,1997. Evaluation of the UW-Madison’s Summer Undergraduate Research Programs: Final Report. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Madison, LEAD Center. 12. Alexander, B. B., Lyons, L., Pasch, J. E., & Patterson, J.,1996. Team Approach in the First Research Experience for Undergraduates in Botany/Zoology 152
modelingPerformance Engineer Specialist Engine Manufacturing Simulation/modeling of gas turbine cyclesDesign Engineer Motion and Control Technol. Simulation, modeling and statistical designNational FactorsModeling and simulation (M & S) are endorsed at the federal level as an area needed in theUnited States. It is endorsed through House Resolution Number 487, which passed in the Houseof Representatives by voice vote in 2007.17 The Resolution recognized the contribution ofmodeling and simulation technology to the security and prosperity of the United States, andrecognized modeling and simulation as a National Critical Technology. In addition, the topic isof sufficient national importance to have a Congressional
(b) a video clip that demonstrated the operation of the drive. The students reallyenjoyed the video clip demonstration. (a) Actual Parts (b) Operation Video Figure 1. Actual Parts and Operation Video of a Harmonic DriveLaboratory ProjectsThe hands-on laboratory sessions consisted of two different types: weekly lab projects andcourse projects. There were ten weekly laboratory projects that consisted of two portions. Thefirst portion covered the description of the project including objective(s), required parts and partdescriptions, a wiring diagram, a sample program, and step-by-step tutorial instructions attachedin appendices. The second portion required the student to apply the knowledge
23.432.14References[1] Carliner, S., An overview of online learning, Minneapolis, MN: Lakewood Publications/HRD Press, 1999.[2] Connick, G. P., 1997, “Issues and trends to take us into the twenty-first century,” In T. E. Cyrs (Ed.) Teaching and Learning at a Distance: What it Takes to Effectively Design, Deliver and Evaluate Programs: No. 71. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, San Francisco: Jossey- Bass, pp. 7-12.[3] Herring, S., 2002, “Computer-mediated communication on the Internet,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), Vol. 36, pp. 109-168.[4] Hollandsworth, R., “Toward an Instructional Model for Asynchronous Instruction of Interpersonal Communications,” a paper presented at
integrating opportunities to develop non-disciplinary workplace related skills into college classes.Dr. Patricia A Ralston, University of Louisville Patricia A. S. Ralston is Professor and Chair of the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Uni- versity of Louisville where she also received her B.S., MEng, and Ph.D. degrees in chemical engineering. Her educational research interests include the use of technology in engineering education, incorporation of critical thinking in engineering education, and ways to improve retention. Her other interests include process modeling, simulation, and process control
Program SolicitationNSF 11-514, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2011/nsf11514/nsf11514.htm.2. W. A. Wulf. Editorial “Engineering Ethics”. The Bridge 32 (3), Fall, 2002, p. 3.3. J. R Herkert. “Continuing and Emerging Issues in Engineering Ethics Education”. The Bridge 32 (3), Fall, 2002,pp 8–13.4. J. R Herkert. “Collaborative Learning in Engineering Ethics”. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 4, 1997, pp447-462.5. C. E. Harris, Jr., M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, M. J. Rabins. “Engineering Ethics: What? Why? How? AndWhen?”. Journal of Engineering Education, April 1996, pp 93-96.6. A. Colby and W. Sullivan. “Ethics Teaching in Undergraduate Engineering Education”. Journal of EngineeringEducation, 2008, 97, 3, pp 327-3387. Bryant University first-year program
undergraduates “tend to overrate theirabilities a great deal when it comes to finding information on the Internet”[5]. According toBuschman and Warner, undergraduates generally consider themselves to be competent and effective Page 23.478.3researchers, though assessments of their information literacy skills show that they are not nearly ascapable as they believe themselves to be [6]. More often than not, “[s]tudents do not understand theresearch process as well as they know electronic tools”[7].Furthermore, undergraduates overestimate the effectiveness of their information searches. A search isgenerally deemed successful if it yields numerous
(in the end of the1st semester) and a final project report (in the end of the 2nd semester). Although students in eachdepartment were mostly responsible for the subsystems falling in their discipline areas, thesedeliverables were deemed reasonable indicators of effectiveness in student learning.On the liberal arts-related and communication-skills related outcomes, assessments were conductedbased on student team’s participation in various oral presentations within their department. Suchevents are typically offered at least twice in a semester including final oral presentations in fall andspring semesters, and IEEE student paper competition (ECE-specific) in spring with externaljudges as part of the preparation for IEEE Region 2’s Student
(Phase 1 report).Washington, DC; 2009. Available at: http://www.asee.org/about-us/the-organization/advisory-committees/CCSSIE/CCSSIEE_Phase1Report_June2009.pdf.8. ISSOTL. ISSOTL: International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2009. Available at:http://www.issotl.org/index.html. Accessed January 4, 2012.9. Boyer EL. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, N.J.: Carnegie Foundation for theAdvancement of Teaching; 1990.10. Thompson S, Bloomington IU. SOTL home. Available at: http://www.issotl.org/tutorial/sotltutorial/home.html.Accessed December 28, 2011.11. Hutchings P, Shulman LS. The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change.1999;31(5):10–15.12. Singer SR, Nielsen NR
thus, the feminine in any representation is devalued.Consequently, the dichotomous relationships ensue. For example, understanding that to be anengineer is to not be a student in the humanities. The two colleges and cultures representgendered disciplines in this sense.3 Using Putnam et al.’s, explanation of hierarchy in difference,masculine is privileged and so it becomes the ideal.10 Therefore, anything outside of this standardarguably will be a tension.Examining the culture surrounding this tension and in order to better understand the output ofgraduates, Godfrey and Parker found that engineers have certain ways of performing engineer.2They contend that as long as people stay close to the engrained way of “being an engineer” theyare accepted
administrators in questionbothered to read these comments, had them read to them, understood or cared if they did either.Table 3: Comments from Interested StudentsCommentOne of the purposes of the course was to be able to design a military defense system. Thisproject was due on one of the last days of the semester and in order to do it we had to apply allthe knowledge learnt during the course. It is not true that we had no textbook. It was not veryused during the classes. But (the prof) gave us the syllabus the first day of class, and there wereall the topics of the course were related with the corresponding chapters of the book.He is not afraid to give the grades that one deserves. He has given me 40’s and has given me120’s, and every time I deserved
-learning reflection for engineering. In E. Tsang & American Association for Higher Education (Eds.), Projects that matter (pp. 64-75). Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.6. Reynaud, E., Duffy, J. J., Barrington, L., Kazmer, D. O., Tucker, B. G., & Rhoads, J. L. (2012, June). Engineering faculty attitudes towards service-learning. Paper presented at the 119th American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.7. Pierrakos, O., Bielefeldt, A. R., Duffy, J. J., Mcvay, S., Paterson, K., Swan, C. W., & Zilberberg, A. (2012, June). Faculty survey on learning through service: Development and initial findings. Paper presented at the
as an essential component, enablingengineering candidates to span any boundaries.It is evident from the responses that the boundaries that globally prepared engineers must spanare not those within and between engineering disciplines. One respondent noted, “They(students) need to look outside the walls of their university, their community, with the U.S.This view must extend to a global scale, meaning they should have knowledge and be able toarticulate global engineering practices not only in their home state or area, but globally.” S/headded that the ability to interact with engineers from other cultures is critically important
-Hill. 11. Latham, G., Latham, S. D., & Whyte, G. (2004). Fostering Integrative Thinking: Adapting the Executive Education Model to the MBA Program. Journal of Management Education, 28(1), 3-18. 12. Miller, A. (1981). Integrative thinking as a goal of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 12(4), 3-8. 13. Peterson, R. S., & Nemeth, C. J. (1996). Focus Versus Flexibility Majority and Minority Influence Can Both Improve Performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(1), 14-23. 14. Arkowitz, H. (1992). Integrative theories of therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. 15. Showers, C. (1992). Evaluatively integrative thinking about
.” Page 23.1041.3Denton, et al demonstrated that an integrated affective-cognitive approach had a positive effecton student learning and achievement in a first-year computing class5,6. Additional studies on theaffective development of first-year engineering students that included the involvement of StudentAffairs have occurred at Arizona State Universities7 in the 1990’s and The University of SouthCalifornia8 in the late 2000’s.Engineering HouseDesign of Engineering HouseOne of the research pilot projects is Engineering House (EH). Ninety-seven percent of first-yearengineering and applied sciences students choose to live in the residence halls even though thereis no requirement that first-year students live on campus. Enrollment in EH has grown
less: lessons from online learning. Learning & Leading with Technology, March/April, 18-22.13. B. Abernethy. (1993). Searching for the minimum essential information for skilled perception and action. Psychological research, 55, 131-138.14. E.R.. Guthrie. (1952). The Psychology of Learning: Revised Edition. Harper Bros:Massachusetts.15. E. Kim, J. Kim, & S. Hong. (2007). The effects of students’ intrinsic motivation on academic achievement and preference for cooperative learning" Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Page 23.1060.12 Association, San
for data collection, system monitoring, and remote control. Thesystem is required to simultaneously record data from 30 to 40 sensors with samplingfrequencies between kilo to mega samples/s depending on the diagnostic input level and speed.During the preliminary planning of the project, students were responsible for developing theDAQ system from the probe (sensor) amplifier box to the GUI interface. A flow diagram wascreated with a “systems engineering” approach to constructing a timeline and procedure fordevelopment of the system. Project management eventualy became the most prominent hurddle for the collaboration.There were many competing demands on multiple key contributors to the collaboration and timeon task was imperative for
which students tend toward at that particular institution.Bibliography 1. Pascarella, E.T. & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 2. Inman, P. & Pascarella, E. (1998). The impact of college residence on the development of critical thinking skills in college freshmen. Journal of College Student Development, 39(6):557-568. 3. Brint, S. & Cantwell, A.M. (2006). Undergraduate time use and academic outcomes: Results from the University of California undergraduate experience survey 2006. Teachers College Record
questionresponse itself.Overall, clickers have shown potential to keep students engaged in the learning process andprovide a means to quickly assess learning success. Students are prompted to connect the newconcept(s) to those learned previously and demonstrate their mastery of it. This allows thestudents and the instructor to rapidly discover whether the introduction of a new concept wassuccessfully scaffolded onto prior knowledge by a critical portion of the class. If the answer is no,the instructor can return to the concept with a clarification or another example. If the answer isyes, the instructor may move on, but the students who privately know they were not correct are