programs. After an overview of the PEGS program, thequalitative analysis tools used and their results are presented. The paper concludes with adiscussion of results and future plans to improve the PEGS21 program and its assessment methods.PEGS21 ProgramThe PEGS21 program at UC Davis seeks to examine the transition from undergraduate to graduatestudy in engineering, extending the research of Gardner (2007), Gardner and Holley (2011) andTate et al. (2014) who identified five following challenges to graduate degree attainment in first-generation students. 1) Breaking the Chain: Low-income, academically-talented, first-generation (LIATFG) graduate students may have to overcome obstacles to enter and persist in graduate study and their
confident that they had chosen the correct major, will do well in their major during the currentacademic year, were comfortable approaching a faculty member, and will graduate with a degreein their major. The responses for “I am well prepared for post-graduation plans” were more evenlydistributed. One 3rd-4th year student and one 4th-graduation student chose “slightly disagree”indicating that perhaps participating in such a program during earlier academic years would haveproven helpful in determining a career path.Figure 2In the survey, students were given three prompts to reflect on their experience. A simple wordfrequency query in NVIVO 12 pro on each prompt produced the respective word clouds. The top10 most frequent words (with stemmed words
intern’s research project. They sharedthat being involved in designing their interns’ project improved their ability to develop a“realistic clear experimental plan." Because of the rigid and time-bound structure of the program,the mentors had to ensure the plan was achievable within eight-weeks and that the intern wouldhave data to present at the conclusion of their summer internship. Additionally, the interns’limited background knowledge and lack of research experience required that mentors createprojects that specifically fit their abilities. This is supported by the following evaluation data: It has strengthened my ability in terms of developing a research project that is tractable for a fresh person to come in and contribute
Figure 2. Application ProcessBased on the final selection of the students, the CS department team at the university (UTRGV)along with the team from Upward Bound program identified the technical and non-technical skillsthat were then targeted in the summer camp. Table 1. Summer Enrollment Total 31 Forensics& Cybersecurity Track 16 Mobile Applications Track 15Gender GapAs we were planning for the summer camp, one goal of the team, which consisted of two femalesand two males, was to make sure that the selected applicants are more diverse in terms of thegender, since the schools are already
pedagogical practice,such as grouping strategies, management techniques, questioning types, engaging students inproductive struggle, and fostering classroom discourse to promote problem solving skilldevelopment, and 3) plan lessons which integrate cybersecurity concepts in teachers’ classroomsbridging cross-curricular content.Computational thinking is relevant across academic disciplines and has the potential to promotestudent interest in STEM pathways [23]. Female students in MS score as well as their malecounterparts on content area assessments [24], however, they are vastly underrepresented in thecomputer and information science field [25]. Teachers can promote equity and access tocomputer science and technology in nonthreatening environments and
the curriculum in which themethodology was applied. Then, it shows the results of its applications to discuss the implicationsto adopt this approach to inform curriculum design and evaluation.2. Involving students in curriculum evaluation A curriculum is a broad concept. According to Stark and Lattuca (1997), it is not only a subsetof courses in a study plan, but also its content, the course sequence, the students, the teaching-learning processes, the evaluations, the resources, and the necessary adjustments to improve itsresults. Thus, curriculum design and evaluation should consider multiple factors, such as thelearning environments and the interactions between teachers and students [18], [19]. Surprisingly, teachers and students are
introduce PNMSat/CubeSat [13], [14], [15]mission design in a systems engineering framework and foster leadership development amongparticipants. The objectives of the course catered towards – (i) Introducing Systems Engineeringfor PNMSats, (ii) Engage students in the design of a PNMSat with a novel payload and (iii)Foster leadership and team development through learning stages. The course agenda consisted of3 phases and the following outcomes were sought for assessing the success of the course.1. Demonstrate a basic understanding of PNMSats and their purpose.2. Demonstrate an understanding of systems engineering and its need for the design and development of PNMSats.3. Envision a project life cycle of a PNMSat mission and plan to be successful.4
awarded the Glen L. Martin ASEE Civil Engineering Division Best Paper Award. Steve is a registered professional engineer in Utah.Dr. Mercedes Ward, University of UtahProf. Sajjad Ahmad, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Dr. Ahmad is a Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). His teaching and research interests are in the area of sus- tainable planning and management of water resources, water-energy nexus, and stormwater management . He is particularly interested in using systems approach to address water sustainability issues.David Lawrence StevensonProf. Tariq Banuri, University of Utah Professor Tariq Banuri, Department of
Engineering Department. Understanding and classifying the knowledge gapsin the progression of BAE courses can lead to applying the proper integrating techniques in orderto balance and equilibrate the prospective teaching modules.Therefore, in this work we examined specific knowledge concepts considered essential withinthe curriculum at a large southwestern University’s Bio-based engineering program. Theresearch aimed to understand the level of students’ exposure to essential knowledge and suggestrecommendations for an improved comprehensive degree plan. The study used a survey in orderto evaluate knowledge areas required for discipline specific core courses by a program basedassessment of faculty who have taught through at least one academic year
a demographic andleadership questionnaire. Additional sections include logistics reminders for researchers, aprobing question plan, and engineering and leadership identity checklists. To ensure the focusgroup runs smoothly, at least two recording devices are utilized to capture focus groupdiscussion, participants are sent multiple reminder emails and texts, and the interviewers’ tone iskept friendly and conversational. In Focus Group 0 all three researchers interviewed REUstudents. In Focus Group 1 and Focus Group 2 two researchers interviewed participants whilethe REU students and one researcher observed from a viewing room.IntroductionThe introduction is based on standard practice for an IRB exempt study. Participants arewelcomed as they
, and starting a design challenge for high school students to address the needs of the less fortunate.Dylan Bargar, Clemson UniversityDr. Penelope Walters Brunner, Clemson University DR. PENELOPE BRUNNER is the Director of Assessment and Planning for Clemson’s College of En- gineering. In this role, she works with academic departments and administrative offices on assessment reporting and strategic planning alignments. Prior to joining Clemson, Dr. Brunner was an Associate Vice President at the College of Charleston. As an associate professor within the University of North Carolina system, she taught courses in Management and Management Information Systems. Her national and international consultancies involve working
competition are to deliver a market-driven technology application, create aninnovative business plan, and develop a deployment strategy. Two faculty advisers, a mechanicalengineering assistant professor from the college of engineering and an entrepreneurship assistantprofessor from the college of business designed and delivered content to help student memberseffectively collaborate and innovate across their disciplines and form a cohesive and highfunctioning team. In addition to being members of the cross-disciplinary team, half the studentswere concurrently enrolled in a business management course with an emphasis in socialentrepreneurship and market analysis while another half were enrolled in a senior capstoneengineering course. Activities in the
Paper ID #16895Developing a Questionnaire and Evaluation Methods for a High School RocketProgramMr. Ibrahim Halil Yeter, Texas Tech University Ibrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his
the strategies involved in the game. Henceforth it wasbeneficial to include a break for game playing at times when students appeared to be tired or loseinterest.The games primarily involved two players competing against one another in various challengesthat included subtracting numbers to reach zero, eliminating virtual matchsticks to clear theboard, filling Sudoku type squares, and connecting dots to create network patterns. All of thegames involved a need to observe patterns and then plan ahead in strategic ways. Severalelements of classical problem solving were required to participate in these games. Many of thegames are in the NIM category such as that illustrated on the Archimedes’ Lab website.13Students began by competing against the
featuredyear-long capstone projects for outside clients since 1988. The program had remained essentiallythe same over that time until 2011. A course instructor was responsible for all of the groups’work and each team was assigned a faculty member as coach. The projects have always been realprojects for clients with real needs.Early in capstone projects, the groups’ work often required the expertise of a faculty member tomentor field and lab work even though that faculty member was not the team coach or courseinstructor. The field and lab work can be of lesser quality because the teams failed to adequatelyuse the faculty expert to plan their work. Later, during project design, the sub-discipline designrequired on each project was not always mentored by
has a single Electrical Engineering Instructor whoadvises all groups and oversees all projects. Lectures are once per week and serve the purpose ofreinforcing the design process by introducing techniques for project management, research,design process management, prototype planning, and effective presentations and writing skills.The Computer Engineering capstone course consisted of 8 projects. Three were sponsored byindustry and a fourth was a collaborative effort between the CE capstone class and the UCSBDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology. Other projects were student defined.One of the industry sponsored projects was the CE contribution to the SpaceX Hyperloop Podcompetition described above. The technical focus of this team
the Georgetown EnergyCompetition, which aims at reducing electrical and natural gas use within the city over the nexttwo years. A Department of Energy (DOE) grant was also recently awarded to facilitate theinstallation of the first MW of solar photovoltaics in the community. In 2017, the DistrictHeating Plant in downtown will be converted from an inefficient steam system to hot water.Along with these efforts by the city, the local sanitary district is making great strides towardbecoming more sustainable through the installation of biogas digesters, with future plans for acombined heat and power system on site.The University has also been heavily involved in the sustainability movement and has beenactively pursuing sustainability goals for
research interests, in collaboration with the Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW), include developing clinical applications of functional mag- netic resonance imaging, including presurgical planning and evaluation of rehabilitative outcomes after injury or pathology. Ropella is co-director of the Functional Imaging Ph.D. program, jointly offered with MCW. Ropella has twice received the college’s Outstanding Teacher Award (1994 and 2002), the univer- sity Faculty Award for Teaching Excellence (2002) and was named the Wisconsin US Professor of the Year by The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and the Council for Advancement and Support for Education (2007). Among other honors, she was the recipient of the
specifics of various monumentsmore clearly. For this specific simulation, the intent is to replicate the construction of the Roman Colosseum in twodifferent ways – a unique undertaking – which can be adjusted for presentation to various audiences, rangingfrom academic scholars in history or engineering to students in relevant topics. The expected outcome is anassembly of the structure that can be viewed from both the inside and outside. The “top-down” approach,which divides a completed monument into multiple stages, is useful for defining the overall plan of thestructure, but presents a risk of large amounts of data slowing down the simulation process. In contrast, the“bottom-up” approach, which creates the structure in a piecewise fashion, may
visiting or tenure track positions.IntroductionInternational faculty join US institutions to teach in engineering programs among otherprograms. The positions they pursue could be permanent as in tenure-track positions ortemporary as the case in visiting positions or other forms of employment. An internationalfaculty member pursuing a career in academia is usually faced with a decision regarding the kindof position he/she plans to take. Those who love research activities will pursue a career ininstitutions that also value research activities more that teaching. Others who love teaching anddesire to keep it their main focus are likely to pursue a career at teaching institutions that valueteaching excellence and without great emphasis on research
in leadership positions for numerous professional organizations. Page 26.1585.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Time Management Skills and Student Performance in Online CoursesAs educators, we have the almost daily task of turning students’ goals into the reality ofcompleted degrees. In part, we accomplish this by requiring students to spend time with coursecontent. Students, in turn, must plan and use their time effectively in order to accomplish coursegoals and objectives. Online courses present special challenges for student engagement andeffective time management
including co-op and research abroad and established meaningful connection for research and attraction of funded international graduate students. Maria started working at Texas A&M in 2005 as Assistant Director for Latin American Programs and in 2009 she was promoted to Program Manager for South America in the same office. During her time at the Office for Latin America Programs she created, managed and developed projects to enhance the presence of Texas A&M University in Latin American and to support in the internationalization of the education, research, and outreach projects of the university. She was charged with the development and implementation of a strategic plan for Texas A&M in South America. While
assumptions, measurement instruments, and methodological approaches used byresearchers will also vary substantially based on their position in this debate.The other great debate in recent years is an outgrowth of new methods that have been introduced inentrepreneurship education and practice. These methods, although existing in some form in businessliterature for decades (Mintzberg & Waters, 1985), have been popularized more recently as “LeanStartup” or “Lean Launchpad” methods (Blank & Dorf, 2012; Ries, 2011). The advent of these newapproaches has created turbulence among educators and researchers. Many have been quick to “golean” and discard methods that favor a more traditional planning approach, while others have arguedfor the need to
monthsthe space has been active. Planning such a space is a traditional activity. Visions of its use may, however, beoptimistic and pessimistic at the same time. How students use the space has surprised bothfaculty and college administration. Our goal has been to use the space as an organizing conceptfor a diverse array of activities ranging from high school robotics competitions to senior capstoneprojects. Subsequent to its introduction in February of this year, a study was conducted ofstudent awareness. This study informed us of the increased challenges in marketing the use of thespace. We have evolved a mentorship program to support students working in the space. Thepast six months have seen overuse by classes, exciting design
has evaluated and debated the merits of international service learning from theperspective of the student, but little research exists to assess the success and sustainability of anengineered infrastructure system over an extended period of time from a developingcommunity’s perspective. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) hasimplemented a new course that will exist for ten years and will bring together the College ofEngineering, along with departments of Kinesiology and Community Health, Anthropology,Global Studies and Regional and Urban Planning, to collaboratively teach an undergraduateresearch-focused course elective targeted at evaluating baseline conditions precedingimplementation of a new irrigation system for the
for curriculum, pedagogy, and projects. Middle and high schools have historically facedchallenges introducing engineering into the curriculum in an inclusive and authentic manner.Because these students are still flexible about their career decisions3,4, programs that peakinterest can still influence students’ college and career plans. An inclusive approach could havesignificant impact on the diversity of the engineering workforce.A large public university implemented EPICS (Engineering Projects in Community Service) forundergraduates in 19955,6. The approach has been successful in preparing students professionallyas well as addressing compelling needs locally and globally. The program has also shown that itis an inclusive approach to
Contemplation Contemplation I have considered using the instructional practice but have not taken any steps to implement it Preparation Preparation I am currently developing plans/curriculum to implement the instructional practice in my course Action Action I will implement the instructional practice for the first time in my course this upcoming term Maintenance Maintenance I have been regularly using and modifying the instructional practice in my course Termination Standardized
potentially inhibitoryor suppressive presence of boys. The activities are designed to leverage girls’ existing interestsby showing how STEM fields require creativity, can improve lives, or can make the world abetter place. Over one-thousand girls between the ages of 3 and 13 have participated in the lastthree years, and feedback demonstrates that the event has been successful at getting girlsinterested in engineering. This paper will detail how to plan and implement a successful event tointerest young girls in engineering utilizing industry partners, student organizations, and fungirls-only activities.IntroductionCareers in STEM-related fields will comprise much of the future job growth in the U.S. andworldwide [1]. Innovation in science and
Paper ID #27802Research Experience for Community College Students: Design and Opti-mization of Non-Volatile Latch using Anti-Fuse Memory TechnologyMr. Michael Gee, Canada College I’m a third year Mechanical Engineer major at Canada Community College and I plan to transfer to a CSU or UC in the Fall of 2019.Anthony Akash LalAlex E HerculesTyler Sheaves, San Francisco State University A graduate researcher at San Francisco State University’s Nano Electronics and Computing Research Lab (NeCRL). He has assisted in multiple projects involving hardware and IP security, typically focus- ing research efforts on development and
problems was closely linked to the environment inwhich the problem was presented.One theme that was common between all instructors was providing “minimal background.”Instructors wanted to provide as much time as possible for class discussions rather than lectures.Some instructors achieved minimal lecture in class by using a “flipped classroom” approach.Instructors viewed in class discussions and “contextualizing mathematics” as a better use of classtime.Instructors described a need to be flexible in terms of the amount of time they spent on eachpresented task. The code “dynamic lesson plan” captures the need to recognize that students willfind certain tasks more or less interesting than originally anticipated. This can be difficult topredict