principles.Keywords: Backward Design Process, Course Design, Outcome Based Learning, Statics.I. INTRODUCTIONA. Setting for the Curriculum ProjectThe specific setting for this curriculum project is outlined as follow:1. Salient characteristics of the institution or sponsoring organizationAs described by Anand (2005), " Engineering Mechanics - Statics is a core course in most of theengineering disciplines, and is generally taught by a civil and/or a mechanical engineeringfaculty at the nations' ABET accredited colleges and universities" (p.1). The institutional settingfor this course is also considered an ABET accredited engineering college that offersundergraduate degree programs for civil engineering and/or mechanical engineering students.This course is not
viewed as more important emphases or topicsthan they were years ago.Second, the EBOK and the ECM each are products of the integrated effort of manyvolunteer academics and practitioners representing a wide range of engineeringdisciplines. That kind of diverse participation enhances the credibility of the resultingproducts.Preliminary Ideas on How the Seven Capabilities/Competencies Might be Reflectedin the Next CEBOKConsider two ways to explicitly include one or more of the seven elements in Table 1 in athird edition of the CEBOK or as an amendment to the second edition. The basic optionsfor each are adding an outcome, while maybe deleting one or more, or introducing astrong theme. Example of the New Outcome OptionUsing
the classroom. Previously, Dr. Cutler worked as the research specialist with the Rothwell Center for Teaching and Learning Excellence Worldwide Campus (CTLE - W) for Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University.Dr. James J. Pembridge, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ., Daytona Beach James J. Pembridge is an Assistant Professor in the Freshman Engineering Department at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University. He earned a B.S. in Aerospace Engineering, M.A. Education in Curriculum and Instruction, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. His research has focused on mentoring as pedagogy for project-based courses and understanding the adult learning characteristics of undergraduate students.Dr. Matthew A. Verleger
assessenergy conservation opportunities. In addition, the students demonstrate the appropriate usage ofenergy monitoring and measuring equipment commonly used by energy specialists and energyauditors. The course is taught as a lecture-practicum with an emphasis on clean energy and energyefficiency both in class and in laboratory. In particular, the key energy efficiency topics arediscussed how they can be integrated into manufacturing coursework to include sustainabilityprinciples.1. IntroductionFusing U.S. innovation on green science and clean manufacturing is an environmental necessity.There is a need to instill sustainability awareness and concepts among undergraduate students, inorder to ensure that sustainable production will be achieved in the
, stimulate cross-disciplinecollaborations and serve all ranks. Faculty representing departments across the College eachcreated an at-a-glance ‘bio-board’, a one-page laminated pictorial summary of name, researcharea and current research project. Participants were divided into two groups positioned in pairsopposite each other on two sides of a long table and engaged in a controlled series of ten minuteresearch exchanges. The activity stimulated integrative and collaborative research conversations,built relationships across rank and disciplines, and resulted in the pursuit of collaborativefunding. Agency, national laboratory, and industry visits began in 2009. The COE Associate Dean ledfaculty on annual visits to funding agencies, national
website lists fourteendegree programs at US schools related to nanotechnology: four minor programs innanotechnology, six degrees that include a specialization or concentration in nanotechnology,and four B.S. degree programs in nanoscience or nanoengineering.7 A review of nanotechnologyprograms by Minaie et al. categorized current initiatives into nine models of integratingnanotechnology into engineering curricula.8 Of the universities included in their review, TexasState was the only school categorized as integrating nanotechnology into existing courses. Themajority of nanotechnology education efforts focusing on teaching nanotechnology as a separatesubject or in addition to traditional topics in the curriculum is incongruous with the
hard. This could be particularly relevant forfreshmen and sophomore students who may struggle with relating the course content with theirproject. It is expected that students find involvement with undergraduate research as one possiblemeans of developing analytical and professional skills that they can use in a rapidly changingenvironment where employers are seeking a very diverse set of skills from graduating students.13Survey results indirectly indicate that the scaffolding approach used in introducing students toundergraduate research has been useful. However, further development of the framework used tointroduce undergraduates to research is needed. In the long term, undergraduate research couldbe integrated into curriculum through a
Masters program. He currently works as a Digital Electronics Engineer at Northrop Grumman Corporation.Dr. Wagdy H. Mahmoud, University of the District of Columbia Wagdy H. Mahmoud is an Associate Professor of electrical engineering at the Electrical Engineering Department at UDC. Mahmoud is actively involved in research in the areas of reconfigurable logic, hard- ware/software co-design of a system on a chip using reconfigurable logic, application-specific integrated circuits (ASIC), digital logic design, image compressions, digital signal processing, computer architec- ture, embedded systems, system on a chip, and renewable energy.Dr. Nian Zhang, University of the District of Columbia Research Interests: Dr. Zhang’s
members were connected with an array ofworkshops and mentoring opportunities and assessment feedback indicated that they reallyappreciated mentoring around pitch practices and the opportunities for connection at the mentordinner. Students indicated a number of skills gains related to the development of a businessmodel with skills related to selecting key activities and identifying key partners for their projects.Alumni results revealed stronger skills gains after the program in the area of identifying keyresources for their projects. Teams provided additional feedback on the alumni survey indicatingcontinued mentor support after the program and additional fundraising success (two teamsreceived $250k investment).Integration of results with on
assess the student. • For some outcomes, the workplace is simply better suited for assessment. For example, the assessment of teamwork skills in the academic setting might take place through a variety of projects, activities, and labs scattered throughout the curriculum. (Not every course is conducive to assessment of teamwork!) However, these are often very discrete events and the faculty member may have limited access to observe the student interactions. In contrast, an employer can work closely with a student on a full-time basis over an extended period of time. Since most industry settings rely heavily on teamwork skills, we believe that the supervisor is much
is explicitly stated in multiple ABET criterion and the BOK. The BOK’s Outcome9 calls for graduates to “design a system or process to meet desired needs within such realisticconstraints as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,constructability, and sustainability.” The ABET General Criterion 3 requires “an ability todesign a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, andsustainability.” ABET General Criterion 5 also requires that “students must be prepared forengineering practice through a curriculum culminating in a major design experience based on theknowledge and skills
samescenario tested in this experiment. Figure 20 shows the results of the FEA simulation run for theFSAE spaceframe. The simulation was run with 400 ft-lbf, an average suspension load, appliedacross the front axle. The torsional stiffness at the front axle from FEA was calculated to bearound 1100 ft-lbf/deg. This is within 10% of the value calculated from the experimental setup. Figure 20: The results of the torsional rigidity computer simulation.Course StructureThe implementation of the laboratory experiment consisted of both horizontal and verticalcurricular integration with other courses.Horizontally, this laboratory experiment in ME160 Engineering Experimentation is an extensionof an experiment that is done earlier in the course
, whilesuperficially similar in topics covered to Electronic Instrumentation, is a very different course.First, because there are no formal college level prerequisites (only a typical high school scienceand math experience is assumed), circuit analysis emphasizes algebraic methods and preparationfor future circuits and electronics courses. An even more important distinction is the emphasis ona more complete and integrated Experimental Centric Pedagogy (ECP) than has been the case inElectronic Instrumentation (EI). Essentially every concept is first introduced through anexperiment (experiment first) which requires that a substantial fraction of time spent in and outof class is dedicated to enhancing the students skills as electronics experimenters. A
blended-learning characteristics. (For an example, see therecent work by Long.39) In addition, from 2016, the engineering curriculum is seeing asignificant shift towards project and design-based learning.40 This will result in even morechanges to the residential-school programs.41With many on-campus programs, including at Deakin University, there exists a popular trendin higher education towards the development and implementation of blended learning, inparticular integrating Internet-enabled learning and assessment methods, to strive forinstitutional academic and administrative goals. What remains is the development andimplementation of authentic blended learning for online programs to introduce, enhance, andintegrate campus-based methods in
Paper ID #14519Engineering Competitions as Pathways to Development of Professional Engi-neering SkillsDr. Lori C. Bland, George Mason University Lori C. Bland, Ph.D., is an associate professor at George Mason University. She teaches courses in edu- cational assessment, program evaluation, and data-driven decision-making. Bland received her Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Virginia. Her current research focuses on identifying, ex- amining, and assessing learning and professional outcomes in formal and informal learning environments in K-12, higher education, and the workforce; how data is used from
aspects. Assessment of outcomes of studentlearning from these real world energy applications was also performed.Extracurricular Project: Design, Build and Test (DBT) of an Air Flow BenchWestern Kentucky University takes pride in adhering to a design, build, and test methodology3,4,which is typically incorporated within the design sequence of the curriculum. Through thismethodology, a student team is typically required to conduct research and learn essential skillsbefore ever building or testing an experiment. Because Halton Company manufactures kitchenventilation hoods, which are sized for commercial use, it was impossible to obtain a hood sizedfor laboratory use. It was determined that a scaled-down model must be created so that theresults from
Kelso Farrell is an Associate Professor at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. She has a PhD in English Literature (Science Fiction) from Louisiana State University (2007), an MA in English from Montana State University, and a BA in Creative Writing from the University of Montana. At LSU, Jennifer was part of the Communication Across the Curriculum (CxC) and worked in the Engineering Communication Studio. Jennifer has published articles in The Leading Edge, Carbon, The Journal of Popular Culture, and Foundation.Dr. Alicia Domack, Milwaukee School of Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Impact of Experiential Learning on
students enrolled in fall 2015. The followingexamples show how peer review of oral presentations can be adapted to various situations and besubmitted in written, oral, or electronic form. In addition, each instructor asked her students toprovide some feedback on the peer review process, and this information is presented as well.Table 1 provides an overview of the types of peer review used in each context.Table 1: Comparison of Peer Review in Three Engineering Contexts Dedicated Communications Integrated Course Workshop Assignment Feedback written online written/oral Channel Anonymity single-blind single-blind
instrument designed to measuretheir perceived effectiveness of Scaffolding, Interactivity, and Reflectivity components of thecourse by using the SIRA scales.20 Lastly, in Phase 3 we used correlation analysis to compare therelationships between ethical reasoning development and the SIRA scale responses for bothmodes of participation.Figure 1 provides an overview of these research phases and the analysis methods that we utilizedwithin each. While Phases 1 and 2 do not inform one another, we integrated the data collectedthroughout these phases in Phase 3. Figure 1: Depiction of the multiphase research process of this studyIntervention/Course OverviewThe intervention used in this study began with training students to understand the
, master planning, management for energy conservation/renewable energy projects and space planning for campus expansion. As a senior administrative leader, I have facilitated climate action planning in com- pliance with the American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC) and re- ceived the Outstanding Climate Leadership award that recognized successful carbon reduction strategies, innovative curriculum and the dynamic engagement faculty, staff and students in a the pursuit of carbon neutrality. Although my primary formal training has been in the field of architecture, recent doctoral studies at the University of Pennsylvania were focused in the field of higher education management. As part of an
Thermo/Fluid Courses”, AIAA 47th Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA paper no. AIAA-2009-570, January 2009.3. Penney, R., Lee, R, Magie, M., and Clausen, E., “Design Projects in Undergraduate Heat Transfer: Six Examples from the Fall 2007 Course at the University of Arkansas”, Proc. of 2007 Midwest Section Conference of ASEE, Wichita, KS, September 2007.4. Smith, A., Volino, R., and Flack., K., “Design of a Heat Sink in an Undergraduate Heat Transfer Course, Proc. of ASME 2012 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Houston, TX, November 2012.5. Mokhtar, W., Duesing, P., and Hildebrand, R., “Integration of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) into the Mechanical Engineering Programs
0 3 0 28/97% (n=29) 1 2 0 1/3% 2-hr course 0 2 0 1/100% 1-hr course 0 1 0 1/100% (n=37) Yes No % all hours ET 91.9% 8.1% Summary: These tables look at the Criterion 5: Curriculum credit hour category claimed forthis course. From the dataset, the course ranged from a 1-hour to a 4-hour course, and withineach of these the credits assigned to math & basic science, engineering topics, generaleducation, and other varied. An assignment of 100%5555 ET was most common, showingup in 66% of the 4-hour courses, 97% of the 3-hour courses, and 100% of the 2- and
System Integration: Electronic ControlsOne key aspect of additive manufacturing is to match the dispensing of the material with themovement of the stages. This required that the activation of the cake icing dispenser beautomated to allow for proper filling of the cavity. To accomplish this, the circuit shown in Fig. 6was designed and implemented. First, a multiplexer and transistor (TIP120 NPN in Fig. 6) wasused to extract an additional output from the LegoTM NXT controller to allow for the X, Y, and Zaxes as well as the cake icing dispenser to be synchronized. The circuit utilized the pulse widthmodulation PWM) of the LegoTM NXT controller to turn on an external voltage source thatpowered the cake icing dispenser. (Thetoggle switch (DPDT Switch
portion of the program is to prepare Scholars for the pace,rigor, and depth of the STEM curriculum at Rice. All Scholars take first-year Chemistry,Physics, and Calculus as courses, five days a week; homework, quizzes and exams areadministered like in the academic year. As stated above, RESP is not a remedial program.Instead, the summer portion of RESP exposes students to the most challenging sections ofChemistry, Physics, and Calculus. Scholars simultaneously receive coaching from instructors,staff, and upperclassmen Fellows in study and learning techniques. This coursework issupplemented by individual Pre-Calculus remediation through ALEKS, an adaptive onlinelearning system. Additionally, students complete modules in engineering design and
the First Year Engineering Experience committee, chair for the LTU KEEN Course Modification Team, chair for the LTU Leadership Curriculum Committee, supervisor of the LTU Thermo-Fluids Laboratory, coordinator of the Certificate/Minor in Aeronautical Engineering, and faculty advisor of the LTU SAE Aero Design Team. Dr. Gerhart conducts workshops on active, collaborative, and problem-based learning, entrepreneurial mindset education, creative problem solving, and innovation. He is an author of a fluid mechanics textbook.Dr. Doug E. Melton, Kern Family Foundation c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Entrepreneurially Minded Learning: Incorporating Stakeholders, Discovery
Paper ID #15527Development of PBL Students as Self-Directed LearnersMr. Ronald R. Ulseth, Iron Range Engineering Ron Ulseth directs and instructs in the Iron Range Engineering program in Virginia, Minnesota and he teaches in the Itasca Community College engineering program in Grand Rapids, MN. He was instrumental in growing the Itasca program from 10 students in 1992 to 160 students in 2010. In 2009, he worked with a national development team of engineering educators to develop the 100% PBL curriculum used in the Iron Range model. He has successfully acquired and managed over $10 million in educational grants including
will help guide thisoverview. Firstly, aerospace engineers are often engaged in the design of large scale complexengineered systems, and design involves an individual’s technical competency integrated into ateam of specialists and generalists. For example, a team of propulsion engineers in an enginecompany may coordinate and communicate with a team of propulsion integration engineers in anairframe company, and those integration engineers are simultaneously coordinating with aircraftperformance engineers and the flight test team. Secondly, because of complexity of the systemsand specialty of the engineer, an engineer’s experience is unique. For example, a propulsionengineer in a propulsion company may have a very different experience from a
decisions, believing that thoseconsiderations are in someone else’s purview.”34,35 Stephen Petrina36 suggests this is due to thelack of an integrated understanding of how closely building is related to its socio-political andecological consequences. “When we design, and teach design and technological problem solving,however, we invariably neglect the interconnectedness of products, streams, and wakes.”36Vanderburg and Khan37 observe that in the formal undergraduate engineering curriculum,“Technological development is primarily guided by values and measures such as efficiency,productivity, cost-effectiveness and profitability. These measure how much output can be derivedfrom certain inputs, but they tell us nothing about how any technological
. This research is funded by the NSF as acollaborative research grant (EEC-1360665, 1360956, and 1360958). Any opinions, findings,and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and donot necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.Bibliography[1] National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, 2010 SESTAT Integrated Data System, 2013, Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/sestat.[2] G. Lichtenstein, H. G. Loshbaugh, B. Claar, H. L. Chen, K. Jackson, and S. D. Sheppard, “An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors,” J. Eng. Ed., vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 227-234.[3] National Center
entrepreneurs. A seminar seriesbrings local businessmen and -women in to talk about entrepreneurship principles and ideals andtrains students in basic business planning practices. The students develop a business model tocommercialize their research. These models are presented at an end-of-program EngiPreneurship(engineering entrepreneurship) competition consisting in a “Shark Tank” style pitch contest. Thecompetition is judged by a panel of entrepreneurs and local industry experts, pictured in Figure11. Figure 11: Local experts judging the EngiPreneurship CompetitionExpansionExpansion of the program curriculum began in 2015 by reaching out to additional industrypartners. This initiative began with tours at Danfoss Turbocor, shown in Figure