Polytechnic Institute and State University Jennifer Case is Head and Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She holds an honorary position at the University of Cape Town. Her research on the student experience of learning, focusing mainly on science and engineerinDr. David B Knight, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University David Knight is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech and also serves as Special Assistant to the Dean for Strategic Plan Implementation in the College of Engineering. His research tends to be at the macro-scale, focused on a systems-level perspective of how engineering education can become more effective, efficient, and
instructor and technician observe students’ activities throughout the experiment. Thislaboratory can assess the ABET students’ outcome 5: “an ability to function effectively on ateam whose members provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment,establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives”[13].SafetyThe Electric Energy and Machines course has several lectures at the beginning of the semesterthat cover electric power safety [3]. Students learn about the dangers of working with electricalAC and DC currents that can flow through the body. They are advised to be extremely cautiouswhile working on these circuits. A hard copy of the effects of AC and DC currents from theIEEE standard on page 17 in [12] is given to students in the
2024 semester-end survey asked students to rate twelve course elementson a 4-point scale from “not at all effective” (1) to “highly effective” (4) in aiding their learning.The majority of the class found the quiz effective, giving it a mean ranking of 2.66. However, itis notable that only the exam corrections assignment (the other major metacognitive activity) wasrated lower than this. It is the perception of the instructors that the fall semester cohorts tend toengage more with these aspects of the course, and they plan to repeat this survey for severalsemesters to determine if there is a difference between the semesters. Regardless, there is roomfor improvement in how metacognition is encouraged in the course.AttendanceAttendance is
follow-up for 5 out 7 CS perception items.3. Specifically, their perception increased continuously from pre to post to follow-up for two itemsTo what extent do educators increase the incorporation of integrated computer science contentwithin their existing coursework after participating in RET?1. All were able to incorporate integrated Computer Science into their lessons or activities2. All plan to extend this incorporation beyond the current school year3. Course participants plan to implement integrated CS in Life Science, Astronomy, Physical Science, Math, Geometry, Machine Learning, Phonics, Reading, etc.To what extent do faculty-research mentors and graduate students assist educators to incorpo-rate integrated computer science content
, Education for Chemical Engineers, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. e12-e30, 2013.[6] P. Field, Creating Case Study Presentations, Journal of College Science Teaching, Vol. 35, Issue 1, 2005.[7] P. Field, Revising a Formal Case Study Presentations as an Independent Research Project, Journal of College Science Teaching, Vol. 43, Issue 2, 2013.[8] https://cse.umn.edu/college/four-year-plans/mechanical-engineering-four-year-plan[9] B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Vol. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay Company, 1956.[10] T. Girard, M. Pinar, P. Trapp, An Exploratory Study of Class Presentations and Peer Evaluations: Do Students Perceive the Benefits?, Academy of Educational
Manufacturing/Enterprise, its evolution from the Toyota Production System (TPS), its key features, and its relationships with Industrial and Systems Engineering methods. 2. Acquire knowledge of the appropriate contexts and conditions for applying Lean methods and related Industrial Engineering and Systems Engineering methods. 3. Equip students with the skills to identify, communicate, initiate, plan, execute, and manage Lean projects and programs. Table 2. The definition of course learning outcomes. Course Learning Outcomes: 1. Clearly articulate the concept of Lean Manufacturing/Enterprise, including its roots, evolution, breadth, principles, limitations, and
planning and steering capabilities of the boat needed to be upgraded to rankhigher in the overall competition. There were several primary objectives this year includingdistributing weight to the back of the boat, shortening the drive train, upgrading the telemetrysystem, improving the steering, and remounting the solar array. To achieve these goals, the teamcollaborated on data collection, drive train modification, and solar panel array design with acombined effort towards efficiency and functionality in pursuit of victory. In the 2023competition, our team placed fourth overall, third in the United States, third place for our videopresentation, and lastly earned the Outstanding Solar System Design. Our team was successful atmaking the necessary
is an example of this trend. The U.S. Coast Guard is expected to adopthis approach soon and mandate that an ETO man all ships in U.S. waters. No higher educationinstitutions, not even the seven maritime academies in the U.S., currently provide a degree or atraining course for electro-technical officers.In the future, the Marine Engineering Technology Department at the Galveston campus of TexasA&M University plans to develop a new program in collaboration with the MultidisciplinaryEngineering Technology Program from the main campus in College Station.3. InstitutionTexas A&M University at Galveston, an ocean-focused branch campus of Texas A&MUniversity, educates early 2,300 undergraduate and graduate students in a diverse range
]. Candidates are mentored through their Ph.D. committee and complete a subjectmatter comprehensive exam, preserving a strong emphasis on the development of specializedknowledge and skills. Patent planning is a 4-step process: understanding the invention,researching the invention, choosing the type of protection, and drafting the patent application.This provides a core program requirement which addresses recommendations around identifyingand researching a problem, developing a research strategy, and evaluating outcomes. Therequirement to develop a viable patentable technology, reviewed by the patent committee and theexternal peer review of the proposed technology, reinforces the program's emphasis ontechnological literacy. Candidates must conduct
of these changes mean that little is known about how thesechanges are understood by HEFS.Objective: The primary purpose of this paper is to answer the question: How do higher educationfaculty and staff, especially those in engineering, perceive the new legal landscape?Methods: We gathered data from HEFS who chose to participate (n = 46) in a community ofpractice designed to help participants understand and negotiate the new legal landscape. This dataincluded a survey, written artifacts from community activities, meeting transcripts, and plans foraction. We performed a content analysis on this data using the framework developed by Kania etal. for understanding systems change that considers structural, relational, and transformativefactors in
removed from our networks, anyfindings in our research will automatically apply to minorities as the vast majority of ourstudent demographic is Hispanic.Future WorkWe have information on the students’ grade classification at enrollment, we plan to use that infuture iterations of the models. We aim to increase the number of predictor data we haveavailable and grade the effect of each of these predictors in guiding the outcome of ourstudents in the program. Such predictors include nationality, first-generation status,socioeconomic status, employment, scholarship status, military participation, and firstlanguage. We are working closely with university administrators and student offices to obtainmore student data for our efforts. We are also making
workshop and howwhat they learned would impact their future career plans. Table 1 shows the 2023 workshopschedule and the following paragraphs provide brief descriptions of workshop sessions.Mathematics: During this session, students learned about coding theory, history and technology.Students were taught integers modulo and cut out two wheels to make their own ciphers. Acipher is an algorithm for encrypting or decrypting messages. During this time, studentsencrypted their own messages and let other students decrypt them. Students also learned aboutcryptology through other ciphers like the affine ciphers and other ways of encryption anddecryption like error correcting code and public key encryption. In addition, vectors and matriceswere also
Room was often at capacity during tutoring hours. Peertutors are a low-cost, community building way to provide more resources for student success.The implementation of ICPT has improved the peer tutoring program at University of Portland,and we plan to continue implementing ICPT in other classes and engineering disciplines.Paper Type: Evidence-Based PracticeKey Words: tutoring, peer learning, conceptual understanding, multidisciplinaryIntroductionPeer tutoring has been used extensively in the past 20 years, and many studies have shown that itis beneficial to student learning [1]-[5]. Peer tutoring is particularly helpful in the first two yearsof engineering, when most students leave engineering for other majors [6], [7]. Peer tutoring
maps for their courses and guide them through five stagesof course design, centering on the ILOs in the sequence. The research team will provide detailson relevant learning theory, instructional design, and active learning approaches as well asindividual or group prompts at each stage. By the end of the workshop, faculty participants will 3have a plan in place for modifying their courses beginning in the next academic year. The fivestages of facilitation are summarized in Table 2. The effect of the intervention on courseplanning and faculty knowledge of instructional design methodologies will be assessed throughfaculty pre- and post-workshop surveys, a follow-up analysis of course materials in
the lab in Fall quarter—forming relationships with their lab mentor, becoming familiar with the lab research, and developing a research plan for the Winter and Spring Quarters. GEAR students then spend Winter and Spring quarters conducting their research project in the laboratory. • Mentorship: GEAR offers an extensive support system through various levels of mentorship including the GEAR Central Mentor who acts as a bridge between the GEAR students and laboratories, graduate lab mentors who provide regular guidance to the GEAR students, and faculty Principal Investigators (PIs). • Socials and Workshops: GEAR socials and workshops offer opportunities for relaxing, team building, and exploring
the activities andproblems students see in class to ensure they align with the caliber of questions they are assessedon during quizzes. I plan to continue assessing one quiz in take-home format, specifically formetrics that cannot be feasibly completed in class. I will consider adding course metrics that willrequire students to synthesize material from multiple parts of the class in a take-home assignmentor project. Finally, I plan to administer additional focus groups to learn from more students whotook the class in the Fall 2023 semester and to conduct a qualitative thematic analysis onfeedback from these focus groups; just as students taking an SBG course can learn from theirmistakes and change their methods of studying if they are not
understanding the efficiency and performance of the pick-up process.Further data collection is planned to compare these findings with two more gloves for pick uptime and drop-off time statistics, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of haptic gloveperformance in VR applications. We are planning to complete collection of data for bHaptics andManus Prime gloves so we can report their comparative results to SenseGlove at ASEEconference in Portland, OR in 2024. These outcomes may benefit engineering students who areinvolved in hands-on laboratory simulations via virtual reality.The involvement of student developers, predominantly undergraduate students engaged in thedevelopment of the VR environment and research on haptic gloves, presents a
problem-solving techniques,educators have sought innovative methods to facilitate understanding. Among these methods, conceptmapping has emerged as a promising approach, particularly for the assessment of EM [8–10].Davies provides a summary of concept mapping software tools and features [11]. Kane and Trochim [12]explored concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Prior research indicates that concept maps can beused effectively as an educational tool to improve students' understanding in various disciplines, not onlyengineering. A summary of prior work in concept mapping is shown in Table 1.While prior studies have explored concept maps as an engineering tool, this research focuses on howconcept maps can be used to address the complexity of
engineering and STEM fields in general. This, in turn,creates a more equitable engineering field that can be welcoming and comfortable, andencourage authentic selves while learning and practicing engineering. Studying these perceptionscan potentially identify “features” that have been perpetuating the unwelcoming anduncomfortable environment that makes the participation of LGBTQIA+ engineers difficult.Specifically, this pilot study can contribute to reimagining how the pedagogical and assessmentapproaches in classrooms help with such research by engaging the students to help with thereimagination, which I find to be a knowledge gap in engineering education scholarship. To doso, I plan to conduct a survey based on bell hook’s engaged pedagogy as a
skewed depending on a singular identity. Thisdistribution may also account for higher scores reported by students than professionals, as allstudents attended the same private institution known for having a student body with a highersocioeconomic status. While we accounted for this imbalance by analyzing each identityconstruct and refining the item set, we aim for balance among items in each measured construct.Further adjustments include rephrasing the responses to be true/false (vs. yes/no) to avoidconfusion of items that may result in false positives. We also plan to modify phrasing andremove items (e.g., “I do not have to work to pay for my college education (including workstudy.”) to ensure they are explicit about computing environments to
extent to which students have a healthy balancebetween work (school work, jobs, co-curricular activities) and life (leisure activities, personalneeds) [6]. Work-life balance (WLB) considerations were found to be very important to currentU.S. civil engineering students (e.g., “I don’t want to spend an excessive number of hours at myjob”) [7]. Concerns about WLB impact STEM students’ planned career trajectories, includingthoughts about leaving STEM [8]. Thus, engineering’s common reputation for being “all workand no rest” [9] should be of concern to faculty.Mental Health ModuleDuring the COVID pandemic in fall 2020 the University of Colorado Boulder (CU) required thatall incoming first-year students learn about mental health issues in a course
2023 and recently concludedin spring 2024 semester. The preliminary impact of the proposed approach is planned to beevaluated using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods, which couldinclude, pre- and post-surveys, interviews with students, faculty, sponsors, and Expo judges, aswell as scores provided by Expo judges. These results will help educators assess the benefits ofthe approach and develop a framework to integrate effective communication teaching andpractice skills within the curriculum for engineering design courses.1. Introduction1.1 BackgroundEngineering Capstone Design courses offer immersive experiential learning opportunities,including the opportunity to practice communication across a wide range of
2023 Summer Cohort, twenty studentsenrolled in an I-Corps site program experience that involved training and 6 weeks of customerdiscovery and answered to a pre- and post-surveys that included questions in the dimensions of:(1) interest in entrepreneurship, (2) confidence in value proposition, (3) self-efficacy inentrepreneurship, (4) self-efficacy in marketing/business planning, (5) self-efficacy in customerinterview skills, and (6) current status of technology and business model. Preliminaryquantitative analyses showed similar results to prior research about significant changes in studentperceptions of confidence in value proposition, customer interview skills, and current status oftechnology and business model. However, in qualitative terms
writing phases) as identified from the motivationsurvey. Additionally, we are planning on doing a longitudinal assessment of doctoral student motivationto see how student motivation changes as the doctoral students progress through their doctoral degreeprogram.AcknowledgementsThis work was made possible by a U.S. Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas ofNational Need (GAANN) Grant Number P200A210109 and by a NSF Innovations in Graduate Education(IGE) Program [IGE DGE#2224724] grant. 5References[1] Spaulding, L. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to
the participant's individual reflections. (2) Opportunity evaluation (connections) – photovoice- based pedagogical interventions in the classroom that enable participant discussions (e.g., sharing reflections with peers and instructors) (3) Opportunity exploitation (creating value) – photovoice- based interventions in the classroom that allow participants to create and initiate action plans to share with stakeholders. A non-applicable category was included to
445 Fig. 4. Solar PV installation learning system [9]. Fig. 5. Solar PV troubleshooting [9].The new course at NJIT, “Solar PV Planning and Installation” (3 credit hours, class 2 hours, lab2 hours), was developed to train students for engineering and technician jobs in solar PVtechnology, installation, commissioning, and troubleshooting. The course flow diagram isdepicted in Fig. 6. This course covers the following topics on solar PV systems: introduction torenewable energy and PV systems, solar thermal systems, solar radiation, sun path Proceedings of the 2022 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2022, American Society for
procedures for their injuries and illnesses. Severalother constraints may need to be considered—such as patient criticality, medical specialtyavailability at an HCF, and transportation resource availability—when pairing a patient to anHCF and to resources for safe medical transportation. A stronger, standardized methodologycould increase system efficiency and decrease system delay times, since a range of factors shouldbe considered in determining an adequate HCF, transport mode and safe transport medicalcapability. As in other types of complex decision-making, a decision support system (DSS) toolcan promote rapid but disciplined and effective decision-making for this issue.Background:The planning scenario projects that approximately 35 wounded or
Statement Team Member Biographies Diversity Statement Project information (up to five pages) Background Problem Statement Solution Technology-to-Market Plan References (does not count toward five-page maximum) Appendix (does not count toward five-page maximum)The unlimited number of pages in the Appendix becomes a key element for the holistic presentationof the project since only five pages are allowed in the project information section of the manuscript.Detailed information can be given in Appendix regarding assumptions, computations, simulations,and results. The CourseThe course in which the competition was implemented is the graduate course MENG 5318 – Heating
importance of instructorsfocusing on critical thinking as a learning outcome regardless of the pedagogical approach.However, the researchers warn that the critical thinking measures instructors choose to assesscould influence the perceived effectiveness of the instruction.Endicott College’s engineering department offers one-credit courses focused on technical skilldevelopment. Teaching students technical skills, presenting approaches to issues that requirecritical thinking (such as planning or trouble-shooting), and then challenging them withopen-ended problems, gives students practice with creative and analytical thinking in a variety ofcontexts. In the Critical Thinking for Causal Analysis skills course offered Spring 2023, studentswere trained in
undergraduate electivein biomedical engineering at the University of California Irvine. Students were instructed in theprinciples of identifying unmet clinical needs and subsequently applied the platform for needsfinding, culminating in the development of a proposed design plan by the end of the course [10].Throughout the course, students received instruction in a diverse range of topics encompassingteam formation, human-centered engineering, regulatory controls, intellectual propertyconsiderations, and global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic design factors. Thecurriculum also covered unmet needs evaluation, go-to-market strategy, and commercializationconcepts, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted considerations