Asee peer logo
Displaying results 871 - 900 of 1360 in total
Collection
2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting
Authors
Kofi Nyarko, Morgan State University; Sacharia Albin, Norfolk State University; John Okyere Attia P.E., Prairie View A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Sonnet Lite software.Insights from 2020 Summer ProgramThe SageFox Consulting Group is responsible for all SCR2 program assessments. The insightsdocumented in this section are derived from their assessment report. The assessment instrumentsused include: A pre-survey for students and teachers; A post-survey for students and teachers; afollow-up survey for students and teachers; and a post-program survey for mentors. These surveyswere created in consultation with Audrey Rorrer, author of the CISE REU Evaluation Toolkitsurvey instruments[22,23], which contains construct subscales measuring research skills,leadership skills, self-efficacy, scientist identity formation, intention to attend graduate school,grit, mentoring relationships, and attitudes
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jacques C. Richard, Texas A&M University; Noemi V. Mendoza Diaz, Texas A&M University; Tanya Dugat Wickliff, Texas A&M University; So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
institutional data analyst. As a psychometrician, she revised the PSVT:R for secondary and undergraduate students, developed the TESS (Teaching Engineering Self-efficacy Scale) for K-12 teachers, and rescaled the SASI (Student Attitudinal Success Inventory) for engineering students. As a program evaluator, she evaluated the effects of teacher professional development (TPD) programs on elementary teachers’ attitudes toward engineering and students’ STEM knowledge through a NSF DRK-12 project. As an institutional data analyst, she is investigating engineering students’ pathways to their success. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Enculturation of Diverse Students to the
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katherine Drinkwater, Duke University; Charlotte Sendek; Allison N Stocks, Duke University; Paula Kworekwa; Julius Mugaga; Robert Tamale Ssekitoleko; Ann Saterbak, Duke University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
makerspacescan be found in the news as the source of the next manufacturing revolution [6].Makerspaces as a locus for design learning is a topic that has received extensive attention. Thetheory of maker education relates to many educational frameworks, including Piaget’sconstructivism theory [7], the Situated Learning Model [8], and Community of Practice [9], allof which have been applied to understand learning in a makerspace [10]. The style of learningand appropriate frameworks depend highly on the type, location, and use of a makerspace.Experience working in a makerspace improves creativity [11], collaboration in diverse teams[12], design self-efficacy [13], and technical skills used in industry [12]. Agency is an importantcomponent of a makerspace
Conference Session
Engineering Technology Division (ETD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mohamed Khalafalla, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; Tejal Udhan Mulay, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; Doreen Kobelo Regalado, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; Behnam Shadravan, Florida A&M University - Florida State University; David Akinsanya, Florida A&M University - Florida State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology Division (ETD)
education [2, 13].Previous studies have found that hands-on, design-oriented activities can increase students'engagement and interest in engineering [13, 23]. Several studies have examined the effectivenessof hands-on engineering technology summer camps in increasing the representation ofunderrepresented students in STEM majors. A recent study found that participation in a hands-onengineering technology summer camp was associated with increased interest in pursuing anengineering degree among underrepresented high school students [24]. Another study by DeanHughes [25] found that underrepresented high school students who participated in a hands-onengineering technology summer camp had higher levels of self-efficacy in engineering and weremore likely
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division Technical Session - Understanding and Changing Engineering Culture
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Omoju Miller, UC Berkeley
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
77 college students chose to continue to the next more demanding firstcourse intended for CS majors, CS61A.Research MethodsFormative, mixed-method research was conducted to test out the effectiveness of Beauty and Joyof Computing (BJC) curriculum as implemented in UC Berkeley’s CS10, in attracting historicallyunderrepresented students. To gain a comprehensive analysis into the socio-curriculareffectiveness of the BJC curriculum as the first class in a student’s CS trajectory, it wasbenchmarked against CS61A—the first class for majors, and increasingly, for non-majors aswell.Survey instruments were developed to measure participants’ self-reported efficacy along severaldimensions. To determine the role of identity and self efficacy; as well as
Conference Session
Empowering Marginalized Voices in STEM: Perspectives and Initiatives
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adrian Rodriguez, The University of Texas at Austin
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
, and self-efficacy with conducting research and working on a research team and in a lab. • Skills: writing scientific papers, making oral presentations, and conducting observations in the lab or field. • Attitudes and Behaviors: working in a scientific community and feelings of creativity, independence, and responsibility around working on scientific projects.This survey instrument is shown in the literature to accurately validate a research experienceprogram for undergraduates in STEM [20]. A copy of the survey questions is provided in theAppendix section and listed as instrument A4. The survey was administered only once after theresearch experience. Despite pairing 8 students with mentors for the research
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Lauren Summers, University of Washington; Joanna Wright, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
courses, students were incentivized witha nominal amount of extra credit for the course in which they were recruited. All studentscompleted an electronic survey online and outside of class. Surveys were collected withidentifying information so that duplicates could be removed before aggregating data for analysis.All results were cross-sectional. In the survey, students reported their perceptions of variousitems related to engagement, belonging, effort, peer harassment, task value, self-efficacy, TA andfaculty interactions, and other measures of course achievement as well as multiple demographicitems.InstrumentsThe part of the study reported in this paper focuses on a five primary engagement variables andfour demographic measures (gender, race
Conference Session
Technical Session 8 - Paper 5: Cultivating Inclusivity: A Systematic Literature Review on Developing Empathy for Students in STEM Fields
Collection
2022 CoNECD (Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity)
Authors
Stephanie Jill Lunn, Georgia Institute of Technology; Cristi L. Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology; Joseph M LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Sessions, Diversity
Publications where the primary focus of Publications where the primary focus of the the research was K-12 students, faculty, research was undergraduate or graduate students practicing clinicians or non-college or university students Research was conducted in the United States or Research specific to a university outside of the in Canada United States or Canada Focus of publication is empathy, component of Focus of publication is not empathy, and if it empathy described by the framework, or which includes empathy is more about measuring mention how to develop/foster/imbue empathy empathy than its development or learning Include
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 10: Broadening Participation in P12
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Taryn Melkus Bayles, University of Pittsburgh; Claudia J. Morrell; Sandra Staklis; Kevin A Jordan
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
. Freire studied theconcept of empowerment in school environments and educational settings 50 years ago[19]. Hefound that an educational system can either liberate marginalized students or maintain systems ofoppression that fail to give students a voice and opportunity to control their educational destiny.Intrapersonal student empowerment is predicted by equitable power use, positive teacher-studentrelationships, and a sense of community in the classroom[20]. Empowering students entailsbuilding their self-efficacy, agency in their learning, and resilience in schools[21].Inclusive refers to classrooms or school settings where educators are aware of and responsive tothe ways that students are marginalized by our current education system and
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Etahe Johnson, University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Willie L. Brown Jr., University of Maryland Eastern Shore; Mere Serea
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
-college STEM students.OverviewUnderrepresented groups in STEM gives a benefit to pre-college STEM education initiativesusing PBL as a tool for at learning and scientific innovation. Mentorship provides opportunityfor accessibility, increase self-efficacy and STEM degree completion of learners. In STEMprofessions, the mentorship practices allow for a transformative STEM interdisciplinary mindsetfor industry careers. For students in the STEM fields, mentoring is essential for matriculation,retention, and graduation. Mentoring in STEM promotes the formation of a STEM identity andoffers knowledge of industry trends, technical expertise, and professional networking. Mentoringprovides STEM students with setting goals and expectations, building
Conference Session
Materials Division (MATS) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Michael Roberts, University of Florida
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Materials Division (MATS)
one’sattitude/motivation, self-efficacy, and experience with technology. How a student views andvalues their education will influence how seriously they interact with an online course [3]. For anonline class, it is up to the student to participate in class and interact with the course.Student engagement can be enhanced by improved instructional techniques. Methods ofteaching can be broken down into four categories; instructor centered, interactive,individualized, and experiential [4]. Instructor centered learning primarily involves one-waycommunication from the instructor to the students. Questions from instructor to the whole classis also a form of an instructor centered strategy; this method primarily facilitates passive learningfor the student which
Conference Session
CoNECD Session : Day 2 Slot 7 Technical Session 3
Collection
2021 CoNECD
Authors
M. Javed Khan, Tuskegee University; Chadia A. Aji, Tuskegee University
Tagged Topics
CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity
, “Embracing Ambiguity: A Framework for Promoting IterativeDesign Thinking Approaches in Engineering and Design Curricula,” ASEE 124th AnnualConference & Exposition, Jun 25-28, 2017, Columbus, OH[13] J. Hertz, “Confidently Uncomfortable: First-year Student Ambiguity Tolerance and Self-efficacy on Open-ended Design Problems,” ASEE 125th Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun24-27, 2018, Salt Lake City, UT[14] E. Dringenberg and R. E. H. Wertz, “How do first-year engineering students experienceambiguity in engineering design problems: The development of a self-report instrument,” 2016ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana,https://doi.org/10.18260/p.25474[15] R.L. Tauritz, “How to handle knowledge uncertainty: learning and
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; Jing Yan, Nanjing Forestry University; Justin R. Allison, Jackson State University; Zhenbu Zhang, Jackson State University; Huiru Shih P.E., Jackson State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
toperform online collaborative learning, in which students were engaged in deep discussion withtheir peers and each student was provided with a specific task through e-mail with expectationfor improving their students’ technical and conceptual knowledge [7]. Bohorquez and Toft-Nielsen designed a problem-oriented medical electronics laboratory, where collaborativelearning was adopted with the intentions of improving the expertise, self-efficacy andcraftsmanship skills of biomedical engineering students. Their implementation yieldedsatisfactory results and demonstrated the effectiveness of their collaborative learning strategies[8]. Dong and Guo incorporated Collaborative Project-Based Learning (CPBL) into theirComputer Networking course for
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 13: Student Learning and Contexts
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Julianna S. Ge, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Justin Charles Major, Purdue University; John Mark Froiland, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
courses: Effects on self- regulatory self-efficacy, mood, stress, and sleep quality,” J. Am. Coll. Heal., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 433–442, 2010.[26] M. Scheidt et al., “Validity evidence for the SUCCESS survey: Measuring non-cognitive and affective traits of engineering and computing students,” 2018, p. 28.[27] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006.[28] A. Chiesa, “The difficulty of defining mindfulness: Current thought and critical issues,” Mindfulness (N. Y)., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 255–268, 2013.[29] S. Sauer et al., “Assessment of mindfulness: Review on state of the art,” Mindfulness (N. Y)., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2013.[30
Conference Session
Latest Trends and Implementations in Manufacturing Education
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Avneet Hira, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing
of measuring impacts of theiruniversity Makerspace "through engineering design self-efficacy, retention in the engineeringmajor; and idea generation ability."Halverson and Sheridan31 in their comparative case study on different Makerspace invokedwork by Papert and Dewey as the theoretical underpinning of the Maker movement and itsrelation with education.Figure 4. Educational and developmental theoryEducational and developmental theoryThe allusion to the theories of thinking and development in the academic research literatureencourages our inquiry into these theories and how they are and can potentially be related tothe educational aspects of Makerspaces. Figure 4 shows these connections in the form of aconcept map.Papert’s32 theories on
Conference Session
Bridging Cultures, Advancing Justice: Fostering Inclusion and Sustainability in Engineering Education
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kian G. Alavy, The University of Arizona; Matthieu Bloch, Georgia Institute of Technology; Gregory L. Heileman, The University of Arizona; Benjamin Richmond, The University of Arizona; Ahmad Slim, The University of Arizona; Mitchell L R Walker II, Georgia Institute of Technology; David Ruiter, University of California, San Diego
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
journey and use culturally anchored curriculum to increase students’ knowledge and skills, improve students’ self-efficacy in pursuing higher education, increase sense of belonging on a university campus, and help students navigate campus systems.Ahmad Slim, The University of Arizona Dr. Ahmad Slim is a PostDoc researcher at the University of Arizona, where he specializes in educational data mining and machine learning. With a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering from the University of New Mexico, he leads initiatives to develop analytics solutions that support strategic decision-making in academic and administrative domains. His work includes the creation of predictive models and data visualization tools that aim to improve
Collection
15th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience Conference (FYEE)
Authors
Sukeerti Shandliya, University of Cincinnati; Cedrick Kwuimy, University of Cincinnati
Tagged Topics
Diversity
distinct transformation categories. The studycorrelated these categories with the TROPOS subscales and examines demographic factors.Findings indicate higher TROPOS scores for first-generation students and female studentscompared to their peers.I. IntroductionThe perceptions and belief system of first year engineering students affects their self-efficacy,confidence, sense of belonging, satisfaction and other such constructs which are essential forshaping successful student experiences and outcomes. For example, Hutchison-Green [1] foundthat first year engineering students’ perception of their course success depended on their speed ofsolving problems and the amount of time taken to learn new material in comparison to theirpeers. Further, student
Conference Session
Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Anne Marguerite McAlister, University of Virginia; Sarah Catherine Lilly, University of Virginia; Jennifer L. Chiu, University of Virginia
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
students,specifically, are often told to prioritize their research role over their educator role [61], despitethe demonstrated benefits of being in the educator role. For example, the experience of teachingleads to higher self-efficacy and effectiveness as an educator [62]–[65]. Additionally, graduatestudents’ experimental design and hypothesis generation skills improved from teaching aboutinquiry [61]. The benefits of serving in an educator role may be attractors to the educatoridentity. Graduate students serving in the role of an educator through involvement in scienceeducational outreach has been examined (e.g., [66]–[72]), with demonstrated benefits for K-12student participants, such as increased interest and positive views of science
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 4: Professional Development in Undergraduate Programs
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Manuel Alejandro Figueroa, The College of New Jersey; Diane C. Bates, The College of New Jersey; J. Lynn Gazley, The College of New Jersey; Christopher Wagner, The College of New Jersey; Steven Schreiner P.E., The College of New Jersey; Bijan Sepahpour P.E., The College of New Jersey
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
) their experience in professional seminars.This reflects ongoing work in the multiple dimensions of identity development, particularly inconnecting academic competence (‘can I do this’, or academic self-efficacy) to professionalaspirations (‘do I belong’, or professional role confidence).Course Performance - ‘The Ultimatum’Course performance is the first measure freshman students use to determine how well they fitin the engineering program. This was true across majority groups and underrepresentedstudents. However, many students who were well prepared and had strong family supportcommented that adjusting to college and learning how to study were the biggest obstacles theyfaced during their first year. Those students, who arrived to college with
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
college personnel and students in both educationalvenues. Forty-one interviews were conducted with 10+ at each CC site during the first semesterof our research. These data, along with a careful review of documents and websites availablefrom each CC and applicable higher education literature as a comparison informed therefinement of the CPPI which was developed, and tested in our previously described STEMcommunity college study.3The Refined College Pedagogical Practice Inventory (CPPI-R): Refinement, testing, and use ofthe CPPI has been informed by measurement research of educational psychologicalresearchers.31 Specifically, the inventory was initially designed with the intent of enabling us toexplore relationships among the dependent and
Conference Session
Research Methods I: Developing Research Tools and Methods
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rachel Roberts, University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences; Denise Wilson, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
projects focusing on engaging stakeholders in forest management issues, surveys on public values of cultural ecosystem services, and psychographic market segmentation of sustainable tourism.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non- cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Cross-Validation of a
Conference Session
Engineering Cultures and Identity
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hank Boone, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno
Tagged Topics
ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
dissociation from engineering but is more a measure of one’s “fit”14. FGS students may seetheir salient identity as separate from engineering, but they choose to associate (major in)engineering and thus take on engineering’s group affiliation. Social identity serves as theoverlying structure guiding our work. This theory serves to potentially bridge the gap betweenengineering identity and belongingness to engineering. Additionally, the role of social capitalfalls into this theory as it serves to moderate entrance into the engineering group and thedevelopment of feelings of belongingness in engineering. Identity, belongingness, and socialcapital will be used to measure the students’ engineering social identity for this study. Explicitframing of how we
Conference Session
Diversity Research - Session I
Collection
2018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference
Authors
Jacklin Stonewall, Iowa State University; Michael Dorneich, Iowa State University; Cassandra Dorius; Jane Rongerude PhD, Iowa State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Diversity Research
. [39] F. Pajares, & M. J. Johnson, “Selfefficacy beliefs and the[27] J. S. Nevid, & N. McClelland, “Measurement of implicit writing performance of entering high school and explicit attitudes toward Barack Obama,” Psychology students,” Psychology in the Schools, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. & Marketing, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 989-1000, 2010. 163-175, 1996.[28] A. J. Pantos, & A. W. Perkins, “Measuring implicit and [40]D. B. Kaufman, R. M. Felder, & H. Fuller, (2000). explicit attitudes toward foreign accented Accounting for individual effort in cooperative learning speech,” Journal of Language and Social teams. Journal of
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division Poster Session
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ramsey George Jabaji, University of Maryland, College Park; Shannon Hayes Buenaflor, University of Maryland, College Park; Brian Farrington Dillehay, University of Maryland, College Park; Rebecca Z. Kenemuth, University of Maryland, College Park; Elizabeth Kurban, University of Maryland, College Park; Paige E. Smith, University of Maryland, College Park
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
Studies, a master’s in Counseling and Personnel Services, and is a doctoral candidate in Higher Education, Student Affairs, and International Education Policy.Dr. Shannon Hayes Buenaflor, University of Maryland, College Park Shannon Hayes Buenaflor currently serves as the Assistant Director of Transfer Student Advising and Admissions in the A. James Clark School of Engineering. Recently completing her Ph.D. in Higher Education at the University of Maryland, Dr. Buenaflor’s research focuses on transfer student success, pre-transfer advising, and the role of self-efficacy in the transfer process.Mr. Brian Farrington Dillehay, University of Maryland, College Park Brian Dillehay is the Assistant Director in the Office of
Conference Session
Qualitative Methodologies
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy E. Slaton, Drexel University (Eng. & Eng. Tech.); Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
grit have no meaning. More and more STEMeducation research, as noted, now interrogates the student experience of low self-efficacy or self-confidence as a contributing factor to minority under-representation, but unusually, LfSN asks usto interrogate the political instrumentality of that interrogation. It helps us ask: Where does suchanalytical emphasis on individual agency locate responsibility for educational attainment or itsabsence? On another level, acknowledging the differences between this qualitative research andcustomary quantitative studies of STEM education regarding causal factors lets us see the“reciprocally constituted relations” between morals and ethics on one hand and scientific conducton the other. This suggests still more
Conference Session
Community Engagement Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University; Francis Xavier McAfee, Florida Atlantic University; Diana Mitsova, Florida Atlantic University; Summer Scarlatelli, Museum of Discovery and Science
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Community Engagement Division
-value theory to explain persistence. Eccles’ theory factors in genderand ethnic differences in STEM participation (Eccles, 2005). They hypothesized thateducational, vocational, and avocational choices would be most directly related to person’sexpectations for success and the value they attach to the available options. Simply put, theEccles’ theory suggests that choices to engage in activities are shaped by competence and valuebeliefs. Competence is about acquiring skills and applying them. Competence beliefs have beenstudied more widely than value beliefs among K-12 and engineering students. They are mostlybased on the self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1997). Self-efficacy is enhanced by positivefeedback, better performance, and social comparisons
Conference Session
Diverse Pathways: Exploring Inclusive Practices and Outreach in Engineering Education
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lexy Chiwete Arinze, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Jacqueline E McDermott, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Janet M Beagle
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
: Getting to Ph.D. JHU Press, 2006.[11] T. Hodapp and K. S. Woodle, “A bridge between undergraduate and doctoral degrees,” Phys. Today, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 50–56, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1063/PT.3.3464.[12] J. M. Barth, S. T. Dunlap, A. C. Bolland, D. M. McCallum, and V. L. Acoff, “Variability in STEM Summer Bridge Programs: Associations with Belonging and STEM Self-Efficacy,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, 2021, Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.667589[13] V. Born and C. Brock, “Writing for Social Sciences and Humanities: Bridge Programs and Improving Graduate Student Outcomes,” J. Polit. Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 371–385, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1080
Conference Session
Academic Success and Retention
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Olusola Adesope, Washington State University; Oluwafemi J. Sunday, Washington State University; Ebenezer Rotimi Ewumi, Washington State University; Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Muhammad Asghar P.E., Utah State University; Candis S. Claiborn, Washington State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
ofpractices that would result in the maximum attainment of academic success for students fromvarious backgrounds and among different levels of their study program (i.e., first-year or seniorstudents). Additionally, these engagement practices' voluntary nature means that students fromminority demographic groups might not participate, and they are more at risk of dropping out ofan engineering program. However, studies have shown that participation in HIEP improves E/CSHIEP participation could be a predictor of academic success [5]. The combination of severalengagement academic practices, and experience would increase the general knowledge within amajor, improves competence (self-efficacy), social interactions, and job opportunities [1
Collection
2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference
Authors
Ryan Yedinak, Cañada College; Oskar Granados, Canada College; Vincent Vu Thanh Tran, San Jose State University; Moises Arturo Vieyra, Canada College; Alec William Maxwell, San Francisco State University; Amelito G Enriquez, Canada College; Wenshen Pong P.E., San Francisco State University; Cheng Chen, San Francisco State University; Kwok Siong Teh, San Francisco State University; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Hamid Mahmoodi, San Francisco State University; Hao Jiang, San Francisco State University; Zhaoshuo Jiang P.E., San Francisco State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
to use acoustic sensors for non-contact, non-destructive structural health monitoring.After learning basic theory through a series of training workshops, the students performedexperimental testing with various configurations of an array of microphone sensors on a single-degree-of-freedom structure excited by an earthquake simulator. With the acquired data, severalpost-processing algorithms are proposed to extract the useful information and eliminateunwanted signals.In addition to the surveys, the participants were invited to participate in a 30-minute conversationabout their summer internship experience to examine the internships’ impact on interviewees interms of: i) engineering self-efficacy and commitment to engineering as a career; ii
Conference Session
The Best of First-year Programs Division
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Chao Wang, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
punishment avoidance.SDT also postulates that individuals will adopt more internalized/autonomous forms ofmotivations, resulting in more optimal learning outcomes, when three basic psychological needsare satisfied: autonomy, a sense of choice and control; relatedness, a sense of positive andsupportive connections to others; and competence, a sense of mastery and self-efficacy [18].In a real-world setting, individuals express multiple forms of motivation to varying degrees inany given activity, instead of appearing as either autonomous/internalized orcontrolled/externalized. Examining the learner’s motivation across the whole continuum ofamotivation, external regulation, identified regulation and intrinsic motivation, i.e.,characterizing it into a