engineering programs? • How is the intersectional identity of being neurodivergent and LGBTQIA+ unique in engineering spaces? • How can neuroqueer students be best supported by their engineering programs?IRB approval will be sought for interview-based research on student experiences to begin theprocess of quantifying the needed supports for neuroqueer engineering students. This willprovide a foundation for developing pedagogy for teaching faculty in engineering. Future workwill determine at what level the pedagogy could be most effective, such as introductory freshmenengineering classes versus senior design level classes.References[1] M. C. Kleekamp, "Neuroqueer," in Encyclopedia of Queer Studies in Education, Brill, 2021, p. 410–416
Paper ID #40912Game-Based Immersive Learning for Education: Empowering Autistic HighSchool Students to Address the Growing Cyber Threats in K-12 SchoolsKaren N Nix, Auburn University Karen Nix is a PhD student at Auburn University, Samuel Ginn College of Engineering. She received a bachelor’s degree in Computer Science from LaGrange College and a master’s degree in Computer Science with a concentration of Software Development from Columbus State University. She works as a Graduate Teaching Assistant at Auburn University and recently began work for the City of Opelika, AL in the IT department as Assistant CIO. Her research
participants.MethodologyThe Biological Engineering (BENG) Mentor Program was piloted in Fall 2024. The programwas designed based on successful mentorship models from the University of Arkansas ChemicalEngineering [9, 10] and Industrial Engineering [11] Departments, both of which have beenestablished for over three years. To ensure an effective launch, the BENG Mentor Programcommittee consulted representatives from these programs to gather advice, best practices, andlessons learned.One of the key recommendations from these consultations was to adopt a mentor circle formatand focus the program primarily on the fall semester. The mentor circle structure was favoredover one-on-one meetings because it encouraged richer discussions and more diverseperspectives
, at the Intense Pulsed Neutron Source (IPNS). Dr. Ilhem F. Hakem joined the Colloids, Polymers and Surfaces (CPS) Program and the Department of Chemical Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University in 2018 as Teaching Professor to support and expand the educational activi- ties of the CPS Program. This involves teaching of undergraduate and graduate level courses, supervising undergraduate and Master students in research projects related to soft materials and finally develop and get involved in K-12 outreach activities. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: A Summer Outreach Program in Chemical Engineering Emphasizing
workers2. At the same time, it isrecognized that nanotechnology is still a developing field and nanotechnology R&D is expectedto accelerate throughout the decade3. Patents and scientific papers on nanotechnology topicsquadrupled in the last decade, and this growth has accelerated in the past couple of years4. All ofthese trends point to a need to train nanoscience researchers and scientists to continue the growthin this field and meet the nanotechnology vision for 2020 set forth by NSF3.Along with continuous advances in nanoscience and technology, educators have developeddifferent courses and programs at both undergraduate and graduate levels to attract the best andbrightest students to the field and help creation of a new work-force. Wansom
ethics and service learning. If students need to learn tobe responsible to society, the arguments go, then students need to take more courses in ethicsand/or take courses that feature a service learning dimension.Ethics education for engineering students has gained new stature in the past fifteen years,spawning a movement to encourage engineering faculty to add ethical dimensions to theirtechnical courses. Resources for faculty are available at The Online Ethics Center forEngineering and Science. According to Whitbeck, the best approach to teaching ethics toengineering students is to adopt a “’hands on,’ ‘practice-oriented,’ ‘experiential,’ or ‘activelearning approach”: The active learning exercises should be chosen so that over the course
. Ayala spent three years as a Postdoctoral Researcher at University of Delaware where he expanded his knowledge on simulation of multiphase flows while acquiring skills in high performance parallel computing and scientific computation. Before that, Dr. Ayala hold a faculty position at Universidad de Oriente at Mechanical Engineering Department where he taught and developed graduate and undergraduate courses for a number of subjects such as Fluid Mechanics, Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics, Multiphase Flows, Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulic Machinery, as well as Mechanical Engineering Laboratory courses. In addition, Dr. Ayala has had the opportunity to work for a number of engineering consulting companies, which have
Paper ID #46891Rock paper symbols: Leveraging the spiral curriculum to teach coding inprimary schoolsDr. Brendan Jacobs, The University of New England Brendan Jacobs is an Associate Professor and Head of Department (STEM Education) at the University of New England, Australia. His research interests are in STEM education, explanatory animation creation, conceptual consolidation and digital scholarship.Solina Quinton, University of Waterloo Solina Quinton is an environmental engineering graduate from the University of Waterloo with a passion for education. Her experience in the field of engineering education began during her
won best paper at the Annual ASEE conference in both Design in Engineering Education Division and the Professional Interest Council 5 (PIC V) for her research in Inclusive Team-based learning. In 2023, she won the Northeastern Inaugural Global Educator Award for her impactful work developing and running international educational programs. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work-In-Progress: Integrating Sustainability Across the Chemical Engineering CurriculumAbstractThe United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development represents a global commitmentto addressing the world's most pressing economic, social, and environmental challenges with
classes, conduct research, andinteract with departmental faculty, staff, and other graduate students, the climate they experienceand the support they receive at the departmental level can have a major impact on their success.When interventions address students directly, once they graduate, there may be no lasting changein the department. However, when faculty attitudes and mentoring practices along withdepartmental processes and procedures change, the changes are likely to be more sustainable.Using institutional theory as the analytical lens, the purpose of this paper is to examine how onecollaborative project implements a faculty-led institutional change model for diversifying theSTEM professoriate. Each participating doctoral granting
experiences for first year studentsa. By 1982, over 175 educators acrossthe country came together to discuss first-year seminars, and the following year the AnnualConference on the Freshman Year Experience was born. Today, an effective first-yearexperience has been identified as a high impact educational practice by the Association ofAmerican Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). Although these experiences differ significantlyfrom university to university, ranging anywhere from a single course specifically taken in themajor itself, through more involved practices including live-learn communities, Kuh emphasizesthe most influential points of a first-year experience include a “strong emphasis on criticalinquiry, frequent writing, information literacy
surface or deep levelprocessing) to study the impact of collaboration in these online learning environments, Pena-Shaff and Nicholls, (2004), [11].To be truly effective, safety culture and community learning structures must be built to facilitatethe interaction of researchers, educators and students from multiple disciplines. This effort isaimed at integrating multiple interests into one community, a community of safety practice. Inaddition, educational programs must be recast to produce a new breed of researcher prepared andsuited to working at the interface of multiple disciplines, thereby creating a second type ofintegration, a new learning community. However, several barriers must be overcome to achieveboth forms of integration effectively
into undergraduate writing-intensive courses. We conducted design-basedimplementation research (DBIR) during the 2023-24 academic year on the incorporation of AIwriting tools for scientific communication centered on teacher instruction, student learning, andproblems of teaching practice as identified by practitioners, students, and researchers [4].Through iterative cycles of DBIR, we explored best practices for teaching and learning the use ofAI writing tools in scientific communication; integrated these practices into the products;evaluated the impact on students’ development as writers; and improved the project's products.For this paper, we focus on two research questions: 1) What emerging best practices do we seeinstantiated for using
. The originaloffering was cohort-based and it employed a weekend format; meeting from Friday throughSunday. The cohort met three times a semester, twice in the summer semester, for a total of fivesemesters (Fall, Spring, Summer, Fall and Spring). After 22 months, all members of the initialcohort format graduated in the May 2000 graduation ceremony. Because of its non-traditionalapproach, the state’s authorization included the establishment of a different fee structure thannormal on-campus classes which resulted in a program cost that was higher than traditional on-campus equivalent programs.The Center for Professional Studies in Technology and Applied Research (ProSTAR) wasapproved by Purdue University under the College of Technology as an
graduating." This module and these exercises have prepared thestudents for their future work in the field.ConclusionsIn this paper, we showcased a series of new hands-on PLC modules for chemical engineeringundergraduate students, which were implemented in the Process Control Lab course. The firstmodule utilized ready-to-work-with Learning Center Opto-22 hardware. For the second modulewe designed and built a portable cart with a Liquid Level column, powered by the SNAP PACOpto-22 architecture. Comprehensive tutorials to guide students through wiring, programming,and system operation were created for both assignments. The main goal of these activities is toaddress the long-expressed concern about the theory vs. practice "gap" in process
their Healthcare Systems Engineering Institute (HSyE) as a post- doctoral research fellow. Native from San Juan, Puerto Rico, Dayna graduated with a bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus (¡Colegio!) and then she completed a master’s and PhD degree in Industrial Engineering from the University of South Florida in Tampa. Being Hispanic and an engineer herself, Dayna has a passion for increasing Hispanic representation in STEM. She currently lives with her husband Andrés, their two sons David and Sebastián, and their miniature schnauzer Lucca in Winter Garden, Florida.Esther Gonzalez (Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, Inc
among these demandsis the call for outfitting students – the future workforce – with so-called 21st-century skills [3].Most notably, these include skills of abstract thinking, critical reasoning, technicalcommunication, teamwork, lifelong learning, creativity, and leadership. A critical line ofresponse to equipping students with these skills has been pedagogical advances and instructionalinnovation at the course and curriculum levels. Student-centric, active-learning, and experientialeducational practices – such as flipped classes, project-based courses, undergraduate research,and work-integrated learning – have emerged as effective tools for supporting students’professional skill development in line with expectations of the modern workplace [4
statisticallysignificant difference at α = 0.05. It should be noted that these grades are reasonable for agraduate course since a C is generally considered unsatisfactory at the graduate level. As ameasure of practical significance, the experienced instructor’s assessment of student quality isthat the latter class was on average a weaker group—which makes their better performance evenmore significant. The students learned the material in a better way using modern tools, in a waythey will remember better, and in a way that will help them get a job. This is far more importantthan the improved test scores.The students were highly engaged in the 2013 class; they felt that learning the material usingspreadsheets was a job skill that they could market. This was
moved from the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, where he was the Head of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, in 2010. Tryggvason received his doctorate from Brown University in 1985 and spent a year as a postdoctoral researcher at the Courant Institute. After fifteen years as a professor of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics at the University of Michigan, he moved to WPI in 2000. He has also held short term visiting positions at Caltech, NASA Lewis Engineering Research Center, University of Marseilles, and University of Paris VI. Professor Tryg- gvason is well known for his research on numerical simulations of multiphase and free-surface flows, vortex flows, and flows with phase changes. He is an
priority. As with many fields, thisdevelopment has the potential of impacting the teaching models and content of architecturalcourses and related research endeavors. This paper offers a case study of how a variety ofenvironmental-analysis technologies have been integrated within specific technical coursework,student research, and how the resulting feedback has been made visible to the student body andgeneral public.IntroductionIn Winter 2010, a team of NDSU College of Engineering and Architecture faculty and staffdeveloped a proposal for an NDSU Student Technology Fee Grant.1 The proposal, titled“Technology for Feedback,” aimed to benefit students both within and outside of NDSU’sprofessional architecture and mechanical engineering degree programs
. Hiring the Next Generation of Faculty, volume 2010(152). New Directions for Community Colleges, 2011. [4] M Bernardine Dias, Brett Browning, G Ayorkor Mills-Tettey, Nathan Amanquah, and Noura El-Moughny. Undergraduate robotics education in technologically underserved communities. In Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 1387–1392. IEEE, 2007. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.2007.363178. [5] Michael Rosenblatt and Howie Choset. Designing and implementing hands-on robotics labs. IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications, 15(6):32–39, 2000. doi: 10.1109/5254.895856. [6] Glen R Rasmussen. An evaluation of a student-centered and instructor-centered method of conducting a graduate course in
thatapproach because it consistently notes that there is no difference in time regarding theexamination of objectives and outcomes. Further, general models 5,6 provide for a one-dimensional assessment practice. That is, collect and analyze the data then make curriculummodifications to rectify any problems identified through data analysis 7. As a refinement of thegeneral models, assessment experts argue that the process of data triangulation, collection ofthree sets of data to examine the same phenomenon, strengthens the validity of assessmentresults 4,8.Recent research on evaluating engineering program effectiveness has focused on the portion ofthe ABET standards mandated in EC 2000 related to demonstrating achieving student outcomes9 . Examination
technical currency issues via faculty development activities!” • “Every faculty member should be encouraged to complete several classes from the education department to assist in the development of teaching skills. The skill of teaching young men and women is not automatically obtained…” • “We need easy and rapid dissemination of best practices as found by educational research centers.” • “Why educate our students to a standard that is ten years old? …Wouldn’t it be better to educate our students for the standard that will exist ten years in the future? How can this be done without technical currency?” • “Resources are the key, you can have all the policies and good intentions you want but
interdisciplinary skills, context to design impacts and real-worldmanagement structure. Such projects benefit the University and its students. They give students real worldexperience with core knowledge in a variety of technical and specific discipline domains [4]. They 2provide a real-world testbed for engaging first-hand the real-world challenges of communityimplementation [5]. Moreover, PBL provides a network of connections and experiences that students canbuild on as they finish their college degrees and take their next steps into graduate school or careers [4].As was shown by Strand, this has many advantages over other kinds of experiential or
Teacher Education Program (MCCE), and the Collaborative Research Experience for Undergraduates (CREU - CRA-WP). Dr. Dillon currently serves as a Co-PI for the STARS Computing Corps, which recently has been renewed for funding by NSF. He has also conducted a Faculty in Residency at Google during the summer of 2018 to learn more about this company’s culture, practices, and to understand the expectations for candidates (e.g. aspiring CS majors) who pursue career opportunities at this company and related prominent companies in tech.Zubayer Ahmed Sadid, Florida International University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Educational Expertise: Faculty Insights on Preparing Computing
creativity, problem-solving, and a strongfoundation for translating university research into impactful innovations.There are many motivations for pursuing academic entrepreneurship. These include personalaspirations, career goals, and institutional support (Abreu & Grinevich, 2013; Hayter et al.,2018). For faculty, motivations often include the potential for societal impact, financial rewards,and professional recognition (Lam, 2011). Graduate students, on the other hand, are more likelyto be motivated by the opportunity to gain entrepreneurial skills, advance their careers, orexplore alternative career paths outside academia (Mosey et al., 2012). Designing training thateffectively serves these two groups requires a deep understanding of their
course that combines both goals to share lessons learned with other instructors, especially thosedesigning their own new ML courses.2 Course goalsThe initial goals for the intro to ML course were to increase programming practice for electricalengineering students and to expose them to ML concepts. There were two primary directionsthe faculty considered for the course. One option, which was ultimately rejected, was to have a“how to” focus for the course. Students would have read documentation on how to use existingML libraries and build their own systems around these tools, considering the algorithms largelyas “black boxes.” This approach is enticing because it allows students to quickly see excitingapplications without the need for upper-level
long learners’ and stay current with rapidly advancing technical changes and global competitive needs. • Provide graduates that are not only excellent problem solvers, but also exemplary communicators and top shelf team players.OIT works closely with Boeing to evolve a tailored program for advancing MMET students whoare full time Boeing employees and set up the times so that jobs are not impacted and classes are Page 11.1175.3provided right at the Boeing site. The course work also weaves in many of the specific needs ofBoeing such as ‘lean manufacturing’, advanced material understanding in composites andmethods of designing
style in noway reflects an engineer’s requirement in their job which includes teamwork and multi-disciplineproblem solving skills [1]. Project-based learning (PBL) is a part of a pedagogical practice thatinvolves a wide range of engineering requirements methods. However, this learning method hasnot been holistically implemented [2]. To help with this issue, ABET, in its most recent guidanceis pushing for more PBL which research has shown as key and most prevailing attribute amongsuccessful graduate engineers within the industry [1]. The prevalent method for teaching inengineering disciplines is the “Chalk and Talk” approach. The instructor will lecture and thestudent will be a passive learner, not a student centered method [1]. These authors
incorporate the goals of this laboratory into earlier courses to better preparestudents for their junior-year laboratory.To provide further context for this course, an example lab assignment is presented in theappendix. This assignment is typical of the assignment for this course in length and expectation.Students are expected to make decisions on how to best complete the assignment including whatcontent to use from previous courses, what instruments to use, how to verify their measurementsand how to justify the validity of their experiments. A main objective of this course is thatstudents will practice problem solving and learn from failure. To facilitate that objective, six labassignments are scaffolded such that students are given more help with