Education Income EiE’s Portfolio In School Out of School 4 units PK Wee Engineer 4 units EiE for K Kindergarten20 unitsDifferentiated 1–2 The EiE Resources CurriculumDigital Storybooks 3–5 Engineering Adventures 10 units + 1 Engineering 6–8 Everywhere 10 units + 2 Habits of MindProblem‐solvingInnovationEngineering Design Process Habits of MindApply science Apply math Engineering Integrates with Science
makerspaces motivation history types examplesmakerhistory 19881997BASIC Stamp 1995 Arduino 2005Raspberry Pi 20122000 2007 2008 2009 blogs & user groups 200020052005DIWO 20082007 2013 2009 2017: 150+ Higher Education Makerspaces ASEE Conference “makerspace” keyword: 2014 - 1 2015 – 22 2016 - 49Higher Education Markerspace Initiative (HEMI)academic makerspaces motivation history types examplestypes of academic makerspaces course focusproject (personal/club) focus community focusmakerspace characteristics accessibility: courses, department
://research.utah.edu/grants/seed.php Some Statistics Yr 1 - Yr 1 - Yr 2 - Yr 2 - Yr 3 - Yr 3 - Yr 4 - Yr 4 - Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring FallCollege Award Submit Award Submit Award Submit Award Submit Award Submit Award Submit Award Submit Award SubmitArchitecture 0 2Business 1 1Engineering 6 13 5 8 4 8 1 9 3 17 4
cemented and biologically fixed implantsFrom plastic prototypes and custom components to production parts in a 5 year periodComplex solid geometries!Perfect for prototyping and small unitinstrument production!Applications have expanded rapidly…………From custom/prototype ... to production (100 at a time) 1 out of 30 hip surgeries involves components that come from an Arcam systemExactech experienceo
/pre-service educators School, district, state administratorsResearch-based, iterative development processFive partner organizations22-member steering committee (Dean Pines!)Collaboration with TeachEngineering NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERINGEnhancing Teachers’ Voices in K-12 Engineering EducationGoal: Bring national attention to the value of involving classroom teachers in policy making related to the implementation of K-12 engineering education.Convocation: Sept. 30-Oct. 1 at the NAS Building; ~100 attendees, majority classroom teachersProducts: Summary report and 3-4 targeted, companion “briefs” NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Engineering Technology Education in the
levelTable 1 80 60-95 program officers Reduced teaching load and/or a one semester sabbatical Facilitated at the college level Associate Dean and Dean meet with untenured faculty a couple of times per semester Facilitated at the college level Facilitated with money from the vice provost for Proposal development workshops and consultants, particularly for research or college. Expertise obtainedTable 2 182 45-340 CAREER awards
CommitteePanelists:Wayne Davis, Dean of Engineering, University of TennesseeMichelle Sabick, Dean of Engineering, Saint Louis UniversityHisham Hegab, Dean of Engineering, Louisiana Tech UniversityAlec Scranton, Dean of Engineering, University of IowaQuestion # 1: Why do you have andsupport a GCSP on your campus?Question # 2: How have youleveraged your GCSP with otherprograms, initiatives & curricula onyour campus?Question # 3: How has your GCSPbrought value to your campus as awhole?Questions?
- government) built upon, driven by, community and agency interests Common approach: Initial community engagement: level of interest, capacity? Workshops, engaging community, to determine challenges, opportunities NSF-internal discussions, informed by workshops SolicitationTRIPODS Computer Science Research 5 Community 1 2 3 4Smart and Connected Communities Computer Science Research 5 Community 1 2 3 4
experience and recruit graduate students”Facilitated Discussions• Summary slide of the keynote and some prepared questions.• Break-out session to address key challenges .• Reporting by break-out groups and discussions8 Chicago Conference Summary Findingsa) Helping faculty to be successful, i.e. getting more funding andnational recognition 1) What does a successful proposal look like, library of successful proposals. 2) Appropriate startup for new faculty and its management. 3) Assist faculty to find collaborators. 4) National recognition; participate/organize wkshps/conf.b) Assist junior faculty, through mentoring, particularly forhighly prestigious and competitive grants. 1) Provide grant writing and proposal development support. 2) Build
positively enumerated, they will be described using the defined term “specially designed” 3Definitions Rules in 2015 and 2016 BIS and DDTC published proposed rules revising definitions to improve harmonization between the EAR and ITAR on June 3, 2015 ● BIS proposed rule: 80 FR 35586 ● DDTC proposed rule: 80 FR 31525 BIS and DDTC published final rules on June 3, 2016, with an effective date of September 1, 2016 ● BIS final rule: 81 FR 35586 ● DDTC interim final rule: 81 FR 35611 DDTC published a final rule further revising definitions in the ITAR on September 8, 2016 (81 FR 62004) BIS FAQs available at https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/2012-03-30
• 7 in Mexico VOLUME EMEA 1.8 M 5.3 Million Vehicles LATAM 37 Manufacturing Facilities 561K • 1 in Brazil Presence in 150+ countries EDI Infrastructure & Logistics EngineeringFCA Supply Chain Management Logistics Service Industry Marketing Suppliers Manufacturing Dealers Consumer
S&T Funding in the NewAdministration & CongressMatt HourihanMarch 8, 2017For the ASEE Engineering Research CouncilAAAS R&D Budget and Policy Programhttp://www.aaas.org/program/rd-budget-and-policy-program Copyright © 2015 American Association for the Advancement of Science 8/26/15 1 Where We Are and Upcoming Milestones FY 2017 DOD S&T in FY 2017 Appropriations percent change from FY 2016 levels, nominal dollars Appropriations stuck since fall 15% Trump Admin budget amendment
-sustaining after federal startup investment ends.• Workforce training and development is an essential component in institute focus. Federal startup investment: $70M - $120M/institute over 5 years Institute Consortium owners must have minimum 1:1 co-investment Manufacturing USA Strategic Goals• Increase the competiveness of U.S. manufacturing.• Facilitate the transition of innovative technologies into scalable, cost-effective, and high-performing domestic manufacturing capabilities.• Accelerate the development of an advanced manufacturing workforce.• Support business models that help institutes become stable and sustainable. https://www.manufacturing.gov/files/2016/02/2015-NNMI
University ofTechnology, JamaicaEngineering DeansInstitute Conference,Biltmore HotelPresented by Prof. Nilza Aples - DeanApril 3, 2017 1 History and Background• Established 1958 as Jamaica Institute of Technology• Changed to the College of Arts, Science and Technology in 1959• Granted University status in 1995 2 Our VisionThe University of Technology, Jamaica will:• Offer innovative, transformational, profession-driven and leading-edge programmes• Have in place high quality staff who are professionally competent, innovative and leaders in their own field• Operate with high quality environment. 3
. • Sponsor 70%; State 15%; OR/college/dept 5%/5%/5%• Other Cost Share: • Most c/s is in-kind e.g. % time of faculty and key staff • Up to 10% cash matched 1:1 College/Dept• We require 2-4 weeks to develop cost share plans • It is rarely formulaic, and often requires 1-1 negotiation. Some offices require 2 weeks lead time
5-20 years Discovery & Invention (Basic and Applied 4-8 years Science)Focus 2-4 years Leap Ahead Innovations Technology (Innovative Naval Maturation Prototypes) ≈ 12% ≈ 50% 1-2 years (FNCs, etc.) Quick Reaction &