Engineering Educationprojects such as research, case studies, or real-life activities” was rated at 10 % higher than thenational average.Table 3 shows the key IDEA survey results for the highly rated items and faculty writtenquestions related to the course objectives. Other survey questions not specifically addressed herewere all in the average range as compared to the IDEA T-Score Comparison with Classes ofSimilar Size and Level of Student Motivation in IDEA National Normative Database. It can beinferred, therefore, that the highly rated teaching methods contributed to making the coursebetter than average, in the minds of the students. The high ratings (over 4.0 out of 5.0 possible)for the three course objective survey questions demonstrated that
attendees at a two-year and four-year assessment meeting concluded, “articulationagreements are necessary, but not sufficient, for seamless transfers of community collegestudents”.1 Instead, institutions must collaborate to enact effective and sustainable transferprogramming.ApproachWith these limitations and recommendations in mind, the College of Engineering teamed with Page 26.296.6the College of Education at NC State to develop initiatives targeting and leveraging NC CC’srole within North Carolina communities. The central objectives were to increase the awarenessand understanding of engineering among North Carolina residents and develop a
Deans Counciland the Corporate Roundtable, ASEE, 1994. "Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education" 116 Recommendations for Action in Support of Undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics,Project Kaleidoscope Report On Reports 2002. www.pkal.org7 Hazeltine, B. and Bull, C., (1999) Appropriate Technology: Tools, Choices, Implications, Academic Press, SanDiego, CA.8 How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, Expanded edition, National Academy Press,Washington, DC, 2000.9 Tsang, E
, mentioned gains from the modules and theopportunities to choose their own path through the course. These gains are expressed in terms ofachieving a deeper understanding of engineering and aligning choices to personal values andinterests. Both groups seem to gain a broad perspective of the different areas and dimensions ofengineering, as well as an understanding of the different Immersed Program opportunitiesavailable in the college. This broad perspective appears to support students who feel certainabout their interest by inspiring them to explore beyond their initial ideas and ‘remainopen-minded.’ The students who mention feeling uncertain, find in the array of modules areas ofengineering that appeal to their interests, skills and values, gaining
AC 2011-768: INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL REALITY GAMES TO TEACH-ING CIRCUIT ANALYSIS WITH METACOGNITIVE AND PROBLEM-SOLVING STRATEGIESYing Tang, Rowan University Ying Tang is Associate Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ. She received the B.S. and M.S. degrees from the Northeastern University, P. R. China, in 1996 and 1998, respectively, and Ph. D degree from New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, in 2001. Her research interests include virtual/augmented reality, operational research, discrete event systems, Petri nets applications, artificial intelligence, and computer networking.Sachin Shetty, Tennessee State University Dr. Sachin Shetty is currently an Assistant
need to attract top talent from all over the world willing towork hard in applied research to get new patents, publish scientific papers and create wealth forthe supporting companies. With all these objectives in mind a group of five companies foundedthe Industrial Consortium to Foster Applied Research in Mexico in February 2008. UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY PARTNERSHIP THE SYNERGY THAT MAY CHANGE THE INDUSTRIAL FUTURE It is well known that most of the top engineering students receive good work offers fromleading companies at the time of their bachelor graduation, but a few of them reject these offers,as they are willing to pursue graduate studies. These students are not attracted by just a goodsalary
AC 2011-117: LEARNING ASSESSMENT IN A DESIGN-THROUGHOUT-THE-CURRICULUM PROGRAMNaomi C. Chesler, University of Wisconsin, Madison Naomi C. Chesler is an Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering with an affiliate appointment in Educational Psychology. Her research interests include vascular biomechanics, hemodynamics and cardiac function as well as the factors that motivate students to pursue and persist in engineering careers, with a focus on women and under-represented minorities.Christopher L Brace, University of WisconsinWillis J. Tompkins, University of Wisconsin, Madison Willis J. Tompkins received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Maine at Orono in 1963 and 1965
mind, we negotiated with the State University of New York(SUNY) at New Paltz, centrally located within the region, to offer a Semiconductor ProcessTechnology course for the community college students utilizing the university’s equipment andexpertise. We also arranged a Vacuum and RF Technology course at a local industry siteproviding students with hands-on experience with expensive vacuum equipment. We recruitedan adjunct in Statistical Process Control to develop an internet version of the course to be offeredon SUNY’s Learning Network (sln.suny.edu ). Page 6.776.5 Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education
defined set of parameters from which a significantdigit analysis can be followed. For the above example, a more correct and realistic problemstatement might be: The force vector F has a magnitude of 6.50 (102) lb and acts through point A at a slope of 2.01 vertical to 5.47 horizontal. Determine the x and Page 5.309.3 y components of F.This statement leaves no doubt in the student’s mind as to the accuracy of measurements (reallife measurement capability) and allows the student to follow proper engineering practice.An incomplete problem statement also affects the third step of Eide’s engineering problem-solving presentation
new curriculum was to emphasize the inherent connectivity ofthe disciplines used in engineering practice in addition to teaching the fundamental principles ofmechanical engineering. With this in mind, representatives from four sub-groups, thermalsciences & fluids, mechanics & materials, dynamics & controls, and mechanical design metseparately to formulate the new integrated ME curricula. Based on a pilot models implementedearlier in other ME departments (for examples, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology) weconsolidated the twelve traditional, discipline-specific 3 credit courses into a set of four, two-course sequences consisting of 4 credit hour courses. In particular, (1) Thermal Fluids I & II
Session 1009 Integrating Discipline-Specific Communication Instruction based on Workforce Data into Technical Communication Courses* Lisa DuPree McNair, Judith Shaul Norback, Ben Miller School of Literature, Communication and Culture/ School of Industrial and Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractBecause of Georgia Tech’s collaboration between the School of Literature, Communication, andCulture (LCC), College of Computing (CoC), and Industrial and Systems Engineering (ISyE)departments, our
Conference & Exposition Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationthat with the ever growing body of knowledge needed for a successful career, the centuries oldeducation model of one master and few apprentices had become largely insufficient. Education ofa goal-minded individual who uses technical knowledge as a principal tool and communicateseffectively with non-technical personnel became the emphasis of the education in that institution.The principles of today’s engineering work have not changed much since. Increasingly more oftenfunctioning of an engineer is viewed in context of the entire scientific and economic environment. Several reports by professional societies and papers published in the last
Development of Teaching Strategies and Assessment Methods for Course “Mechanisms” based on Students’ Outcomes Shyi-Jeng Tsai1, Pei-fen Chang2, Jiunn-Chi Wu1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering/2Graduate Institute of Learning and Instruction, National Central University, Jong-Li, TAIWANAbstractThe introduction of accrediting programs in colleges is now the main topic of the engineeringeducation reform in Taiwan. This paper presents therefore our current research results oncurriculum planning and evaluation of the mechanical engineering course based on the learningoutcomes proposed in ABET EC-2000, with example of the course “Mechanisms”. With aid
many industries such as automotive, chemical distribution etc. on transportation and operations management projects. She works extensively with food banks and food pantries on supply chain management and logistics focused initiatives. Her graduate and undergraduate students are integral part of her service-learning based logistics classes. She teaches courses in strategic relationships among industrial distributors and distribution logistics. Her recent research focuses on engineering education and learning sciences with a focus on how to engage students better to prepare their minds for the future. Her other research interests include empirical studies to assess impact of good supply chain practices such as
testing educational materials and learning spaces that stimulate serious play. Page 13.280.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Case Study: A Space Designed for Cooperative Learning with Multiple ProcessesAbstractThe importance of cooperative and active approaches to classroom learning has long beenrecognized. However most of our resources, textbooks, curriculum structures and learningspaces are not designed with these pedagogies in mind. Many instructors have developed theirown materials and figured out how to conduct an engaged, active and cooperative class in
Educationbetter benchmarks for undergraduate reform in engineering education than major research-oriented universities.Building a Network for ReformThe traditional view of benchmarking in academe is to identify standards for comparison. Thesestandards may serve as the basis for program review or accreditation, norms for setting salariesand workloads, or goals. However, none of these purposes is particularly suited to disseminatinginnovations 22. Instead of seeing benchmarking solely as setting standards and norms , wepropose to use it to promote dissemination. From this perspective, benchmarking serves to helpus identify partnerships with like-minded individuals, that is, individuals and institutionsinterested in engineering service course reform
Paper ID #21161The Effects of Professional Development and Coaching on Teaching PracticesDr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. He also serves as an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Academic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering
. Page 8.375.7 “Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition c 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThis work has been supported in part by NSF grant CMS-9634846 and in part by U.S. Armygrant DAAD 19-00-1-0479.BIBLIOGRAPHY1. ACI 446 Fracture Toughness Testing of Concrete, State-of-the-Art Report, Draft I, September 2002.2. Andre, T. “Minds-on and Hands-on Activity: Improving Instruction in Science for All Stu- dents,” Mid-Western Educational Researcher 10 (1997) 28-34.3. Elshorbagy, A. and Schonwetter, D.J. “Engineer Morphing: Bridging the Gap Between Class- roon Teaching an the Engineering Profession,” International Journal of Engineering Edu
Session 2630 Improving Retention by Redesigning Freshmen Mathematics with the Dimensions of Learning Pedagogy, Assessment and Technology Framework Pamela Leigh-Mack, Shurron Farmer, Solomon Alao, Craig Scott, Gaston N’Guerekata Morgan State University Baltimore, MarylandAbstract The retention of engineering students continues to be a major issue affecting engineeringschools across the country and unsuccessful experiences in freshmen mathematics is one of thefactors attributing to
-level engineer. With this in mind, semiconductor design andmanufacturing companies are looking to educational institutions to provide this experience as an integralcomponent of an undergraduate curriculum. Industry has even sponsored a textbook specifically aboutmixed-signal testing2 to facilitate this. The text, by Mark Burns (Texas Instruments) and GordonRoberts (McGill University), covers all aspects of mixed-signal test from actual measurement techniquesto the economics of production testing.Presently, the Electronics Engineering Technology program at Texas A&M University offers twocourses in mixed-signal test based on this book. The original intent of these courses was to teach testconcepts using a standard production tester donated by
competitive environment has perhaps become unpredictable to the pointthat challenges the even well run organizations 17. No longer do engineers work independently,and employers are looking for more quality-minded and customer-oriented work teams. Mostresearch shows that when the learner is actively involved in acquiring knowledge, theacquisition occurs much more rapidly and is more effectively retained. Therefore, howseriously should educators take the training of social, ethical, human values, andcommunication skills? Perhaps one answer would be the inclusion of cultural diversity that isbrought into the classroom by international students.Cultural diversity is the beginning of prosperity in society. It is the notion that differences canprovide for
NationalAcademy of Engineering, through its NAE Committee on the Diversity of the EngineeringWorkforce, sponsors an Enginergirl.org website that explains engineering principles [6]. Whenthe "KISS (keep it simple stupid)" principle conflicts with the "keep the target user in mind"principle, an engineer makes a choice. The data curation process retains the engineeringprinciples to prepare those community college students interested in engineering.ImplementationData curation examples on spatial data in stochastic calculus Fokker Planck equation, SolarDynamics Observatory data, T-cell spatial-temporal data, exoplanet archive data, and Hubblequasar data are presented.The stochastic calculus Fokker Planck equation could be applied whenever there is a
AC 2010-1012: PROMOTING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY BY UTILIZINGPICTURES AND RECREATED ARTIFACTSWilliam Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington University. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional Engineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an Engineer or Engineering Manager at General Motors, Cadnetix, and Motorola. His interests
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationReferencesBell, Eric. (2001), "Using an Expert System to Recognize and Remediate Student Errors",Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Washington, D.C.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), “Mind in Society: The Development of Higher PsychologicalProcesses”, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.ERIC BELLEric Bell is currently a full time instructor at Triton College. He received his B.S. andM.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois of Chicago. Page 7.970.10 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for
Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering EducationReferencesBell, Eric. (2001), "Using an Expert System to Recognize and Remediate Student Errors",Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Washington, D.C.Vygotsky, L. S. (1978), “Mind in Society: The Development of Higher PsychologicalProcesses”, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.ERIC BELLEric Bell is currently a full time instructor at Triton College. He received his B.S. andM.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Illinois of Chicago. Page 7.1048.10 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for
innovation cycle [1].Research Design Considerations and Study AimsIn a precursory study that developed a framework to encourage pedagogical risk-taking amongfaculty [2], the research team developed a set of guiding principles to evaluate interventionsaimed at revolutionizing engineering departments. According to these guiding principles,faculty-based interventions should be “based on faculty-driven (vs. administration-driven)ideas;” “community (versus individually) focused;” and “sustained in duration” (i.e., not a one-off event). In this study, a multiple case study approach is employed to investigate theeffectiveness and impact of a program designed with these principles in mind. We arespecifically interested in understanding how participation in
-based initiatives, such as the establishment of school makerspaces, are having on the culture of formal educational institutions. Before starting his doctoral studies, Mr. Weiner served as the founding Program Director for CREATE at Arizona Science Center, a hybrid educational makerspace/ community learning center. He has previous experience as a physics and math instructor at the middle school and high school levels.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams and Tooker Professor at the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches human-centered engineering
Paper ID #25716Teaching Social Responsibility in a Circuits CourseDr. Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego Susan M. Lord received a B.S. from Cornell University and the M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford Univer- sity. She is currently Professor and Chair of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. Her teaching and research interests include inclusive pedagogies, electronics, optoelectronics, materials sci- ence, first year engineering courses, feminist and liberative pedagogies, engineering student persistence, and student autonomy. Her research has been sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr
Paper ID #41030WIP Nurturing Novice Researchers: An Exploration of UndergraduateStudent Experiences in a Creativity Inquiry Research ClassElizabeth Zanin Flanagan, Clemson University Libby Flanagan is a current doctoral candidate in the Engineering and Science Education Department at Clemson University. She received her B.S. in Biosystems Engineering from the Clemson University Honors Program in 2017, along with a minor in Spanish Language Studies. She completed a two-year teaching appointment with Teach for America in 2019, where she taught 6th-grade math and computer science in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She earned her M.S. in
from reading, for instance,and this is backward from what Dale’s Cone suggests. I’m not “ear-minded” as the learningpsychologists say, and I understand that about a third of the U. S. population is like me (and Ican’t quote an exact source for this number either – I got it from learning psychologist FredKeller7 in a conversation with him). I don’t receive vocal information as efficiently as I do whenI read about something – I can always read text over again, but it isn’t usually possible to“replay” a lecture or a conversation. So my learning skills don’t match the lower levels of Dale’sCone. But after 43 years of teaching engineering subjects I am quite comfortable with the ideasthat, for most engineering students, Visual Receiving is superior