Interest Council IV. All of Dr. Borrego’s degrees are in Materials Science and Engineering. Her M.S. and Ph.D. are from Stanford University, and her B.S. is from University of Wisconsin-Madison.Dr. Cynthia Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Research Asso- ciate Professor of Education, and Founding Director of the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering at the University of Michigan. Her research areas include student resistance to active learn- ing, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and institutional change. She is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, an Associate Editor of
2006-1475: ENGINEERING STUDENTS FOR THE 21ST CENTURYCharles Bunting, Oklahoma State University Charles Bunting received his Ph.D. from Virginia Tech in 1994. His interests are in Electromagnetic characterization and application of reverberation chambers, computational electromagnetics, and analysis of optical and microwave structures using numerical methods. Currently he teaches at both the undergraduate and graduate level, developing hands-on approaches to teaching electromagnetics.Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University Alan Cheville is an associate professor of electrical engineering at Oklahoma State University. Starting out along the traditional tenure path as a researcher in THz
Paper ID #6807Introducing an Instructional Model in Undergraduate Electric Power En-ergy Systems Curriculum-Part (I): Authoritative vs. Dialogic Discourse inProblem-Centered LearningDr. Jia-Ling Lin, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Dr. Jia-Ling Lin is a research scientist in the STEM Education Center at the University of Minnesota Twin Cities. Her research interests are in areas of developing and exploring innovative instructional models in undergraduate engineering education and embodied theoretical claims about effective teaching and learning, particularly in discipline-based problem solving.Prof. Paul Imbertson
. Page 25.233.2Supto1 taught for many years as an adjunct and humorously describes how adjuncts can betreated as a “pet rock” which is a near-perfect low-maintenance pet. Adjuncts typically are “offthe radar screen” of the Dean and Chair, hence receive minimal feedback except from students intheir classes. Adjuncts often have little authority to improve the laboratory/class they teach andmay not be included in curriculum decisions. Supto recommends that “every adjunct shouldhave a full-time faculty member assigned as an advocate and resource” but this often isn’t thecase1. Adjuncts are often left to fend for themselves.Departments and faculty may want to do an excellent job of teaching undergraduates, yet it isoften the lack of resources and not
beable to visit approximately 90% of the bridges previously visited, and we will be able to add acovered wooden bridge, as we will be taking a different route to Portland where one is easilyaccessible.ConclusionsStanding next to a real structure and discussing the methods of its creation in its time and placeas well as concepts in fundamental mechanics and design of steel or concrete provide for aprofound learning experience. Having access to experts in these areas via a co-teaching methodaffords students multiple perspectives on a particular structure and on civil engineering broadly.And while a field experience can be simulated in the classroom or laboratory, when it comes tocivil engineering and history, there is simply nothing like being
’ notes, teaching curricula and bibliographies had been regarded as outside of thescope of the board’s responsibilities as an examining body. It was considered by theCoordinating Committee, however, that it would be essential to the successful introduction ofengineering science (Advanced) that material of this kind should be provided. It is quite evidentthat in setting up the Coordinating Committee with the terms of reference given [44] and with theprovision of extensive teaching resource material the Board embarked on a novel and importantextension of its role” [45].To achieve these goals the coordinating committee set up four working parties. These were: (i) Textbook writing (ii) Teacher training (iii) Laboratory and coursework (iv
. Vernier was heavily involved in teaching and content development with the Fundamentals of Engineering for Honors (FEH) program.Mr. Patrick M. Wensing, The Ohio State University Patrick M. Wensing is an NSF Graduate Research Fellow and Graduate Teaching Assistant at The Ohio State University. Mr. Wensing received his B.S. degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from The Ohio Sate University in 2009. Since 2009, he has been working toward a Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Ohio State. Mr. Wensing currently teaches and develops content for the laboratory portion of the Fundamentals for Engineering for Honors (FEH) program and is actively involved in humanoid locomotion research.Mr. Craig E Morin
skills beyond a single use normally requires feedback, which in-person lectures oronline videos rarely deliver. 1The master-student demonstration framework for spreadsheet training is also employed in manyengineering courses [9]. For example, sessions held in computer labs involve a professor orteaching assistant demonstrating spreadsheet skills or techniques that can be mimicked bystudents. While instructors can give real time feedback in computer laboratories with smallnumbers of students, measuring students’ spreadsheet skills at scale is quite difficult.Alternatively, multiple choice tests can assess spreadsheet skills [10]. Now, web-based platformscan deliver interactive content delivery and
and sociocultural norms as well as in classic studies of socialization in scientific andtechnical careers, which don’t mention novices’ existing knowledge, skills, or identities (e.g.,[17], [18], [19]). Despite ongoing critiques of this mindset as inaccurate and a barrier to learningand identity formation (e.g., [20], [21], [22]), some academic communities, such as theengineering research laboratory groups that co-author Wylie studies, continue to talk aboutnovices according to this model. This approach does great injustice to newcomers to expertcommunities as well as robs experts of opportunities to learn from “a wisdom of peripherality”([23] p. 216), i.e., the invaluable perspective of outsiders. In ongoing observations and interviewsof
more active role in their own learning [1]. However, there existdiverse interpretations and discussions around the idea of what active learning means as well asthe types of teaching and learning approaches that have been utilized by engineering facultyaimed at including active learning in their course delivery. In a comparative literature review [2],it was discovered that there are significant differences in what has been understood and appliedin science classrooms as active learning. Consequently, Chi [2] developed a framework oflearning activities aimed at highlighting the different types of learning activities that are and canbe included in classrooms for maximized results. Building on the work of Chi [2], this paper seeksto explore the
Head of Pillar, Engineering and Product Development(EPD), and Co-Director of the SUTD-MIT International Design Center (IDC) at the Singapore Universityof Technology and Design (SUTD). Dr. Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in the Divisionof Engineering and Applied Science at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&TBell Laboratories Ph.D. Scholar. Dr. Wood joined the faculty at the University of Texas in September1989 and established a computational and experimental laboratory for research in engineering design andmanufacturing, in addition to a teaching laboratory for prototyping, reverse engineering measurements,and testing. During his academic career, Dr. Wood was a Distinguished Visiting Professor at the
is my intent to teach you the skills needed to be a residential designer and begin a career in residential architecture. The skills you gain from the courses in the Drafting Program are transferable to almost every profession and can be a source of income for you as you continue your education. I have taught drafting on the college level for ten years with high expectations and rigor. I currently teach Design Engineering courses at both Fremont and Bonneville. I also teach Driver Educa- tion for Fremont High, as well as mathematics and interior design courses for BYUI, architecture courses for Weber State University, and graduate level courses in Business and Education for Argosy University. I am currently the
University Dr. David Gill is an Assistant Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at Western Washington University where he specializes in CAD/CAM and CNC. Prior to coming to Western, Dr. Gill was Principal Member of the Technical Staff at Sandia National Laboratori ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Adapting CAD/CAM and CNC Curriculum to Advances in TechnologyOne of the challenges faced in manufacturing engineering education is how best to teach important,traditional content while branching out into new areas that are emerging as manufacturingtechnologies evolve. Dealing with this challenge requires a clear understanding of what is thefoundational material for a MFGE student to
Labs for Automation Teaching: a Cost Effective Approach⁎⁎Authors thank Tecnológico de Monterrey because its support.,” IFAC-Pap., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 266–271, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.08.219.[24] A. A. Altalbe, “Performance Impact of Simulation-Based Virtual Laboratory on Engineering Students: A Case Study of Australia Virtual System,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 177387–177396, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957726.[25] “Commercialization Center,” Lamar University.edu. https://www.Lamar University.edu/commercializationcenter/index.html (accessed Jan. 20, 2021).[26] “21 CFR 820.30 - Design controls. - Document in Context - CFR-2012-title21-vol8-sec820- 30.” https%3A%2F%2Fwww.govinfo.gov%2Fapp%2Fdetails%2FCFR
- and transdisciplinary experiences relevant to the currenttechnical development. More specifically, this program provided three main objectives,including: (1) providing transdisciplinary engineering design experiences relevant to cutting edgetechnical development for teachers; (2) developing teacher-driven lesson plans that could beimplemented in the classroom, and (3) disseminating results and developed materials to helpteachers in the region and beyond.In this RET site program, teachers rotated to four different research laboratories with a 1.5-to-3-week duration in each at the University of Central Florida (UCF) campus under the guidance offaculty mentors, graduate students and, in some cases, even undergraduate NSF REUparticipants [4]. In
studieswere and continue to be designed by the Director, who previously created a textbook ofengineering ethics case studies [53]. The U.S. Senate Hearing Panel case study implementation isfully described in her textbook [54] as an Ethics Laboratory. Project outputs from three of thefour case study projects are used as evidence for continuous improvement of ABET StudentOutcomes (3) and (4), which cover to effective communication and ethical and professionalresponsibility, respectively. Given the research on the impact of active learning teaching methods and the innovativecurricular design of the undergraduate Engineering program at Loyola University Chicago, theresearch questions for this study include the following: • What are the
), S38 – S44.[24] Thornton, R. and Sokoloff, D. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858 – 867.[25] Redish, E. F. and Steinberg, R. N. (1999). Teaching physics: Figuring out what works. Physics Today, 52(1), 24 – 30.[26] Van Heuvelen, A. (1991). Overview, case study physics. American Journal of Physics, 59(10), 898 – 906.[27] Larkin, T. L. (2013, January). The evolution of assessment within an introductory physics course. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), Vol. 3, Special Issue 1, pp. 39 - 48. Kassel University Press GmbH, Kassel, Germany. eISSN: 2192-4880. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijep. v3iS1.2393.[28
currently teaches Engineering Statics, Mechanics of Solids, and Civil Engineering Materials. Page 23.600.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013First Encounters: Statics as the Gateway to Engineering CultureThis paper describes ongoing efforts at Syracuse University to re-engineer the traditionalstatics course. This course forms part of a larger NSF funded project aimed at increasinginnovation and creativity in engineering curricula. The principal aim of the overallproject is to find strategies to foster and reward creativity in engineering students.At Syracuse University, as at many
involved asking students to look beyondequations to investigate the relationship physics has to philosophy, history, literature, andWestern culture. Students were asked to think about what physics could teach them about theworld, about themselves, and about society as a whole. Although some assignments were givenwith the goal of satisfying the general goals of a typical college writing class, others werespecifically linked to physics and to science, in general.During the Fall 2000 semester, 2 lecture and 8 laboratory sections of Physics for the ModernWorld consisting of approximately 16 students in each were offered. Typical enrollmentsaverage about 120 students each semester in Physics for the Modern World. One of the 8laboratory sections was
defined by the following: i. The Learner is in a professional environment, generally in industry; ii. The Learner works towards a qualification that is relevant to the industry, and aligned with her/ his work profile; iii. The workplace is the natural setting for the delivery of the education, and is converted into a learning environment or class room/laboratory; iv. Synchronous instruction is employed to teach the fundamental principles, and applications, in core and advanced areas relevant to the domain, along with relevant laboratory sessions; v. Asynchronous means of instruction are employed to provide flexibility and ease of access, and most importantly, to keep the learner engaged constantly
Paper ID #39760Board 429: Variations in Motivation for Learning to Use MATLAB amongFirst-Year Engineering StudentsDr. Alison K Polasik, Campbell University Alison Polasik, Ph.D. joined the Campbell University School of Engineering in August 2018. Previously, she was an assistant professor of practice in The Ohio State University’s Materials Science & Engineering Department. She has a decade of experience teaching and designing curriculum and incorporating real- world scenarios in her courses. Her work in engineering education has been presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed proceedings for the American
Leadership and Principal Certificate from Northern Arizona University in 2007. She is currently working on heRebekah Jongewaard, Arizona State UniversityMaryan RobledoSteven J. Zuiker, Arizona State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Energizing the Engineering Pipeline with Agrivoltaics Citizen Science (Pre-College Resource Exchange) Authors: Janet Ankrum, Cheryl Carswell, Andrew Centanni, Melany Coates, Mia DeLaRosa, Rebekah Jongewaard, Michelle Jordan, Maryan Robledo, Steven ZuikerThe Sonoran Photovoltaics Laboratory (hereafter SPV Lab) organizes a regional approach topursuing photovoltaic (PV) engineering research for 4th-12th grade STEM teachers and
Paper ID #34955Lessons Learned From the First-Year Enrichment Program for Engineeringand Computer Science Students in the ASSURE-US ProgramDr. Doina Bein, California State University, Fullerton Dr. Bein has an extensive publication record: 13 book chapters, 19 journal articles, and 69 conference papers. Four of her conference papers have received the best paper awards. She was awarded (as PI or co-PI) several research and teaching grants from AFOSR and NSF. She is the general vice-chair of an annual conference, International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), held in April in Las Vegas, NV. She
each week (lecture and labs). Some of the previous lab assignments were set-up toallow students to work together in groups of three or four on a coordinate measurement machine.Adjustments were made during the Fall 2020 semester to minimize the physical distancebetween individuals in the classroom and laboratory while also giving students the option foraccessing the classroom remotely through Zoom and the software remotely through Citrix.Students who felt uncomfortable being around other individuals were given access to themetrology lab outside of normal class hours. This paper will describe the parameters in whichfaculty at Illinois State University used to make decisions about the mode of instruction in theircourses, describe the adjustments
Laboratory, a design-oriented facility that engages students in team-based, socially relevant projects. While at Texas A&M University Imbrie co-led the design of a 525,000 square foot state-of-the-art engineering education focused facility; the largest educational building in the state. His expertise in educational pedagogy, student learning, and teaching has impacted thousands of students at the universities for which he has been associated. Imbrie is nationally recognized for his work in ac- tive/collaborative learning pedagogies, teaming and student success modeling. His engineering education leadership has produced fundamental changes in the way students are educated around the world. Imbrie has been a member of
. References 1. Attarzadeh, Farrokh, “Innovations in Laboratory Development for Computer Engineering Technology Programs,” IJME, Volume 7, Number 2, Spring 2007, http://www.ijme.us/, Accessed on 2/10/2008. 2. Attarzadeh, Farrokh, “Empowering Students to Become Highly Skilled Professionals for the 21st Century Industries,” Proc. of The 9th Annual IJME-INTERTECH International Conference, Session EN, October 19-21, 2006, Keen University, Union, NJ. Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering
an elevated bonus zone beyond the finish area. The robots aretested, both individually and in head-to-head competitions, at the end of the ten-week quarter.Points earned in the individual runs and the head-to-head competition contribute to the team’s course grade.Other activities that are graded throughout the quarter include written and oral reports and laboratory exercisesrelated to various robot subsystems.At the beginning of the design project, each team is required to prepare a detailed design schedule. Theschedules are reviewed by the faculty and suggestions are made to help students prepare realistic schedules.Teams in the first pilot group (Spring 1995) were expected to follow their schedules, and faculty informallymonitored their
collect data and to do control operationsis demonstrated in the laboratory experiments. Certain elements of the course touch upon the following:(1) Measurements of physical quantities. Here the student is introduced, for the first time in some cases, to the concepts of Page 1.389.2 imprecision and noise corruption in practical measurements. ?&iii’ ‘..+,ym } 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings “y,..’” 1
. No required courses feature Mechatronics as a prerequisite, though some technicalelectives do. While cataloged as a 3000 level course, the majority of students are seniors withjuniors and new graduate students making up the balance. Figure 1. The interdisciplinary nature of Mechatronics [14]. Figure 2. EME 3214 – Mechatronics with prerequisite courses.The four-credit course is taught with three hours of lecture and two hours of laboratory. Becausethe lecture and laboratory sessions are considered a single section, class size is capped at16 students per section to accommodate the available laboratory stations. Both daytime andevening
contractor, under the umbrella of a multi-million dollar contract, in space flight hard- ware research and development to NASA Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio. Dr. Garafolo was instrumental in developing a synergistic approach in the research and component modeling of elastomeric space seals for manned spaceflight; an asset to NASA and the development of advanced aerospace seals for the next generation of manned spacecraft. The unique problem necessitated a grasp of both fluid dynamics and material science, as well as experimental and computational analysis. As a DAGSI/Air Force Research Laboratory Ohio Student-Faculty Fellow, Dr. Garafolo gained experimental knowledge in structural dynamics of turbomachinery. In