). Page 23.564.11Figure 1: Opinion off EXCEED students s on how h well thee program met m the primaary objectivees.The EXC CEED studen nts were alsoo asked to raate how well the program m accomplishhed morespecific learning l objeectives, Tablle 1. Studennt opinion inndicates the program p wass successful inmeeting the t specific learning objectives. Thiis data also indicated i thaat the studennts were not as
% Average B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8Figure 6. Comparison of stages for the VBioR teamsFigure 7 shows the proportion of words spoken in the DMM by person, including the coach andall three students. All of the VBioR teams had three students. There is variation from team toteam according to team preparation and prior knowledge, team dynamics and the team’sinteraction with the coach. For example, in team B4’s coaching session only two of the studentstalked during the meeting and the coach spoke more than 80% of the words. By comparison,with team B2 the coach spoke much less, around 60% of the words, while the three studentsspoke more substantial amounts of 10% to 15% each. 100% 90% 80% 70% 60
in micrrosystems beecause of thee high surfacce arrea to volum me ratio, • TheT no-slip condition maay not alwayss apply, and • Chemical C issu ues at the surfaces can afffect microscale fluid mechanics.This lectuure was desiigned to provvide a commmon background for studdents from thhe threeengineeriing disciplin nes; (all students had preeviously takeen a fluid meechanics couurse within thheirdepartmeent). It also supported new n materialls introducedd in other moodules.Laboratoory Module I: I Flow in Microchannel M s allowed a comparison
second-grade class taught by Ms. Smith, students justified the criteria theychose for a good design by referring to the context set by the story. The students were workingon choosing a site for a model Tarpul, a kind of gondola used to cross rivers in Nepal. In thestory and context for the Evaluating a Landscape EiE unit, Suman is a boy who is concernedabout the siting of a Tarpul near his home, because his grandmother is sometimes ill and needs tobe transported across the river to the nearest clinic. Ms. S: Who has tested site H? Go back to that page for a second. Look on your test page where you wrote how many weights you tested. All of you tested site H. Can you tell me how many weights you got [into the model Tarpul]? When you tested H
AC 2010-1218: TEACHING INQUIRY-BASED STEM IN THE ELEMENTARYGRADES USING MANIPULATIVES: A SYSTEMIC SOLUTION REPORTLouis Nadelson, Boise State University Louis S. Nadelson is an Assistant Professor in the College of Education at Boise State University. His research agenda is conducted within the context of STEM education and includes aspects of conceptual change, inquiry, and pre-service and in-service teacher education. He has published research ranging from teacher professional development to the impact of inquiry on STEM learning. Dr. Nadelson earned a B.S. degree in Biological and Physics Science from Colorado State University, a B.A. with concentrations in computing, mathematics and
✂✁☎✄✆✄✆✝✟✞✡✠☞☛✍✌✏✎✒✑✔✓ ✕✗✖✙✘✛✚✢✜✤✣✦✥★✧✪✩✬✫✭✖✤✥✯✮✱✰ ✥✦✲✭✳✂✮✴✳✡✧✶✵✸✷✹✥✻✺☎✳✔✚✽✼✶✖✾✧✏✳✂✿✪✥✻✣❀✧❁✩❂✲✾✳❄❃❅✩❇❆❈✜❉✮✴✥★✧❁✩✴✫✭✖❋❊●✫✭✿❍✕■✖✤✥✯✮✬❏❑✺✏✩✴✺ ✫▲❊✛▼✛✫❖◆✳✔✿■◗❘✿✪✥✯✖✤✺✏✩✴✳✂✖✾✧✏✺❙✥✯✖✤✚❚❃❅❯✤✫▲✿✏✧❱✵❲◗✩✴❆❄✳❨❳❩✩✴✺✶✧✪✜✤✿❭❬✤✥✯✖✤✣✦✳✔✺❀❪ ❫❵❴✪❛❖❜❝❴✪❞■❡❣❢✻❤❥✐❱❦♠❧♦♥q♣▲rts✈✉①✇②❜♠❞④③⑤❴✪❞✂⑥⑦✐❱❴✏⑧⑨♣♦⑩❶❦❷✐❹❸✦❴✪❞✂❛✔❺✸❧❻❫❣❢♦❤❥✐❱❦❷❧✂❼①♣❖❴✪❞✂❛■❽▲❧✂⑥❹❜❷❴✪❞❍r❥❜❝s✦⑥⑦❴✏❾ ❿➁➀✯➂★➃✆➄➅➄➇➆q➈➉➆❑➃➉➊❀➋❖➌❹➈✆➍➅➌❹➆q➆q➎✴➍➏➌❹➈❹➐⑦➑✍➒●➓⑦➌❹➆✤➔❲→✬➒①→❂➆❅➣✭➌✶➍➅↔➉➆q➎✴↕✬➍➇→♠➓➉➐❱➙✾➆q→❂➎✬➃✆➍➇→q➐☎➛❘➍➅➜✴➝❱➍➇➈✆➒➉➌❘➞❉➟✆➀♦➙✾➆q➠❱➒①➎✴→✬➡❉➆●➌⑨→▲➃➉➊➂★➃✆➡✢➠❱➢❹→❂➆q➎✾➔⑦➜q➍➅➆●➌✶➜➤➆☞➒➉➌✶➥❘➞✤➦✆➀♦➙✾➆q
are still practicing engineering, but the proportion drops toabout sixty percent in their mid-30’s, forty-five percent by their mid-40’s, and plateaus at about Page 5.570.2forty percent by their late 50’s (Engineers, Oct. 1997: 6). About one-fifth of all engineeringgraduates are employed in management (but this is not new: at the beginning of the 20thcentury engineering educators were noting the tendency for their graduates to becomemanagers). In response, there have been repeated calls for undergraduate engineeringcurriculum to prepare students for their entire careers, not just their first technical job. “Theengineer is being transformed
Page 5.651.1it was fabricated, and suggest possible redesigns and improvements. 1 Intro. to ME Machine Design Thermal Systems Design Product Design Engineering Design Methods and Development Lo catio n fo r Re mo va ble Ta ctile G rip s
research paper will specifically explore the past production of solar energy in all the statesin the US, and with the use of data analysis tools will predict the production to the year 2030.The reduction of CO2 emissions with the use of renewable solar energy is in direct support of thethree elements of sustainability, namely the 3Es: Environment, Economics, and Equity (or socialjustice). This research will quantify the past benefits already realized in all these three areas forsolar energy, and project them up to 2030. Cluster analysis technique will be applied to solar generation across all US States to identifygroup(s) at distinct levels of production. This can help States to follow the leading State(s) policyand process to increase their solar
in US society [11]. Engineers work across industries and are at times the interface betweenmanagement and the production and operation of the organization. The development ofengineering as a profession and the focus of engineering education has been intertwined withcurrent national and international needs hence preparing and educating engineers to meet theneeds of the future is often a common theme in engineering program development, accreditationand reform [5][12], [13], [14]. Approaches to engineering education are variable across nationalborders and reflective of the national culture [13]. In the 1950’s engineering education in the USevolved into programs heavy with math and sciences [13] and most engineering programs haveretained this
required additional prompting through clarification question(s)(Question 4). While four students did present an HLC-indicating evaluation that included costand efficiency (80%), three of the students also mis-evaluated and/or mis-applied concepts (60%IU), displaying mixed outcomes. Several answers alluded to concepts related to the build projectbut less relevant to the broader context of large-scale water treatment operations (i.e. “overflow,running out of chemicals, or not adding in things at the correct time”). This disconnectedresponse may be indicative of students thinking that all project concepts correlate with real life, apotential issue of PBL. It is unclear if these answers show an incorrect or merely an incompleteunderstanding of full
Grant #DGE1255832.Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.REFERENCES[1] Council of Graduate Schools, “Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline program data from the Ph.D. completion project,” Washington D.C, 2008.[2] R. Sowell, J. Allum, and H. Okahana, “Doctoral initiative on minority attrition and completion,” Council of Graduate Schools, Washington D. C, 2015.[3] M. Bahnson and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Current trends in attrition considerations of engineering Master’s and Ph.D. students at research-intensive universities in the United States,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 39, no. 1
Abington, Abington, PA, 19001, USA 2 Institutional Researcher, Penn State Abington, Abington, PA, 19001, USA 3 College of Arts and Sciences, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott, AZ, 86301, USAAbstractAt its essence, collaborative efforts define STEM research. Likewise, one can anticipate thatfostering interdisciplinary collaboration in STEM education will yield positive outcomes. Arecent NSF S-STEM grant has empowered us to formulate and implement integrated courses atPenn State Abington, covering subjects in mathematics, physics, and engineering.Despite calculus being a prerequisite for physics across many undergraduate programs in theUnited States, a
the growing needs ofthe industry.References[1] J. Krajcik, “Three-Dimensional Instruction: Using a New Type of Teaching in the Science Classroom,” Science Scope, vol. 039, no. 03, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.2505/4/ss15_039_03_16.[2] İ. Topsakal, S. A. Yalçın, and Z. Çakır, “The Effect of Problem-based STEM Education on the Students’ Critical Thinking Tendencies and Their Perceptions for Problem Solving Skills,” Science Education International, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 136–145, May 2022, Available: https://icaseonline.net/journal/index.php/sei/article/view/400[3] C. Sen, Z. Ay, A. Seyit, and Kiray, “STEM Skills in the 21 st Century Education.” Available: https://www.isres.org/books/chapters/STEM
research grant (e.g., NSF),s/he must comply with already structured research as stated in the grant proposal which rarelyincludes RT as defined and outlined above (NSF’s Broader Impact criterion is not RT). In spiteof these institutional, structural, and procedural constraints, the student co-authors in this paperdeveloped a commitment to RT mainly due to the spaces that their HES graduate programopened to do so and the guidance of faculty committed to RT. Hence, as expected, their RTefforts had to be implemented somewhat haphazardly, often circumventing established academicpractices but without placing themselves in trouble. Other students, while deeply committed toRT, found themselves prioritizing traditional academic writing, valued by academic
. Anexample of this can be seen with Zhang et al.’s [5] work looking at implementing large languagemodels into their curricula at MIT. Other researchers are successfully sharing their experienceswith this type of implementation of GenAI as well as impacts on higher education at variousinstitutions [6]. When integrated with AEI, these materials can be designed to not only educatebut also to emotionally engage students, fostering a deeper connection to the subject matter andenhancing overall learning outcomes. Texas A&M University (TAMU) has made MicrosoftCopilot, a GPT 4.0 powered chatbot available for use for both students and faculty. Additionallythey have provided guidance as to what appropriate usage should look like both for faculty
Chemical Engineering from the University of Dayton and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Understanding the Skills and Knowledge Emphasized in Undergraduate Industrial Engineering CoursesAbstractIn an effort to characterize how, if at all, required courses in industrial engineering (IE) facilitatestudents’ development of sociotechnical engineering skills, this research examined the generalcontent of required IE courses at a large, predominantly white institution in the Midwest. Thispaper drew on data generated for a larger research study that leverages Holland et al.'s figuredworlds framework to explore the messaging that
Simulation Wheatstone Bridge Circuit Derive output voltage expression of the op Linearize the circuit to meet deisign amp-based Wheatsone bridge circuit with specification. Use Matlab as a design tool to respect to the thermistor and resistor network. assist in achieving the design goals. Analyze Write Matlab script to simulate the op amp circuit linearity of the design. Build the circuit. output voltage as s function of temperature. Week 3 – Voltage Comparing and Alarm Week 4 – System Integration and Design Circuits Design Characterization Design comparing circuit to cmpare voltage
Presenters: 3Presenter Name(s):1) Last Musavi First Mohamad Affiliation University of Maine, Associate Dean,College of Engineering2) Last Abedi First Ali Affiliation University of Maine, Associate Professor of Electricaland Computer Engineering3) Last James First Cary Affiliation Bangor High School, Director of Science DepartmentContact Person’s Name: Mohamad Musavi Page 18.14.2Contact Person’s Email: musavi@maine.edu2015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form Musavi (1).docxPage 1 of 17 WORKSHOP PROPOSAL FORM 2015 Annual ASEE K-12 Workshop on Engineering Education “Authentic
inward Preference to focus on the present, the The preference we use Sensing (S) details, and personal to take in information knowledge Sensing (S) or and determine the Intuition (N) Preference to focus on kind of information we prefer to trust the future, the big
stakeholders’ social interaction and software productivity from an SIF perspective.Dr. Nan Niu, Mississippi State University Nan Niu is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at Mississippi State University. He received his Ph.D. in Computer Science in 2009 from the University of Toronto, where he specialized in requirements engineering for software product lines. His current research interests include informa- tion seeking in software engineering, requirements engineering, program comprehension, and software engineering education. He is a member of ASEE and a senior member of IEEE.Dr. Donna Reese, Mississippi State University Donna S. Reese received her BS from Louisiana Tech University and her MS and
redesign of an electrictoothbrush, while a third section focused on rice cookers. Project requirements asked students to Page 23.1186.12use product archeology concepts during their designs, and document their work on this as part oftheir design reports.Assessment: Students were provided an optional test question (worth 17/102 points) to respondto the following questions: 1) Briefly explain what product archeology is, and how and for what purpose it can be used in support of designing, or redesigning a product. 2) Consider your team’s implementation of product archeology. Please circle from the options below on which GSEE issue(s
:10.1371/journal.pone.0248925[3] K. Hu, K. Godfrey, Q. Ren, S. Wang, X. Yang, and Q. Li, “The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on college students in USA: Two years later,” Psychiatry Research, vol. 315, p. 114685, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114685.[4] M. Mailizar, D. Burg, and S. Maulina, “Examining university students’ behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model,” Educ Inf Technol, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7057–7077, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5.[5] A. D. Dumford and A. L. Miller, “Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp
worldwide.References[1] NCES, 2013. National Centers for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.[2] S. Aljawarneh and J. A. Lara, “Data science for analyzing and improving educational processes,” Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol. 33, pp. 545–550, 2021.[3] R. Ammigan and E. Jones, “Improving the Student Experience: Learning From a Comparative Study of International Student Satisfaction,” Journal of Studies in International Education, 22(4), 283-301, 2018.[4] C. Alvarado, M. Minnes, and L. Porter, “Micro-classes: A structure for improving student experience in large classes,” In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 21—26, 2017.[5] S. Aggrawal and A. J. Magana