composites. She has co-authored6 book chapters, 100 peer reviewed journal and over 100 conference publications. She has received over$7 M in external research funding. She was recognized as a Fellow of the Society of Plastics Engineersin 2013 and American Society of Mechanical Engineers in 2023. She received the 2015 DistinguishedEngineering Educator Award by the Society of Women Engineers (SWE), 2022 WEPAN Exemplary ServiceAward, 2022 SAMPE DEI Impact Award for her efforts to be inclusive. As a board member ofWEPAN, she hosted 12 webinars to provide best practices to implementing DEI with cultural humility asthe framework (bidirectional learning). She has integrated Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers,National Society of Black Engineers and
user research as anethnographic assessment, embedding themselves in engineering labs. During the study, librariansserved as a point of need for resources, mentors, and instructors during lab meetings. Thisapproach provided librarians with deep knowledge of their liaison area’s research practices, butwas limited in tracking how students, staff, and faculty responded to this exposure [12]. Outside of libraries, numerous studies have interrogated success and failures of specificengineering departments using user-centered models. Villanova University’s Engineeringprogram noted a comparatively high number of female graduates compared to the nationalaverage, and sought out students to help explain [13]. Focus groups surfaced themes of
University, SCAbstractIt is vital to guarantee that engineering graduates have learned essential skills required to excel ina dynamic technological landscape. Today the proliferation of low-cost, high-speed computingdevices offer opportunities for design and control of systems with varying levels of complexity.What this means in practice is that engineers increasingly need expert knowledge of variouscomputer systems and software. Computing expertise once considered arcane must now becomecommonplace. We develop a novel Machine Learning (ML) course, designed for allundergraduate engineering majors with appropriate programming and mathematics background,to take as an elective in their junior or senior year. The course introduces deep learning
21 Century, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter st Economic Future. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press (2005). 4. Duderstadt, J. J., Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, (2007). 5. Boyer, E. , Reinventing Undergraduate Education (The Boyer Commission Report). New York: Carnegie Foundation (2001). 6. Clough, G. W. (Chair), The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. National Academy of
neverhappened. While at UM I initially taught a variety of chemical engineering courses, includingsenior plant design, reactor design, and unit operations laboratories. Later I taught college-levelcomputing courses including introductory freshman computing and graduate courses in scientificvisualization and virtual reality programming. I also conducted research, in conjunction withH. Scott Fogler, into the use and development of virtual reality for chemical engineeringeducation. This research was conducted with undergraduate student programmers, and produceda number of virtual-reality based educational modules. Papers were written predominantly forASEE and AIChE annual conferences[1-3], plus a few journal articles[4-6
Engineering Department at MIT. SheKhas served in various teaching capacities from undergraduate instructor to lead instructor of courses in design and manufacturing in the departments of mechanical engineering and materials science at MIT over the course of eighteen years. Her PhD research and current lab focus on projects at the intersection of design and manufacturing, with challenging materials and environments. For five years prior to graduate study, she worked as a manufacturing engineer in the medical device and microfabrication industries. This time in industry, combined with her experience as an undergraduate student taking the same course, as well as family members specializing in education careers have
information. Next, an OSU graduate student in speech communication presented anevening session on effective oral communication. Finally, the REACH participants shared anevening meal and additional personal discussions with nine female mentors. The mentors wereaccomplished professionals in Oklahoma, as all are practicing architects or engineers.Academic ModulesArchitectureTo begin understanding the aspects of the career of an architect, students were asked to designan artist’s display module for a park in downtown Oklahoma City. The students werechallenged to rethink their conventional notions of what an artist’s display module could be;they were asked to consider the problem as “functional sculpture”. Issues of public circulation,image, and display
indicated theirwillingness to share the information with selected faculty who they thought might be interested,no additional participants were gleaned from this recruitment method. One organizationalrepresentative requested that the researcher obtain full institutional review board approval fromthe target institution prior to allowing the request for participation to be shared with theirengineering faculty. While this may be standard practice for that institution, it set a high barriergiven that the likely best-case result would have been only one or two additional participants.Additional details regarding the methodology for this study are beyond the scope of this paperbut are detailed in a separate paper presented at the ASEE Zone IV conference
architect. During her time in UTEP graduate school, she conducted research for the civil engineering (CE) department on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles technology on construction-site workers safety. She also conducted joint research for the National Science Foundation’s ASPIRE (Advancing Sustainable through Powered Infrastructure for Roadway Electrification) Engineering Research Center and the US Department of Transportation’s CAR- TEEH (Center for Advancing Research in Transportation Emissions, Energy, and Health). She evaluated the environmental and social justice impacts of the electrified technologies (electric vehicles (EVs), EV charging stations, and electrified roadways) with a focus on underrepresented communities.Dr
the TRB Standing Committee on Seismic Design and Performance of Bridges and holds a Remote Pilot UAS license.Manuel Salmeron, Purdue University Manuel Salmer´on is currently a 4th year PhD student in Structural Engineering at Purdue University, under the supervision of Prof. Shirley J. Dyke. He received a B.S. in Civil Engineering and a M.Sc. in Structural Engineering at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). His research interests include cyber-physical testing, stochastic modeling of degradation phenomena, and the development of decision-making tools for socio-technical systems.Gaurav Chobe, Purdue University Gaurav Chobe is a Ph.D. student in Civil Engineering at Purdue University. His research
approaches can reduce inequities by valuing progress and learn- ing, though barriers may still arise if students lack access to resources (including time and confidence).Overall, these grading systems share the goal of fostering a deeper, more meaningful educationalexperience, with ongoing research and case studies contributing to best practices for their imple-mentation. It is also noteworthy that this is not a one-size-fits-all approach, and faculty at specificinstitutions are subject to unique constraints on a case-by-case basis. Our institution enforces someunique constraints that are discussed as applicable. Furthermore, neither of the authors had anyexpertise in alternative grading and we consider this initial attempt a pilot upon
Educationhaving a set agenda for each discussion meeting. Additionally, more time could be spentexploring current research to build experience connecting available research findings withteaching practice.V. Example Active Learning Modules Developed by StudentsThe following is a list of some of the modules developed by students in the course. Theplanning of these modules typically took less than 5 hours. • Role-playing to learn about transportation safety. Roles included: urban planner, bicyclists, drivers, environmentalists, construction contractors and historians, with the "teacher" playing the expert role of transportation engineer. While senior design students may practice their skills on this type of problem, role
Systems Technology at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (NCAT), Greensboro, North Carolina for last five years. His current research focuses on Big data Analytics, Cloud Computing, and Content-based Image Retrieval. He received the best paper award for his paper on Image Clustering Using Multimodal Key- words in the International Conference on Semantics and Digital Media Technology, Athens, Greece. He has published more than 40 referred journal and conference papers and 4 book chapters. He has been project manager and a member of several research and industrial grants. Dr. Agrawal actively serves as committee member and reviewer for conferences and journals in his area of research. He is a
project manager and expected us tomeet the agreed upon design requirements, stay under budget, and finish on schedule. In order toguide us to meet these criteria, we created a timeline, had specific project assignments, and gaveregular reports on our progress. After conducting research, we started designing our prototypeand pitched the initial concept and budget to both our client and professor. After approval andsmall revisions, we had the first working iteration finished. For our customer, it was importantthat this project was durable, intuitive for students, and attractive, while our engineeringprofessor wanted technical elements, reports, and assignments. In the end we were able to satisfyboth parties with a project that met the expectations
technical community have called for systemic changes in engineeringeducation that include a shift to integrated and multidisciplinary approaches; an emphasis onunderstanding of societal impacts of engineering; increased teaming skills, includingcollaborative, active learning; and an improved capacity for life-long, self-directed learning.1,2,3This study focuses upon two of the critical skills listed above: self-directed learning andcontextual understanding.Calls for educational reform emphasize the need for new student-centered learning approachesthat aid development of broader skills and attitudes to complement traditional knowledgeacquisition.1,2 A capacity for self-direction and life-long learning is often identified as a criticaloutcome for
to put theory into practice in the real world.She goes on to write that ”students should be continually engaged in these intellectual processesthroughout the curriculum — not just in their final year — and at an increasingly sophisticatedlevel.” She advocates for ”the need to do all of the above concurrently and continually across thecurriculum, in an intentional and coherent way, which may require a “wipe the slate clean”approach to the design of 21st century engineering education” [14].Similarly, the University of Dayton sponsors a Kern Entrepreneurial Engineer Network (KEEN)Fellows Program for faculty to reach 100 percent of the undergraduate engineering studentpopulation by significantly expanding the number of faculty involved in the
Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University in the Polytech- nic School. London is a mixed methods researcher with interests in research impact, cyberlearning, and instructional change in STEM Education. Prior to ASU, London worked at the National Science Founda- tion, GE Healthcare, and Anheuser-Busch. She earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Way to Win: Incentivizing Engineering Faculty to Incorporate Entrepreneurship in their CoursesAbstractIt can be very challenging to incentivize engineering faculty to incorporate something
Instruction Modelinto co-curricular design project. The development and implementation of the proposedPedagogical Model in a mainstream civil engineering curriculum and its outcomes are revealedand their further improvements are discussed. Implementation outcomes suggest that theproposed Pedagogical Model could be suitable for involving students to acquire metacognitiveknowledge and promote practice of metacongitive strategies, and has a potential for leading todevelopment of attitudes and skills for self-directed learning and creativity.Literature Review - Theoretical and Methodological Background of Proposed PedagogicalModel for Engineering EducationResearch development from Cognitive Science and Educational Psychology provides scientificframeworks
Paper ID #47757Navigating the Social-Emotional Landscape of Neurodiversity in AI EducationRen Butler, Carnegie Mellon University Ren Butler is a Ph.D. student in Human-Computer Interaction at Carnegie Mellon University. Ren researches psychological safety in neurodiverse AI engineering teams. Ren aims to discover design principles for software development tools that support psychological safety among engineers with social and emotional differences. These principles can foster team learning, well-being, and productivity.Dr. D. Matthew Boyer, Clemson UniversityAndrew Begel, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Andrew Begel, PhD
the college. Thedegree of competition for space in the college’s graduate program is increasing. The pre-application process enables the departmental graduate coordinators the ability to review the pre-applicants’ qualifications to identify candidates that would be a good match for the respectiveprograms. It also allows the departmental graduate coordinators to waive the application fees ofthe prospective applicants. The Six Sigma project helped to define improvements to the pre-application process, as well as identify areas for improvement to enhance the technology that isused within the pre-application process. The team effectively used benchmarking techniques toidentify and compare best practices use of technology for the pre-application
[12] Moore, T. J., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Kersten, J. A. (2015). NGSS and the landscape of engineering indesign [8] [15]. While gaps in understanding in about engineering processes are important (and K‐12 state science standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(3), 296-318.are in addition to the need for support around pedagogical and pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) for engineering instruction), this project focused on the epistemology of engineering. The [13] Osborne, J. W., Costello, A. B., & Kellow, J. T. (2008). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. Bestteachers targeted by our PD
of global markets and competition • demonstrated management skills and a strong business senseMany of these skills and expertise are not easily taught within a traditional classroom setting. Infact most, if not all, of these abilities are best developed in practice. With the EnterpriseProgram, MTU has created a new and different experience designed to educate and preparegraduating engineers for more productive and successful careers. The Enterprise Curriculum isoffered as a 20-credit minor or a 12-credit concentration, typically completed over two to three-years. The curriculum is two-pronged and consists of 1) participation in the operation of abusiness (project work) and 2) completion of concentrated course material
faculty mentorship, the pathway into and through graduate education, and gender and race in engineering.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. She is also the Engineering Workforce Development Director for CISTAR, the Center for Innovative and Strategic Transformation of Alkane Resources, a Na- tional Science Foundation Engineering Research Center. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and
recommendations for (a) modified part or tool design or (b) modified laser pattern curing of part. 4. The usage of the SLA system will allow CIM students working in concurrent engineering design teams to thoroughly examine and functionally test multiple design alternatives because the time to prototype will be reduced by several orders of magnitude. This iterative process of product visualization, verification, and optimization is consistent with current best practices in industry and will constitute an invaluable learning experience. Page 1.271.3 ---- $i!ih’-’ ) 1996 ASEE
andacademic advisors (e.g., you should take course X to better accomplished their goal of achieving a passing grade inprepare yourself for course Y). At the moment, only a few Algorithm Design and Analysis in four or fewerexisting systems attempt to do this [17]–[19]. Explanation is semesters from the current state.an important part of recommendation [20]. Involving users indialogue can improve the probability that recommendations The goal of this research is to explore the impact ofare considered valid and adopted [21]. explanation on the adoption of recommended courses of action The notion of uncertainty of
Session 3560 Improving the Classroom Environment: With a Focus on the Arab Gulf States Waddah Akili Professor of Civil Engineering (Retired) Principal, Geotechnical Engineering, Ames, IowaAbstract:This paper focuses on “viable teaching-learning” protocols for potential adoption by educators inthe Arab Gulf States, seeking to improve their classroom effectiveness. It was inspired byremarks and suggestions made by a number of engineering graduates, who have experienced“negative” aspects of the “classroom
student interview data toidentify areas of agreement and disagreement that will support the development of training andresources for educators.Data CollectionThe research design and instruments were approved by the university’s Institutional ReviewBoard #20223 before data analysis began. Student participants for the cognitive interviews wererecruited through a university newsletter calling for participation from undergraduate and first-year graduate students in engineering. Faculty and staff were similarly recruited to participatethrough the same university newsletter. Student participants were offered a $10 Amazon gift cardfor participating in the cognitive interviews and faculty and staff were offered a $50 Amazon giftcard. All interviews were
sustainability had beenintegrated as an important theme. However, there was generally little organization to the effortsto infuse engineering education with sustainability, and the report suggested that standardsshould be developed for sustainability in engineering education. Another finding regardingsustainability education in US engineering schools was that such education tends “to emphasizethe immediate environmental and social impacts of engineering designs”7. This indicates theabsence of a critical long term sustainability component. The present status of sustainability inhigher education has been considered as: “Although efforts are being made in pursuit ofsustainability the current glut of unsustainable practices in the US and around the globe
Technology Zhen Zhao is a Postdoctoral Associate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His research interests include engineering student mentorship and leadership development, engineering research center education and diversity impact evaluation, and engineDr. Meredith Thompson, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Meredith Thompson is a STEM education researcher and program manager for MIT’s Learning Engineering And Practice (LEAP) Group. Her areas of research include virtual and augmented reality, collaboration in virtual environments, STEM education in K-16, and using simulations to prepare preservice and inservice teachers. In her current role, she is a program manager for the Technologist Advanced
face many challenges bothacademic and non-academic9. One widely studied impact of these challenges is transfer shock, adip in the GPAs of transfer students during the first one or two terms after transfer6. Althoughbelieved to be nearly universal, transfer shock is generally not severe10 and Cantrell et al.1 havetheorized that pre-transfer support programs are one technique that can be used to help transferstudents get through their transfer shock and “experience the rewards of their efforts.”We were interested in comparing how well our transfer students were doing in comparison withtheir native classmates. One measure of success is how long a student takes to graduate and dothey ever graduate. The most commonly used metric for graduation and