-9830.2006.tb00885.x[5] M. Prince, “Does active learning work? A review of the research,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 223-231, 2004. doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x[6] L. D. Feisel, and A. J. Rosa, “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005. doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x[7] A. Cheville, “Designing Successful Design Projects,” presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky, 2010.[8] A. Shekar, “Project-based Learning in Engineering Design Education: Sharing Best Practices,” presented at ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis
of the Practice for the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Duke University and is the Director of Undergraduate Studies for the Department of Biomedical Engineering in the Pratt School of Engineering. She graduated with her Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Duke University in 2008 and has been teaching at Duke since 2010. She teaches classes such as Signals and Systems, Modern Diagnostic Imaging Systems, Freshmen Design and Communication, a Magnetic Resonance Imaging class and a graduate version of Signals and Systems.Dr. Genevieve M Lipp Genevieve Lipp received a B.S.E. in mechanical engineering from Duke University in 2010 and a Ph.D. in 2014 with a focus on nonlinear dynamical systems. She now works in
. HEAT aims to examine the impact of this combined mentoring model on theoutcome of its scholars. We report positive impacts of this model on student academicperformance as assessed by rates of retention and 4-year college matriculation in engineeringdisciplines: 90% of the scholars remain in the program, have graduated with an A.S. inEngineering, and/or working in engineering. Here, we examine the HEAT Scholars’ perceptionabout the program. HEAT Scholars have reported that the combined mentoring model is themost valuable aspect of the program. Altogether, HEAT serves as a model for improvingengineering / STEM education outcomes and enhancing socio-economic mobility amongunderserved communities for adoption by other community colleges and 4-year
well-rounded team.6 They are: leader, team player,researcher, expert, planner, creative, and communicator. Our students need to become aware oftheir team member type and how this impacts the team in order to be more productive to apotential employer. At Baylor University, neither team types nor team member types are coveredanywhere in the curriculum.Why Work on Teams?There are distinct advantages to working in and on teams. West lists a number of advantages, afew of which are listed below:7 1. Teams are the best way to enact organizational strategies. 2. Teams enable organizations to develop and deliver products and services quickly and cost effectively. 3. Teams enable organizations to learn more effectively. 4
Paper ID #41920Board 432: Work in Progress: Immersive, Hands-On, and Interactive QuantumInformation Science and Technology: Empowering Undergraduate Studentsin Quantum ComputingMr. Syed Hassan Tanvir, University of Florida Syed Hassan Tanvir is a doctoral candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Florida. He holds a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science and a Master’s in Software Engineering. His research is focused on investigating the factors that influence engineering undergraduate enrollment, retention, graduation, and dropout. For his Ph.D., he plans to incorporate stealth assessment techniques to foster
Frances Britt, Eileen Britt is a Clinical Psychologist and member of the Motivational Interviewing (MI) Network of Trainers, an international collective of MI trainers and researchers who promote excellence in the practice and training of MI. Eileen teaches MI at the University of Canterbury on the Postgraduate Diploma in Clinical Psychology programme, as well two postgraduate papers on MI within Health Sciences, and has experience in providing MI training to a range of health practitioners. She has been involved in a recent project training MI to staff from the College of Engineering at the University of Canterbury. American c Society for Engineering
approach to problem-solving, innovation, and value creation” [4]. The KEENframework emphasizes three primary components of the entrepreneurial mindset: curiosity,connections, and creating value. Project-based learning in which students are given a specificaudience to understand and design for is one way in which students learn to create value withtheir technical skills. Projects with simulated or real-world applications also provide students theopportunity to practice situational curiosity [5].Effective science communication is particularly necessary in the process of commercializingtechnology. When engineers create goods and services that are to have a societal impact oraddress a need, it is crucial for their success that the value of these
. Example 2: An instrument question designed to test social impact understandingThe ethics of engineering and its impact on society are an important part of cognitivedevelopment and enculturation. While the distractors in Example 2 have degrees of correctness,the best answer is the life-saving advantage of automated technology to society.Implementation of Position-of-Stress SurveysThe second major research result from year two is the implementation of a quantitative three-question survey administered to students as they complete activities that are judged to bepositions of academic stress. The goal was identification of student cohorts that were gaining,losing, or remaining the same in confidence about major choice as they study
compound. For example, funded research is needed so undergraduateshave a reason to be on campus during the summer to take a class. The reverse perspective is thata relevant class is needed to make the research more appealing. Another example is there needsto be enough undergraduates interested in an area to support graduate student research (enoughgraduates are also needed to guide undergraduates). Any of these areas decreasing below acritical mass could, in turn, negatively impact other areas and upset the program’s balance.Obstacle 2-The “Real World”: A concern for some students is what they are doing in collegedoesn’t apply to the “real world”. This idea is often supported by friends, family, and those witha job in the “real world
of this project was to use Keysight ADS (Advanced Design System) Via DrawingUtility software for a detailed examination of the worst-case impact of vias on the signal integrityof a signal when traversing a printed circuit board with 5 and 9 layers, respectively. The insightsgained from simulation and modeling show the best practices and design strategies for mitigatingsignal integrity challenges on industry standard PCB layer thicknesses. The first step is to designthe 3D model. This is done in the Layout modeler in ADS. In the Layout modeler, the next step isto open the substrate window. In the substrate window, layers are then added until we reach thenumber of metal layers needed for the simulation. The bottom and top substrate layers are
identifying common anti-patterns observed in classrooms, pedal can providemore nuanced feedback to students alongside feedback on rubric-based evaluations such as “Doesthe code correctly use a for loop?”. Alternatively, another approach [19], combines program repairtechniques with automated grading to directly evaluate the logic and structure of student sub-missions themselves. These innovations can effectively handle diverse solutions and demonstratea scalable approach for assignments in which students design unique projects, propose problemstatements, and implement customized solutions. However, to the best of our knowledge, none ofthe existing autograder tools can fully evaluate open-ended assignments. Most available tools aredesigned for well
CT in K-12 and higher education. From this effort, over 20different definitions and frameworks for CT have emerged. Although the availability of literatureon CT has been increasing over the last decade, there is limited research synthesis available onassessing CT better. Besides, it is known that in higher education designing assessments for CT ischallenging and one of the primary reasons is that the precise meaning of CT is still unknown.This research paper, therefore, presents a systematized literature review on CT frameworks andassessment practice. We search three different databases and review 19 journal articles that addressCT assessment in higher education to answer the following two research questions: 1) What doesthe literature
practice in engineering education at the national level in Canada, before beginning a faculty appointment in 2022 with a teaching focus. Mattucci’s favourite courses to teach are engineering design, mechanics (solids), dynamics, and anything related to leadership and professional / transferable skills. His favourite things to do are backcountry camping, and going on adventures with his family.Makary Nasser, University of Guelph Nasser is a Biomedical Engineering Graduate student at the University of Guelph. His exploration in educational leadership initiated as he began working as a Graduate Teaching Assistant under Mattucci’s guidance. This introduced him to Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) providing fresh
development representsjust the beginning of a journey that requires careful attention toward human resource planningand course marketing. Without careful ongoing attention to the customers, including their needs,schedules, and availability, the best designed course will remain unexercised and fall short of itsidealized potential.ConclusionIn this paper, an innovative graduate level engineering education course was outlined. Thecourse, Harnessing Engineering Expertise in Industry, focused on exploring relevant literatureand methodological approaches for research tied to the central topics of expertise, knowledgecapture/loss, and organizational learning. The course’s development was discussed and exploredthrough the novel lens of Six Sigma’s six
Association.[9] Guthrie, J. T., & Ozgungor, S. (2002). Instructional contexts for reading engagement. In C. Collins Block andM. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 275–288). New York: GuilfordPress.[10] Palincsar, A., and Magnusson, S. (2001). The interplay of firsthand and text based investigations to model andsupport the development of scientific knowledge and reasoning. In S. Carver and D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition andinstruction: Twenty five years of progress (pp. 151–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.[11] Renaissance Learning, Inc (2014), STAR Reading™ is most accurate predictor of Ohio grade 3 readingassessment scores. Retrieved from the Renaissance Learning Website:http://doc.renlearn.com/kmnet
Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA, in 2016, and the B.S. degree in intelligent transportation engineering from Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China, in 2014. He was Graduate Teaching Assistant for ECE1013 Foundations in ECE, ECE1022 Foundations in Design, ECE4713/6713 Computer Architecture, and ECE4753/6753 Introduction to Robotics at the undergraduate level and as a guest lecturer delivered graduate-level courses, ECE 8743 Advanced Robotics and ECE8833 Computational Intelligence. He received the ECE Best Graduate Researcher Award from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State University in 2023. He received the Research Travel Award from Bagley College of Engineering
workshops organized in either collaborations by industry, government,and academia12 or as a singular effort. Initiatives from universities include use of standardsin capstone projects12-13 and design classes.14-15 Academic libraries also play a role instandards education by providing campus-wide access to standards collections, teachingabout standards through research guides,16 library instruction sessions,17 collaboration withfaculty18 and organizing small scale local workshops, etc.On our campus, the analysis of a library survey sent to returning co-op students by theengineering librarian revealed a strong need for standards education. There was also interest indeveloping a standards workshop from two graduate students who were active members
narratives shared by the four practitioners may provide insight on best practices to delivereffective, inclusive, and equitable educational content when virtual implementation is used as themethod of delivery in STEM programming for the historically excluded.LimitationsThe practices and methods discussed in this paper are subject to some limitations. The virtualprograms hosted by the practitioners were specifically designed for women students, faculty, andstaff, as well as racially and ethnically diverse middle school, high school and entering first yearcollege students. The paper reflects the experiences of four practitioners employed at the samehistorically White, tier 1 research institution in the Midwest during a single program year.Moreover
industry after graduation andtherefore would benefit from the experience and lessons learned from those who have reallyencountered the problems while functioning as a full time practicing engineer. The theory is thesame but the practical execution and frame of mind are different than that of the researcher.Today’s students need both perspectives if they going to be able to compete in the highlycompetitive global economy. The student of today needs to be more job ready and know morethen just theories if they are to compete for the jobs of tomorrow. Exactly how this uniqueperspective has helped to shape the curriculum at Eastern Washington University’s (EWU)Engineering Technology Programs will be described. Engineers who return to the classroom
workforce research characterizing, expanding, sus- taining, measuring and training the technical and professional construction workforce in the US. The broader impact of this work lies in achieving and sustaining safe, productive, diverse, and inclusive project organizations composed of engaged, competent and diverse people.Meltem Duva, Michigan State University Meltem Duva is a PhD student and graduate research assistant in the Construction Management Program in the School of Planning Design and Construction at the Michigan State University. She holds a B.S. de- gree in architecture and M.S. degree in construction management. She has worked for several companies and projects prior to starting PhD. Meltem Duva pursues
AC 2009-793: A TALE OF TWO CITIES: DISTANCE-LEARNINGTECHNOLOGIES IN AN INTERINSTITUTIONAL BME DEPARTMENTMia Markey, University of Texas, Austin MIA K. MARKEY is an Associate Professor in The University of Texas Department of Biomedical Engineering. The mission of her Biomedical Informatics Lab is to design cost-effective, computer-based decision aids. The BMIL develops decision support systems for clinical decision making and scientific discovery using artificial intelligence and signal processing technologies. The BMIL's research portfolio also includes projects in biometrics. Dr. Markey’s primary interests in improving engineering education are the identification of effective strategies
demonstrate thesequalities in addition to the ability to apply engineering to the design and analysis of systems andexperiments. Instead of adding more courses to satisfy ABET requirements, these criteria aremet by S-L projects in existing core courses. For example, having community partners on S-Lprojects essentially guarantees that students will work on multidisciplinary teams. With thecorrect structure of S-L projects, the students will examine the impacts of engineering solutionsin a societal context. Also, if S-L projects replace traditional analytical exercises in courses, theoverall workload will typically not increase for the students. If students are motivated to spendmore time on S-L projects, they are free to do so and should learn more in
Conference on Neural Networks. His research interests are: applications of neural networks, fuzzy logic controllers, and design of fuzzy logic controllers for industrial applicationsDr. Mequanint A. Moges, University of Houston, College of Technology (CoE & CoT) Mequanint Moges earned his Ph.D. from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. He received his B.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Addis Ababa in Ethiopia and M.Sc. degree in Communication Systems from the University of New South Wales in Australia. His research interests are in the areas of wireless sensor networking, load scheduling in parallel and distributed systems and
Page 10.91.1learning objectives, appropriate course content and teaching methodology [1.4], we hypothesize Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society of Engineering Educationthat soliciting their opinions on what constitutes a good educational experience, and whatinstructional delivery methods they prefer (in their own words), then mapping these attributes toappropriate teaching methodologies rooted in published best practices, should result in a bettereducational experience for the students and increased learning. The objectives of this study,therefore, was to1. Develop an approach that views the students as ‘the customer
interdisciplinary study of best practice, politics, and ethics associated with technical solutions to humanitarian assistance within Canada and abroad. [...]’ c) relating implicitly, or in part, to environmental sustainability For example, Waterloo’s CIVE241: ‘Transportation Principles and Applications: Application of scientific principles to the planning, design, maintenance and management of transportation systems. [...] Transportation economics, environmental impacts, and demand estimation.’ d) relating implicitly, or in part, to social systems and social responsibility For example, UofT’s APS360H1: ‘Applied Fundamentals of Deep Learning: A basic introduction to the history, technology, programming and applications of
collaboration. Also, studentsgenerally reported feeling comfortable, committed, and supported by their peers, fostering a strongsense of community and shared responsibility. However, some students felt like outsiders, whichaffected their sense of belonging. This research provides valuable insights into how virtualcollaboration shapes student engagement and offers guidance for designing effective onlineengineering education programs.Keywords: engineering education; virtual learning; virtual design; virtual collaboration; studentengagement.IntroductionVirtual learning environments offer flexibility in creating communication channels and shapinghow engineering students would interact, engage, network, and collaborate with their peers, whileremoving the
) from Florida International University in 1996; a Master of Science in Civil Infrastructure Systems in 1997, and a Ph.D. in Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing (Infrastructure Systems) from Carnegie Mellon University in 1999. She directs the Infrastructure Research Group (www.irg.ce.gatech.edu) at Georgia Tech, a group whose vision is to develop thought leaders in engineering and policy development for sustainable development. The IRG focuses on the study, development and application of systems method to manage civil infrastructure as assets for sustain- able development. Kennedy has developed undergraduate and graduate courses in Systems Engineering, Transportation Asset Management, and Sustainable Development
freshmen need tocomplete an introductory assignment on Matlab, and some of the lab managers offer tutorialsoutside of class hours to guide students through the Matlab assignment. The freshmen also havea Thursday noon lecture series which introduces them to a variety of opportunities throughoutJohns Hopkins. Lab managers can present their research, study abroad trip, and/or design teamprojects at one of these lectures. Lab managers prepare slides for a short oral presentation, andtalk about the challenges and benefits of their experiences. In fact, the student-run Thursdaypresentations were rated significantly higher by the freshmen compared to the more formalpresentations by the Career Center, BME faculty, or other guests. Over 96% of the freshmen
have been implicitly doingthis for sometime, the focus on outcomes now requires it to become explicit.This new focus on student learning outcomes will have an impact on curriculum at the programlevel. The traditional way of building an engineering curriculum is based on providing afoundation in the sciences, adding engineering science and then introducing program subjectmatter with increasing levels of depth. A parallel process exists for skill development,particularly for acquiring the important engineering design skills. Here, one starts with freshmanexperiencing simple design processes. By the senior year, the student is expected to incorporate
will bring new excitement toeducation by introducing reconfigurable electronics with a new world of possibilities for studentprojects, such as robot competitions, video game design, embedded systems and more. Finally,the project will develop industry, K-12 and university partnerships to facilitate pathways tocareers in the exciting field of reconfigurable electronics for first-generation, minority and otherunder-served populations, including veterans. In summary, this project will provide the trainingand educational resources and promote best practices for community college, university, andhigh school instructors to enable them to teach new hardware technologies to a broad range ofstudents, including those who have not previously had access to