engineering design course can be seen atthe Altoona College of the Pennsylvania State University. Engineering Design and Graphics 100is a three-credit course which introduces students to Computer Aided Design (CAD) skills,engineering design, decision making, and teamwork. This class incorporates mini-projects, teampresentations, lectures, exercises, and case studies. As a final design challenge, students designeda soda can lifter using dc motors, a gear box, and two AAA batteries [1]. Student responses to aquestionnaire show that most of the students enjoyed working on mini-projects and the finaldesign challenge. Suggestions for future offerings of the course include modifications totechnical specifications and providing students with a more rugged
, 2021 1. Power Engineering Education StatusEmerging trends in STEM education have continued to call for quality education that is fosteringthe ability of graduates to meet the challenges of the 21st century industry, while encouragingtheir participation in sustainable development. Energy and power industries are the cornerstoneof prosperous society, while all the critical and crucial socio-economic functions depend on thesecure, sustainable and reliable power and energy infrastructures. There are recent recognitionsand acknowledgements of the needs to improve, restructure or rebuild curriculum and revitalizedand reform energy and power engineering education. Equipping students with the skills andknowledge required to be successful engineers
qualitative feedback onproject-centric learning before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The three capstone projectsinvestigated were the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Concrete CanoeCompetition, the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Student Steel BridgeCompetition (SSBC), and a partnered project with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)investigating sustainable solutions for lock and dam components. The study revealed that, in themidst of a pandemic, effective use of PBL will enable students to (1) capitalize on collaborativetechnology to efficiently and successfully solve complex engineering problems, and in doing so,improve student time management skills, (2) improve their critical thinking and engineeringjudgement, (3
the assigned project questions such asfinding the tension, the speed, and the power, students are expected to apply theirknowledge of the equation of motions, work and energy, and angular momentum inkinetics. Finally, this paper will also show the result of students’ surveys on this projectlearning experience, the team function, and topic understanding as demonstrated throughthe project and analysis of the related learning outcomes from midterm and final exams.Keywords: PBL, curvilinear motion, dynamics in MET programIntroductionDynamics is one of the most essential and conceptually challenging topics in studyingengineering mechanics.1 Undergraduate students in a mechanical engineering technology(MET) program normally take this course in
Project-Based Learning: Contrasting Experience between Traditional Face- to-Face Instruction and Virtual Instruction Jaya Dofe1, Sudarshan Kurwadkar2 1 Department of Computer Engineering 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA *Corresponding author: jdofe@fullerton.eduAbstractThe Introduction to engineering (EGGN-100) is a project-based course offered every fall semesterto first-year students with undecided engineering majors at California State University, Fullerton(CSUF). The primary
prerequisite courses for calculus in highschool, there are a growing number of students who either choose or are placed in college classesbelow the calculus level [1]. Despite success in precalculus in high school, many students acrossthe country are not successful in the college level precalculus course. Even if the students aresuccessful in precalculus (e.g., receiving a B or above), many do not go on to take calculus or failto be successful in calculus [1, 2]. Single variable calculus is a major gatekeeper for studentswho want to pursue degrees in STEM [3]. The national trend of high attrition in university-levelprecalculus and calculus highlights the need to continue to assess and build on the best practicesto strengthen these courses and increase
differences lead to inequitable practices within teams such as unfair distributionsof the workload or type of work, often in problematic ways. For example, active and dominantstudents might advocate for themselves to take on the more challenging and interesting parts of aproject, leaving the more mundane and menial work to their passive teammates. Mix-genderedteams in engineering education have been found to have unbalanced work distribution: womenmay do more work related to planning or communication, while men may do more technicalwork [1]. Such disproportionate allocation of work and assumption of roles lead to studentsobtaining unequal gains from team projects, for which the more active student might have hadthe more enjoyable and useful
include the integration between the psychological and sociological aspects of honor and shame as it relates to educational psychology. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Providing an Enriching Learning Experience for Under- resourced Academic Programs Through MOOCIBLIntroductionCardiovascular Engineering is a multidisciplinary field of study that requires interdisciplinarycollaboration [1]. This kind of course can provide students with an immersive opportunity thatprepares them for graduate studies or industry jobs. However, the cost to start and maintain arobust cardiovascular engineering course can be challenging, especially for
experience during the pandemic.Activities with the MMTK have generally increased students’ confidence with hands-on workand conducting experiments. Future work will include further development of the MMTK for usemore broadly within engineering research and education.1. IntroductionLaboratory experiences and hands-on learning are crucial parts of the undergraduate engineeringexperience [1], however the COVID-19 pandemic has greatly restricted the delivery of theseactivities [2]. Challenges associated with the costs of lab equipment as well as obviousrestrictions on access to equipment and tools at home have limited students’ opportunities formeaningful hands-on learning, particularly in engineering design and build courses.Many studies have explored
cross-cutting engineering concepts into a PDSTEM program provides a unique opportunity for both teachers and students. Students gain adeeper understanding of individual concepts and the relationship among the components ofSTEM. Teachers benefit from demonstration of how this integration of concepts can bepractically carried out in their classrooms. The goals of the PD institute were to 1) integrateindustrial technology, engineering technology and computer science constructs into core mathand science high school curriculum (Physical Science, Biology, Chemistry and Physics); 2)advance teacher knowledge in the core science subjects with emphasis on misconceptions; 3)introduce/reinforce the engineering design process; and 4) due to COVID-19
development of evidence-based interventions to promote retention and student success in engineering. Her fields of technical expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Psychological Cost, Gender, and Retention Among Engineering Students AbstractThere is great interest in developing interventions to improve retention in engineering programsby exploring influential factors at the institutional, curricular, and student levels, especially forunderrepresented minorities. According to expectancy-value theory [1], students’ perceptions oftask-related
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Qualitative Analysis of Lab Skills in CHE LabAbstractTo better understand the change in student perception and abilities in a CHE laboratory course, amulti-dimensional survey was administered to two different student cohorts: one with atraditional lab structure and one with a revised lab structure. While quantitative data from theself-assessment and lab skills test has been analyzed [1], this work presents analysis of one of theopen-ended responses questions on the lab skills test. This study was motivated by the desire tounderstand the impact curriculum revisions have on student experience and abilities. The data setfor this project
Computational Thinking course for non-majors. An initialquantitative evaluation of the visualizations raised questions about their long-term effectivenessand ease of use. This study represents a qualitative study done to gain deeper insight into theexperiences of students. The results of this study demonstrated students were engaging withcourse materials in unexpected ways but frequently referred back to the visualizations.Additionally, students had an approach to understanding the visualizations that was both helpfuland problematic. These findings help to inform visualization and curriculum designers aboutstudent attitudes and strategies in using course materials.1 IntroductionDue to the abstract nature of Computer Science it is not uncommon for
STEM education “to guide research aimedat understanding how STEM students develop challenge-engaging disposition and the ability toadaptively cope with failure.” This framework focusing on academic STEM failures forundergraduate students could be readily applied to failures of students in an engineeringentrepreneurial context. Figure 1 shows the general framework to be applied from Henry et al.which is a combination of four distinct mini-model frameworks. The framework suggests thatjust as prefailure disposition can be predicted based on mindset, goal orientation and fear offailure, post-failure attributions, responses and coping styles can also be predicted. It wasconstructed based on research at the K-12 levels of education and in
environment.The objective of the study is to answer the questions: (1) Which factors affect the systemperformance measures and to what extent? and (2) can optimal settings be identified for thesystem to perform consistently over the range of the extraneous noise variable? To do this,Taguchi experiments will be utilized, along with Signal to Noise (S/N) ratios and factorial plots,to analyze the results. The aim of this paper is to introduce the application of quality controlmethods in performance optimization for an automated electrohydraulic position control system.The system setup, hardware, software, and programming will be introduced. The researchdesign, measurements, and experimental runs will be demonstrated and explained. The impact onstudents
Deployment (QFD) emerged in Japan in the 1970’s with the objective ofinstilling quality in product development. QFD is built on the foundation of the “voice of thecustomer” and is intended to be applied from early stage design through production [1], [2]. Itgained acceptance in Japan and in the United States and remains a popular component of thedesign process [3], [4]. QFD techniques are often implemented by multi-functional teams thatdefine the customers’ requirements early in the design process and translates them intoengineering specifications [5]–[7]. It is then intended to be used to analyze components andmanufacturing processes, and serve as a tool for later quality assurance efforts [6].QFD is often incorporated in undergraduate engineering
. The paper reports the application of stage gate for a course, aimed at courserefinement and attempts to present evidence to assess the effectiveness and achievement ofthe desired outcomes. Improvements in the course contents, delivery methods, assessments,and student performance are reported for the selected freshmen course titled “Introduction toEngineering”. The paper explains activities, working team and deliverables that are part ofthe stages, with samples. The decision-making methodology in gate reviews using criteriaand rubrics are also explained with samples. Samples of course design outputs, coursematerial, checklists with rubrics that were used during the gate reviews also are included inthe paper.1. IntroductionThe Fourth United
forms of knowledge and information regardinginternship/employment resources, departmental and research opportunities, curriculumalternatives, exposure to graduate school, and professional experiences that may result favorablein future career aspirations. A fundamental component to facilitating successful student careerpaths is correlated to an authentic form of mentorship, which exposes students to a plethora ofcareer opportunities and prepares them to navigate postgraduate experiences. The proposed model,which was implemented over a span of four years with a total of sixteen engineering studentsconducting undergraduate research, identifies four key elements in the transformative process: 1)develop student-faculty relationship; 2) faculty
Florida from 2008 to 2016and contain approximately 170,000 students.IntroductionPredicting students’ academic success in higher education has been one of the most popularsubjects among educational researchers for decades. Identifying vulnerable students early on canhelp in providing them critical supports through their academic careers. Based on the NationalStudent Clearinghouse Research Center, on average, only 58% of students who started colleges infall 2012 have earned their degrees within six years, which means 42% of students either havegraduated in more than six years or have left college without degrees [1]. Research show thatdemographic features, such as gender, race, and family income have effects on the six-yeargraduation rate and
has been the director of the Learning Resource Center at Penn State Behrend for 20 years, where she is also an affiliate instructor of English. She has been involved in a number of federal grants, including two NSF STEM grants, an EU-Atlantis grant, and is currently PI for an NSF IUSE-EHR col- laborative grant. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Quantitative Assessment of Writing Register in Engineering Technology StudentsIntroductionSome earlier papers [1],[2] discussed the use of a “common language” to improve undergraduateSTEM writing. The importance of writing to STEM undergraduates is well-known
-Sep Trans* Student Experiences (Marine & Nicolazzo, 2014)16-Sep Active Learning & Group Work (Cooper & Brownell, 2016)23-Sep Social Justice in Engineering (Riley, 2013)30-Sep Queering Higher Education (Renn, 2010) 7-Oct Student Resistance (Part 1) (Revelo & Baber, 2018)14-Oct Student Resistance (Part 2) (Renn & Ozaki, 2010)21-Oct The intersection of race and LGBTQIA+ (Alimahomed, 2010) identity28-Oct The intersection of ability and LGBTQIA+ (Miller, 2018) identity 4-Nov Engineering and Masculinity (Miller et
opportunities in which to remove barriers for womenwithin the engineering and computing discipline by understanding their experiences and participation in the fields.I. INTRODUCTION Recent reports from the National Science Foundation (NSF) have indicated that while the number of women in Science and Engineering (S&E) related jobs continue to grow, the group remains underrepresented in the S&E workforce relative to their overall presence in the population [1]. The lack of women in STEM transcends traditional narratives on the importance of broadening participation and increasing STEM diversity because of the nuanced issues women face in a male dominated field. Issues concerning women feeling unwelcomed in STEM begin at the academic level and
-term investment in a software platform.IntroductionExperiential learning is a relatively modern technique to supplement students’ education by“[developing] a wide range of thinking strategies and perceptual skills which are not called forthby books or lectures” [1]. The benefits of this method have long-term impacts that play a crucialrole in an individual’s professional success. Most ABET-accredited higher-education programsfeature a design course intended to leverage experiential learning by pairing the culmination ofstudents’ knowledge from their undergraduate program with a simulated real-world industryenvironment [2], [3]. There are also several supplemental outlets for continuous project-basedlearning on a larger scale, such as research
thinking, problem-solving and algorithmic thinking. Dr. Mendoza-Garcia’s research interests include investigating how to nurture in students these skills. He also worked in Industry before transitioning to academia. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Redesigning a large enrollment online course using a learner-centered approach.This paper is a follow-up to my experience redesigning my online course in problem-solving CGS2531Problem-Solving Using Computer Software [1]. In that paper, the instructional developer and I describedthe design decisions to improve students' engagement. In this second paper, I am reporting what hashappened after its implementation.My
content and reflections from the instructor, TAs, and students.1. IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic disrupted higher education worldwide in March 2020. Colleges anduniversities abruptly stopped in-person instruction and instead required remote teaching.Instructors’ challenges included preparing virtual lessons, learning videoconferencing software,and selecting appropriate graded assessments. At the same time, students’ learning routines weredisrupted as many returned home and were away from their peers; some students also lost thesafety net that the university provided, such as reliable food and shelter [1]. Furthermore, bothstudents and faculty were affected by limited internet connectivity and additional familyresponsibilities due to the
operation of healthcare systems. . American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Real Data and Application based Interactive Modules for Data Science Education in Engineering Kerul Suthar1, Thomas Mitchell1, Anna Hartwig1, Jin Wang1, Shiwen Mao2, Laura Parson3, Peng Zeng4, Bo Liu5, Q. Peter He1,* 1 Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849 2 Dept. of Electric and Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849 3 Dept. of Educational and Organizational Leadership, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105 4
, particularlyrelated to how they conceptualize engineers’ responsibilities to stakeholders [1]-[5] however, there has beenlimited (if any) discussion of engineering faculty’ experience of teaching CSR to students. Although CSRhas been identified as an important part of the undergraduate and graduate curriculums for the Mining,Petroleum and Geological Engineering Departments by both industry and professors, there seems to be adifference between student identification of CSR content and importance between the departments thatcould indicate a difference in teaching styles and possible effectiveness. Examining student and facultyperceptions of CSR is crucial, because discrepancies can exist between what faculty believe they areteaching and what students actually
) Shannon O’Donnell, Americas Zone Strategy Lead, Academic Programs Melanie Spare, Portfolio Development Executive, Academic Enablementumich mbse asee filed -- 2021-05-24.docx Page 1 of 27 Date Created: December 17, 2020 Date Modified: May 24, 2021 Redefining Student Preparation for Engineering Leadership Using Model-Based Systems Engineering in an Undergraduate Curriculum May 24, 2021 – FiledAbstractUS colleges and universities confer over 130,000 engineering degrees each year. However, whilegraduating students from top universities possess
neurodiverse students as well as all students with differentlearning styles and disabilities.1. IntroductionThe goal of undergraduate engineering programs is to teach how to solve problems [1] withcritical thinking and other necessary skills. Engineering programs typically have had a narrowfocus and rigid adherence to traditional instruction and assessment [2]. Blickenstaff [3] reportedthe lecture format that was adopted in most engineering courses can be detrimental in that itpotentially creates a barrier between students and instructors. Felder et al. [4] and Suresh [5]found that performance in key introductory undergraduate courses is related to engineeringpersistence. Even long after Seymour and Hewitt’s earlier study about students
withdrawal rate in the regular in-personteaching mode, an average of about 30% in the past ten consecutive semesters. Our institution, the New York City College of Technology, abruptly switched to distancelearning mode in Spring 2020 and continues to offer all courses online in Fall 2020. This paperpresents our effort to redesign the contents, applications, and assessments of this course to face thechallenges of teaching an online hands-on lab class. We also want to implement remote learningadvantages, such as the flexibility and numerous methods to deliver information, into this course.The arrangements we made to adjust to the remote learning mode include: 1) redesign of the labcontents into 12 lab experiments in four modules; 2) integrate the